Confusion in the definition of direct product of finite groups












0












$begingroup$


Let $G$ be a finite group. We will say that $G=A times B times C$ if




  1. A,B,C are normal in $G$

  2. $Acap B cap C ={e}$

  3. $|G|=|A||B||C|$


Is the first condition ok? or should I say $A times B$ is normal in $G$ and $C$ is normal in $G$.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Let $G$ be a finite group. We will say that $G=A times B times C$ if




    1. A,B,C are normal in $G$

    2. $Acap B cap C ={e}$

    3. $|G|=|A||B||C|$


    Is the first condition ok? or should I say $A times B$ is normal in $G$ and $C$ is normal in $G$.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Let $G$ be a finite group. We will say that $G=A times B times C$ if




      1. A,B,C are normal in $G$

      2. $Acap B cap C ={e}$

      3. $|G|=|A||B||C|$


      Is the first condition ok? or should I say $A times B$ is normal in $G$ and $C$ is normal in $G$.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let $G$ be a finite group. We will say that $G=A times B times C$ if




      1. A,B,C are normal in $G$

      2. $Acap B cap C ={e}$

      3. $|G|=|A||B||C|$


      Is the first condition ok? or should I say $A times B$ is normal in $G$ and $C$ is normal in $G$.







      direct-sum






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 24 at 6:11









      I_wil_break_wallI_wil_break_wall

      805




      805






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          That is satisfied if $G$ is an elementary Abelian group of order $8$,
          $A={e,a}$, $B={e,b}$ and $C={e,ab}$ where $a$ and $b$ are distinct elements
          of order two. But in this case the natural homomorphism from $Atimes Btimes C$
          to $G$ is not an isomorphism.



          In this case the subgroups "$Atimes B$", "$Atimes C$" and "$Btimes C$"
          are all normal in $G$ too.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I did not get your answer. In general, Is first condition fine?
            $endgroup$
            – I_wil_break_wall
            Jan 24 at 6:25










          • $begingroup$
            In an Abelian group all subgroups are normal. @I_wil_break_wall
            $endgroup$
            – Lord Shark the Unknown
            Jan 24 at 6:26










          • $begingroup$
            My question is what are the conditions for $G$ can be written as a direct product of three subgroups.
            $endgroup$
            – I_wil_break_wall
            Jan 24 at 6:27











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3085537%2fconfusion-in-the-definition-of-direct-product-of-finite-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          That is satisfied if $G$ is an elementary Abelian group of order $8$,
          $A={e,a}$, $B={e,b}$ and $C={e,ab}$ where $a$ and $b$ are distinct elements
          of order two. But in this case the natural homomorphism from $Atimes Btimes C$
          to $G$ is not an isomorphism.



          In this case the subgroups "$Atimes B$", "$Atimes C$" and "$Btimes C$"
          are all normal in $G$ too.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I did not get your answer. In general, Is first condition fine?
            $endgroup$
            – I_wil_break_wall
            Jan 24 at 6:25










          • $begingroup$
            In an Abelian group all subgroups are normal. @I_wil_break_wall
            $endgroup$
            – Lord Shark the Unknown
            Jan 24 at 6:26










          • $begingroup$
            My question is what are the conditions for $G$ can be written as a direct product of three subgroups.
            $endgroup$
            – I_wil_break_wall
            Jan 24 at 6:27
















          0












          $begingroup$

          That is satisfied if $G$ is an elementary Abelian group of order $8$,
          $A={e,a}$, $B={e,b}$ and $C={e,ab}$ where $a$ and $b$ are distinct elements
          of order two. But in this case the natural homomorphism from $Atimes Btimes C$
          to $G$ is not an isomorphism.



          In this case the subgroups "$Atimes B$", "$Atimes C$" and "$Btimes C$"
          are all normal in $G$ too.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I did not get your answer. In general, Is first condition fine?
            $endgroup$
            – I_wil_break_wall
            Jan 24 at 6:25










          • $begingroup$
            In an Abelian group all subgroups are normal. @I_wil_break_wall
            $endgroup$
            – Lord Shark the Unknown
            Jan 24 at 6:26










          • $begingroup$
            My question is what are the conditions for $G$ can be written as a direct product of three subgroups.
            $endgroup$
            – I_wil_break_wall
            Jan 24 at 6:27














          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          That is satisfied if $G$ is an elementary Abelian group of order $8$,
          $A={e,a}$, $B={e,b}$ and $C={e,ab}$ where $a$ and $b$ are distinct elements
          of order two. But in this case the natural homomorphism from $Atimes Btimes C$
          to $G$ is not an isomorphism.



          In this case the subgroups "$Atimes B$", "$Atimes C$" and "$Btimes C$"
          are all normal in $G$ too.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          That is satisfied if $G$ is an elementary Abelian group of order $8$,
          $A={e,a}$, $B={e,b}$ and $C={e,ab}$ where $a$ and $b$ are distinct elements
          of order two. But in this case the natural homomorphism from $Atimes Btimes C$
          to $G$ is not an isomorphism.



          In this case the subgroups "$Atimes B$", "$Atimes C$" and "$Btimes C$"
          are all normal in $G$ too.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 24 at 6:19









          Lord Shark the UnknownLord Shark the Unknown

          106k1161133




          106k1161133












          • $begingroup$
            I did not get your answer. In general, Is first condition fine?
            $endgroup$
            – I_wil_break_wall
            Jan 24 at 6:25










          • $begingroup$
            In an Abelian group all subgroups are normal. @I_wil_break_wall
            $endgroup$
            – Lord Shark the Unknown
            Jan 24 at 6:26










          • $begingroup$
            My question is what are the conditions for $G$ can be written as a direct product of three subgroups.
            $endgroup$
            – I_wil_break_wall
            Jan 24 at 6:27


















          • $begingroup$
            I did not get your answer. In general, Is first condition fine?
            $endgroup$
            – I_wil_break_wall
            Jan 24 at 6:25










          • $begingroup$
            In an Abelian group all subgroups are normal. @I_wil_break_wall
            $endgroup$
            – Lord Shark the Unknown
            Jan 24 at 6:26










          • $begingroup$
            My question is what are the conditions for $G$ can be written as a direct product of three subgroups.
            $endgroup$
            – I_wil_break_wall
            Jan 24 at 6:27
















          $begingroup$
          I did not get your answer. In general, Is first condition fine?
          $endgroup$
          – I_wil_break_wall
          Jan 24 at 6:25




          $begingroup$
          I did not get your answer. In general, Is first condition fine?
          $endgroup$
          – I_wil_break_wall
          Jan 24 at 6:25












          $begingroup$
          In an Abelian group all subgroups are normal. @I_wil_break_wall
          $endgroup$
          – Lord Shark the Unknown
          Jan 24 at 6:26




          $begingroup$
          In an Abelian group all subgroups are normal. @I_wil_break_wall
          $endgroup$
          – Lord Shark the Unknown
          Jan 24 at 6:26












          $begingroup$
          My question is what are the conditions for $G$ can be written as a direct product of three subgroups.
          $endgroup$
          – I_wil_break_wall
          Jan 24 at 6:27




          $begingroup$
          My question is what are the conditions for $G$ can be written as a direct product of three subgroups.
          $endgroup$
          – I_wil_break_wall
          Jan 24 at 6:27


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3085537%2fconfusion-in-the-definition-of-direct-product-of-finite-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

          Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory

          in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith