Proof verification for the equivalence of two sets.












2












$begingroup$


I have constructed two identical draft proofs for the following question using implications and words. Can you please verify whether they are logically correct. Should I have used De Morgan's Laws?



Exercise:



Suppose that $C,D$ are subsets of a set $X$. Prove that $$(Xsetminus C){,}cap{,}D =Dsetminus C.$$



Proof 1:



Suppose that $xin{(Xsetminus C){,}cap{,}D}$. Then $xin{(Xsetminus C)}$ and $xin{D}$. Then ($xin{X}$ and $xnotin{C}$) and $xin{D}$. Then ($xin{X}$ and $xin{D}$) and ($xin{D}$ and $xnotin {C}$). Then $xin(X cap D) cap (D setminus C)$. Thus, $xin(D setminus C)$. So, $(X setminus C) {,} cap D subseteq (D setminus C)$.



Conversely, suppose that $xin (Dsetminus C)$. Then $(xin{D}$ and $xnotin{C})$. Then $(xin X$ and $xin{D}$) and $xnotin{C}$. Then $(xin{X}$ and $xnotin{C})$ and $xin{D}$. Thus $xin(Xsetminus {C})cap{D}$. So, $(Dsetminus{C}) subseteq{(Xsetminus{C}})cap{D}$.



Since $(X setminus C) {,} cap D subseteq (D setminus C)$ and $(Dsetminus{C}) subseteq{(Xsetminus{C}})cap{D}$, we have that $(X setminus C) {,} cap D = (D setminus C)\$.



Proof 2:



Suppose that $xin{(Xsetminus C){,}cap{,}D}$. Then,



begin{align}
&implies xin{(Xsetminus C)}{,}{,}text{and}{,}D \
&implies(xin{X} {,}text{and} {,}xnotin{C}) {,}text{and}{,} xin{D} \
&implies (xin{X} {,}text{and}{,} xin{D}) {,}text{and} {,}(xin{D} {,}text{and}{,} xnotin {C})\
&implies xin(X cap D) cap (D setminus C)\
&implies xin(D setminus C).\ \
text{Thus}, (X setminus C) {,} cap D subseteq (D setminus C).\ \
end{align}



Conversely, suppose $xin (Dsetminus C)$. Then,



begin{align}
&implies (xin{D} {,}text{and}{,} xnotin{C}) \
&implies (xin X {,}text{and}{,} xin{D}){,}text{and}{,} xnotin{C} \
&implies (xin{X}{,}text{and}{,} xnotin{C}){,}text{and}{,} xin{D} \
&implies xin(Xsetminus {C})cap{D}. \ \
text{Thus,}{,}(Dsetminus{C}) subseteq{(Xsetminus{C}})cap{D}.
end{align}

Since $(X setminus C) {,} cap D subseteq (D setminus C)$ and $(Dsetminus{C}) subseteq{(Xsetminus{C}})cap{D}$, we have that $(X setminus C) {,} cap D = (D setminus C)$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    I have constructed two identical draft proofs for the following question using implications and words. Can you please verify whether they are logically correct. Should I have used De Morgan's Laws?



    Exercise:



    Suppose that $C,D$ are subsets of a set $X$. Prove that $$(Xsetminus C){,}cap{,}D =Dsetminus C.$$



    Proof 1:



    Suppose that $xin{(Xsetminus C){,}cap{,}D}$. Then $xin{(Xsetminus C)}$ and $xin{D}$. Then ($xin{X}$ and $xnotin{C}$) and $xin{D}$. Then ($xin{X}$ and $xin{D}$) and ($xin{D}$ and $xnotin {C}$). Then $xin(X cap D) cap (D setminus C)$. Thus, $xin(D setminus C)$. So, $(X setminus C) {,} cap D subseteq (D setminus C)$.



    Conversely, suppose that $xin (Dsetminus C)$. Then $(xin{D}$ and $xnotin{C})$. Then $(xin X$ and $xin{D}$) and $xnotin{C}$. Then $(xin{X}$ and $xnotin{C})$ and $xin{D}$. Thus $xin(Xsetminus {C})cap{D}$. So, $(Dsetminus{C}) subseteq{(Xsetminus{C}})cap{D}$.



    Since $(X setminus C) {,} cap D subseteq (D setminus C)$ and $(Dsetminus{C}) subseteq{(Xsetminus{C}})cap{D}$, we have that $(X setminus C) {,} cap D = (D setminus C)\$.



    Proof 2:



    Suppose that $xin{(Xsetminus C){,}cap{,}D}$. Then,



    begin{align}
    &implies xin{(Xsetminus C)}{,}{,}text{and}{,}D \
    &implies(xin{X} {,}text{and} {,}xnotin{C}) {,}text{and}{,} xin{D} \
    &implies (xin{X} {,}text{and}{,} xin{D}) {,}text{and} {,}(xin{D} {,}text{and}{,} xnotin {C})\
    &implies xin(X cap D) cap (D setminus C)\
    &implies xin(D setminus C).\ \
    text{Thus}, (X setminus C) {,} cap D subseteq (D setminus C).\ \
    end{align}



    Conversely, suppose $xin (Dsetminus C)$. Then,



    begin{align}
    &implies (xin{D} {,}text{and}{,} xnotin{C}) \
    &implies (xin X {,}text{and}{,} xin{D}){,}text{and}{,} xnotin{C} \
    &implies (xin{X}{,}text{and}{,} xnotin{C}){,}text{and}{,} xin{D} \
    &implies xin(Xsetminus {C})cap{D}. \ \
    text{Thus,}{,}(Dsetminus{C}) subseteq{(Xsetminus{C}})cap{D}.
    end{align}

    Since $(X setminus C) {,} cap D subseteq (D setminus C)$ and $(Dsetminus{C}) subseteq{(Xsetminus{C}})cap{D}$, we have that $(X setminus C) {,} cap D = (D setminus C)$.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      I have constructed two identical draft proofs for the following question using implications and words. Can you please verify whether they are logically correct. Should I have used De Morgan's Laws?



      Exercise:



      Suppose that $C,D$ are subsets of a set $X$. Prove that $$(Xsetminus C){,}cap{,}D =Dsetminus C.$$



      Proof 1:



      Suppose that $xin{(Xsetminus C){,}cap{,}D}$. Then $xin{(Xsetminus C)}$ and $xin{D}$. Then ($xin{X}$ and $xnotin{C}$) and $xin{D}$. Then ($xin{X}$ and $xin{D}$) and ($xin{D}$ and $xnotin {C}$). Then $xin(X cap D) cap (D setminus C)$. Thus, $xin(D setminus C)$. So, $(X setminus C) {,} cap D subseteq (D setminus C)$.



      Conversely, suppose that $xin (Dsetminus C)$. Then $(xin{D}$ and $xnotin{C})$. Then $(xin X$ and $xin{D}$) and $xnotin{C}$. Then $(xin{X}$ and $xnotin{C})$ and $xin{D}$. Thus $xin(Xsetminus {C})cap{D}$. So, $(Dsetminus{C}) subseteq{(Xsetminus{C}})cap{D}$.



      Since $(X setminus C) {,} cap D subseteq (D setminus C)$ and $(Dsetminus{C}) subseteq{(Xsetminus{C}})cap{D}$, we have that $(X setminus C) {,} cap D = (D setminus C)\$.



      Proof 2:



      Suppose that $xin{(Xsetminus C){,}cap{,}D}$. Then,



      begin{align}
      &implies xin{(Xsetminus C)}{,}{,}text{and}{,}D \
      &implies(xin{X} {,}text{and} {,}xnotin{C}) {,}text{and}{,} xin{D} \
      &implies (xin{X} {,}text{and}{,} xin{D}) {,}text{and} {,}(xin{D} {,}text{and}{,} xnotin {C})\
      &implies xin(X cap D) cap (D setminus C)\
      &implies xin(D setminus C).\ \
      text{Thus}, (X setminus C) {,} cap D subseteq (D setminus C).\ \
      end{align}



      Conversely, suppose $xin (Dsetminus C)$. Then,



      begin{align}
      &implies (xin{D} {,}text{and}{,} xnotin{C}) \
      &implies (xin X {,}text{and}{,} xin{D}){,}text{and}{,} xnotin{C} \
      &implies (xin{X}{,}text{and}{,} xnotin{C}){,}text{and}{,} xin{D} \
      &implies xin(Xsetminus {C})cap{D}. \ \
      text{Thus,}{,}(Dsetminus{C}) subseteq{(Xsetminus{C}})cap{D}.
      end{align}

      Since $(X setminus C) {,} cap D subseteq (D setminus C)$ and $(Dsetminus{C}) subseteq{(Xsetminus{C}})cap{D}$, we have that $(X setminus C) {,} cap D = (D setminus C)$.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I have constructed two identical draft proofs for the following question using implications and words. Can you please verify whether they are logically correct. Should I have used De Morgan's Laws?



      Exercise:



      Suppose that $C,D$ are subsets of a set $X$. Prove that $$(Xsetminus C){,}cap{,}D =Dsetminus C.$$



      Proof 1:



      Suppose that $xin{(Xsetminus C){,}cap{,}D}$. Then $xin{(Xsetminus C)}$ and $xin{D}$. Then ($xin{X}$ and $xnotin{C}$) and $xin{D}$. Then ($xin{X}$ and $xin{D}$) and ($xin{D}$ and $xnotin {C}$). Then $xin(X cap D) cap (D setminus C)$. Thus, $xin(D setminus C)$. So, $(X setminus C) {,} cap D subseteq (D setminus C)$.



      Conversely, suppose that $xin (Dsetminus C)$. Then $(xin{D}$ and $xnotin{C})$. Then $(xin X$ and $xin{D}$) and $xnotin{C}$. Then $(xin{X}$ and $xnotin{C})$ and $xin{D}$. Thus $xin(Xsetminus {C})cap{D}$. So, $(Dsetminus{C}) subseteq{(Xsetminus{C}})cap{D}$.



      Since $(X setminus C) {,} cap D subseteq (D setminus C)$ and $(Dsetminus{C}) subseteq{(Xsetminus{C}})cap{D}$, we have that $(X setminus C) {,} cap D = (D setminus C)\$.



      Proof 2:



      Suppose that $xin{(Xsetminus C){,}cap{,}D}$. Then,



      begin{align}
      &implies xin{(Xsetminus C)}{,}{,}text{and}{,}D \
      &implies(xin{X} {,}text{and} {,}xnotin{C}) {,}text{and}{,} xin{D} \
      &implies (xin{X} {,}text{and}{,} xin{D}) {,}text{and} {,}(xin{D} {,}text{and}{,} xnotin {C})\
      &implies xin(X cap D) cap (D setminus C)\
      &implies xin(D setminus C).\ \
      text{Thus}, (X setminus C) {,} cap D subseteq (D setminus C).\ \
      end{align}



      Conversely, suppose $xin (Dsetminus C)$. Then,



      begin{align}
      &implies (xin{D} {,}text{and}{,} xnotin{C}) \
      &implies (xin X {,}text{and}{,} xin{D}){,}text{and}{,} xnotin{C} \
      &implies (xin{X}{,}text{and}{,} xnotin{C}){,}text{and}{,} xin{D} \
      &implies xin(Xsetminus {C})cap{D}. \ \
      text{Thus,}{,}(Dsetminus{C}) subseteq{(Xsetminus{C}})cap{D}.
      end{align}

      Since $(X setminus C) {,} cap D subseteq (D setminus C)$ and $(Dsetminus{C}) subseteq{(Xsetminus{C}})cap{D}$, we have that $(X setminus C) {,} cap D = (D setminus C)$.







      proof-verification elementary-set-theory logic






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 15 at 2:43









      Andrés E. Caicedo

      65.5k8158249




      65.5k8158249










      asked Jan 15 at 2:06







      user503154





























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Your logic all seems to follow fine. My main nitpick would be to more clearly indicate when the assumption $C,D subseteq X$ is used.



          With respect to whether you should have used De Morgan's law, I don't think they would have made anything easier. I'm not even sure if they would have any use here. In any event your method of proof is how I would've done things at any rate.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$









          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Thanks. Can you please let me know where you would indicate in the proof what you have suggested. :)
            $endgroup$
            – user503154
            Jan 15 at 2:25






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            The main point that it came to mind was when you went from $$(xin{D} {,}text{and}{,} xnotin{C})$$ to $$(xin X {,}text{and}{,} xin{D}){,}text{and}{,} xnotin{C}$$ It took me a bit to realize that this followed because $D subseteq X$. I didn't really have any other problems following the proof other than that, so that'd probably be the main point to apply it.
            $endgroup$
            – Eevee Trainer
            Jan 15 at 2:31



















          0












          $begingroup$

          Perhaps more briefly:



          For any sets $A,B$ we define $Acap B$ by $forall x,(;xin Acap Biff (xin Aland xin B);).$ And we define $Asetminus B$ by $;forall x ,(;xin Asetminus B iff (xin Aland x not in B);).$



          And we have $Dsubset Xiff forall x;(xin D iff (xin Dland xin X))$ .



