How can we solve $x^a = b ; mod ; n$ equation for big n, a,












2












$begingroup$


I would like to have a method to solve an equation of the type: $x^a = b ; mod ; n$, knowing that n can be decomposed into a product of prime numbers $n = n_1 times n_2 times ... times n_k$



I already know how to do it for small numbers, like if n is a prime number:



in this case, I am looking for $e$, such that $ae = 1 ; mod ; (n-1)$. Like that, I can transform my equation into $x = b^e ; mod ; n$.



But here the numbers are too big to compute this in a single time. So maybe there is a method to solve it I am not aware of.



In my exercise, I have :



n = 264356242932330620591879762011459333409



b = 259252555055790712660181286804144327401



a = 151089236568313654499150506467499










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Is it $x^a$ or $a^x$?
    $endgroup$
    – kcborys
    Jan 22 at 17:42










  • $begingroup$
    $x^a$ sorry I gonna edit
    $endgroup$
    – gommy
    Jan 22 at 17:42










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to stackexchange. This looks like cryptography homework. You are more likely to get help rather than downvotes and votes to close if you edit the question to show us what you tried and where you are stuck. Can you do the problem with smaller number?
    $endgroup$
    – Ethan Bolker
    Jan 22 at 17:45










  • $begingroup$
    @Moo : No I am trying to find x. a, b and n are given
    $endgroup$
    – gommy
    Jan 22 at 17:54
















2












$begingroup$


I would like to have a method to solve an equation of the type: $x^a = b ; mod ; n$, knowing that n can be decomposed into a product of prime numbers $n = n_1 times n_2 times ... times n_k$



I already know how to do it for small numbers, like if n is a prime number:



in this case, I am looking for $e$, such that $ae = 1 ; mod ; (n-1)$. Like that, I can transform my equation into $x = b^e ; mod ; n$.



But here the numbers are too big to compute this in a single time. So maybe there is a method to solve it I am not aware of.



In my exercise, I have :



n = 264356242932330620591879762011459333409



b = 259252555055790712660181286804144327401



a = 151089236568313654499150506467499










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Is it $x^a$ or $a^x$?
    $endgroup$
    – kcborys
    Jan 22 at 17:42










  • $begingroup$
    $x^a$ sorry I gonna edit
    $endgroup$
    – gommy
    Jan 22 at 17:42










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to stackexchange. This looks like cryptography homework. You are more likely to get help rather than downvotes and votes to close if you edit the question to show us what you tried and where you are stuck. Can you do the problem with smaller number?
    $endgroup$
    – Ethan Bolker
    Jan 22 at 17:45










  • $begingroup$
    @Moo : No I am trying to find x. a, b and n are given
    $endgroup$
    – gommy
    Jan 22 at 17:54














2












2








2





$begingroup$


I would like to have a method to solve an equation of the type: $x^a = b ; mod ; n$, knowing that n can be decomposed into a product of prime numbers $n = n_1 times n_2 times ... times n_k$



I already know how to do it for small numbers, like if n is a prime number:



in this case, I am looking for $e$, such that $ae = 1 ; mod ; (n-1)$. Like that, I can transform my equation into $x = b^e ; mod ; n$.



But here the numbers are too big to compute this in a single time. So maybe there is a method to solve it I am not aware of.



In my exercise, I have :



n = 264356242932330620591879762011459333409



b = 259252555055790712660181286804144327401



a = 151089236568313654499150506467499










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I would like to have a method to solve an equation of the type: $x^a = b ; mod ; n$, knowing that n can be decomposed into a product of prime numbers $n = n_1 times n_2 times ... times n_k$



I already know how to do it for small numbers, like if n is a prime number:



in this case, I am looking for $e$, such that $ae = 1 ; mod ; (n-1)$. Like that, I can transform my equation into $x = b^e ; mod ; n$.



But here the numbers are too big to compute this in a single time. So maybe there is a method to solve it I am not aware of.



In my exercise, I have :



n = 264356242932330620591879762011459333409



b = 259252555055790712660181286804144327401



a = 151089236568313654499150506467499







modular-arithmetic arithmetic






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 22 at 17:53







gommy

















asked Jan 22 at 17:40









gommygommy

133




133












  • $begingroup$
    Is it $x^a$ or $a^x$?
    $endgroup$
    – kcborys
    Jan 22 at 17:42










  • $begingroup$
    $x^a$ sorry I gonna edit
    $endgroup$
    – gommy
    Jan 22 at 17:42










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to stackexchange. This looks like cryptography homework. You are more likely to get help rather than downvotes and votes to close if you edit the question to show us what you tried and where you are stuck. Can you do the problem with smaller number?
    $endgroup$
    – Ethan Bolker
    Jan 22 at 17:45










  • $begingroup$
    @Moo : No I am trying to find x. a, b and n are given
    $endgroup$
    – gommy
    Jan 22 at 17:54


















  • $begingroup$
    Is it $x^a$ or $a^x$?
    $endgroup$
    – kcborys
    Jan 22 at 17:42










  • $begingroup$
    $x^a$ sorry I gonna edit
    $endgroup$
    – gommy
    Jan 22 at 17:42










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to stackexchange. This looks like cryptography homework. You are more likely to get help rather than downvotes and votes to close if you edit the question to show us what you tried and where you are stuck. Can you do the problem with smaller number?
    $endgroup$
    – Ethan Bolker
    Jan 22 at 17:45










  • $begingroup$
    @Moo : No I am trying to find x. a, b and n are given
    $endgroup$
    – gommy
    Jan 22 at 17:54
















$begingroup$
Is it $x^a$ or $a^x$?
$endgroup$
– kcborys
Jan 22 at 17:42




$begingroup$
Is it $x^a$ or $a^x$?
$endgroup$
– kcborys
Jan 22 at 17:42












$begingroup$
$x^a$ sorry I gonna edit
$endgroup$
– gommy
Jan 22 at 17:42




$begingroup$
$x^a$ sorry I gonna edit
$endgroup$
– gommy
Jan 22 at 17:42












$begingroup$
Welcome to stackexchange. This looks like cryptography homework. You are more likely to get help rather than downvotes and votes to close if you edit the question to show us what you tried and where you are stuck. Can you do the problem with smaller number?
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Jan 22 at 17:45




$begingroup$
Welcome to stackexchange. This looks like cryptography homework. You are more likely to get help rather than downvotes and votes to close if you edit the question to show us what you tried and where you are stuck. Can you do the problem with smaller number?
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Jan 22 at 17:45












$begingroup$
@Moo : No I am trying to find x. a, b and n are given
$endgroup$
– gommy
Jan 22 at 17:54




$begingroup$
@Moo : No I am trying to find x. a, b and n are given
$endgroup$
– gommy
Jan 22 at 17:54










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

The Euclidean algorithm proves that $gcd(b,n)=1$.



Since you know the prime factorization of $n$, you know $phi(n)$.



The Euclidean algorithm proves that $gcd(a,phi(n))=1$.



The extended Euclidean algorithm then gives $c$ such that $ac equiv 1 bmod phi(n)$ and so $x equiv b^c$.



These computations are probably not easy when done by hand. But WA handles it fine.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your answer @Ihf, I will try it right now
    $endgroup$
    – gommy
    Jan 22 at 18:05











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3083447%2fhow-can-we-solve-xa-b-mod-n-equation-for-big-n-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

The Euclidean algorithm proves that $gcd(b,n)=1$.



Since you know the prime factorization of $n$, you know $phi(n)$.



The Euclidean algorithm proves that $gcd(a,phi(n))=1$.



The extended Euclidean algorithm then gives $c$ such that $ac equiv 1 bmod phi(n)$ and so $x equiv b^c$.



These computations are probably not easy when done by hand. But WA handles it fine.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your answer @Ihf, I will try it right now
    $endgroup$
    – gommy
    Jan 22 at 18:05
















0












$begingroup$

The Euclidean algorithm proves that $gcd(b,n)=1$.



Since you know the prime factorization of $n$, you know $phi(n)$.



The Euclidean algorithm proves that $gcd(a,phi(n))=1$.



The extended Euclidean algorithm then gives $c$ such that $ac equiv 1 bmod phi(n)$ and so $x equiv b^c$.



These computations are probably not easy when done by hand. But WA handles it fine.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your answer @Ihf, I will try it right now
    $endgroup$
    – gommy
    Jan 22 at 18:05














0












0








0





$begingroup$

The Euclidean algorithm proves that $gcd(b,n)=1$.



Since you know the prime factorization of $n$, you know $phi(n)$.



The Euclidean algorithm proves that $gcd(a,phi(n))=1$.



The extended Euclidean algorithm then gives $c$ such that $ac equiv 1 bmod phi(n)$ and so $x equiv b^c$.



These computations are probably not easy when done by hand. But WA handles it fine.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The Euclidean algorithm proves that $gcd(b,n)=1$.



Since you know the prime factorization of $n$, you know $phi(n)$.



The Euclidean algorithm proves that $gcd(a,phi(n))=1$.



The extended Euclidean algorithm then gives $c$ such that $ac equiv 1 bmod phi(n)$ and so $x equiv b^c$.



These computations are probably not easy when done by hand. But WA handles it fine.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 22 at 17:53









lhflhf

166k10171398




166k10171398












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your answer @Ihf, I will try it right now
    $endgroup$
    – gommy
    Jan 22 at 18:05


















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your answer @Ihf, I will try it right now
    $endgroup$
    – gommy
    Jan 22 at 18:05
















$begingroup$
Thank you for your answer @Ihf, I will try it right now
$endgroup$
– gommy
Jan 22 at 18:05




$begingroup$
Thank you for your answer @Ihf, I will try it right now
$endgroup$
– gommy
Jan 22 at 18:05


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3083447%2fhow-can-we-solve-xa-b-mod-n-equation-for-big-n-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith