AMC 2000, Problem 16












1












$begingroup$


A checkerboard of  $13$ rows and  $17$ columns has a number written in each square, beginning in the upper left corner, so that the first row is numbered $1,2,3,4,...,17$ , the second row $18,19,20...34$, and so on down the board. If the board is renumbered so that the left column, top to bottom, is $1,2,3,....13$ , the second column $14,15,16,17,...26$ and so on across the board, some squares have the same numbers in both numbering systems. Find the sum of the numbers in these squares (under either system).



The answer was 555, with the solution provided below



Index the rows with  $ i=1,2,3,...13$
Index the columns with $ j=1,2,3,4,...17$
For the first row number the cells $1,2,3...17$
For the second, $18,19,20..34$ and so on
So the number in row = $i$ and column = $j$ is 
$f(i,j) = 17(i-1)+j$
Similarly, numbering the same cells columnwise we find the number in row = $i$ and column = $j$ is $g(i,j)= i+13j-13$
So we need to solve
$f(i,j) =g(i,j)$
Which gives $i=(1+3j)/4$





We get the solutions $1, 56, 111, 166,221$ which sums to $555$.





The question is why would there be $17(i-1)+j $ being equated as follows? Is it necessarily unique? How did the author derived it to find the solutions?
And is there another way?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    A checkerboard of  $13$ rows and  $17$ columns has a number written in each square, beginning in the upper left corner, so that the first row is numbered $1,2,3,4,...,17$ , the second row $18,19,20...34$, and so on down the board. If the board is renumbered so that the left column, top to bottom, is $1,2,3,....13$ , the second column $14,15,16,17,...26$ and so on across the board, some squares have the same numbers in both numbering systems. Find the sum of the numbers in these squares (under either system).



    The answer was 555, with the solution provided below



    Index the rows with  $ i=1,2,3,...13$
    Index the columns with $ j=1,2,3,4,...17$
    For the first row number the cells $1,2,3...17$
    For the second, $18,19,20..34$ and so on
    So the number in row = $i$ and column = $j$ is 
    $f(i,j) = 17(i-1)+j$
    Similarly, numbering the same cells columnwise we find the number in row = $i$ and column = $j$ is $g(i,j)= i+13j-13$
    So we need to solve
    $f(i,j) =g(i,j)$
    Which gives $i=(1+3j)/4$





    We get the solutions $1, 56, 111, 166,221$ which sums to $555$.





    The question is why would there be $17(i-1)+j $ being equated as follows? Is it necessarily unique? How did the author derived it to find the solutions?
    And is there another way?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      A checkerboard of  $13$ rows and  $17$ columns has a number written in each square, beginning in the upper left corner, so that the first row is numbered $1,2,3,4,...,17$ , the second row $18,19,20...34$, and so on down the board. If the board is renumbered so that the left column, top to bottom, is $1,2,3,....13$ , the second column $14,15,16,17,...26$ and so on across the board, some squares have the same numbers in both numbering systems. Find the sum of the numbers in these squares (under either system).



      The answer was 555, with the solution provided below



      Index the rows with  $ i=1,2,3,...13$
      Index the columns with $ j=1,2,3,4,...17$
      For the first row number the cells $1,2,3...17$
      For the second, $18,19,20..34$ and so on
      So the number in row = $i$ and column = $j$ is 
      $f(i,j) = 17(i-1)+j$
      Similarly, numbering the same cells columnwise we find the number in row = $i$ and column = $j$ is $g(i,j)= i+13j-13$
      So we need to solve
      $f(i,j) =g(i,j)$
      Which gives $i=(1+3j)/4$





      We get the solutions $1, 56, 111, 166,221$ which sums to $555$.





      The question is why would there be $17(i-1)+j $ being equated as follows? Is it necessarily unique? How did the author derived it to find the solutions?
      And is there another way?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      A checkerboard of  $13$ rows and  $17$ columns has a number written in each square, beginning in the upper left corner, so that the first row is numbered $1,2,3,4,...,17$ , the second row $18,19,20...34$, and so on down the board. If the board is renumbered so that the left column, top to bottom, is $1,2,3,....13$ , the second column $14,15,16,17,...26$ and so on across the board, some squares have the same numbers in both numbering systems. Find the sum of the numbers in these squares (under either system).



      The answer was 555, with the solution provided below



      Index the rows with  $ i=1,2,3,...13$
      Index the columns with $ j=1,2,3,4,...17$
      For the first row number the cells $1,2,3...17$
      For the second, $18,19,20..34$ and so on
      So the number in row = $i$ and column = $j$ is 
      $f(i,j) = 17(i-1)+j$
      Similarly, numbering the same cells columnwise we find the number in row = $i$ and column = $j$ is $g(i,j)= i+13j-13$
      So we need to solve
      $f(i,j) =g(i,j)$
      Which gives $i=(1+3j)/4$





      We get the solutions $1, 56, 111, 166,221$ which sums to $555$.





      The question is why would there be $17(i-1)+j $ being equated as follows? Is it necessarily unique? How did the author derived it to find the solutions?
      And is there another way?







      elementary-number-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 22 at 1:14









      Bill Dubuque

      212k29195650




      212k29195650










      asked Jan 22 at 1:07









      299792458299792458

      527




      527






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Imagine first that we are number along the rows. What number will we place in the cell in row $i,$ column $j?$ We have already full numbered $i-1$ rows, and since there are $17$ numbers in a row, in these rows we have used the first $17(i-1)$ numbers. In row $i,$ column $1$ we therefore place $17(i-1)+1,$ in row $i,$ column $2$ we place $17(i-1)+2,$ ... and in row $i,$ column $j$ we place $17(i-1)+j$. This explains the formula for $f(i,j),$ and a wholly analogous argument explains the formula for $g(i,j).$



          I don't fully understand all of your questions. We equate $f(i,j)$ and $g(i,j)$ because the question asks for the cells where the two numbers are the same. We easily get the solution $$i={3j+1over4}$$ Since $i$ and $j$ are integers, we need $3j+1$ to be divisible by $4,$ which happens when $jin{1,5,9,13,17}$



          Solving for the corresponding $i$ values and plugging into the the formula for $f(i,j)$ (or $g(i,j),$) should give you the five numbers that the author claims, but I haven't checked this.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            But wouldn’t I obtain a different answer if I had considered $17(i-2) +2j$?
            $endgroup$
            – 299792458
            Jan 22 at 1:50










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, but you wouldn't get a correct answer. With that formula, the cell in row $1$, column $1$ would be numbered $-15.$ The first part of the argument proves that $f(i,j)$ gives the correct numbering.
            $endgroup$
            – saulspatz
            Jan 22 at 1:54



















          1












          $begingroup$

          Let $fleft(i,jright)$ be the integer written in each cell according to the first numbering system, such that:
          begin{equation*}
          fleft(i,jright)=17(i-1)+j
          end{equation*}

          where $1leq ileq 13$ is the row value, and $1leq jleq 17$ is the column value.



          This formula means that each cell is the sum of the column value $j$ with a multiple of $17$ that depends on the row value.



          The same idea applies to the second numbering system, with $gleft(i,jright)$ being the writter integer in this case, such that:
          begin{equation*}
          gleft(i,jright)=13(j-1)+i
          end{equation*}

          This second formula means that each cell is the sum of the row value $i$ with a multiple of $13$ that depends on the column value this time.



          Anyway we are interested on coincident values on both numbering systems. then:
          begin{equation*}
          fleft(i,jright)=gleft(i,jright)
          end{equation*}

          begin{equation*}
          17(i-1)+j=13(j-1)+i
          end{equation*}

          begin{equation*}
          16i-12j=4
          end{equation*}

          begin{equation*}
          4i-3j=1
          end{equation*}

          Thus, a multiple of $4$ subtracted by a multiple of $3$ that is equal to $1$, which happens to:
          begin{equation*}
          4-3=1rightarrowleft(i,jright)=left(1,1right)
          end{equation*}

          begin{equation*}
          16-15=1rightarrowleft(i,jright)=left(4,5right)
          end{equation*}

          begin{equation*}
          28-27=1rightarrowleft(i,jright)=left(7,9right)
          end{equation*}

          begin{equation*}
          40-39=1rightarrowleft(i,jright)=left(10,13right)
          end{equation*}

          begin{equation*}
          52-51=1rightarrowleft(i,jright)=left(13,17right)
          end{equation*}

