Mixing
Is it necessary to add vegetables to slow cooker pot roast?
I like slow cooked roast for tenderness but hate the taste of 'pot roast' vegetables. Is it really necessary to cook vegetables with the roast?
roast pot
edited Jan 24 at 20:41
rumtscho♦
82.5k28191357
asked Jan 24 at 6:09
Elizabeth BoeppleElizabeth Boepple
7113
add a comment |
I like slow cooked roast for tenderness but hate the taste of 'pot roast' vegetables. Is it really necessary to cook vegetables with the roast?
roast pot
edited Jan 24 at 20:41
rumtscho♦
82.5k28191357
asked Jan 24 at 6:09
Elizabeth BoeppleElizabeth Boepple
7113
3
This is an interesting question. As a UK native living in the US. I always wondered this, I never even thought of the idea of roasting the meat and vegetables together as generally one wants the meat tender and vegetables crisp. Admittedly I have not used a slow cooker, placing everything in the oven in baking dishes. So this question is very interesting to me +1
– Vality
Jan 24 at 17:54
add a comment |
I like slow cooked roast for tenderness but hate the taste of 'pot roast' vegetables. Is it really necessary to cook vegetables with the roast?
roast pot
edited Jan 24 at 20:41
rumtscho♦
82.5k28191357
asked Jan 24 at 6:09
Elizabeth BoeppleElizabeth Boepple
7113
I like slow cooked roast for tenderness but hate the taste of 'pot roast' vegetables. Is it really necessary to cook vegetables with the roast?
roast pot
roast pot
edited Jan 24 at 20:41
rumtscho♦
82.5k28191357
asked Jan 24 at 6:09
Elizabeth BoeppleElizabeth Boepple
7113
edited Jan 24 at 20:41
rumtscho♦
82.5k28191357
asked Jan 24 at 6:09
Elizabeth BoeppleElizabeth Boepple
7113
edited Jan 24 at 20:41
rumtscho♦
82.5k28191357
edited Jan 24 at 20:41
rumtscho♦
82.5k28191357
edited Jan 24 at 20:41
rumtscho♦
82.5k28191357
82.5k28191357
asked Jan 24 at 6:09
Elizabeth BoeppleElizabeth Boepple
7113
asked Jan 24 at 6:09
Elizabeth BoeppleElizabeth Boepple
7113
asked Jan 24 at 6:09
Elizabeth BoeppleElizabeth Boepple
7113
7113
3
This is an interesting question. As a UK native living in the US. I always wondered this, I never even thought of the idea of roasting the meat and vegetables together as generally one wants the meat tender and vegetables crisp. Admittedly I have not used a slow cooker, placing everything in the oven in baking dishes. So this question is very interesting to me +1
– Vality
Jan 24 at 17:54
add a comment |
3
This is an interesting question. As a UK native living in the US. I always wondered this, I never even thought of the idea of roasting the meat and vegetables together as generally one wants the meat tender and vegetables crisp. Admittedly I have not used a slow cooker, placing everything in the oven in baking dishes. So this question is very interesting to me +1
– Vality
Jan 24 at 17:54
3
3
This is an interesting question. As a UK native living in the US. I always wondered this, I never even thought of the idea of roasting the meat and vegetables together as generally one wants the meat tender and vegetables crisp. Admittedly I have not used a slow cooker, placing everything in the oven in baking dishes. So this question is very interesting to me +1
– Vality
Jan 24 at 17:54
This is an interesting question. As a UK native living in the US. I always wondered this, I never even thought of the idea of roasting the meat and vegetables together as generally one wants the meat tender and vegetables crisp. Admittedly I have not used a slow cooker, placing everything in the oven in baking dishes. So this question is very interesting to me +1
– Vality
Jan 24 at 17:54
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
If you're doing it as a pot roast, the vegetables are mainly there to deliver flavour (unlike in a stew, where they're a major part of the dish). Sometimes they're eaten, sometimes discarded (which seems like a waste to me, so I would choose vegetables I'd want to eat). They take on a role similar to stock or a flavoured rub or oil when roasting in an oven.