          So if $Dsubset X$ then for all $x$ we have $$[xin Dsetminus C]iff$$ $$iff [xin Dland xnot in C] iff$$ $$iff [(xin Dland xin X)land xnot in C] iff$$ $$iff [xin D land (xin Xland x not in C)]iff$$ $$iff [xin Dland xin Xsetminus C] iff$$ $$iff [ xin Dcap (Xsetminus C)].$$ And it doesn't matter whether or not $Csubset X.$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3074001%2fproof-verification-for-the-equivalence-of-two-sets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown
























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            Your logic all seems to follow fine. My main nitpick would be to more clearly indicate when the assumption $C,D subseteq X$ is used.



            With respect to whether you should have used De Morgan's law, I don't think they would have made anything easier. I'm not even sure if they would have any use here. In any event your method of proof is how I would've done things at any rate.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$









            • 2




              $begingroup$
              Thanks. Can you please let me know where you would indicate in the proof what you have suggested. :)
              $endgroup$
              – user503154
              Jan 15 at 2:25






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              The main point that it came to mind was when you went from $$(xin{D} {,}text{and}{,} xnotin{C})$$ to $$(xin X {,}text{and}{,} xin{D}){,}text{and}{,} xnotin{C}$$ It took me a bit to realize that this followed because $D subseteq X$. I didn't really have any other problems following the proof other than that, so that'd probably be the main point to apply it.
              $endgroup$
              – Eevee Trainer
              Jan 15 at 2:31
















            0












            $begingroup$

            Your logic all seems to follow fine. My main nitpick would be to more clearly indicate when the assumption $C,D subseteq X$ is used.



            With respect to whether you should have used De Morgan's law, I don't think they would have made anything easier. I'm not even sure if they would have any use here. In any event your method of proof is how I would've done things at any rate.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$









            • 2




              $begingroup$
              Thanks. Can you please let me know where you would indicate in the proof what you have suggested. :)
              $endgroup$
              – user503154
              Jan 15 at 2:25






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              The main point that it came to mind was when you went from $$(xin{D} {,}text{and}{,} xnotin{C})$$ to $$(xin X {,}text{and}{,} xin{D}){,}text{and}{,} xnotin{C}$$ It took me a bit to realize that this followed because $D subseteq X$. I didn't really have any other problems following the proof other than that, so that'd probably be the main point to apply it.
              $endgroup$
              – Eevee Trainer
              Jan 15 at 2:31














            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            Your logic all seems to follow fine. My main nitpick would be to more clearly indicate when the assumption $C,D subseteq X$ is used.



            With respect to whether you should have used De Morgan's law, I don't think they would have made anything easier. I'm not even sure if they would have any use here. In any event your method of proof is how I would've done things at any rate.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Your logic all seems to follow fine. My main nitpick would be to more clearly indicate when the assumption $C,D subseteq X$ is used.



            With respect to whether you should have used De Morgan's law, I don't think they would have made anything easier. I'm not even sure if they would have any use here. In any event your method of proof is how I would've done things at any rate.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Jan 15 at 2:15









            Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer

            6,0931936




            6,0931936








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              Thanks. Can you please let me know where you would indicate in the proof what you have suggested. :)
              $endgroup$
              – user503154
              Jan 15 at 2:25






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              The main point that it came to mind was when you went from $$(xin{D} {,}text{and}{,} xnotin{C})$$ to $$(xin X {,}text{and}{,} xin{D}){,}text{and}{,} xnotin{C}$$ It took me a bit to realize that this followed because $D subseteq X$. I didn't really have any other problems following the proof other than that, so that'd probably be the main point to apply it.
              $endgroup$
              – Eevee Trainer
              Jan 15 at 2:31














            • 2




              $begingroup$
              Thanks. Can you please let me know where you would indicate in the proof what you have suggested. :)
              $endgroup$
              – user503154
              Jan 15 at 2:25






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              The main point that it came to mind was when you went from $$(xin{D} {,}text{and}{,} xnotin{C})$$ to $$(xin X {,}text{and}{,} xin{D}){,}text{and}{,} xnotin{C}$$ It took me a bit to realize that this followed because $D subseteq X$. I didn't really have any other problems following the proof other than that, so that'd probably be the main point to apply it.
              $endgroup$
              – Eevee Trainer
              Jan 15 at 2:31








            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            Thanks. Can you please let me know where you would indicate in the proof what you have suggested. :)
            $endgroup$
            – user503154
            Jan 15 at 2:25




            $begingroup$
            Thanks. Can you please let me know where you would indicate in the proof what you have suggested. :)
            $endgroup$
            – user503154
            Jan 15 at 2:25




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            The main point that it came to mind was when you went from $$(xin{D} {,}text{and}{,} xnotin{C})$$ to $$(xin X {,}text{and}{,} xin{D}){,}text{and}{,} xnotin{C}$$ It took me a bit to realize that this followed because $D subseteq X$. I didn't really have any other problems following the proof other than that, so that'd probably be the main point to apply it.
            $endgroup$
            – Eevee Trainer
            Jan 15 at 2:31




            $begingroup$
            The main point that it came to mind was when you went from $$(xin{D} {,}text{and}{,} xnotin{C})$$ to $$(xin X {,}text{and}{,} xin{D}){,}text{and}{,} xnotin{C}$$ It took me a bit to realize that this followed because $D subseteq X$. I didn't really have any other problems following the proof other than that, so that'd probably be the main point to apply it.
            $endgroup$
            – Eevee Trainer
            Jan 15 at 2:31











            0












            $begingroup$

            Perhaps more briefly:



            For any sets $A,B$ we define $Acap B$ by $forall x,(;xin Acap Biff (xin Aland xin B);).$ And we define $Asetminus B$ by $;forall x ,(;xin Asetminus B iff (xin Aland x not in B);).$



            And we have $Dsubset Xiff forall x;(xin D iff (xin Dland xin X))$ .



            So if $Dsubset X$ then for all $x$ we have $$[xin Dsetminus C]iff$$ $$iff [xin Dland xnot in C] iff$$ $$iff [(xin Dland xin X)land xnot in C] iff$$ $$iff [xin D land (xin Xland x not in C)]iff$$ $$iff [xin Dland xin Xsetminus C] iff$$ $$iff [ xin Dcap (Xsetminus C)].$$ And it doesn't matter whether or not $Csubset X.$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              Perhaps more briefly:



              For any sets $A,B$ we define $Acap B$ by $forall x,(;xin Acap Biff (xin Aland xin B);).$ And we define $Asetminus B$ by $;forall x ,(;xin Asetminus B iff (xin Aland x not in B);).$



              And we have $Dsubset Xiff forall x;(xin D iff (xin Dland xin X))$ .



              So if $Dsubset X$ then for all $x$ we have $$[xin Dsetminus C]iff$$ $$iff [xin Dland xnot in C] iff$$ $$iff [(xin Dland xin X)land xnot in C] iff$$ $$iff [xin D land (xin Xland x not in C)]iff$$ $$iff [xin Dland xin Xsetminus C] iff$$ $$iff [ xin Dcap (Xsetminus C)].$$ And it doesn't matter whether or not $Csubset X.$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                Perhaps more briefly:



                For any sets $A,B$ we define $Acap B$ by $forall x,(;xin Acap Biff (xin Aland xin B);).$ And we define $Asetminus B$ by $;forall x ,(;xin Asetminus B iff (xin Aland x not in B);).$



                And we have $Dsubset Xiff forall x;(xin D iff (xin Dland xin X))$ .



                So if $Dsubset X$ then for all $x$ we have $$[xin Dsetminus C]iff$$ $$iff [xin Dland xnot in C] iff$$ $$iff [(xin Dland xin X)land xnot in C] iff$$ $$iff [xin D land (xin Xland x not in C)]iff$$ $$iff [xin Dland xin Xsetminus C] iff$$ $$iff [ xin Dcap (Xsetminus C)].$$ And it doesn't matter whether or not $Csubset X.$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Perhaps more briefly:



                For any sets $A,B$ we define $Acap B$ by $forall x,(;xin Acap Biff (xin Aland xin B);).$ And we define $Asetminus B$ by $;forall x ,(;xin Asetminus B iff (xin Aland x not in B);).$



                And we have $Dsubset Xiff forall x;(xin D iff (xin Dland xin X))$ .



                So if $Dsubset X$ then for all $x$ we have $$[xin Dsetminus C]iff$$ $$iff [xin Dland xnot in C] iff$$ $$iff [(xin Dland xin X)land xnot in C] iff$$ $$iff [xin D land (xin Xland x not in C)]iff$$ $$iff [xin Dland xin Xsetminus C] iff$$ $$iff [ xin Dcap (Xsetminus C)].$$ And it doesn't matter whether or not $Csubset X.$







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 15 at 7:29









                DanielWainfleetDanielWainfleet

                35.1k31648




                35.1k31648






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3074001%2fproof-verification-for-the-equivalence-of-two-sets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                    How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                    Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory