尾上卯三郎 (2代目)




二代目 尾上卯三郎（にだいめ おのえ うさぶろう、1860年3月14日（安政7年2月22日） - 1928年（昭和3年）1月16日）は、明治から大正にかけて関西で活躍した歌舞伎役者。俳名に濤昇。屋号は音羽屋。本名は木下 卯三郎（きのした うざぶろう）。


美濃国出身。はじめ力士志望で行司の木村庄之助に弟子入りするが、明治6年（1873年）9月に役者になるため初代尾上卯三郎の門人となり、尾上卯多市を名乗って子供芝居に参加した。明治9年（1876年）4月、師が座元となり舞台活動から引いたのを機に、二代目尾上卯三郎を襲名、養子となった。


関西の舞台で活躍するうち初代中村鴈治郎にその芸を見込まれ一座に加わる。役柄は広く、立ち回りをよくした。門閥外の出だけに、従来の型にはとらわれない、卯三郎独自の型を編み出した。その写実的な芸を民俗学の折口信夫は「脇役としての大きさと自由な技巧が横溢していた」と評した。また新派俳優に影響を与えている。


『天下茶屋仇討』の安達元右衛門が生涯の当たり役だった。








Popular posts from this blog

Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

Image
28 6 $begingroup$ Per the Font of Magic feature, sorcerer can use Flexible Casting to create 5th-level spell slots at level 7, even though they are not typically available until level 9. You can transform unexpended sorcery points into one spell slot as a bonus action on your turn. The Creating Spell Slots table shows the cost of creating a spell slot of [5th level is 7] If such a sorcerer levels up while still having this 5th-level spell slot, can they choose a 5th-level spell as the spell they gain upon levelling up? The Spellcasting feature states: Additionally, when you gain a level in this class, you can choose one of the sorcerer spells you know and replace it with another spell from the sorcerer spell list, which also must be of a level for which you have spell slots.
Read more

Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

Image
up vote 13 down vote favorite 1 After the 2018 errata, the disintegrate spell description now reads: A creature targeted by this spell must make a Dexterity saving throw. On a failed save, the target takes 10d6 + 40 force damage. The target is disintegrated if this damage leaves it with 0 hit points. If you were to polymorph an enemy into a rat and then disintegrate it, would the enemy be disintegrated or would it just return to its original form? I know that for Druids, it’s not an instant kill anymore, but is this the case for polymorph as well? dnd-5e spells polymorph errata share | improve this question edited 18 hours ago
Read more

A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$

Image
3 3 $begingroup$ Recently, I saw a construction of topological invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$ with $ngeq 2$ : $$ N=frac{1}{24pi^2}int_{S^3} d^3x epsilon^{ijk} Tr[(U^{-1}partial_{x_i}U)(U^{-1}partial_{x_j}U)(U^{-1}partial_{x_k}U)] , $$ where $Uin U(n)$ depends on $boldsymbol{x}=(x_1,x_2,x_3)in S^3$ , $epsilon^{ijk}$ is the Levi-Civita symbol, $i,j,k=1,2,3$ , and the duplicated indexes are summed over. It is claimed that $N$ is an integer, but why? Update 02/02/2019 I think I got an argument for $n=2$ . In this case, $U=e^{i varphi} q$ with $qin SU(2)$ . Due to the trace and the Levi-Civita symbol in $N$ , $varphi$ does not contribute to $N$ . As $Tr[q^{dagger}partial_i q]=0$ and $(q^{dagger}partial_i q)^{dagger}=-q^{dagger}partial_i q$ , $q^{dagger}partial_i q$ in geneeral has the form $q^{dagger}partia
Read more