On that basis you can generally omit them. One thing to watch out for though is that the vegetables can be used to lift the joint slightly, so it doesn't sit in a pool of fat*. In that case you'd want to replace them with something inert, or use them but discard them.
If you then find that the meat wants a little more flavour, you can always add a little of a suitable herb and some black peppercorns, to be discarded.
* Note that the term "pot roast" is used broadly, sometimes adding significant amounts of liquid and sometimes not. I don't know if this is a regional thing, but my answer is meant to cover both types.
answered Jan 24 at 7:44
Chris HChris H
20.3k13861
3
It's also easier to throw everything in one pot and not have to cook separately. If you don't know the exact meal time, a slow cooker can be automatically keeping the whole meal immediately ready for serving when the unknown time arrives.
– Keeta
Jan 24 at 13:59
@Keeta - That's precisely how I use the slow cooker. Meat and veg get chopped up into the same bowl, then just left to cook all day. On your return you've got a one-pot meal with meat and two veg
– Richard
Jan 24 at 17:15
@Richard After second thought, I decided it may be better to make it an answer all to itself, rather than updating this one.
– Keeta
Jan 24 at 17:50
add a comment |
To directly answer the question as it was originally posted before edit:
why does everyone add vegetables to slow cooker pot roast
To save time
Longer answer:
It is not necessary to cook vegetables with meat. The vegetables do add flavor (a flavor that many appreciate) but I don't feel that is the main reason. Many people add potatoes to the pot roast while cooking. Potatoes don't add any appreciable flavor.
Instead, in my case I do it to save time. Sometimes I will plan my lunch meal on Sunday and put things in the pot to cook. By having everything in one pot, when I return from morning services I can just pull everything out of the pot and put it on the table. Based on services ending just about noon and the travel time home, this removes the need to wait for food to be prepared for the lunch meal.
It's also easier to do. Rather than put only the meat in one pot and then create more dirty dishes by cooking the vegetables separately, I can put them all in one pot and make cleanup time shorter.
So, to answer what I feel is a very opinion based question, "to save time".
answered Jan 24 at 17:46
KeetaKeeta
24115
You also don't have to add everything at the same time -- unless you're in the 'set it up and leave it alone 'til it's done' situation (eg, while at work), you can add some of the vegetables after the meat has cooked for a few hours so they still retain their texture. (frozen peas to just warm through add good texture)
– Joe
Jan 25 at 12:48
add a comment |
I agree about those vegetables. Julia Child has a great solution.
Julia Child only adds aromatics like onions, celery, carrots, and garlic (never potatoes) to a roast in her pot roast recipes (see Beef Burgundy). Once the roast is finished, she strains-out the aromatics because they are now tasteless and mushy. She then sautes pearl onions in butter and adds those in just before serving. If you want potatoes, she cooks those separately or adds them to the pot roast about 2 hours before the roast is finished cooking.
Google "julia child beef bourguignon" for her recipe and many variations. BTW, her recipe is delicious, it is worth any extra time or expense to try at least once in your life.
answered Jan 24 at 20:25
PhilPhil
312
add a comment |
Sometimes it's to lift the meat up so it's not cooking directly on the bottom of the pot. In any case, if you wrap your meat in parchment paper you can roast it in the oven and get pretty much the same effect as a pot roast.
You still need to add aromatics like onions to your roast if it's in the recipe though. That's a flavoring issue.
answered Jan 24 at 17:55
SteveSteve
50026
2
Agreed on the lifting it -- I always either place a couple of carrots (not necessarily chopped ... just two peeled carrots) or some onion across the bottom so the meat is surrounded by liquid. I think it's more important for ones with metal vessels (multicookers, slow cooking in a rice cooker, etc.)