          Thus, the sum of these cells is:
          begin{equation*}
          sum=fleft(1,1right)+fleft(4,5right)+fleft(7,9right)+fleft(10,13right)+fleft(13,17right)
          end{equation*}

          begin{equation*}
          sum=gleft(1,1right)+gleft(4,5right)+gleft(7,9right)+gleft(10,13right)+gleft(13,17right)
          end{equation*}

          begin{equation*}
          sum=1+56+111+166+221=555
          end{equation*}






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3082629%2famc-2000-problem-16%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            Imagine first that we are number along the rows. What number will we place in the cell in row $i,$ column $j?$ We have already full numbered $i-1$ rows, and since there are $17$ numbers in a row, in these rows we have used the first $17(i-1)$ numbers. In row $i,$ column $1$ we therefore place $17(i-1)+1,$ in row $i,$ column $2$ we place $17(i-1)+2,$ ... and in row $i,$ column $j$ we place $17(i-1)+j$. This explains the formula for $f(i,j),$ and a wholly analogous argument explains the formula for $g(i,j).$



            I don't fully understand all of your questions. We equate $f(i,j)$ and $g(i,j)$ because the question asks for the cells where the two numbers are the same. We easily get the solution $$i={3j+1over4}$$ Since $i$ and $j$ are integers, we need $3j+1$ to be divisible by $4,$ which happens when $jin{1,5,9,13,17}$



            Solving for the corresponding $i$ values and plugging into the the formula for $f(i,j)$ (or $g(i,j),$) should give you the five numbers that the author claims, but I haven't checked this.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              But wouldn’t I obtain a different answer if I had considered $17(i-2) +2j$?
              $endgroup$
              – 299792458
              Jan 22 at 1:50










            • $begingroup$
              Yes, but you wouldn't get a correct answer. With that formula, the cell in row $1$, column $1$ would be numbered $-15.$ The first part of the argument proves that $f(i,j)$ gives the correct numbering.
              $endgroup$
              – saulspatz
              Jan 22 at 1:54
















            2












            $begingroup$

            Imagine first that we are number along the rows. What number will we place in the cell in row $i,$ column $j?$ We have already full numbered $i-1$ rows, and since there are $17$ numbers in a row, in these rows we have used the first $17(i-1)$ numbers. In row $i,$ column $1$ we therefore place $17(i-1)+1,$ in row $i,$ column $2$ we place $17(i-1)+2,$ ... and in row $i,$ column $j$ we place $17(i-1)+j$. This explains the formula for $f(i,j),$ and a wholly analogous argument explains the formula for $g(i,j).$



            I don't fully understand all of your questions. We equate $f(i,j)$ and $g(i,j)$ because the question asks for the cells where the two numbers are the same. We easily get the solution $$i={3j+1over4}$$ Since $i$ and $j$ are integers, we need $3j+1$ to be divisible by $4,$ which happens when $jin{1,5,9,13,17}$



            Solving for the corresponding $i$ values and plugging into the the formula for $f(i,j)$ (or $g(i,j),$) should give you the five numbers that the author claims, but I haven't checked this.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              But wouldn’t I obtain a different answer if I had considered $17(i-2) +2j$?
              $endgroup$
              – 299792458
              Jan 22 at 1:50










            • $begingroup$
              Yes, but you wouldn't get a correct answer. With that formula, the cell in row $1$, column $1$ would be numbered $-15.$ The first part of the argument proves that $f(i,j)$ gives the correct numbering.
              $endgroup$
              – saulspatz
              Jan 22 at 1:54














            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            Imagine first that we are number along the rows. What number will we place in the cell in row $i,$ column $j?$ We have already full numbered $i-1$ rows, and since there are $17$ numbers in a row, in these rows we have used the first $17(i-1)$ numbers. In row $i,$ column $1$ we therefore place $17(i-1)+1,$ in row $i,$ column $2$ we place $17(i-1)+2,$ ... and in row $i,$ column $j$ we place $17(i-1)+j$. This explains the formula for $f(i,j),$ and a wholly analogous argument explains the formula for $g(i,j).$



            I don't fully understand all of your questions. We equate $f(i,j)$ and $g(i,j)$ because the question asks for the cells where the two numbers are the same. We easily get the solution $$i={3j+1over4}$$ Since $i$ and $j$ are integers, we need $3j+1$ to be divisible by $4,$ which happens when $jin{1,5,9,13,17}$



            Solving for the corresponding $i$ values and plugging into the the formula for $f(i,j)$ (or $g(i,j),$) should give you the five numbers that the author claims, but I haven't checked this.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Imagine first that we are number along the rows. What number will we place in the cell in row $i,$ column $j?$ We have already full numbered $i-1$ rows, and since there are $17$ numbers in a row, in these rows we have used the first $17(i-1)$ numbers. In row $i,$ column $1$ we therefore place $17(i-1)+1,$ in row $i,$ column $2$ we place $17(i-1)+2,$ ... and in row $i,$ column $j$ we place $17(i-1)+j$. This explains the formula for $f(i,j),$ and a wholly analogous argument explains the formula for $g(i,j).$



            I don't fully understand all of your questions. We equate $f(i,j)$ and $g(i,j)$ because the question asks for the cells where the two numbers are the same. We easily get the solution $$i={3j+1over4}$$ Since $i$ and $j$ are integers, we need $3j+1$ to be divisible by $4,$ which happens when $jin{1,5,9,13,17}$



            Solving for the corresponding $i$ values and plugging into the the formula for $f(i,j)$ (or $g(i,j),$) should give you the five numbers that the author claims, but I haven't checked this.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Jan 22 at 1:39









            saulspatzsaulspatz

            16.7k31333




            16.7k31333












            • $begingroup$
              But wouldn’t I obtain a different answer if I had considered $17(i-2) +2j$?
              $endgroup$
              – 299792458
              Jan 22 at 1:50










            • $begingroup$
              Yes, but you wouldn't get a correct answer. With that formula, the cell in row $1$, column $1$ would be numbered $-15.$ The first part of the argument proves that $f(i,j)$ gives the correct numbering.
              $endgroup$
              – saulspatz
              Jan 22 at 1:54


















            • $begingroup$
              But wouldn’t I obtain a different answer if I had considered $17(i-2) +2j$?
              $endgroup$
              – 299792458
              Jan 22 at 1:50










            • $begingroup$
              Yes, but you wouldn't get a correct answer. With that formula, the cell in row $1$, column $1$ would be numbered $-15.$ The first part of the argument proves that $f(i,j)$ gives the correct numbering.
              $endgroup$
              – saulspatz
              Jan 22 at 1:54
















            $begingroup$
            But wouldn’t I obtain a different answer if I had considered $17(i-2) +2j$?
            $endgroup$
            – 299792458
            Jan 22 at 1:50




            $begingroup$
            But wouldn’t I obtain a different answer if I had considered $17(i-2) +2j$?
            $endgroup$
            – 299792458
            Jan 22 at 1:50












            $begingroup$
            Yes, but you wouldn't get a correct answer. With that formula, the cell in row $1$, column $1$ would be numbered $-15.$ The first part of the argument proves that $f(i,j)$ gives the correct numbering.
            $endgroup$
            – saulspatz
            Jan 22 at 1:54




            $begingroup$
            Yes, but you wouldn't get a correct answer. With that formula, the cell in row $1$, column $1$ would be numbered $-15.$ The first part of the argument proves that $f(i,j)$ gives the correct numbering.
            $endgroup$
            – saulspatz
            Jan 22 at 1:54











            1












            $begingroup$

            Let $fleft(i,jright)$ be the integer written in each cell according to the first numbering system, such that:
            begin{equation*}
            fleft(i,jright)=17(i-1)+j
            end{equation*}

            where $1leq ileq 13$ is the row value, and $1leq jleq 17$ is the column value.



            This formula means that each cell is the sum of the column value $j$ with a multiple of $17$ that depends on the row value.



            The same idea applies to the second numbering system, with $gleft(i,jright)$ being the writter integer in this case, such that:
            begin{equation*}
            gleft(i,jright)=13(j-1)+i
            end{equation*}

            This second formula means that each cell is the sum of the row value $i$ with a multiple of $13$ that depends on the column value this time.



            Anyway we are interested on coincident values on both numbering systems. then:
            begin{equation*}
            fleft(i,jright)=gleft(i,jright)
            end{equation*}

            begin{equation*}
            17(i-1)+j=13(j-1)+i
            end{equation*}

            begin{equation*}
            16i-12j=4
            end{equation*}

            begin{equation*}
            4i-3j=1
            end{equation*}

            Thus, a multiple of $4$ subtracted by a multiple of $3$ that is equal to $1$, which happens to:
            begin{equation*}
            4-3=1rightarrowleft(i,jright)=left(1,1right)
            end{equation*}

            begin{equation*}
            16-15=1rightarrowleft(i,jright)=left(4,5right)
            end{equation*}

            begin{equation*}
            28-27=1rightarrowleft(i,jright)=left(7,9right)
            end{equation*}

            begin{equation*}
            40-39=1rightarrowleft(i,jright)=left(10,13right)
            end{equation*}

            begin{equation*}
            52-51=1rightarrowleft(i,jright)=left(13,17right)
            end{equation*}

            Thus, the sum of these cells is:
            begin{equation*}
            sum=fleft(1,1right)+fleft(4,5right)+fleft(7,9right)+fleft(10,13right)+fleft(13,17right)
            end{equation*}

            begin{equation*}
            sum=gleft(1,1right)+gleft(4,5right)+gleft(7,9right)+gleft(10,13right)+gleft(13,17right)
            end{equation*}

            begin{equation*}
            sum=1+56+111+166+221=555
            end{equation*}






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Let $fleft(i,jright)$ be the integer written in each cell according to the first numbering system, such that:
              begin{equation*}
              fleft(i,jright)=17(i-1)+j
              end{equation*}

              where $1leq ileq 13$ is the row value, and $1leq jleq 17$ is the column value.



              This formula means that each cell is the sum of the column value $j$ with a multiple of $17$ that depends on the row value.



              The same idea applies to the second numbering system, with $gleft(i,jright)$ being the writter integer in this case, such that:
              begin{equation*}
              gleft(i,jright)=13(j-1)+i
              end{equation*}

              This second formula means that each cell is the sum of the row value $i$ with a multiple of $13$ that depends on the column value this time.



              Anyway we are interested on coincident values on both numbering systems. then:
              begin{equation*}
              fleft(i,jright)=gleft(i,jright)
              end{equation*}

              begin{equation*}
              17(i-1)+j=13(j-1)+i
              end{equation*}

              begin{equation*}
              16i-12j=4
              end{equation*}

              begin{equation*}
              4i-3j=1
              end{equation*}

              Thus, a multiple of $4$ subtracted by a multiple of $3$ that is equal to $1$, which happens to:
              begin{equation*}
              4-3=1rightarrowleft(i,jright)=left(1,1right)
              end{equation*}

              begin{equation*}
              16-15=1rightarrowleft(i,jright)=left(4,5right)
              end{equation*}

              begin{equation*}
              28-27=1rightarrowleft(i,jright)=left(7,9right)
              end{equation*}

              begin{equation*}
              40-39=1rightarrowleft(i,jright)=left(10,13right)
              end{equation*}

              begin{equation*}
              52-51=1rightarrowleft(i,jright)=left(13,17right)
              end{equation*}

              Thus, the sum of these cells is:
              begin{equation*}
              sum=fleft(1,1right)+fleft(4,5right)+fleft(7,9right)+fleft(10,13right)+fleft(13,17right)
              end{equation*}

              begin{equation*}
              sum=gleft(1,1right)+gleft(4,5right)+gleft(7,9right)+gleft(10,13right)+gleft(13,17right)
              end{equation*}

              begin{equation*}
              sum=1+56+111+166+221=555
              end{equation*}






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Let $fleft(i,jright)$ be the integer written in each cell according to the first numbering system, such that:
                begin{equation*}
                fleft(i,jright)=17(i-1)+j
                end{equation*}

                where $1leq ileq 13$ is the row value, and $1leq jleq 17$ is the column value.



                This formula means that each cell is the sum of the column value $j$ with a multiple of $17$ that depends on the row value.



                The same idea applies to the second numbering system, with $gleft(i,jright)$ being the writter integer in this case, such that:
                begin{equation*}
                gleft(i,jright)=13(j-1)+i
                end{equation*}

                This second formula means that each cell is the sum of the row value $i$ with a multiple of $13$ that depends on the column value this time.



                Anyway we are interested on coincident values on both numbering systems. then:
                begin{equation*}
                fleft(i,jright)=gleft(i,jright)
                end{equation*}

                begin{equation*}
                17(i-1)+j=13(j-1)+i
                end{equation*}

                begin{equation*}
                16i-12j=4
                end{equation*}

                begin{equation*}
                4i-3j=1
                end{equation*}

                Thus, a multiple of $4$ subtracted by a multiple of $3$ that is equal to $1$, which happens to:
                begin{equation*}
                4-3=1rightarrowleft(i,jright)=left(1,1right)
                end{equation*}

                begin{equation*}
                16-15=1rightarrowleft(i,jright)=left(4,5right)
                end{equation*}

                begin{equation*}
                28-27=1rightarrowleft(i,jright)=left(7,9right)
                end{equation*}

                begin{equation*}
                40-39=1rightarrowleft(i,jright)=left(10,13right)
                end{equation*}

                begin{equation*}
                52-51=1rightarrowleft(i,jright)=left(13,17right)
                end{equation*}

                Thus, the sum of these cells is:
                begin{equation*}
                sum=fleft(1,1right)+fleft(4,5right)+fleft(7,9right)+fleft(10,13right)+fleft(13,17right)
                end{equation*}

                begin{equation*}
                sum=gleft(1,1right)+gleft(4,5right)+gleft(7,9right)+gleft(10,13right)+gleft(13,17right)
                end{equation*}

                begin{equation*}
                sum=1+56+111+166+221=555
                end{equation*}






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Let $fleft(i,jright)$ be the integer written in each cell according to the first numbering system, such that:
                begin{equation*}
                fleft(i,jright)=17(i-1)+j
                end{equation*}

                where $1leq ileq 13$ is the row value, and $1leq jleq 17$ is the column value.



                This formula means that each cell is the sum of the column value $j$ with a multiple of $17$ that depends on the row value.



                The same idea applies to the second numbering system, with $gleft(i,jright)$ being the writter integer in this case, such that:
                begin{equation*}
                gleft(i,jright)=13(j-1)+i
                end{equation*}

                This second formula means that each cell is the sum of the row value $i$ with a multiple of $13$ that depends on the column value this time.



                Anyway we are interested on coincident values on both numbering systems. then:
                begin{equation*}
                fleft(i,jright)=gleft(i,jright)
                end{equation*}

                begin{equation*}
                17(i-1)+j=13(j-1)+i
                end{equation*}

                begin{equation*}
                16i-12j=4
                end{equation*}

                begin{equation*}
                4i-3j=1
                end{equation*}

                Thus, a multiple of $4$ subtracted by a multiple of $3$ that is equal to $1$, which happens to:
                begin{equation*}
                4-3=1rightarrowleft(i,jright)=left(1,1right)
                end{equation*}

                begin{equation*}
                16-15=1rightarrowleft(i,jright)=left(4,5right)
                end{equation*}

                begin{equation*}
                28-27=1rightarrowleft(i,jright)=left(7,9right)
                end{equation*}

                begin{equation*}
                40-39=1rightarrowleft(i,jright)=left(10,13right)
                end{equation*}

                begin{equation*}
                52-51=1rightarrowleft(i,jright)=left(13,17right)
                end{equation*}

                Thus, the sum of these cells is:
                begin{equation*}
                sum=fleft(1,1right)+fleft(4,5right)+fleft(7,9right)+fleft(10,13right)+fleft(13,17right)
                end{equation*}

                begin{equation*}
                sum=gleft(1,1right)+gleft(4,5right)+gleft(7,9right)+gleft(10,13right)+gleft(13,17right)
                end{equation*}

                begin{equation*}
                sum=1+56+111+166+221=555
                end{equation*}







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 22 at 11:52









                Cleyton MutoCleyton Muto

                913410




                913410






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3082629%2famc-2000-problem-16%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                    in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

                    How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter