Let $K=Bbb Q (e^{frac{2 pi i}{7}})$ and $alpha in K - Bbb Q$. Then show that, $Bbb Q(alpha)=K$
$begingroup$
Let $K=Bbb Q (e^{frac{2 pi i}{7}})$ and $alpha in K - Bbb Q$. Then show that, $Bbb Q(alpha)=K$ .
My attempt:
I have computed the minimal polynomial of$e^{frac{2 pi i}{7}}$ over $Bbb Q$ to be $x^6+x^5+x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1 $ and thus, $[K:Bbb Q]=6$
Since, $alpha in K - Bbb Q$ , it follows that, $Bbb Q(alpha)$ is a subfield of $K$ containing $Bbb Q$, moreover, $[Bbb Q(alpha):Bbb Q] | [K:Bbb Q] implies [Bbb Q(alpha):Bbb Q] =$1 or 2 or 3 or 6 .Since, $alpha notin Bbb Q$, $[Bbb Q(alpha):Bbb Q] ne 1$ .
Since, for $beta = e^{frac{2 pi i}{7}}$, ${1,beta,beta^2,beta^3 ,beta^4,beta^5}$ is a basis of $K$ over $Bbb Q$. then, $exists a_j in Bbb Q , 0le j le 5$ with at least one of $a_j ne 0 $ for $j ge 1$ so that, $alpha=a_0 +a_1 beta+dots+a_5 beta^5$ .
How to proceed with then proof. Thanks in advance for help!
Note that this question is also present in here, here etc. but they use galois theory, but I only know Field theory and am also trying to solve the question using only that.
field-theory cyclotomic-fields
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Let $K=Bbb Q (e^{frac{2 pi i}{7}})$ and $alpha in K - Bbb Q$. Then show that, $Bbb Q(alpha)=K$ .
My attempt:
I have computed the minimal polynomial of$e^{frac{2 pi i}{7}}$ over $Bbb Q$ to be $x^6+x^5+x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1 $ and thus, $[K:Bbb Q]=6$
Since, $alpha in K - Bbb Q$ , it follows that, $Bbb Q(alpha)$ is a subfield of $K$ containing $Bbb Q$, moreover, $[Bbb Q(alpha):Bbb Q] | [K:Bbb Q] implies [Bbb Q(alpha):Bbb Q] =$1 or 2 or 3 or 6 .Since, $alpha notin Bbb Q$, $[Bbb Q(alpha):Bbb Q] ne 1$ .
Since, for $beta = e^{frac{2 pi i}{7}}$, ${1,beta,beta^2,beta^3 ,beta^4,beta^5}$ is a basis of $K$ over $Bbb Q$. then, $exists a_j in Bbb Q , 0le j le 5$ with at least one of $a_j ne 0 $ for $j ge 1$ so that, $alpha=a_0 +a_1 beta+dots+a_5 beta^5$ .
How to proceed with then proof. Thanks in advance for help!
Note that this question is also present in here, here etc. but they use galois theory, but I only know Field theory and am also trying to solve the question using only that.
field-theory cyclotomic-fields
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Let $alpha=beta+beta^{-1}$. Then ${bf Q}(alpha)$ has degree 3. There are also examples with degree 2.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Jan 22 at 3:40
1
$begingroup$
@GerryMyerson so is my question wrong? Anyway would you considering giving an answer.
$endgroup$
– Coherent
Jan 22 at 4:34
$begingroup$
OK, I've given an answer – does it work for you?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Jan 24 at 0:06
$begingroup$
Are you still here, Coherent?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Jan 25 at 2:56
$begingroup$
@GerryMyerson In the linked questions, it's proved that there is no intermediate field between $Q$ and $Q(e^{frac{2 pi i}{7}})$ other than those two itself, so I am also waiting for a few other answers. If I find you answer helpful, I'll definitely accept it, you don't need to worry about it.I'm not a new member to the site.
$endgroup$
– Coherent
Jan 25 at 3:05
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Let $K=Bbb Q (e^{frac{2 pi i}{7}})$ and $alpha in K - Bbb Q$. Then show that, $Bbb Q(alpha)=K$ .
My attempt:
I have computed the minimal polynomial of$e^{frac{2 pi i}{7}}$ over $Bbb Q$ to be $x^6+x^5+x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1 $ and thus, $[K:Bbb Q]=6$
Since, $alpha in K - Bbb Q$ , it follows that, $Bbb Q(alpha)$ is a subfield of $K$ containing $Bbb Q$, moreover, $[Bbb Q(alpha):Bbb Q] | [K:Bbb Q] implies [Bbb Q(alpha):Bbb Q] =$1 or 2 or 3 or 6 .Since, $alpha notin Bbb Q$, $[Bbb Q(alpha):Bbb Q] ne 1$ .