– Joe
Jan 25 at 12:50
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "49"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcooking.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f95906%2fis-it-necessary-to-add-vegetables-to-slow-cooker-pot-roast%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If you're doing it as a pot roast, the vegetables are mainly there to deliver flavour (unlike in a stew, where they're a major part of the dish). Sometimes they're eaten, sometimes discarded (which seems like a waste to me, so I would choose vegetables I'd want to eat). They take on a role similar to stock or a flavoured rub or oil when roasting in an oven.
On that basis you can generally omit them. One thing to watch out for though is that the vegetables can be used to lift the joint slightly, so it doesn't sit in a pool of fat*. In that case you'd want to replace them with something inert, or use them but discard them.
If you then find that the meat wants a little more flavour, you can always add a little of a suitable herb and some black peppercorns, to be discarded.
* Note that the term "pot roast" is used broadly, sometimes adding significant amounts of liquid and sometimes not. I don't know if this is a regional thing, but my answer is meant to cover both types.
answered Jan 24 at 7:44
Chris HChris H
20.3k13861
3
It's also easier to throw everything in one pot and not have to cook separately. If you don't know the exact meal time, a slow cooker can be automatically keeping the whole meal immediately ready for serving when the unknown time arrives.
– Keeta
Jan 24 at 13:59
@Keeta - That's precisely how I use the slow cooker. Meat and veg get chopped up into the same bowl, then just left to cook all day. On your return you've got a one-pot meal with meat and two veg
– Richard
Jan 24 at 17:15
@Richard After second thought, I decided it may be better to make it an answer all to itself, rather than updating this one.
– Keeta
Jan 24 at 17:50
add a comment |
If you're doing it as a pot roast, the vegetables are mainly there to deliver flavour (unlike in a stew, where they're a major part of the dish). Sometimes they're eaten, sometimes discarded (which seems like a waste to me, so I would choose vegetables I'd want to eat). They take on a role similar to stock or a flavoured rub or oil when roasting in an oven.
On that basis you can generally omit them. One thing to watch out for though is that the vegetables can be used to lift the joint slightly, so it doesn't sit in a pool of fat*. In that case you'd want to replace them with something inert, or use them but discard them.
If you then find that the meat wants a little more flavour, you can always add a little of a suitable herb and some black peppercorns, to be discarded.
* Note that the term "pot roast" is used broadly, sometimes adding significant amounts of liquid and sometimes not. I don't know if this is a regional thing, but my answer is meant to cover both types.
answered Jan 24 at 7:44
Chris HChris H
20.3k13861
3
It's also easier to throw everything in one pot and not have to cook separately. If you don't know the exact meal time, a slow cooker can be automatically keeping the whole meal immediately ready for serving when the unknown time arrives.
– Keeta
Jan 24 at 13:59
@Keeta - That's precisely how I use the slow cooker. Meat and veg get chopped up into the same bowl, then just left to cook all day. On your return you've got a one-pot meal with meat and two veg
– Richard
Jan 24 at 17:15
@Richard After second thought, I decided it may be better to make it an answer all to itself, rather than updating this one.
– Keeta
Jan 24 at 17:50
add a comment |
If you're doing it as a pot roast, the vegetables are mainly there to deliver flavour (unlike in a stew, where they're a major part of the dish). Sometimes they're eaten, sometimes discarded (which seems like a waste to me, so I would choose vegetables I'd want to eat). They take on a role similar to stock or a flavoured rub or oil when roasting in an oven.
On that basis you can generally omit them. One thing to watch out for though is that the vegetables can be used to lift the joint slightly, so it doesn't sit in a pool of fat*. In that case you'd want to replace them with something inert, or use them but discard them.
If you then find that the meat wants a little more flavour, you can always add a little of a suitable herb and some black peppercorns, to be discarded.
* Note that the term "pot roast" is used broadly, sometimes adding significant amounts of liquid and sometimes not. I don't know if this is a regional thing, but my answer is meant to cover both types.
answered Jan 24 at 7:44
Chris HChris H
20.3k13861
If you're doing it as a pot roast, the vegetables are mainly there to deliver flavour (unlike in a stew, where they're a major part of the dish). Sometimes they're eaten, sometimes discarded (which seems like a waste to me, so I would choose vegetables I'd want to eat). They take on a role similar to stock or a flavoured rub or oil when roasting in an oven.
On that basis you can generally omit them. One thing to watch out for though is that the vegetables can be used to lift the joint slightly, so it doesn't sit in a pool of fat*. In that case you'd want to replace them with something inert, or use them but discard them.
If you then find that the meat wants a little more flavour, you can always add a little of a suitable herb and some black peppercorns, to be discarded.
* Note that the term "pot roast" is used broadly, sometimes adding significant amounts of liquid and sometimes not. I don't know if this is a regional thing, but my answer is meant to cover both types.
answered Jan 24 at 7:44
Chris HChris H
20.3k13861
answered Jan 24 at 7:44
Chris HChris H
20.3k13861
answered Jan 24 at 7:44
Chris HChris H
20.3k13861
answered Jan 24 at 7:44
Chris HChris H
20.3k13861
20.3k13861
3
It's also easier to throw everything in one pot and not have to cook separately. If you don't know the exact meal time, a slow cooker can be automatically keeping the whole meal immediately ready for serving when the unknown time arrives.
– Keeta
Jan 24 at 13:59
@Keeta - That's precisely how I use the slow cooker. Meat and veg get chopped up into the same bowl, then just left to cook all day. On your return you've got a one-pot meal with meat and two veg
– Richard
Jan 24 at 17:15
@Richard After second thought, I decided it may be better to make it an answer all to itself, rather than updating this one.
– Keeta
Jan 24 at 17:50
add a comment |
3
It's also easier to throw everything in one pot and not have to cook separately. If you don't know the exact meal time, a slow cooker can be automatically keeping the whole meal immediately ready for serving when the unknown time arrives.
– Keeta
Jan 24 at 13:59
@Keeta - That's precisely how I use the slow cooker. Meat and veg get chopped up into the same bowl, then just left to cook all day. On your return you've got a one-pot meal with meat and two veg
– Richard
Jan 24 at 17:15
@Richard After second thought, I decided it may be better to make it an answer all to itself, rather than updating this one.
– Keeta
Jan 24 at 17:50
3
3
It's also easier to throw everything in one pot and not have to cook separately. If you don't know the exact meal time, a slow cooker can be automatically keeping the whole meal immediately ready for serving when the unknown time arrives.
– Keeta
Jan 24 at 13:59
It's also easier to throw everything in one pot and not have to cook separately. If you don't know the exact meal time, a slow cooker can be automatically keeping the whole meal immediately ready for serving when the unknown time arrives.
– Keeta
Jan 24 at 13:59
@Keeta - That's precisely how I use the slow cooker. Meat and veg get chopped up into the same bowl, then just left to cook all day. On your return you've got a one-pot meal with meat and two veg
– Richard
Jan 24 at 17:15
@Keeta - That's precisely how I use the slow cooker. Meat and veg get chopped up into the same bowl, then just left to cook all day. On your return you've got a one-pot meal with meat and two veg
– Richard
Jan 24 at 17:15
@Richard After second thought, I decided it may be better to make it an answer all to itself, rather than updating this one.
– Keeta
Jan 24 at 17:50
@Richard After second thought, I decided it may be better to make it an answer all to itself, rather than updating this one.
– Keeta
Jan 24 at 17:50
add a comment |
To directly answer the question as it was originally posted before edit:
why does everyone add vegetables to slow cooker pot roast
To save time
Longer answer:
It is not necessary to cook vegetables with meat. The vegetables do add flavor (a flavor that many appreciate) but I don't feel that is the main reason. Many people add potatoes to the pot roast while cooking. Potatoes don't add any appreciable flavor.
Instead, in my case I do it to save time. Sometimes I will plan my lunch meal on Sunday and put things in the pot to cook. By having everything in one pot, when I return from morning services I can just pull everything out of the pot and put it on the table. Based on services ending just about noon and the travel time home, this removes the need to wait for food to be prepared for the lunch meal.
It's also easier to do. Rather than put only the meat in one pot and then create more dirty dishes by cooking the vegetables separately, I can put them all in one pot and make cleanup time shorter.
So, to answer what I feel is a very opinion based question, "to save time".
answered Jan 24 at 17:46
KeetaKeeta
24115
You also don't have to add everything at the same time -- unless you're in the 'set it up and leave it alone 'til it's done' situation (eg, while at work), you can add some of the vegetables after the meat has cooked for a few hours so they still retain their texture. (frozen peas to just warm through add good texture)
– Joe
Jan 25 at 12:48
add a comment |
To directly answer the question as it was originally posted before edit:
why does everyone add vegetables to slow cooker pot roast
To save time
Longer answer:
It is not necessary to cook vegetables with meat. The vegetables do add flavor (a flavor that many appreciate) but I don't feel that is the main reason. Many people add potatoes to the pot roast while cooking. Potatoes don't add any appreciable flavor.
Instead, in my case I do it to save time. Sometimes I will plan my lunch meal on Sunday and put things in the pot to cook. By having everything in one pot, when I return from morning services I can just pull everything out of the pot and put it on the table. Based on services ending just about noon and the travel time home, this removes the need to wait for food to be prepared for the lunch meal.
It's also easier to do. Rather than put only the meat in one pot and then create more dirty dishes by cooking the vegetables separately, I can put them all in one pot and make cleanup time shorter.
So, to answer what I feel is a very opinion based question, "to save time".
answered Jan 24 at 17:46
KeetaKeeta
24115
You also don't have to add everything at the same time -- unless you're in the 'set it up and leave it alone 'til it's done' situation (eg, while at work), you can add some of the vegetables after the meat has cooked for a few hours so they still retain their texture. (frozen peas to just warm through add good texture)
– Joe
Jan 25 at 12:48
add a comment |
To directly answer the question as it was originally posted before edit:
why does everyone add vegetables to slow cooker pot roast
To save time
Longer answer:
It is not necessary to cook vegetables with meat. The vegetables do add flavor (a flavor that many appreciate) but I don't feel that is the main reason. Many people add potatoes to the pot roast while cooking. Potatoes don't add any appreciable flavor.
Instead, in my case I do it to save time. Sometimes I will plan my lunch meal on Sunday and put things in the pot to cook. By having everything in one pot, when I return from morning services I can just pull everything out of the pot and put it on the table. Based on services ending just about noon and the travel time home, this removes the need to wait for food to be prepared for the lunch meal.
It's also easier to do. Rather than put only the meat in one pot and then create more dirty dishes by cooking the vegetables separately, I can put them all in one pot and make cleanup time shorter.
So, to answer what I feel is a very opinion based question, "to save time".
answered Jan 24 at 17:46
KeetaKeeta
24115
To directly answer the question as it was originally posted before edit:
why does everyone add vegetables to slow cooker pot roast
To save time
Longer answer:
It is not necessary to cook vegetables with meat. The vegetables do add flavor (a flavor that many appreciate) but I don't feel that is the main reason. Many people add potatoes to the pot roast while cooking. Potatoes don't add any appreciable flavor.
Instead, in my case I do it to save time. Sometimes I will plan my lunch meal on Sunday and put things in the pot to cook. By having everything in one pot, when I return from morning services I can just pull everything out of the pot and put it on the table. Based on services ending just about noon and the travel time home, this removes the need to wait for food to be prepared for the lunch meal.
It's also easier to do. Rather than put only the meat in one pot and then create more dirty dishes by cooking the vegetables separately, I can put them all in one pot and make cleanup time shorter.
So, to answer what I feel is a very opinion based question, "to save time".
answered Jan 24 at 17:46
KeetaKeeta
24115
edited Jan 25 at 11:57
answered Jan 24 at 17:46
KeetaKeeta
24115
answered Jan 24 at 17:46
KeetaKeeta
24115
answered Jan 24 at 17:46
KeetaKeeta
24115
24115
You also don't have to add everything at the same time -- unless you're in the 'set it up and leave it alone 'til it's done' situation (eg, while at work), you can add some of the vegetables after the meat has cooked for a few hours so they still retain their texture. (frozen peas to just warm through add good texture)
– Joe
Jan 25 at 12:48
add a comment |
You also don't have to add everything at the same time -- unless you're in the 'set it up and leave it alone 'til it's done' situation (eg, while at work), you can add some of the vegetables after the meat has cooked for a few hours so they still retain their texture. (frozen peas to just warm through add good texture)
– Joe
Jan 25 at 12:48
You also don't have to add everything at the same time -- unless you're in the 'set it up and leave it alone 'til it's done' situation (eg, while at work), you can add some of the vegetables after the meat has cooked for a few hours so they still retain their texture. (frozen peas to just warm through add good texture)
– Joe
Jan 25 at 12:48
You also don't have to add everything at the same time -- unless you're in the 'set it up and leave it alone 'til it's done' situation (eg, while at work), you can add some of the vegetables after the meat has cooked for a few hours so they still retain their texture. (frozen peas to just warm through add good texture)
– Joe
Jan 25 at 12:48
add a comment |
I agree about those vegetables. Julia Child has a great solution.
Julia Child only adds aromatics like onions, celery, carrots, and garlic (never potatoes) to a roast in her pot roast recipes (see Beef Burgundy). Once the roast is finished, she strains-out the aromatics because they are now tasteless and mushy. She then sautes pearl onions in butter and adds those in just before serving. If you want potatoes, she cooks those separately or adds them to the pot roast about 2 hours before the roast is finished cooking.
Google "julia child beef bourguignon" for her recipe and many variations. BTW, her recipe is delicious, it is worth any extra time or expense to try at least once in your life.
answered Jan 24 at 20:25
PhilPhil
312
add a comment |
I agree about those vegetables. Julia Child has a great solution.
Julia Child only adds aromatics like onions, celery, carrots, and garlic (never potatoes) to a roast in her pot roast recipes (see Beef Burgundy). Once the roast is finished, she strains-out the aromatics because they are now tasteless and mushy. She then sautes pearl onions in butter and adds those in just before serving. If you want potatoes, she cooks those separately or adds them to the pot roast about 2 hours before the roast is finished cooking.
Google "julia child beef bourguignon" for her recipe and many variations. BTW, her recipe is delicious, it is worth any extra time or expense to try at least once in your life.
answered Jan 24 at 20:25
PhilPhil
312
add a comment |
I agree about those vegetables. Julia Child has a great solution.
Julia Child only adds aromatics like onions, celery, carrots, and garlic (never potatoes) to a roast in her pot roast recipes (see Beef Burgundy). Once the roast is finished, she strains-out the aromatics because they are now tasteless and mushy. She then sautes pearl onions in butter and adds those in just before serving. If you want potatoes, she cooks those separately or adds them to the pot roast about 2 hours before the roast is finished cooking.
Google "julia child beef bourguignon" for her recipe and many variations. BTW, her recipe is delicious, it is worth any extra time or expense to try at least once in your life.
answered Jan 24 at 20:25
PhilPhil
312
I agree about those vegetables. Julia Child has a great solution.
Julia Child only adds aromatics like onions, celery, carrots, and garlic (never potatoes) to a roast in her pot roast recipes (see Beef Burgundy). Once the roast is finished, she strains-out the aromatics because they are now tasteless and mushy. She then sautes pearl onions in butter and adds those in just before serving. If you want potatoes, she cooks those separately or adds them to the pot roast about 2 hours before the roast is finished cooking.
Google "julia child beef bourguignon" for her recipe and many variations. BTW, her recipe is delicious, it is worth any extra time or expense to try at least once in your life.
answered Jan 24 at 20:25
PhilPhil
312
edited Jan 24 at 20:32
answered Jan 24 at 20:25
PhilPhil
312
answered Jan 24 at 20:25
PhilPhil
312
answered Jan 24 at 20:25
PhilPhil
312
312
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sometimes it's to lift the meat up so it's not cooking directly on the bottom of the pot. In any case, if you wrap your meat in parchment paper you can roast it in the oven and get pretty much the same effect as a pot roast.
You still need to add aromatics like onions to your roast if it's in the recipe though. That's a flavoring issue.
answered Jan 24 at 17:55
SteveSteve
50026
2
Agreed on the lifting it -- I always either place a couple of carrots (not necessarily chopped ... just two peeled carrots) or some onion across the bottom so the meat is surrounded by liquid. I think it's more important for ones with metal vessels (multicookers, slow cooking in a rice cooker, etc.)
– Joe
Jan 25 at 12:50
add a comment |
Sometimes it's to lift the meat up so it's not cooking directly on the bottom of the pot. In any case, if you wrap your meat in parchment paper you can roast it in the oven and get pretty much the same effect as a pot roast.
You still need to add aromatics like onions to your roast if it's in the recipe though. That's a flavoring issue.
answered Jan 24 at 17:55
SteveSteve
50026
2
Agreed on the lifting it -- I always either place a couple of carrots (not necessarily chopped ... just two peeled carrots) or some onion across the bottom so the meat is surrounded by liquid. I think it's more important for ones with metal vessels (multicookers, slow cooking in a rice cooker, etc.)
– Joe
Jan 25 at 12:50
add a comment |
Sometimes it's to lift the meat up so it's not cooking directly on the bottom of the pot. In any case, if you wrap your meat in parchment paper you can roast it in the oven and get pretty much the same effect as a pot roast.
You still need to add aromatics like onions to your roast if it's in the recipe though. That's a flavoring issue.
answered Jan 24 at 17:55
SteveSteve
50026
Sometimes it's to lift the meat up so it's not cooking directly on the bottom of the pot. In any case, if you wrap your meat in parchment paper you can roast it in the oven and get pretty much the same effect as a pot roast.
You still need to add aromatics like onions to your roast if it's in the recipe though. That's a flavoring issue.
answered Jan 24 at 17:55
SteveSteve
50026
answered Jan 24 at 17:55
SteveSteve
50026
answered Jan 24 at 17:55
SteveSteve
50026
answered Jan 24 at 17:55
SteveSteve
50026
50026
2
Agreed on the lifting it -- I always either place a couple of carrots (not necessarily chopped ... just two peeled carrots) or some onion across the bottom so the meat is surrounded by liquid. I think it's more important for ones with metal vessels (multicookers, slow cooking in a rice cooker, etc.)
– Joe
Jan 25 at 12:50
add a comment |
2
Agreed on the lifting it -- I always either place a couple of carrots (not necessarily chopped ... just two peeled carrots) or some onion across the bottom so the meat is surrounded by liquid. I think it's more important for ones with metal vessels (multicookers, slow cooking in a rice cooker, etc.)
– Joe
Jan 25 at 12:50
2
2
Agreed on the lifting it -- I always either place a couple of carrots (not necessarily chopped ... just two peeled carrots) or some onion across the bottom so the meat is surrounded by liquid. I think it's more important for ones with metal vessels (multicookers, slow cooking in a rice cooker, etc.)
– Joe
Jan 25 at 12:50
Agreed on the lifting it -- I always either place a couple of carrots (not necessarily chopped ... just two peeled carrots) or some onion across the bottom so the meat is surrounded by liquid. I think it's more important for ones with metal vessels (multicookers, slow cooking in a rice cooker, etc.)
– Joe
Jan 25 at 12:50
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Seasoned Advice!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcooking.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f95906%2fis-it-necessary-to-add-vegetables-to-slow-cooker-pot-roast%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
This is an interesting question. As a UK native living in the US. I always wondered this, I never even thought of the idea of roasting the meat and vegetables together as generally one wants the meat tender and vegetables crisp. Admittedly I have not used a slow cooker, placing everything in the oven in baking dishes. So this question is very interesting to me +1
– Vality
Jan 24 at 17:54