Let $a$ be a real number. If $a$ is positive, then $-a$ is negative. Conversely, if $a$ is negative, then...












2












$begingroup$


Let $a$ be a real number. If $a$ is positive, then $-a$ is negative. Conversely, if $a$ is negative, then $-a$ is positive.



Having a hard time with intuition and the obvious answer getting in the way of my thought process. We are supposed to "verify" the statement above, given Axiom II -- the order axioms.



Since $ainmathbb{R}^{+}$, then $-(-a)$ is positive for all $ainmathbb{R}^{+}$.



Something about $mathbb{R}^{+}$ is confusing me.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Perhaps you should be thinking along the lines of: “$-x$” means “$x$ with its sign changed”.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Jan 17 at 2:55
















2












$begingroup$


Let $a$ be a real number. If $a$ is positive, then $-a$ is negative. Conversely, if $a$ is negative, then $-a$ is positive.



Having a hard time with intuition and the obvious answer getting in the way of my thought process. We are supposed to "verify" the statement above, given Axiom II -- the order axioms.



Since $ainmathbb{R}^{+}$, then $-(-a)$ is positive for all $ainmathbb{R}^{+}$.



Something about $mathbb{R}^{+}$ is confusing me.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Perhaps you should be thinking along the lines of: “$-x$” means “$x$ with its sign changed”.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Jan 17 at 2:55














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Let $a$ be a real number. If $a$ is positive, then $-a$ is negative. Conversely, if $a$ is negative, then $-a$ is positive.



Having a hard time with intuition and the obvious answer getting in the way of my thought process. We are supposed to "verify" the statement above, given Axiom II -- the order axioms.



Since $ainmathbb{R}^{+}$, then $-(-a)$ is positive for all $ainmathbb{R}^{+}$.



Something about $mathbb{R}^{+}$ is confusing me.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $a$ be a real number. If $a$ is positive, then $-a$ is negative. Conversely, if $a$ is negative, then $-a$ is positive.



Having a hard time with intuition and the obvious answer getting in the way of my thought process. We are supposed to "verify" the statement above, given Axiom II -- the order axioms.



Since $ainmathbb{R}^{+}$, then $-(-a)$ is positive for all $ainmathbb{R}^{+}$.



Something about $mathbb{R}^{+}$ is confusing me.







real-analysis axioms






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 17 at 2:45







Ryan

















asked Jan 17 at 2:31









RyanRyan

1578




1578












  • $begingroup$
    Perhaps you should be thinking along the lines of: “$-x$” means “$x$ with its sign changed”.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Jan 17 at 2:55


















  • $begingroup$
    Perhaps you should be thinking along the lines of: “$-x$” means “$x$ with its sign changed”.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Jan 17 at 2:55
















$begingroup$
Perhaps you should be thinking along the lines of: “$-x$” means “$x$ with its sign changed”.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
Jan 17 at 2:55




$begingroup$
Perhaps you should be thinking along the lines of: “$-x$” means “$x$ with its sign changed”.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
Jan 17 at 2:55










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$


  1. By definition, if $a$ is positive then $a>0$.

  2. By the order axioms, we have that $a+(-a)>0+(-a)$

  3. This simplifies to $0>-a$ (by definition of additive inverse and additive identity)

  4. Therefore $-a<0$ and by definition $-a$ is negative.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! I wasn't sure if we could use Field Axioms, but that was my own brain fart.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan
    Jan 22 at 17:41



















1












$begingroup$

According to the order axioms, if $a > b$ then $c + a > c + b$.



Thus if $a > 0$ then $-a + a > -a + 0$, i.e., $0 > -a$, i.e., $-a < 0$.



Conversely, if $a < 0$ then $-a + a < -a + 0$, i.e., $0 < -a$, i.e., $-a > 0$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3076533%2flet-a-be-a-real-number-if-a-is-positive-then-a-is-negative-conversely%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$


    1. By definition, if $a$ is positive then $a>0$.

    2. By the order axioms, we have that $a+(-a)>0+(-a)$

    3. This simplifies to $0>-a$ (by definition of additive inverse and additive identity)

    4. Therefore $-a<0$ and by definition $-a$ is negative.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thank you! I wasn't sure if we could use Field Axioms, but that was my own brain fart.
      $endgroup$
      – Ryan
      Jan 22 at 17:41
















    3












    $begingroup$


    1. By definition, if $a$ is positive then $a>0$.

    2. By the order axioms, we have that $a+(-a)>0+(-a)$

    3. This simplifies to $0>-a$ (by definition of additive inverse and additive identity)

    4. Therefore $-a<0$ and by definition $-a$ is negative.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thank you! I wasn't sure if we could use Field Axioms, but that was my own brain fart.
      $endgroup$
      – Ryan
      Jan 22 at 17:41














    3












    3








    3





    $begingroup$


    1. By definition, if $a$ is positive then $a>0$.

    2. By the order axioms, we have that $a+(-a)>0+(-a)$

    3. This simplifies to $0>-a$ (by definition of additive inverse and additive identity)

    4. Therefore $-a<0$ and by definition $-a$ is negative.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




    1. By definition, if $a$ is positive then $a>0$.

    2. By the order axioms, we have that $a+(-a)>0+(-a)$

    3. This simplifies to $0>-a$ (by definition of additive inverse and additive identity)

    4. Therefore $-a<0$ and by definition $-a$ is negative.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Jan 17 at 2:55









    obscuransobscurans

    1,152311




    1,152311












    • $begingroup$
      Thank you! I wasn't sure if we could use Field Axioms, but that was my own brain fart.
      $endgroup$
      – Ryan
      Jan 22 at 17:41


















    • $begingroup$
      Thank you! I wasn't sure if we could use Field Axioms, but that was my own brain fart.
      $endgroup$
      – Ryan
      Jan 22 at 17:41
















    $begingroup$
    Thank you! I wasn't sure if we could use Field Axioms, but that was my own brain fart.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan
    Jan 22 at 17:41




    $begingroup$
    Thank you! I wasn't sure if we could use Field Axioms, but that was my own brain fart.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan
    Jan 22 at 17:41











    1












    $begingroup$

    According to the order axioms, if $a > b$ then $c + a > c + b$.



    Thus if $a > 0$ then $-a + a > -a + 0$, i.e., $0 > -a$, i.e., $-a < 0$.



    Conversely, if $a < 0$ then $-a + a < -a + 0$, i.e., $0 < -a$, i.e., $-a > 0$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      According to the order axioms, if $a > b$ then $c + a > c + b$.



      Thus if $a > 0$ then $-a + a > -a + 0$, i.e., $0 > -a$, i.e., $-a < 0$.



      Conversely, if $a < 0$ then $-a + a < -a + 0$, i.e., $0 < -a$, i.e., $-a > 0$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        According to the order axioms, if $a > b$ then $c + a > c + b$.



        Thus if $a > 0$ then $-a + a > -a + 0$, i.e., $0 > -a$, i.e., $-a < 0$.



        Conversely, if $a < 0$ then $-a + a < -a + 0$, i.e., $0 < -a$, i.e., $-a > 0$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        According to the order axioms, if $a > b$ then $c + a > c + b$.



        Thus if $a > 0$ then $-a + a > -a + 0$, i.e., $0 > -a$, i.e., $-a < 0$.



        Conversely, if $a < 0$ then $-a + a < -a + 0$, i.e., $0 < -a$, i.e., $-a > 0$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 17 at 3:01









        J. W. TannerJ. W. Tanner

        2,3761117




        2,3761117






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3076533%2flet-a-be-a-real-number-if-a-is-positive-then-a-is-negative-conversely%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith