Should I check QEvent dynamic_cast result if I already checked event->type()?












0















QEvent has a type() member function which returns the event type as enum value. Should I check dynamic_cast result for QEvent* if I already checked event->type(). E.g.



bool ClassName::eventFilter(QObject* obj, QEvent* event)
{
if (event->type() == QEvent::KeyPress)
{
auto ke = dynamic_cast<QKeyEvent*>(event);
if (ke) // <----------- needed?
{
// ...
}
}
// ...
}


Is if (ke) condition needed here?










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    If you already know the type you can safely use static_cast instead without checking the result against null pointer. This is faster approach.

    – vahancho
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:17











  • @vahancho hence second checking is redundant, right?

    – αλεχολυτ
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:24






  • 1





    That's what I meant. And static_cast is more preferable in this case.

    – vahancho
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:29











  • @vahancho maybe some reference to Qt documentation/implementation? Such info should be placed in answer area and accepted :)

    – αλεχολυτ
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:34











  • Have a look at Qt doc.: Event Filters. There you find an example which uses a static_cast like mentioned by @vahancho.

    – Scheff
    Nov 21 '18 at 15:16
















0















QEvent has a type() member function which returns the event type as enum value. Should I check dynamic_cast result for QEvent* if I already checked event->type(). E.g.



bool ClassName::eventFilter(QObject* obj, QEvent* event)
{
if (event->type() == QEvent::KeyPress)
{
auto ke = dynamic_cast<QKeyEvent*>(event);
if (ke) // <----------- needed?
{
// ...
}
}
// ...
}


Is if (ke) condition needed here?










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    If you already know the type you can safely use static_cast instead without checking the result against null pointer. This is faster approach.

    – vahancho
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:17











  • @vahancho hence second checking is redundant, right?

    – αλεχολυτ
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:24






  • 1





    That's what I meant. And static_cast is more preferable in this case.

    – vahancho
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:29











  • @vahancho maybe some reference to Qt documentation/implementation? Such info should be placed in answer area and accepted :)

    – αλεχολυτ
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:34











  • Have a look at Qt doc.: Event Filters. There you find an example which uses a static_cast like mentioned by @vahancho.

    – Scheff
    Nov 21 '18 at 15:16














0












0








0








QEvent has a type() member function which returns the event type as enum value. Should I check dynamic_cast result for QEvent* if I already checked event->type(). E.g.



bool ClassName::eventFilter(QObject* obj, QEvent* event)
{
if (event->type() == QEvent::KeyPress)
{
auto ke = dynamic_cast<QKeyEvent*>(event);
if (ke) // <----------- needed?
{
// ...
}
}
// ...
}


Is if (ke) condition needed here?










share|improve this question














QEvent has a type() member function which returns the event type as enum value. Should I check dynamic_cast result for QEvent* if I already checked event->type(). E.g.



bool ClassName::eventFilter(QObject* obj, QEvent* event)
{
if (event->type() == QEvent::KeyPress)
{
auto ke = dynamic_cast<QKeyEvent*>(event);
if (ke) // <----------- needed?
{
// ...
}
}
// ...
}


Is if (ke) condition needed here?







c++ qt qevent






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 21 '18 at 14:09









αλεχολυταλεχολυτ

1,95411546




1,95411546








  • 1





    If you already know the type you can safely use static_cast instead without checking the result against null pointer. This is faster approach.

    – vahancho
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:17











  • @vahancho hence second checking is redundant, right?

    – αλεχολυτ
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:24






  • 1





    That's what I meant. And static_cast is more preferable in this case.

    – vahancho
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:29











  • @vahancho maybe some reference to Qt documentation/implementation? Such info should be placed in answer area and accepted :)

    – αλεχολυτ
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:34











  • Have a look at Qt doc.: Event Filters. There you find an example which uses a static_cast like mentioned by @vahancho.

    – Scheff
    Nov 21 '18 at 15:16














  • 1





    If you already know the type you can safely use static_cast instead without checking the result against null pointer. This is faster approach.

    – vahancho
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:17











  • @vahancho hence second checking is redundant, right?

    – αλεχολυτ
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:24






  • 1





    That's what I meant. And static_cast is more preferable in this case.

    – vahancho
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:29











  • @vahancho maybe some reference to Qt documentation/implementation? Such info should be placed in answer area and accepted :)

    – αλεχολυτ
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:34











  • Have a look at Qt doc.: Event Filters. There you find an example which uses a static_cast like mentioned by @vahancho.

    – Scheff
    Nov 21 '18 at 15:16








1




1





If you already know the type you can safely use static_cast instead without checking the result against null pointer. This is faster approach.

– vahancho
Nov 21 '18 at 14:17





If you already know the type you can safely use static_cast instead without checking the result against null pointer. This is faster approach.

– vahancho
Nov 21 '18 at 14:17













@vahancho hence second checking is redundant, right?

– αλεχολυτ
Nov 21 '18 at 14:24





@vahancho hence second checking is redundant, right?

– αλεχολυτ
Nov 21 '18 at 14:24




1




1





That's what I meant. And static_cast is more preferable in this case.

– vahancho
Nov 21 '18 at 14:29





That's what I meant. And static_cast is more preferable in this case.

– vahancho
Nov 21 '18 at 14:29













@vahancho maybe some reference to Qt documentation/implementation? Such info should be placed in answer area and accepted :)

– αλεχολυτ
Nov 21 '18 at 14:34





@vahancho maybe some reference to Qt documentation/implementation? Such info should be placed in answer area and accepted :)

– αλεχολυτ
Nov 21 '18 at 14:34













Have a look at Qt doc.: Event Filters. There you find an example which uses a static_cast like mentioned by @vahancho.

– Scheff
Nov 21 '18 at 15:16





Have a look at Qt doc.: Event Filters. There you find an example which uses a static_cast like mentioned by @vahancho.

– Scheff
Nov 21 '18 at 15:16












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53413913%2fshould-i-check-qevent-dynamic-cast-result-if-i-already-checked-event-type%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53413913%2fshould-i-check-qevent-dynamic-cast-result-if-i-already-checked-event-type%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith