Prediction of the function values
$begingroup$
There is a function: $f(t,x,y,z)$, where $t$- time, $x,y,z$- some arguments.
The values of $f$ for $tin [a,b]$ are known (100 samples). What is the most accurate way of predicting the value of $f$ for $t=b+1$, if the values of $x,y,z$ for $tin [a,b+1]$ are known?
ADDITIONAL INFO
I'm propagating the satellite position using an analytical method. During the propagation, the errors accumulate. I endeavor to predict the future position errors. $f$ represents the error value and arguments $x,y,z$ are the affecting parameters, such as distance to the Moon, Sun, solar flux, atmospheric density, etc.
statistics
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a function: $f(t,x,y,z)$, where $t$- time, $x,y,z$- some arguments.
The values of $f$ for $tin [a,b]$ are known (100 samples). What is the most accurate way of predicting the value of $f$ for $t=b+1$, if the values of $x,y,z$ for $tin [a,b+1]$ are known?
ADDITIONAL INFO
I'm propagating the satellite position using an analytical method. During the propagation, the errors accumulate. I endeavor to predict the future position errors. $f$ represents the error value and arguments $x,y,z$ are the affecting parameters, such as distance to the Moon, Sun, solar flux, atmospheric density, etc.
statistics
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a function: $f(t,x,y,z)$, where $t$- time, $x,y,z$- some arguments.
The values of $f$ for $tin [a,b]$ are known (100 samples). What is the most accurate way of predicting the value of $f$ for $t=b+1$, if the values of $x,y,z$ for $tin [a,b+1]$ are known?
ADDITIONAL INFO
I'm propagating the satellite position using an analytical method. During the propagation, the errors accumulate. I endeavor to predict the future position errors. $f$ represents the error value and arguments $x,y,z$ are the affecting parameters, such as distance to the Moon, Sun, solar flux, atmospheric density, etc.
statistics
$endgroup$
There is a function: $f(t,x,y,z)$, where $t$- time, $x,y,z$- some arguments.
The values of $f$ for $tin [a,b]$ are known (100 samples). What is the most accurate way of predicting the value of $f$ for $t=b+1$, if the values of $x,y,z$ for $tin [a,b+1]$ are known?
ADDITIONAL INFO
I'm propagating the satellite position using an analytical method. During the propagation, the errors accumulate. I endeavor to predict the future position errors. $f$ represents the error value and arguments $x,y,z$ are the affecting parameters, such as distance to the Moon, Sun, solar flux, atmospheric density, etc.
statistics
statistics
edited Jan 14 at 16:55
Leeloo
asked Jan 13 at 19:24
LeelooLeeloo
1011
1011
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Without any a priori information about $f$, the problem seems ill-posed. Because you have data values only along a curve and you know little of $f$ . Extrapolation will be hazardous.
If you have a mathematical model with unknown parameters, you can estimate the parameters from the known values.
Otherwise, you can just relate $f$ to the curvilinear abscissa along the trajectory and perform univariate interpolation.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I suppose it may be predicted by means of statistical methods.
$endgroup$
– Leeloo
Jan 13 at 21:03
$begingroup$
@Leeloo: if your data is noisy, even less !
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 14 at 7:32
$begingroup$
What about the Gaussian distribution, maximum likelyhood method etc.?
$endgroup$
– Leeloo
Jan 14 at 16:55
$begingroup$
@Leeloo: if you are after magic, try deep learning.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 14 at 19:46
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072416%2fprediction-of-the-function-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Without any a priori information about $f$, the problem seems ill-posed. Because you have data values only along a curve and you know little of $f$ . Extrapolation will be hazardous.
If you have a mathematical model with unknown parameters, you can estimate the parameters from the known values.
Otherwise, you can just relate $f$ to the curvilinear abscissa along the trajectory and perform univariate interpolation.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I suppose it may be predicted by means of statistical methods.
$endgroup$
– Leeloo
Jan 13 at 21:03
$begingroup$
@Leeloo: if your data is noisy, even less !
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 14 at 7:32
$begingroup$
What about the Gaussian distribution, maximum likelyhood method etc.?
$endgroup$
– Leeloo
Jan 14 at 16:55
$begingroup$
@Leeloo: if you are after magic, try deep learning.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 14 at 19:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Without any a priori information about $f$, the problem seems ill-posed. Because you have data values only along a curve and you know little of $f$ . Extrapolation will be hazardous.
If you have a mathematical model with unknown parameters, you can estimate the parameters from the known values.
Otherwise, you can just relate $f$ to the curvilinear abscissa along the trajectory and perform univariate interpolation.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I suppose it may be predicted by means of statistical methods.
$endgroup$
– Leeloo
Jan 13 at 21:03
$begingroup$
@Leeloo: if your data is noisy, even less !
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 14 at 7:32
$begingroup$
What about the Gaussian distribution, maximum likelyhood method etc.?
$endgroup$
– Leeloo
Jan 14 at 16:55
$begingroup$
@Leeloo: if you are after magic, try deep learning.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 14 at 19:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Without any a priori information about $f$, the problem seems ill-posed. Because you have data values only along a curve and you know little of $f$ . Extrapolation will be hazardous.
If you have a mathematical model with unknown parameters, you can estimate the parameters from the known values.
Otherwise, you can just relate $f$ to the curvilinear abscissa along the trajectory and perform univariate interpolation.
$endgroup$
Without any a priori information about $f$, the problem seems ill-posed. Because you have data values only along a curve and you know little of $f$ . Extrapolation will be hazardous.
If you have a mathematical model with unknown parameters, you can estimate the parameters from the known values.
Otherwise, you can just relate $f$ to the curvilinear abscissa along the trajectory and perform univariate interpolation.
answered Jan 13 at 19:49
Yves DaoustYves Daoust
128k673226
128k673226
$begingroup$
I suppose it may be predicted by means of statistical methods.
$endgroup$
– Leeloo
Jan 13 at 21:03
$begingroup$
@Leeloo: if your data is noisy, even less !
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 14 at 7:32
$begingroup$
What about the Gaussian distribution, maximum likelyhood method etc.?
$endgroup$
– Leeloo
Jan 14 at 16:55
$begingroup$
@Leeloo: if you are after magic, try deep learning.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 14 at 19:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I suppose it may be predicted by means of statistical methods.
$endgroup$
– Leeloo
Jan 13 at 21:03
$begingroup$
@Leeloo: if your data is noisy, even less !
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 14 at 7:32
$begingroup$
What about the Gaussian distribution, maximum likelyhood method etc.?
$endgroup$
– Leeloo
Jan 14 at 16:55
$begingroup$
@Leeloo: if you are after magic, try deep learning.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 14 at 19:46
$begingroup$
I suppose it may be predicted by means of statistical methods.
$endgroup$
– Leeloo
Jan 13 at 21:03
$begingroup$
I suppose it may be predicted by means of statistical methods.
$endgroup$
– Leeloo
Jan 13 at 21:03
$begingroup$
@Leeloo: if your data is noisy, even less !
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 14 at 7:32
$begingroup$
@Leeloo: if your data is noisy, even less !
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 14 at 7:32
$begingroup$
What about the Gaussian distribution, maximum likelyhood method etc.?
$endgroup$
– Leeloo
Jan 14 at 16:55
$begingroup$
What about the Gaussian distribution, maximum likelyhood method etc.?
$endgroup$
– Leeloo
Jan 14 at 16:55
$begingroup$
@Leeloo: if you are after magic, try deep learning.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 14 at 19:46
$begingroup$
@Leeloo: if you are after magic, try deep learning.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 14 at 19:46
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072416%2fprediction-of-the-function-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown