Likelihood Function Given Maximum of data, but not actually data points












1












$begingroup$


I was just wondering how I would go about creating a likelihood function if I have a $N( theta,1)$ distribution and know $x(n)$ the maximum of n observations, but not the actual observations themselves. I understand how to create a CDF for the maximum order statistic (i.e. $F(x)^n $), but the normal distribution does not have a closed form CDF.



Am I able to find the likelihood function by taking the derivative of $F(x)^n $ (in integral form) and then evaluate the derivative at $x(n)$? Or is my reasoning flawed/or is there an easier way to do this?



Any help would be appreciated. Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I was just wondering how I would go about creating a likelihood function if I have a $N( theta,1)$ distribution and know $x(n)$ the maximum of n observations, but not the actual observations themselves. I understand how to create a CDF for the maximum order statistic (i.e. $F(x)^n $), but the normal distribution does not have a closed form CDF.



    Am I able to find the likelihood function by taking the derivative of $F(x)^n $ (in integral form) and then evaluate the derivative at $x(n)$? Or is my reasoning flawed/or is there an easier way to do this?



    Any help would be appreciated. Thank you!










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I was just wondering how I would go about creating a likelihood function if I have a $N( theta,1)$ distribution and know $x(n)$ the maximum of n observations, but not the actual observations themselves. I understand how to create a CDF for the maximum order statistic (i.e. $F(x)^n $), but the normal distribution does not have a closed form CDF.



      Am I able to find the likelihood function by taking the derivative of $F(x)^n $ (in integral form) and then evaluate the derivative at $x(n)$? Or is my reasoning flawed/or is there an easier way to do this?



      Any help would be appreciated. Thank you!










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I was just wondering how I would go about creating a likelihood function if I have a $N( theta,1)$ distribution and know $x(n)$ the maximum of n observations, but not the actual observations themselves. I understand how to create a CDF for the maximum order statistic (i.e. $F(x)^n $), but the normal distribution does not have a closed form CDF.



      Am I able to find the likelihood function by taking the derivative of $F(x)^n $ (in integral form) and then evaluate the derivative at $x(n)$? Or is my reasoning flawed/or is there an easier way to do this?



      Any help would be appreciated. Thank you!







      maximum-likelihood order-statistics






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 25 at 18:44









      David H.David H.

      82




      82






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          We have the functions $Phi()$ and $phi()$, standard notation for the cdf and pdf respectively of a $N(0,1)$ distribution. Or if you want to use $F$ and $f$, that also makes no difference as long as you define them. The fact that the cdf does not have a closed form does not stop us from writing down the likelihood at least.



          Assuming you have i.i.d observations $X_1,ldots,X_nsim N(theta,1)$, the distribution function of $T=maxlimits_{1le kle n}X_k$ is



          $$P(Tle t)=(P(X_1le t))^n=(Phi(t-theta))^nquad,,tinmathbb R$$



          So the pdf of $T$ is



          $$f_{T}(t)=n(Phi(t-theta))^{n-1}phi(t-theta)quad,,tinmathbb R$$



          The likelihood function given $t ,(inmathbb R)$, the observed value of $T$, is therefore



          $$L(thetamid t)=n(Phi(t-theta))^{n-1}phi(t-theta)quad,,thetainmathbb R$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you so much! That was really clear :)
            $endgroup$
            – David H.
            Jan 25 at 19:56











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3087466%2flikelihood-function-given-maximum-of-data-but-not-actually-data-points%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          We have the functions $Phi()$ and $phi()$, standard notation for the cdf and pdf respectively of a $N(0,1)$ distribution. Or if you want to use $F$ and $f$, that also makes no difference as long as you define them. The fact that the cdf does not have a closed form does not stop us from writing down the likelihood at least.



          Assuming you have i.i.d observations $X_1,ldots,X_nsim N(theta,1)$, the distribution function of $T=maxlimits_{1le kle n}X_k$ is



          $$P(Tle t)=(P(X_1le t))^n=(Phi(t-theta))^nquad,,tinmathbb R$$



          So the pdf of $T$ is



          $$f_{T}(t)=n(Phi(t-theta))^{n-1}phi(t-theta)quad,,tinmathbb R$$



          The likelihood function given $t ,(inmathbb R)$, the observed value of $T$, is therefore



          $$L(thetamid t)=n(Phi(t-theta))^{n-1}phi(t-theta)quad,,thetainmathbb R$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you so much! That was really clear :)
            $endgroup$
            – David H.
            Jan 25 at 19:56
















          0












          $begingroup$

          We have the functions $Phi()$ and $phi()$, standard notation for the cdf and pdf respectively of a $N(0,1)$ distribution. Or if you want to use $F$ and $f$, that also makes no difference as long as you define them. The fact that the cdf does not have a closed form does not stop us from writing down the likelihood at least.



          Assuming you have i.i.d observations $X_1,ldots,X_nsim N(theta,1)$, the distribution function of $T=maxlimits_{1le kle n}X_k$ is



          $$P(Tle t)=(P(X_1le t))^n=(Phi(t-theta))^nquad,,tinmathbb R$$



          So the pdf of $T$ is



          $$f_{T}(t)=n(Phi(t-theta))^{n-1}phi(t-theta)quad,,tinmathbb R$$



          The likelihood function given $t ,(inmathbb R)$, the observed value of $T$, is therefore



          $$L(thetamid t)=n(Phi(t-theta))^{n-1}phi(t-theta)quad,,thetainmathbb R$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you so much! That was really clear :)
            $endgroup$
            – David H.
            Jan 25 at 19:56














          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          We have the functions $Phi()$ and $phi()$, standard notation for the cdf and pdf respectively of a $N(0,1)$ distribution. Or if you want to use $F$ and $f$, that also makes no difference as long as you define them. The fact that the cdf does not have a closed form does not stop us from writing down the likelihood at least.



          Assuming you have i.i.d observations $X_1,ldots,X_nsim N(theta,1)$, the distribution function of $T=maxlimits_{1le kle n}X_k$ is



          $$P(Tle t)=(P(X_1le t))^n=(Phi(t-theta))^nquad,,tinmathbb R$$



          So the pdf of $T$ is



          $$f_{T}(t)=n(Phi(t-theta))^{n-1}phi(t-theta)quad,,tinmathbb R$$



          The likelihood function given $t ,(inmathbb R)$, the observed value of $T$, is therefore



          $$L(thetamid t)=n(Phi(t-theta))^{n-1}phi(t-theta)quad,,thetainmathbb R$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          We have the functions $Phi()$ and $phi()$, standard notation for the cdf and pdf respectively of a $N(0,1)$ distribution. Or if you want to use $F$ and $f$, that also makes no difference as long as you define them. The fact that the cdf does not have a closed form does not stop us from writing down the likelihood at least.



          Assuming you have i.i.d observations $X_1,ldots,X_nsim N(theta,1)$, the distribution function of $T=maxlimits_{1le kle n}X_k$ is



          $$P(Tle t)=(P(X_1le t))^n=(Phi(t-theta))^nquad,,tinmathbb R$$



          So the pdf of $T$ is



          $$f_{T}(t)=n(Phi(t-theta))^{n-1}phi(t-theta)quad,,tinmathbb R$$



          The likelihood function given $t ,(inmathbb R)$, the observed value of $T$, is therefore



          $$L(thetamid t)=n(Phi(t-theta))^{n-1}phi(t-theta)quad,,thetainmathbb R$$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 25 at 19:19

























          answered Jan 25 at 19:08









          StubbornAtomStubbornAtom

          6,23821339




          6,23821339












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you so much! That was really clear :)
            $endgroup$
            – David H.
            Jan 25 at 19:56


















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you so much! That was really clear :)
            $endgroup$
            – David H.
            Jan 25 at 19:56
















          $begingroup$
          Thank you so much! That was really clear :)
          $endgroup$
          – David H.
          Jan 25 at 19:56




          $begingroup$
          Thank you so much! That was really clear :)
          $endgroup$
          – David H.
          Jan 25 at 19:56


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3087466%2flikelihood-function-given-maximum-of-data-but-not-actually-data-points%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

          How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

          in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith