Mixing
Is it possible to preload pages without using iframes?
0
I have a list of links on a page. Some of the links are pretty slow. Is there a way to improve the loading speed on my end without preload/embed those sites into an iframe?
I've tried the link attribute rel="preload" to preload documents, but we'll have to embed them in iframes to render.
I hope none of my code will embed into the page once we redirected to the new URL.
html
asked Jan 2 at 19:57
eguitarzeguitarz
362
add a comment |
0
I have a list of links on a page. Some of the links are pretty slow. Is there a way to improve the loading speed on my end without preload/embed those sites into an iframe?
I've tried the link attribute rel="preload" to preload documents, but we'll have to embed them in iframes to render.
I hope none of my code will embed into the page once we redirected to the new URL.
html
asked Jan 2 at 19:57
eguitarzeguitarz
362
No, because those pages need to be executed, not just "loaded", which will give you just the HTML, not the CSS, images or scripts. This sounds like a premature optimization issue. Probably a bad idea.
– Diodeus - James MacFarlane
Jan 2 at 20:02
Let me be clear about this, I don't care the rendering speed in this case. The bottleneck here is the network loading speed. If there's only HTML DOMs rendered at the first time can be accepted. Or we can imagine the target links are pure HTML with texts, no css/javascript/images.
– eguitarz
Jan 2 at 20:30
@eguitarz Is the new HTTP/2 Server Push technology an option?
– Progman
Jan 2 at 20:35
You could grab the HTML via XHR but that really won't help you speed up subsequent page loads because the browser won't cache the content as if it were loaded as a page view.
– Diodeus - James MacFarlane
Jan 2 at 20:36
@Progman Those outer links are not controlled by myself, so sadly it's not an option. I guess there's no good solutions at the moment. But thank you all for the inputs!
– eguitarz
Jan 2 at 20:39
add a comment |
0
0
0
I have a list of links on a page. Some of the links are pretty slow. Is there a way to improve the loading speed on my end without preload/embed those sites into an iframe?
I've tried the link attribute rel="preload" to preload documents, but we'll have to embed them in iframes to render.
I hope none of my code will embed into the page once we redirected to the new URL.
html
asked Jan 2 at 19:57
eguitarzeguitarz
362
I have a list of links on a page. Some of the links are pretty slow. Is there a way to improve the loading speed on my end without preload/embed those sites into an iframe?
I've tried the link attribute rel="preload" to preload documents, but we'll have to embed them in iframes to render.
I hope none of my code will embed into the page once we redirected to the new URL.
html
html
asked Jan 2 at 19:57
eguitarzeguitarz
362
asked Jan 2 at 19:57
eguitarzeguitarz
362
asked Jan 2 at 19:57
eguitarzeguitarz
362
asked Jan 2 at 19:57
eguitarzeguitarz
362
asked Jan 2 at 19:57
eguitarzeguitarz
362
362
No, because those pages need to be executed, not just "loaded", which will give you just the HTML, not the CSS, images or scripts. This sounds like a premature optimization issue. Probably a bad idea.
– Diodeus - James MacFarlane
Jan 2 at 20:02
Let me be clear about this, I don't care the rendering speed in this case. The bottleneck here is the network loading speed. If there's only HTML DOMs rendered at the first time can be accepted. Or we can imagine the target links are pure HTML with texts, no css/javascript/images.
– eguitarz
Jan 2 at 20:30
@eguitarz Is the new HTTP/2 Server Push technology an option?
– Progman
Jan 2 at 20:35
You could grab the HTML via XHR but that really won't help you speed up subsequent page loads because the browser won't cache the content as if it were loaded as a page view.
– Diodeus - James MacFarlane
Jan 2 at 20:36
@Progman Those outer links are not controlled by myself, so sadly it's not an option. I guess there's no good solutions at the moment. But thank you all for the inputs!
– eguitarz
Jan 2 at 20:39
add a comment |
No, because those pages need to be executed, not just "loaded", which will give you just the HTML, not the CSS, images or scripts. This sounds like a premature optimization issue. Probably a bad idea.
– Diodeus - James MacFarlane
Jan 2 at 20:02
Let me be clear about this, I don't care the rendering speed in this case. The bottleneck here is the network loading speed. If there's only HTML DOMs rendered at the first time can be accepted. Or we can imagine the target links are pure HTML with texts, no css/javascript/images.
– eguitarz
Jan 2 at 20:30
@eguitarz Is the new HTTP/2 Server Push technology an option?
– Progman
Jan 2 at 20:35
You could grab the HTML via XHR but that really won't help you speed up subsequent page loads because the browser won't cache the content as if it were loaded as a page view.
– Diodeus - James MacFarlane
Jan 2 at 20:36
@Progman Those outer links are not controlled by myself, so sadly it's not an option. I guess there's no good solutions at the moment. But thank you all for the inputs!
– eguitarz
Jan 2 at 20:39
No, because those pages need to be executed, not just "loaded", which will give you just the HTML, not the CSS, images or scripts. This sounds like a premature optimization issue. Probably a bad idea.
– Diodeus - James MacFarlane
Jan 2 at 20:02
No, because those pages need to be executed, not just "loaded", which will give you just the HTML, not the CSS, images or scripts. This sounds like a premature optimization issue. Probably a bad idea.
– Diodeus - James MacFarlane
Jan 2 at 20:02
Let me be clear about this, I don't care the rendering speed in this case. The bottleneck here is the network loading speed. If there's only HTML DOMs rendered at the first time can be accepted. Or we can imagine the target links are pure HTML with texts, no css/javascript/images.
– eguitarz
Jan 2 at 20:30
Let me be clear about this, I don't care the rendering speed in this case. The bottleneck here is the network loading speed. If there's only HTML DOMs rendered at the first time can be accepted. Or we can imagine the target links are pure HTML with texts, no css/javascript/images.
– eguitarz
Jan 2 at 20:30
@eguitarz Is the new HTTP/2 Server Push technology an option?
– Progman
Jan 2 at 20:35
@eguitarz Is the new HTTP/2 Server Push technology an option?
– Progman
Jan 2 at 20:35
You could grab the HTML via XHR but that really won't help you speed up subsequent page loads because the browser won't cache the content as if it were loaded as a page view.
– Diodeus - James MacFarlane
Jan 2 at 20:36
You could grab the HTML via XHR but that really won't help you speed up subsequent page loads because the browser won't cache the content as if it were loaded as a page view.
– Diodeus - James MacFarlane
Jan 2 at 20:36
@Progman Those outer links are not controlled by myself, so sadly it's not an option. I guess there's no good solutions at the moment. But thank you all for the inputs!
– eguitarz
Jan 2 at 20:39
@Progman Those outer links are not controlled by myself, so sadly it's not an option. I guess there's no good solutions at the moment. But thank you all for the inputs!
– eguitarz
Jan 2 at 20:39
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54012391%2fis-it-possible-to-preload-pages-without-using-iframes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54012391%2fis-it-possible-to-preload-pages-without-using-iframes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
No, because those pages need to be executed, not just "loaded", which will give you just the HTML, not the CSS, images or scripts. This sounds like a premature optimization issue. Probably a bad idea.
– Diodeus - James MacFarlane
Jan 2 at 20:02
Let me be clear about this, I don't care the rendering speed in this case. The bottleneck here is the network loading speed. If there's only HTML DOMs rendered at the first time can be accepted. Or we can imagine the target links are pure HTML with texts, no css/javascript/images.
– eguitarz
Jan 2 at 20:30
@eguitarz Is the new HTTP/2 Server Push technology an option?
– Progman
Jan 2 at 20:35
You could grab the HTML via XHR but that really won't help you speed up subsequent page loads because the browser won't cache the content as if it were loaded as a page view.
– Diodeus - James MacFarlane
Jan 2 at 20:36
@Progman Those outer links are not controlled by myself, so sadly it's not an option. I guess there's no good solutions at the moment. But thank you all for the inputs!
– eguitarz
Jan 2 at 20:39