Since, for $beta = e^{frac{2 pi i}{7}}$, ${1,beta,beta^2,beta^3 ,beta^4,beta^5}$ is a basis of $K$ over $Bbb Q$. then, $exists a_j in Bbb Q , 0le j le 5$ with at least one of $a_j ne 0 $ for $j ge 1$ so that, $alpha=a_0 +a_1 beta+dots+a_5 beta^5$ .
How to proceed with then proof. Thanks in advance for help!
Note that this question is also present in here, here etc. but they use galois theory, but I only know Field theory and am also trying to solve the question using only that.
field-theory cyclotomic-fields
$endgroup$
Let $K=Bbb Q (e^{frac{2 pi i}{7}})$ and $alpha in K - Bbb Q$. Then show that, $Bbb Q(alpha)=K$ .
My attempt:
I have computed the minimal polynomial of$e^{frac{2 pi i}{7}}$ over $Bbb Q$ to be $x^6+x^5+x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1 $ and thus, $[K:Bbb Q]=6$
Since, $alpha in K - Bbb Q$ , it follows that, $Bbb Q(alpha)$ is a subfield of $K$ containing $Bbb Q$, moreover, $[Bbb Q(alpha):Bbb Q] | [K:Bbb Q] implies [Bbb Q(alpha):Bbb Q] =$1 or 2 or 3 or 6 .Since, $alpha notin Bbb Q$, $[Bbb Q(alpha):Bbb Q] ne 1$ .
Since, for $beta = e^{frac{2 pi i}{7}}$, ${1,beta,beta^2,beta^3 ,beta^4,beta^5}$ is a basis of $K$ over $Bbb Q$. then, $exists a_j in Bbb Q , 0le j le 5$ with at least one of $a_j ne 0 $ for $j ge 1$ so that, $alpha=a_0 +a_1 beta+dots+a_5 beta^5$ .
How to proceed with then proof. Thanks in advance for help!
Note that this question is also present in here, here etc. but they use galois theory, but I only know Field theory and am also trying to solve the question using only that.
field-theory cyclotomic-fields
field-theory cyclotomic-fields
asked Jan 22 at 2:15


CoherentCoherent
1,197623
1,197623
1
$begingroup$
Let $alpha=beta+beta^{-1}$. Then ${bf Q}(alpha)$ has degree 3. There are also examples with degree 2.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Jan 22 at 3:40
1
$begingroup$
@GerryMyerson so is my question wrong? Anyway would you considering giving an answer.
$endgroup$
– Coherent
Jan 22 at 4:34
$begingroup$
OK, I've given an answer – does it work for you?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Jan 24 at 0:06
$begingroup$
Are you still here, Coherent?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Jan 25 at 2:56
$begingroup$
@GerryMyerson In the linked questions, it's proved that there is no intermediate field between $Q$ and $Q(e^{frac{2 pi i}{7}})$ other than those two itself, so I am also waiting for a few other answers. If I find you answer helpful, I'll definitely accept it, you don't need to worry about it.I'm not a new member to the site.
$endgroup$
– Coherent
Jan 25 at 3:05
|
show 1 more comment
1
$begingroup$
Let $alpha=beta+beta^{-1}$. Then ${bf Q}(alpha)$ has degree 3. There are also examples with degree 2.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Jan 22 at 3:40
1
$begingroup$
@GerryMyerson so is my question wrong? Anyway would you considering giving an answer.
$endgroup$
– Coherent
Jan 22 at 4:34
$begingroup$
OK, I've given an answer – does it work for you?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Jan 24 at 0:06
$begingroup$
Are you still here, Coherent?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Jan 25 at 2:56
$begingroup$
@GerryMyerson In the linked questions, it's proved that there is no intermediate field between $Q$ and $Q(e^{frac{2 pi i}{7}})$ other than those two itself, so I am also waiting for a few other answers. If I find you answer helpful, I'll definitely accept it, you don't need to worry about it.I'm not a new member to the site.
$endgroup$
– Coherent
Jan 25 at 3:05
1
1
$begingroup$
Let $alpha=beta+beta^{-1}$. Then ${bf Q}(alpha)$ has degree 3. There are also examples with degree 2.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Jan 22 at 3:40
$begingroup$
Let $alpha=beta+beta^{-1}$. Then ${bf Q}(alpha)$ has degree 3. There are also examples with degree 2.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Jan 22 at 3:40
1
1
$begingroup$
@GerryMyerson so is my question wrong? Anyway would you considering giving an answer.
$endgroup$
– Coherent
Jan 22 at 4:34
$begingroup$
@GerryMyerson so is my question wrong? Anyway would you considering giving an answer.
$endgroup$
– Coherent
Jan 22 at 4:34
$begingroup$
OK, I've given an answer – does it work for you?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Jan 24 at 0:06
$begingroup$
OK, I've given an answer – does it work for you?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Jan 24 at 0:06
$begingroup$
Are you still here, Coherent?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Jan 25 at 2:56
$begingroup$
Are you still here, Coherent?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Jan 25 at 2:56
$begingroup$
@GerryMyerson In the linked questions, it's proved that there is no intermediate field between $Q$ and $Q(e^{frac{2 pi i}{7}})$ other than those two itself, so I am also waiting for a few other answers. If I find you answer helpful, I'll definitely accept it, you don't need to worry about it.I'm not a new member to the site.
$endgroup$
– Coherent
Jan 25 at 3:05
$begingroup$
@GerryMyerson In the linked questions, it's proved that there is no intermediate field between $Q$ and $Q(e^{frac{2 pi i}{7}})$ other than those two itself, so I am also waiting for a few other answers. If I find you answer helpful, I'll definitely accept it, you don't need to worry about it.I'm not a new member to the site.
$endgroup$
– Coherent
Jan 25 at 3:05
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $beta=e^{2pi i/7}$, let $K={bf Q}(beta)$, let $alpha=beta+beta^{-1}$. Then $$alpha^3=beta^3+3beta+3beta^{-1}+beta^{-3}=beta^3+3beta+3beta^6+beta^4$$ and $$alpha^2=beta^2+2+beta^{-2}=beta^2+2+beta^5$$ [thanks to Robert Lewis for drawing my attention to a typo here, which I have corrected] so $$alpha^3+alpha^2-2alpha-1=1+beta+beta^2+beta^3+beta^4+beta^5+beta^6=0$$ It's easily seen that $x^3+x^2-2x-1$ is irreducible over the rationals, so it is the minimal polynomial for $alpha$, so ${bf Q}(alpha)$ is a proper subfield of $K$, of degree 3.
Similarly, one can show that $gamma=beta+beta^2+beta^4$ is of degree two over the rationals.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If $alpha = beta + beta^{-1}$, does not $alpha^2 = beta^2 + beta^{-1} + 2$? Where does $alpha^2 = beta^2 + 2beta^{-1} + 2$ come from?
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Jan 22 at 6:52
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3082684%2flet-k-bbb-q-e-frac2-pi-i7-and-alpha-in-k-bbb-q-then-show-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $beta=e^{2pi i/7}$, let $K={bf Q}(beta)$, let $alpha=beta+beta^{-1}$. Then $$alpha^3=beta^3+3beta+3beta^{-1}+beta^{-3}=beta^3+3beta+3beta^6+beta^4$$ and $$alpha^2=beta^2+2+beta^{-2}=beta^2+2+beta^5$$ [thanks to Robert Lewis for drawing my attention to a typo here, which I have corrected] so $$alpha^3+alpha^2-2alpha-1=1+beta+beta^2+beta^3+beta^4+beta^5+beta^6=0$$ It's easily seen that $x^3+x^2-2x-1$ is irreducible over the rationals, so it is the minimal polynomial for $alpha$, so ${bf Q}(alpha)$ is a proper subfield of $K$, of degree 3.
Similarly, one can show that $gamma=beta+beta^2+beta^4$ is of degree two over the rationals.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If $alpha = beta + beta^{-1}$, does not $alpha^2 = beta^2 + beta^{-1} + 2$? Where does $alpha^2 = beta^2 + 2beta^{-1} + 2$ come from?
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Jan 22 at 6:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $beta=e^{2pi i/7}$, let $K={bf Q}(beta)$, let $alpha=beta+beta^{-1}$. Then $$alpha^3=beta^3+3beta+3beta^{-1}+beta^{-3}=beta^3+3beta+3beta^6+beta^4$$ and $$alpha^2=beta^2+2+beta^{-2}=beta^2+2+beta^5$$ [thanks to Robert Lewis for drawing my attention to a typo here, which I have corrected] so $$alpha^3+alpha^2-2alpha-1=1+beta+beta^2+beta^3+beta^4+beta^5+beta^6=0$$ It's easily seen that $x^3+x^2-2x-1$ is irreducible over the rationals, so it is the minimal polynomial for $alpha$, so ${bf Q}(alpha)$ is a proper subfield of $K$, of degree 3.
Similarly, one can show that $gamma=beta+beta^2+beta^4$ is of degree two over the rationals.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If $alpha = beta + beta^{-1}$, does not $alpha^2 = beta^2 + beta^{-1} + 2$? Where does $alpha^2 = beta^2 + 2beta^{-1} + 2$ come from?
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Jan 22 at 6:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $beta=e^{2pi i/7}$, let $K={bf Q}(beta)$, let $alpha=beta+beta^{-1}$. Then $$alpha^3=beta^3+3beta+3beta^{-1}+beta^{-3}=beta^3+3beta+3beta^6+beta^4$$ and $$alpha^2=beta^2+2+beta^{-2}=beta^2+2+beta^5$$ [thanks to Robert Lewis for drawing my attention to a typo here, which I have corrected] so $$alpha^3+alpha^2-2alpha-1=1+beta+beta^2+beta^3+beta^4+beta^5+beta^6=0$$ It's easily seen that $x^3+x^2-2x-1$ is irreducible over the rationals, so it is the minimal polynomial for $alpha$, so ${bf Q}(alpha)$ is a proper subfield of $K$, of degree 3.
Similarly, one can show that $gamma=beta+beta^2+beta^4$ is of degree two over the rationals.
$endgroup$
Let $beta=e^{2pi i/7}$, let $K={bf Q}(beta)$, let $alpha=beta+beta^{-1}$. Then $$alpha^3=beta^3+3beta+3beta^{-1}+beta^{-3}=beta^3+3beta+3beta^6+beta^4$$ and $$alpha^2=beta^2+2+beta^{-2}=beta^2+2+beta^5$$ [thanks to Robert Lewis for drawing my attention to a typo here, which I have corrected] so $$alpha^3+alpha^2-2alpha-1=1+beta+beta^2+beta^3+beta^4+beta^5+beta^6=0$$ It's easily seen that $x^3+x^2-2x-1$ is irreducible over the rationals, so it is the minimal polynomial for $alpha$, so ${bf Q}(alpha)$ is a proper subfield of $K$, of degree 3.
Similarly, one can show that $gamma=beta+beta^2+beta^4$ is of degree two over the rationals.
edited Jan 22 at 10:57
answered Jan 22 at 6:45
Gerry MyersonGerry Myerson
147k8149302
147k8149302
$begingroup$
If $alpha = beta + beta^{-1}$, does not $alpha^2 = beta^2 + beta^{-1} + 2$? Where does $alpha^2 = beta^2 + 2beta^{-1} + 2$ come from?
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Jan 22 at 6:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $alpha = beta + beta^{-1}$, does not $alpha^2 = beta^2 + beta^{-1} + 2$? Where does $alpha^2 = beta^2 + 2beta^{-1} + 2$ come from?
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Jan 22 at 6:52
$begingroup$
If $alpha = beta + beta^{-1}$, does not $alpha^2 = beta^2 + beta^{-1} + 2$? Where does $alpha^2 = beta^2 + 2beta^{-1} + 2$ come from?
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Jan 22 at 6:52
$begingroup$
If $alpha = beta + beta^{-1}$, does not $alpha^2 = beta^2 + beta^{-1} + 2$? Where does $alpha^2 = beta^2 + 2beta^{-1} + 2$ come from?
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Jan 22 at 6:52
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3082684%2flet-k-bbb-q-e-frac2-pi-i7-and-alpha-in-k-bbb-q-then-show-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Let $alpha=beta+beta^{-1}$. Then ${bf Q}(alpha)$ has degree 3. There are also examples with degree 2.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Jan 22 at 3:40
1
$begingroup$
@GerryMyerson so is my question wrong? Anyway would you considering giving an answer.
$endgroup$
– Coherent
Jan 22 at 4:34
$begingroup$
OK, I've given an answer – does it work for you?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Jan 24 at 0:06
$begingroup$
Are you still here, Coherent?
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Jan 25 at 2:56
$begingroup$
@GerryMyerson In the linked questions, it's proved that there is no intermediate field between $Q$ and $Q(e^{frac{2 pi i}{7}})$ other than those two itself, so I am also waiting for a few other answers. If I find you answer helpful, I'll definitely accept it, you don't need to worry about it.I'm not a new member to the site.
$endgroup$
– Coherent
Jan 25 at 3:05