Dividing every term in congruence












1












$begingroup$


Suppose we have the following congruence $6^{6^{6^{6^{6^{6}}}}} equiv x$ (mod $10^6$).



I have read somewhere that it is possible to divide this congruence by $2^6$ to get the following:



$frac{6^{6^{6^{6^{6^{6}}}}}}{2^6} equiv frac{x}{2^6}$ (mod $5^6$)



Now the author of this also states that eliminating the fractions (for example multiplying by $2^6$) would result in finding $x$ modulo $5^6$ and not modulo $10^6$.



Author's words:




Take note that we do not use this technique (multiplying by $2^6$) on $frac{6^{6^{6^{6^{6^{6}}}}}}{2^6} equiv frac{x}{2^6}$ (mod $5^6$) so that we do not eliminate the $2^6$. Doing so would result in finding congruence for $5^6$ and not $10^6$.




So leaving this congruence in this fractional form means that we are solving it modulo $10^6$? How is that possible?



This is the original author's solution: brilliant.org










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The chinese remainder theorem is the key to do that. If we know the residues modulo coprime numbers $a$ and $b$, we can easily determine the residue modulo the product $ab$. I however do not understand, why the author concentrates on the fraction.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter
    Jan 24 at 9:47












  • $begingroup$
    @Peter I am not really interested in solving this, I am more interested in understanding what means that if we do not eliminate the denominators that we would still find a solution modulo $10^6$.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Munta
    Jan 24 at 9:55






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    He/She apparently means the following : Since $2^6$ obviously is a divisor, the number denoted by the fraction is an integer. Suppose, we have the residue of this integer modulo $5^6$ , then we can multiply it with $2^6$ and again reduce modulo $5^6$ to get the residue of the power tower modulo $5^6$. It is however confusing that the $x$ is also divided by $2^6$. Anyway, I think that the author overcomplicates a relatively easy thing.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter
    Jan 24 at 10:00












  • $begingroup$
    I think he meant specifically to multiply both sides by $2^6$ to get $6^{6^{6^{6^{6^{6}}}}} equiv x$ (mod $5^6$)
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Munta
    Jan 24 at 10:47












  • $begingroup$
    He did the division in the first place to enable usage of Euler theorem, since with modulo $10$ power it was not coprime.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Munta
    Jan 24 at 10:55


















1












$begingroup$


Suppose we have the following congruence $6^{6^{6^{6^{6^{6}}}}} equiv x$ (mod $10^6$).



I have read somewhere that it is possible to divide this congruence by $2^6$ to get the following:



$frac{6^{6^{6^{6^{6^{6}}}}}}{2^6} equiv frac{x}{2^6}$ (mod $5^6$)



Now the author of this also states that eliminating the fractions (for example multiplying by $2^6$) would result in finding $x$ modulo $5^6$ and not modulo $10^6$.



Author's words:




Take note that we do not use this technique (multiplying by $2^6$) on $frac{6^{6^{6^{6^{6^{6}}}}}}{2^6} equiv frac{x}{2^6}$ (mod $5^6$) so that we do not eliminate the $2^6$. Doing so would result in finding congruence for $5^6$ and not $10^6$.




So leaving this congruence in this fractional form means that we are solving it modulo $10^6$? How is that possible?



This is the original author's solution: brilliant.org










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The chinese remainder theorem is the key to do that. If we know the residues modulo coprime numbers $a$ and $b$, we can easily determine the residue modulo the product $ab$. I however do not understand, why the author concentrates on the fraction.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter
    Jan 24 at 9:47












  • $begingroup$
    @Peter I am not really interested in solving this, I am more interested in understanding what means that if we do not eliminate the denominators that we would still find a solution modulo $10^6$.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Munta
    Jan 24 at 9:55






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    He/She apparently means the following : Since $2^6$ obviously is a divisor, the number denoted by the fraction is an integer. Suppose, we have the residue of this integer modulo $5^6$ , then we can multiply it with $2^6$ and again reduce modulo $5^6$ to get the residue of the power tower modulo $5^6$. It is however confusing that the $x$ is also divided by $2^6$. Anyway, I think that the author overcomplicates a relatively easy thing.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter
    Jan 24 at 10:00












  • $begingroup$
    I think he meant specifically to multiply both sides by $2^6$ to get $6^{6^{6^{6^{6^{6}}}}} equiv x$ (mod $5^6$)
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Munta
    Jan 24 at 10:47












  • $begingroup$
    He did the division in the first place to enable usage of Euler theorem, since with modulo $10$ power it was not coprime.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Munta
    Jan 24 at 10:55
















1












1








1





$begingroup$


Suppose we have the following congruence $6^{6^{6^{6^{6^{6}}}}} equiv x$ (mod $10^6$).



I have read somewhere that it is possible to divide this congruence by $2^6$ to get the following:



$frac{6^{6^{6^{6^{6^{6}}}}}}{2^6} equiv frac{x}{2^6}$ (mod $5^6$)



Now the author of this also states that eliminating the fractions (for example multiplying by $2^6$) would result in finding $x$ modulo $5^6$ and not modulo $10^6$.



Author's words:




Take note that we do not use this technique (multiplying by $2^6$) on $frac{6^{6^{6^{6^{6^{6}}}}}}{2^6} equiv frac{x}{2^6}$ (mod $5^6$) so that we do not eliminate the $2^6$. Doing so would result in finding congruence for $5^6$ and not $10^6$.




So leaving this congruence in this fractional form means that we are solving it modulo $10^6$? How is that possible?



This is the original author's solution: brilliant.org










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Suppose we have the following congruence $6^{6^{6^{6^{6^{6}}}}} equiv x$ (mod $10^6$).



I have read somewhere that it is possible to divide this congruence by $2^6$ to get the following:



$frac{6^{6^{6^{6^{6^{6}}}}}}{2^6} equiv frac{x}{2^6}$ (mod $5^6$)



Now the author of this also states that eliminating the fractions (for example multiplying by $2^6$) would result in finding $x$ modulo $5^6$ and not modulo $10^6$.



Author's words:




Take note that we do not use this technique (multiplying by $2^6$) on $frac{6^{6^{6^{6^{6^{6}}}}}}{2^6} equiv frac{x}{2^6}$ (mod $5^6$) so that we do not eliminate the $2^6$. Doing so would result in finding congruence for $5^6$ and not $10^6$.




So leaving this congruence in this fractional form means that we are solving it modulo $10^6$? How is that possible?



This is the original author's solution: brilliant.org







elementary-number-theory modular-arithmetic






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 24 at 11:13







Michael Munta

















asked Jan 24 at 9:45









Michael MuntaMichael Munta

85111




85111












  • $begingroup$
    The chinese remainder theorem is the key to do that. If we know the residues modulo coprime numbers $a$ and $b$, we can easily determine the residue modulo the product $ab$. I however do not understand, why the author concentrates on the fraction.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter
    Jan 24 at 9:47












  • $begingroup$
    @Peter I am not really interested in solving this, I am more interested in understanding what means that if we do not eliminate the denominators that we would still find a solution modulo $10^6$.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Munta
    Jan 24 at 9:55






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    He/She apparently means the following : Since $2^6$ obviously is a divisor, the number denoted by the fraction is an integer. Suppose, we have the residue of this integer modulo $5^6$ , then we can multiply it with $2^6$ and again reduce modulo $5^6$ to get the residue of the power tower modulo $5^6$. It is however confusing that the $x$ is also divided by $2^6$. Anyway, I think that the author overcomplicates a relatively easy thing.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter
    Jan 24 at 10:00












  • $begingroup$
    I think he meant specifically to multiply both sides by $2^6$ to get $6^{6^{6^{6^{6^{6}}}}} equiv x$ (mod $5^6$)
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Munta
    Jan 24 at 10:47












  • $begingroup$
    He did the division in the first place to enable usage of Euler theorem, since with modulo $10$ power it was not coprime.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Munta
    Jan 24 at 10:55




















  • $begingroup$
    The chinese remainder theorem is the key to do that. If we know the residues modulo coprime numbers $a$ and $b$, we can easily determine the residue modulo the product $ab$. I however do not understand, why the author concentrates on the fraction.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter
    Jan 24 at 9:47












  • $begingroup$
    @Peter I am not really interested in solving this, I am more interested in understanding what means that if we do not eliminate the denominators that we would still find a solution modulo $10^6$.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Munta
    Jan 24 at 9:55






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    He/She apparently means the following : Since $2^6$ obviously is a divisor, the number denoted by the fraction is an integer. Suppose, we have the residue of this integer modulo $5^6$ , then we can multiply it with $2^6$ and again reduce modulo $5^6$ to get the residue of the power tower modulo $5^6$. It is however confusing that the $x$ is also divided by $2^6$. Anyway, I think that the author overcomplicates a relatively easy thing.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter
    Jan 24 at 10:00












  • $begingroup$
    I think he meant specifically to multiply both sides by $2^6$ to get $6^{6^{6^{6^{6^{6}}}}} equiv x$ (mod $5^6$)
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Munta
    Jan 24 at 10:47












  • $begingroup$
    He did the division in the first place to enable usage of Euler theorem, since with modulo $10$ power it was not coprime.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Munta
    Jan 24 at 10:55


















$begingroup$
The chinese remainder theorem is the key to do that. If we know the residues modulo coprime numbers $a$ and $b$, we can easily determine the residue modulo the product $ab$. I however do not understand, why the author concentrates on the fraction.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Jan 24 at 9:47






$begingroup$
The chinese remainder theorem is the key to do that. If we know the residues modulo coprime numbers $a$ and $b$, we can easily determine the residue modulo the product $ab$. I however do not understand, why the author concentrates on the fraction.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Jan 24 at 9:47














$begingroup$
@Peter I am not really interested in solving this, I am more interested in understanding what means that if we do not eliminate the denominators that we would still find a solution modulo $10^6$.
$endgroup$
– Michael Munta
Jan 24 at 9:55




$begingroup$
@Peter I am not really interested in solving this, I am more interested in understanding what means that if we do not eliminate the denominators that we would still find a solution modulo $10^6$.
$endgroup$
– Michael Munta
Jan 24 at 9:55




1




1




$begingroup$
He/She apparently means the following : Since $2^6$ obviously is a divisor, the number denoted by the fraction is an integer. Suppose, we have the residue of this integer modulo $5^6$ , then we can multiply it with $2^6$ and again reduce modulo $5^6$ to get the residue of the power tower modulo $5^6$. It is however confusing that the $x$ is also divided by $2^6$. Anyway, I think that the author overcomplicates a relatively easy thing.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Jan 24 at 10:00






$begingroup$
He/She apparently means the following : Since $2^6$ obviously is a divisor, the number denoted by the fraction is an integer. Suppose, we have the residue of this integer modulo $5^6$ , then we can multiply it with $2^6$ and again reduce modulo $5^6$ to get the residue of the power tower modulo $5^6$. It is however confusing that the $x$ is also divided by $2^6$. Anyway, I think that the author overcomplicates a relatively easy thing.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Jan 24 at 10:00














$begingroup$
I think he meant specifically to multiply both sides by $2^6$ to get $6^{6^{6^{6^{6^{6}}}}} equiv x$ (mod $5^6$)
$endgroup$
– Michael Munta
Jan 24 at 10:47






$begingroup$
I think he meant specifically to multiply both sides by $2^6$ to get $6^{6^{6^{6^{6^{6}}}}} equiv x$ (mod $5^6$)
$endgroup$
– Michael Munta
Jan 24 at 10:47














$begingroup$
He did the division in the first place to enable usage of Euler theorem, since with modulo $10$ power it was not coprime.
$endgroup$
– Michael Munta
Jan 24 at 10:55






$begingroup$
He did the division in the first place to enable usage of Euler theorem, since with modulo $10$ power it was not coprime.
$endgroup$
– Michael Munta
Jan 24 at 10:55












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3085671%2fdividing-every-term-in-congruence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3085671%2fdividing-every-term-in-congruence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith