What is the proper equation to use when finding the tangent plane?
$begingroup$
My professor has introduced us to this equation when finding a tangent plane.
$$ z= f(x,y) + [frac{∂f}{∂x}(x_0,y_0,z_0)] (x-x_0) + [frac{∂f}{∂y}(x_0,y_0,z_0)] (y-y_0) $$
I am asked to find the tangent plane of the function $ f(x,y,z)= frac{xyz}{x^2+y^2+z^2}$. I get the answer $z=y$ when I solve it myself, but I saw other solutions which used the formula $$ 0 = [frac{∂f}{∂x}(x_0,y_0,z_0)] (x-x_0) + [frac{∂f}{∂y}(x_0,y_0,z_0)] (y-y_0)+[frac{∂f}{∂z}(x_0,y_0,z_0)] (z-z_0) $$
I am not sure which one to use, because this solution gives me $ y=0 $. Can anybody help clear up the difference between these two equations?
multivariable-calculus 3d
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My professor has introduced us to this equation when finding a tangent plane.
$$ z= f(x,y) + [frac{∂f}{∂x}(x_0,y_0,z_0)] (x-x_0) + [frac{∂f}{∂y}(x_0,y_0,z_0)] (y-y_0) $$
I am asked to find the tangent plane of the function $ f(x,y,z)= frac{xyz}{x^2+y^2+z^2}$. I get the answer $z=y$ when I solve it myself, but I saw other solutions which used the formula $$ 0 = [frac{∂f}{∂x}(x_0,y_0,z_0)] (x-x_0) + [frac{∂f}{∂y}(x_0,y_0,z_0)] (y-y_0)+[frac{∂f}{∂z}(x_0,y_0,z_0)] (z-z_0) $$
I am not sure which one to use, because this solution gives me $ y=0 $. Can anybody help clear up the difference between these two equations?
multivariable-calculus 3d
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Definitely the second one is the correct tangent plane. In the first case you have written f(x,y). What does that mean ? Because indeed f is a function on 3 variables.
$endgroup$
– Sota Antonino
Jan 15 at 0:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My professor has introduced us to this equation when finding a tangent plane.
$$ z= f(x,y) + [frac{∂f}{∂x}(x_0,y_0,z_0)] (x-x_0) + [frac{∂f}{∂y}(x_0,y_0,z_0)] (y-y_0) $$
I am asked to find the tangent plane of the function $ f(x,y,z)= frac{xyz}{x^2+y^2+z^2}$. I get the answer $z=y$ when I solve it myself, but I saw other solutions which used the formula $$ 0 = [frac{∂f}{∂x}(x_0,y_0,z_0)] (x-x_0) + [frac{∂f}{∂y}(x_0,y_0,z_0)] (y-y_0)+[frac{∂f}{∂z}(x_0,y_0,z_0)] (z-z_0) $$
I am not sure which one to use, because this solution gives me $ y=0 $. Can anybody help clear up the difference between these two equations?
multivariable-calculus 3d
$endgroup$
My professor has introduced us to this equation when finding a tangent plane.
$$ z= f(x,y) + [frac{∂f}{∂x}(x_0,y_0,z_0)] (x-x_0) + [frac{∂f}{∂y}(x_0,y_0,z_0)] (y-y_0) $$
I am asked to find the tangent plane of the function $ f(x,y,z)= frac{xyz}{x^2+y^2+z^2}$. I get the answer $z=y$ when I solve it myself, but I saw other solutions which used the formula $$ 0 = [frac{∂f}{∂x}(x_0,y_0,z_0)] (x-x_0) + [frac{∂f}{∂y}(x_0,y_0,z_0)] (y-y_0)+[frac{∂f}{∂z}(x_0,y_0,z_0)] (z-z_0) $$
I am not sure which one to use, because this solution gives me $ y=0 $. Can anybody help clear up the difference between these two equations?
multivariable-calculus 3d
multivariable-calculus 3d
asked Jan 15 at 0:05


Justin SkaggsJustin Skaggs
31
31
$begingroup$
Definitely the second one is the correct tangent plane. In the first case you have written f(x,y). What does that mean ? Because indeed f is a function on 3 variables.
$endgroup$
– Sota Antonino
Jan 15 at 0:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Definitely the second one is the correct tangent plane. In the first case you have written f(x,y). What does that mean ? Because indeed f is a function on 3 variables.
$endgroup$
– Sota Antonino
Jan 15 at 0:24
$begingroup$
Definitely the second one is the correct tangent plane. In the first case you have written f(x,y). What does that mean ? Because indeed f is a function on 3 variables.
$endgroup$
– Sota Antonino
Jan 15 at 0:24
$begingroup$
Definitely the second one is the correct tangent plane. In the first case you have written f(x,y). What does that mean ? Because indeed f is a function on 3 variables.
$endgroup$
– Sota Antonino
Jan 15 at 0:24
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You appear to be confusing implicit and explicit functions. The second example function that you’ve given is a function from $mathbb R^3$ to $mathbb R$, so its graph doesn’t have a tangent plane, but rather a tangent hyperplane, which you can find by extending your first formula by one more dimension.
I suspect that what you are really asking about with that second function is a surface in $mathbb R^3$ that’s given implicitly by the equation $f(x,y,z)=c$ for some constant $c$. Such a surface is known as a level surface of $f$. That’s a different matter. If you can solve that equation for $z$ explicitly, i.e., describe the surface as the graph of a function of two variables, then your first formula applies. However, in many cases including this one that’s not possible, so you have to use a related, but different method.
There’s a theorem that says the gradient of a function at a point is always orthogonal to its level surface at that point. The gradient is also normal to the tangent plane (if it exists), so using the point-normal form of the equation of a plane, an equation for the tangent plane at a point $(x_0,y_0,z_0)$ on that surface is $$(x-x_0){partial foverpartial x}(x_0,y_0,z_0)+(y-y_0){partial foverpartial y}(x_0,y_0,z_0)+(z-z_0){partial foverpartial z}(x_0,y_0,z_0)=0.tag{*}$$ The two formulas are related: If you have $z=f(x,y)$, then let $g(x,y,z)=f(x,y)-z$. It should be clear that the graph of $f$ is identical to the level surface $g(x,y,z)=0$. By the chain rule we then have for the gradient $nabla g = left({partial foverpartial x},{partial foverpartial y},-1right)$ and if you plug this into (*) and rearrange you’ll end up with your first formula.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073917%2fwhat-is-the-proper-equation-to-use-when-finding-the-tangent-plane%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You appear to be confusing implicit and explicit functions. The second example function that you’ve given is a function from $mathbb R^3$ to $mathbb R$, so its graph doesn’t have a tangent plane, but rather a tangent hyperplane, which you can find by extending your first formula by one more dimension.
I suspect that what you are really asking about with that second function is a surface in $mathbb R^3$ that’s given implicitly by the equation $f(x,y,z)=c$ for some constant $c$. Such a surface is known as a level surface of $f$. That’s a different matter. If you can solve that equation for $z$ explicitly, i.e., describe the surface as the graph of a function of two variables, then your first formula applies. However, in many cases including this one that’s not possible, so you have to use a related, but different method.
There’s a theorem that says the gradient of a function at a point is always orthogonal to its level surface at that point. The gradient is also normal to the tangent plane (if it exists), so using the point-normal form of the equation of a plane, an equation for the tangent plane at a point $(x_0,y_0,z_0)$ on that surface is $$(x-x_0){partial foverpartial x}(x_0,y_0,z_0)+(y-y_0){partial foverpartial y}(x_0,y_0,z_0)+(z-z_0){partial foverpartial z}(x_0,y_0,z_0)=0.tag{*}$$ The two formulas are related: If you have $z=f(x,y)$, then let $g(x,y,z)=f(x,y)-z$. It should be clear that the graph of $f$ is identical to the level surface $g(x,y,z)=0$. By the chain rule we then have for the gradient $nabla g = left({partial foverpartial x},{partial foverpartial y},-1right)$ and if you plug this into (*) and rearrange you’ll end up with your first formula.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You appear to be confusing implicit and explicit functions. The second example function that you’ve given is a function from $mathbb R^3$ to $mathbb R$, so its graph doesn’t have a tangent plane, but rather a tangent hyperplane, which you can find by extending your first formula by one more dimension.
I suspect that what you are really asking about with that second function is a surface in $mathbb R^3$ that’s given implicitly by the equation $f(x,y,z)=c$ for some constant $c$. Such a surface is known as a level surface of $f$. That’s a different matter. If you can solve that equation for $z$ explicitly, i.e., describe the surface as the graph of a function of two variables, then your first formula applies. However, in many cases including this one that’s not possible, so you have to use a related, but different method.
There’s a theorem that says the gradient of a function at a point is always orthogonal to its level surface at that point. The gradient is also normal to the tangent plane (if it exists), so using the point-normal form of the equation of a plane, an equation for the tangent plane at a point $(x_0,y_0,z_0)$ on that surface is $$(x-x_0){partial foverpartial x}(x_0,y_0,z_0)+(y-y_0){partial foverpartial y}(x_0,y_0,z_0)+(z-z_0){partial foverpartial z}(x_0,y_0,z_0)=0.tag{*}$$ The two formulas are related: If you have $z=f(x,y)$, then let $g(x,y,z)=f(x,y)-z$. It should be clear that the graph of $f$ is identical to the level surface $g(x,y,z)=0$. By the chain rule we then have for the gradient $nabla g = left({partial foverpartial x},{partial foverpartial y},-1right)$ and if you plug this into (*) and rearrange you’ll end up with your first formula.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You appear to be confusing implicit and explicit functions. The second example function that you’ve given is a function from $mathbb R^3$ to $mathbb R$, so its graph doesn’t have a tangent plane, but rather a tangent hyperplane, which you can find by extending your first formula by one more dimension.
I suspect that what you are really asking about with that second function is a surface in $mathbb R^3$ that’s given implicitly by the equation $f(x,y,z)=c$ for some constant $c$. Such a surface is known as a level surface of $f$. That’s a different matter. If you can solve that equation for $z$ explicitly, i.e., describe the surface as the graph of a function of two variables, then your first formula applies. However, in many cases including this one that’s not possible, so you have to use a related, but different method.
There’s a theorem that says the gradient of a function at a point is always orthogonal to its level surface at that point. The gradient is also normal to the tangent plane (if it exists), so using the point-normal form of the equation of a plane, an equation for the tangent plane at a point $(x_0,y_0,z_0)$ on that surface is $$(x-x_0){partial foverpartial x}(x_0,y_0,z_0)+(y-y_0){partial foverpartial y}(x_0,y_0,z_0)+(z-z_0){partial foverpartial z}(x_0,y_0,z_0)=0.tag{*}$$ The two formulas are related: If you have $z=f(x,y)$, then let $g(x,y,z)=f(x,y)-z$. It should be clear that the graph of $f$ is identical to the level surface $g(x,y,z)=0$. By the chain rule we then have for the gradient $nabla g = left({partial foverpartial x},{partial foverpartial y},-1right)$ and if you plug this into (*) and rearrange you’ll end up with your first formula.
$endgroup$
You appear to be confusing implicit and explicit functions. The second example function that you’ve given is a function from $mathbb R^3$ to $mathbb R$, so its graph doesn’t have a tangent plane, but rather a tangent hyperplane, which you can find by extending your first formula by one more dimension.
I suspect that what you are really asking about with that second function is a surface in $mathbb R^3$ that’s given implicitly by the equation $f(x,y,z)=c$ for some constant $c$. Such a surface is known as a level surface of $f$. That’s a different matter. If you can solve that equation for $z$ explicitly, i.e., describe the surface as the graph of a function of two variables, then your first formula applies. However, in many cases including this one that’s not possible, so you have to use a related, but different method.
There’s a theorem that says the gradient of a function at a point is always orthogonal to its level surface at that point. The gradient is also normal to the tangent plane (if it exists), so using the point-normal form of the equation of a plane, an equation for the tangent plane at a point $(x_0,y_0,z_0)$ on that surface is $$(x-x_0){partial foverpartial x}(x_0,y_0,z_0)+(y-y_0){partial foverpartial y}(x_0,y_0,z_0)+(z-z_0){partial foverpartial z}(x_0,y_0,z_0)=0.tag{*}$$ The two formulas are related: If you have $z=f(x,y)$, then let $g(x,y,z)=f(x,y)-z$. It should be clear that the graph of $f$ is identical to the level surface $g(x,y,z)=0$. By the chain rule we then have for the gradient $nabla g = left({partial foverpartial x},{partial foverpartial y},-1right)$ and if you plug this into (*) and rearrange you’ll end up with your first formula.
edited Jan 16 at 1:07
answered Jan 15 at 2:56
amdamd
30.4k21050
30.4k21050
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073917%2fwhat-is-the-proper-equation-to-use-when-finding-the-tangent-plane%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Definitely the second one is the correct tangent plane. In the first case you have written f(x,y). What does that mean ? Because indeed f is a function on 3 variables.
$endgroup$
– Sota Antonino
Jan 15 at 0:24