An abelian group $G$ of order $35$ with $g^{35}=e$ for all $gin G$ is cyclic.
$begingroup$
I'm reading "Contemporary Abstract Algebra," by Gallian.
This is Exercise 4.20.
Suppose that $G$ is an Abelian group of order $35$ and every element of $G$ satisfies the equation $x^{35}=e$. Prove that $G$ is cyclic. Does your argument work if $35$ is replaced with $33$?
There's definitely something I don't understand here. I am/was under the impression that, for any group $H$ and any $hin H$, we have $h^{lvert Hrvert}=e$; indeed: the cyclic subgroup $langle hrangle$ of $H$ has the same order as a group as the order $lvert hrvert$ of $h$ as an element of $H$; Lagrange's theorem then gives that $lvert hrvert$ divides $lvert Hrvert$, so that then $h^{lvert Hrvert}=e$.
So what gives?
I get the feeling that it's something obvious.
group-theory finite-groups abelian-groups cyclic-groups
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm reading "Contemporary Abstract Algebra," by Gallian.
This is Exercise 4.20.
Suppose that $G$ is an Abelian group of order $35$ and every element of $G$ satisfies the equation $x^{35}=e$. Prove that $G$ is cyclic. Does your argument work if $35$ is replaced with $33$?
There's definitely something I don't understand here. I am/was under the impression that, for any group $H$ and any $hin H$, we have $h^{lvert Hrvert}=e$; indeed: the cyclic subgroup $langle hrangle$ of $H$ has the same order as a group as the order $lvert hrvert$ of $h$ as an element of $H$; Lagrange's theorem then gives that $lvert hrvert$ divides $lvert Hrvert$, so that then $h^{lvert Hrvert}=e$.
So what gives?
I get the feeling that it's something obvious.
group-theory finite-groups abelian-groups cyclic-groups
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
It is a very odd question. It's true because every group of order $35$ is cyclic, but the condition applies to a group of order $35$ whether we know that or not, like you said.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Jan 13 at 19:14
1
$begingroup$
It is already enough that the group order is $35$ (or $33$). We only have the cyclic (and therefore abelian) group in this case. If a number is squarefree and has two prime factors $p$ and $q$ ($p<q$) , there is only one group with this order if and only if $p$ does not divide $q-1$
$endgroup$
– Peter
Jan 13 at 19:15
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm reading "Contemporary Abstract Algebra," by Gallian.
This is Exercise 4.20.
Suppose that $G$ is an Abelian group of order $35$ and every element of $G$ satisfies the equation $x^{35}=e$. Prove that $G$ is cyclic. Does your argument work if $35$ is replaced with $33$?
There's definitely something I don't understand here. I am/was under the impression that, for any group $H$ and any $hin H$, we have $h^{lvert Hrvert}=e$; indeed: the cyclic subgroup $langle hrangle$ of $H$ has the same order as a group as the order $lvert hrvert$ of $h$ as an element of $H$; Lagrange's theorem then gives that $lvert hrvert$ divides $lvert Hrvert$, so that then $h^{lvert Hrvert}=e$.
So what gives?
I get the feeling that it's something obvious.
group-theory finite-groups abelian-groups cyclic-groups
$endgroup$
I'm reading "Contemporary Abstract Algebra," by Gallian.
This is Exercise 4.20.
Suppose that $G$ is an Abelian group of order $35$ and every element of $G$ satisfies the equation $x^{35}=e$. Prove that $G$ is cyclic. Does your argument work if $35$ is replaced with $33$?
There's definitely something I don't understand here. I am/was under the impression that, for any group $H$ and any $hin H$, we have $h^{lvert Hrvert}=e$; indeed: the cyclic subgroup $langle hrangle$ of $H$ has the same order as a group as the order $lvert hrvert$ of $h$ as an element of $H$; Lagrange's theorem then gives that $lvert hrvert$ divides $lvert Hrvert$, so that then $h^{lvert Hrvert}=e$.
So what gives?
I get the feeling that it's something obvious.
group-theory finite-groups abelian-groups cyclic-groups
group-theory finite-groups abelian-groups cyclic-groups
edited Jan 13 at 21:58
Shaun
asked Jan 13 at 19:10
ShaunShaun
9,182113684
9,182113684
3
$begingroup$
It is a very odd question. It's true because every group of order $35$ is cyclic, but the condition applies to a group of order $35$ whether we know that or not, like you said.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Jan 13 at 19:14
1
$begingroup$
It is already enough that the group order is $35$ (or $33$). We only have the cyclic (and therefore abelian) group in this case. If a number is squarefree and has two prime factors $p$ and $q$ ($p<q$) , there is only one group with this order if and only if $p$ does not divide $q-1$
$endgroup$
– Peter
Jan 13 at 19:15
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
It is a very odd question. It's true because every group of order $35$ is cyclic, but the condition applies to a group of order $35$ whether we know that or not, like you said.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Jan 13 at 19:14
1
$begingroup$
It is already enough that the group order is $35$ (or $33$). We only have the cyclic (and therefore abelian) group in this case. If a number is squarefree and has two prime factors $p$ and $q$ ($p<q$) , there is only one group with this order if and only if $p$ does not divide $q-1$
$endgroup$
– Peter
Jan 13 at 19:15
3
3
$begingroup$
It is a very odd question. It's true because every group of order $35$ is cyclic, but the condition applies to a group of order $35$ whether we know that or not, like you said.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Jan 13 at 19:14
$begingroup$
It is a very odd question. It's true because every group of order $35$ is cyclic, but the condition applies to a group of order $35$ whether we know that or not, like you said.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Jan 13 at 19:14
1
1
$begingroup$
It is already enough that the group order is $35$ (or $33$). We only have the cyclic (and therefore abelian) group in this case. If a number is squarefree and has two prime factors $p$ and $q$ ($p<q$) , there is only one group with this order if and only if $p$ does not divide $q-1$
$endgroup$
– Peter
Jan 13 at 19:15
$begingroup$
It is already enough that the group order is $35$ (or $33$). We only have the cyclic (and therefore abelian) group in this case. If a number is squarefree and has two prime factors $p$ and $q$ ($p<q$) , there is only one group with this order if and only if $p$ does not divide $q-1$
$endgroup$
– Peter
Jan 13 at 19:15
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
My guess is that Gallian only proves Lagrange's theorem later.
If $(forall gin G):g^{35}=e$, then the order of every element of $G$ is $1$, $5$, $7$, or $35$. Of course, the goal is to prove that some element of $G$ has order $35$.
Suppose that every element other than $e$ has order $5$. Then every element of $Gsetminus{e}$ belongs to sone subgroup of order $5$. Each such subgroup will consist of $4$ elements of order $5$ plus $e$. But there's a problem here: $35$ is not of the form $4k+1$. So, some element from $Gsetminus{e}$ must have order $7$ or $35$. And, by the same argument, not all elements from $Gsetminus{e}$ have order $7$.
Therefore, some $ain G$ has order $5$ or $35$ and some $bin Gsetminus{e}$ has order $7$ or $35$. If one of them has order $35$, we're done: $G$ is cyclic. Otherwise, $ab$ has order $35$ and, again, $G$ is cyclic.
And, clearly, this argument does not apply to $33$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You're right: Gallian hasn't introduced Lagrange's Theorem yet. Your proof is lovely. Thank you :)
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Jan 13 at 19:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $G$ is a group of order $n$, then $x^n=e$ by Euler's theorem for all $xin G$. So this is an empty condition which is satisfied anyway. The point is that groups of order $pq$ are classified for primes $p<q$, depending on whether or not $pmid q-1$. In one case all such groups are cyclic, in the other case there is a non-abelian group of that order.
Now check $(p,q)=(5,7),(3,11)$.
Reference: Let $p<q$ be distinct prime numbers and $G$ be a group with $|G|=pq$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072405%2fan-abelian-group-g-of-order-35-with-g35-e-for-all-g-in-g-is-cyclic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
My guess is that Gallian only proves Lagrange's theorem later.
If $(forall gin G):g^{35}=e$, then the order of every element of $G$ is $1$, $5$, $7$, or $35$. Of course, the goal is to prove that some element of $G$ has order $35$.
Suppose that every element other than $e$ has order $5$. Then every element of $Gsetminus{e}$ belongs to sone subgroup of order $5$. Each such subgroup will consist of $4$ elements of order $5$ plus $e$. But there's a problem here: $35$ is not of the form $4k+1$. So, some element from $Gsetminus{e}$ must have order $7$ or $35$. And, by the same argument, not all elements from $Gsetminus{e}$ have order $7$.
Therefore, some $ain G$ has order $5$ or $35$ and some $bin Gsetminus{e}$ has order $7$ or $35$. If one of them has order $35$, we're done: $G$ is cyclic. Otherwise, $ab$ has order $35$ and, again, $G$ is cyclic.
And, clearly, this argument does not apply to $33$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You're right: Gallian hasn't introduced Lagrange's Theorem yet. Your proof is lovely. Thank you :)
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Jan 13 at 19:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My guess is that Gallian only proves Lagrange's theorem later.
If $(forall gin G):g^{35}=e$, then the order of every element of $G$ is $1$, $5$, $7$, or $35$. Of course, the goal is to prove that some element of $G$ has order $35$.
Suppose that every element other than $e$ has order $5$. Then every element of $Gsetminus{e}$ belongs to sone subgroup of order $5$. Each such subgroup will consist of $4$ elements of order $5$ plus $e$. But there's a problem here: $35$ is not of the form $4k+1$. So, some element from $Gsetminus{e}$ must have order $7$ or $35$. And, by the same argument, not all elements from $Gsetminus{e}$ have order $7$.
Therefore, some $ain G$ has order $5$ or $35$ and some $bin Gsetminus{e}$ has order $7$ or $35$. If one of them has order $35$, we're done: $G$ is cyclic. Otherwise, $ab$ has order $35$ and, again, $G$ is cyclic.
And, clearly, this argument does not apply to $33$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You're right: Gallian hasn't introduced Lagrange's Theorem yet. Your proof is lovely. Thank you :)
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Jan 13 at 19:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My guess is that Gallian only proves Lagrange's theorem later.
If $(forall gin G):g^{35}=e$, then the order of every element of $G$ is $1$, $5$, $7$, or $35$. Of course, the goal is to prove that some element of $G$ has order $35$.
Suppose that every element other than $e$ has order $5$. Then every element of $Gsetminus{e}$ belongs to sone subgroup of order $5$. Each such subgroup will consist of $4$ elements of order $5$ plus $e$. But there's a problem here: $35$ is not of the form $4k+1$. So, some element from $Gsetminus{e}$ must have order $7$ or $35$. And, by the same argument, not all elements from $Gsetminus{e}$ have order $7$.
Therefore, some $ain G$ has order $5$ or $35$ and some $bin Gsetminus{e}$ has order $7$ or $35$. If one of them has order $35$, we're done: $G$ is cyclic. Otherwise, $ab$ has order $35$ and, again, $G$ is cyclic.
And, clearly, this argument does not apply to $33$.
$endgroup$
My guess is that Gallian only proves Lagrange's theorem later.
If $(forall gin G):g^{35}=e$, then the order of every element of $G$ is $1$, $5$, $7$, or $35$. Of course, the goal is to prove that some element of $G$ has order $35$.
Suppose that every element other than $e$ has order $5$. Then every element of $Gsetminus{e}$ belongs to sone subgroup of order $5$. Each such subgroup will consist of $4$ elements of order $5$ plus $e$. But there's a problem here: $35$ is not of the form $4k+1$. So, some element from $Gsetminus{e}$ must have order $7$ or $35$. And, by the same argument, not all elements from $Gsetminus{e}$ have order $7$.
Therefore, some $ain G$ has order $5$ or $35$ and some $bin Gsetminus{e}$ has order $7$ or $35$. If one of them has order $35$, we're done: $G$ is cyclic. Otherwise, $ab$ has order $35$ and, again, $G$ is cyclic.
And, clearly, this argument does not apply to $33$.
answered Jan 13 at 19:28
José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos
161k22127232
161k22127232
$begingroup$
You're right: Gallian hasn't introduced Lagrange's Theorem yet. Your proof is lovely. Thank you :)
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Jan 13 at 19:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You're right: Gallian hasn't introduced Lagrange's Theorem yet. Your proof is lovely. Thank you :)
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Jan 13 at 19:34
$begingroup$
You're right: Gallian hasn't introduced Lagrange's Theorem yet. Your proof is lovely. Thank you :)
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Jan 13 at 19:34
$begingroup$
You're right: Gallian hasn't introduced Lagrange's Theorem yet. Your proof is lovely. Thank you :)
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Jan 13 at 19:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $G$ is a group of order $n$, then $x^n=e$ by Euler's theorem for all $xin G$. So this is an empty condition which is satisfied anyway. The point is that groups of order $pq$ are classified for primes $p<q$, depending on whether or not $pmid q-1$. In one case all such groups are cyclic, in the other case there is a non-abelian group of that order.
Now check $(p,q)=(5,7),(3,11)$.
Reference: Let $p<q$ be distinct prime numbers and $G$ be a group with $|G|=pq$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $G$ is a group of order $n$, then $x^n=e$ by Euler's theorem for all $xin G$. So this is an empty condition which is satisfied anyway. The point is that groups of order $pq$ are classified for primes $p<q$, depending on whether or not $pmid q-1$. In one case all such groups are cyclic, in the other case there is a non-abelian group of that order.
Now check $(p,q)=(5,7),(3,11)$.
Reference: Let $p<q$ be distinct prime numbers and $G$ be a group with $|G|=pq$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $G$ is a group of order $n$, then $x^n=e$ by Euler's theorem for all $xin G$. So this is an empty condition which is satisfied anyway. The point is that groups of order $pq$ are classified for primes $p<q$, depending on whether or not $pmid q-1$. In one case all such groups are cyclic, in the other case there is a non-abelian group of that order.
Now check $(p,q)=(5,7),(3,11)$.
Reference: Let $p<q$ be distinct prime numbers and $G$ be a group with $|G|=pq$
$endgroup$
If $G$ is a group of order $n$, then $x^n=e$ by Euler's theorem for all $xin G$. So this is an empty condition which is satisfied anyway. The point is that groups of order $pq$ are classified for primes $p<q$, depending on whether or not $pmid q-1$. In one case all such groups are cyclic, in the other case there is a non-abelian group of that order.
Now check $(p,q)=(5,7),(3,11)$.
Reference: Let $p<q$ be distinct prime numbers and $G$ be a group with $|G|=pq$
answered Jan 13 at 19:13
Dietrich BurdeDietrich Burde
79.1k647103
79.1k647103
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072405%2fan-abelian-group-g-of-order-35-with-g35-e-for-all-g-in-g-is-cyclic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
It is a very odd question. It's true because every group of order $35$ is cyclic, but the condition applies to a group of order $35$ whether we know that or not, like you said.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Jan 13 at 19:14
1
$begingroup$
It is already enough that the group order is $35$ (or $33$). We only have the cyclic (and therefore abelian) group in this case. If a number is squarefree and has two prime factors $p$ and $q$ ($p<q$) , there is only one group with this order if and only if $p$ does not divide $q-1$
$endgroup$
– Peter
Jan 13 at 19:15