Combinatorics, number theory, and graph theory, in what order should they be learnt?
$begingroup$
Combinatorics, number theory, and graph theory, in what order should they be learnt?
I would like to learn discrete math; these are the three main branches that compose it. I was wondering if there's a "best order" to learn them, or if they can be learnt in any order.
discrete-mathematics self-learning education learning
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Combinatorics, number theory, and graph theory, in what order should they be learnt?
I would like to learn discrete math; these are the three main branches that compose it. I was wondering if there's a "best order" to learn them, or if they can be learnt in any order.
discrete-mathematics self-learning education learning
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Combinatorics, number theory, and graph theory, in what order should they be learnt?
I would like to learn discrete math; these are the three main branches that compose it. I was wondering if there's a "best order" to learn them, or if they can be learnt in any order.
discrete-mathematics self-learning education learning
$endgroup$
Combinatorics, number theory, and graph theory, in what order should they be learnt?
I would like to learn discrete math; these are the three main branches that compose it. I was wondering if there's a "best order" to learn them, or if they can be learnt in any order.
discrete-mathematics self-learning education learning
discrete-mathematics self-learning education learning
asked Jan 15 at 2:05
Daniel Bonilla JaramilloDaniel Bonilla Jaramillo
464310
464310
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I have taken course on all of these subjects, and here is what I would recommend (since you are asking). First combinatorics, then graph theory, then number theory.
Taking number theory at the same time as abstract/modern algebra is a very good idea, since there are lots of connections between group theory and number theory.
My justification for this particular ordering is the simple fact that combinatorics will teach you how to count, which will make you a better graph theorist. Graph theory will teach you how to represent mathematical structures graphically. In number theory and algebra, sometimes combinatorial arguments are handy proof mechanisms. Many properties in algebra and number theory have graph-theoretic representations, such as the Cayley digraph of a group.
You will find that graph theory is especially useful in almost every type of mathematics, computer science, etc...
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073999%2fcombinatorics-number-theory-and-graph-theory-in-what-order-should-they-be-lea%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I have taken course on all of these subjects, and here is what I would recommend (since you are asking). First combinatorics, then graph theory, then number theory.
Taking number theory at the same time as abstract/modern algebra is a very good idea, since there are lots of connections between group theory and number theory.
My justification for this particular ordering is the simple fact that combinatorics will teach you how to count, which will make you a better graph theorist. Graph theory will teach you how to represent mathematical structures graphically. In number theory and algebra, sometimes combinatorial arguments are handy proof mechanisms. Many properties in algebra and number theory have graph-theoretic representations, such as the Cayley digraph of a group.
You will find that graph theory is especially useful in almost every type of mathematics, computer science, etc...
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have taken course on all of these subjects, and here is what I would recommend (since you are asking). First combinatorics, then graph theory, then number theory.
Taking number theory at the same time as abstract/modern algebra is a very good idea, since there are lots of connections between group theory and number theory.
My justification for this particular ordering is the simple fact that combinatorics will teach you how to count, which will make you a better graph theorist. Graph theory will teach you how to represent mathematical structures graphically. In number theory and algebra, sometimes combinatorial arguments are handy proof mechanisms. Many properties in algebra and number theory have graph-theoretic representations, such as the Cayley digraph of a group.
You will find that graph theory is especially useful in almost every type of mathematics, computer science, etc...
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have taken course on all of these subjects, and here is what I would recommend (since you are asking). First combinatorics, then graph theory, then number theory.
Taking number theory at the same time as abstract/modern algebra is a very good idea, since there are lots of connections between group theory and number theory.
My justification for this particular ordering is the simple fact that combinatorics will teach you how to count, which will make you a better graph theorist. Graph theory will teach you how to represent mathematical structures graphically. In number theory and algebra, sometimes combinatorial arguments are handy proof mechanisms. Many properties in algebra and number theory have graph-theoretic representations, such as the Cayley digraph of a group.
You will find that graph theory is especially useful in almost every type of mathematics, computer science, etc...
$endgroup$
I have taken course on all of these subjects, and here is what I would recommend (since you are asking). First combinatorics, then graph theory, then number theory.
Taking number theory at the same time as abstract/modern algebra is a very good idea, since there are lots of connections between group theory and number theory.
My justification for this particular ordering is the simple fact that combinatorics will teach you how to count, which will make you a better graph theorist. Graph theory will teach you how to represent mathematical structures graphically. In number theory and algebra, sometimes combinatorial arguments are handy proof mechanisms. Many properties in algebra and number theory have graph-theoretic representations, such as the Cayley digraph of a group.
You will find that graph theory is especially useful in almost every type of mathematics, computer science, etc...
answered Jan 15 at 2:34
baldguy99baldguy99
111
111
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073999%2fcombinatorics-number-theory-and-graph-theory-in-what-order-should-they-be-lea%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown