$ 0=1 $ ? Where is the mistake?
$begingroup$
I just found this formula although it can be easily derived.
Let $ n $ be any integer then,
$$n=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$$
So if I plug in $ 0 $ in this equation I get,
$$0=sqrt{0-0+sqrt{0-0+....}}$$
$$0=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+sqrt{0+....}}}$$—————->1
But if I plug in $1$ in the equation I get,
$$1=sqrt{1^{2}-1+sqrt{1^{2}-1+.....}}$$
$$1=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+sqrt{0+....}}}$$,—————->2
Which gives me that 0=1.Where is the mistake?
Edit:
Equation 1 can also be derived by the following method
$$1=sqrt{0+sqrt{1}}$$
$$1=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+sqrt{1}}}$$
.
.
.
$$1=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+sqrt{0+....}}}$$
Ok so let me tell you how I derived it.
I came across this particular expression,
$$x=sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+.....}}}$$ which actually gives me the golden ratio,
So I chose n to be an integer and let x be the value of the following expression,
$$x=sqrt{n+sqrt{n+sqrt{n+...}}}$$.
After solving for x you get it’s value to be!
$$x=frac{1+sqrt{1+4n}}{2}$$
(I took a positive sign since x is greater than or equal to 0)
So x can be an integer whenever n=0,2,6,10,20.....
When n=2,x=2(since x>0) and we get,
$$2=sqrt{2+sqrt{2+......}}$$
Similarly for n=6,x=3,
$$3=sqrt{6+sqrt{6+......}}$$
So x is an integer whenever $$n=k^{2}-k$$ where k is a non-negative integer.Substituting $$n=k^{2}-k$$ you get x=k.
After all this I get,
$$n=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$$
sequences-and-series
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I just found this formula although it can be easily derived.
Let $ n $ be any integer then,
$$n=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$$
So if I plug in $ 0 $ in this equation I get,
$$0=sqrt{0-0+sqrt{0-0+....}}$$
$$0=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+sqrt{0+....}}}$$—————->1
But if I plug in $1$ in the equation I get,
$$1=sqrt{1^{2}-1+sqrt{1^{2}-1+.....}}$$
$$1=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+sqrt{0+....}}}$$,—————->2
Which gives me that 0=1.Where is the mistake?
Edit:
Equation 1 can also be derived by the following method
$$1=sqrt{0+sqrt{1}}$$
$$1=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+sqrt{1}}}$$
.
.
.
$$1=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+sqrt{0+....}}}$$
Ok so let me tell you how I derived it.
I came across this particular expression,
$$x=sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+.....}}}$$ which actually gives me the golden ratio,
So I chose n to be an integer and let x be the value of the following expression,
$$x=sqrt{n+sqrt{n+sqrt{n+...}}}$$.
After solving for x you get it’s value to be!
$$x=frac{1+sqrt{1+4n}}{2}$$
(I took a positive sign since x is greater than or equal to 0)
So x can be an integer whenever n=0,2,6,10,20.....
When n=2,x=2(since x>0) and we get,
$$2=sqrt{2+sqrt{2+......}}$$
Similarly for n=6,x=3,
$$3=sqrt{6+sqrt{6+......}}$$
So x is an integer whenever $$n=k^{2}-k$$ where k is a non-negative integer.Substituting $$n=k^{2}-k$$ you get x=k.
After all this I get,
$$n=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$$
sequences-and-series
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
"easily proved" ????
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 29 at 14:09
$begingroup$
Yeah why not?(proved/derived)
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:12
1
$begingroup$
The mistake is in your formula.
$endgroup$
– Word Shallow
Jan 29 at 14:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I just found this formula although it can be easily derived.
Let $ n $ be any integer then,
$$n=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$$
So if I plug in $ 0 $ in this equation I get,
$$0=sqrt{0-0+sqrt{0-0+....}}$$
$$0=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+sqrt{0+....}}}$$—————->1
But if I plug in $1$ in the equation I get,
$$1=sqrt{1^{2}-1+sqrt{1^{2}-1+.....}}$$
$$1=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+sqrt{0+....}}}$$,—————->2
Which gives me that 0=1.Where is the mistake?
Edit:
Equation 1 can also be derived by the following method
$$1=sqrt{0+sqrt{1}}$$
$$1=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+sqrt{1}}}$$
.
.
.
$$1=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+sqrt{0+....}}}$$
Ok so let me tell you how I derived it.
I came across this particular expression,
$$x=sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+.....}}}$$ which actually gives me the golden ratio,
So I chose n to be an integer and let x be the value of the following expression,
$$x=sqrt{n+sqrt{n+sqrt{n+...}}}$$.
After solving for x you get it’s value to be!
$$x=frac{1+sqrt{1+4n}}{2}$$
(I took a positive sign since x is greater than or equal to 0)
So x can be an integer whenever n=0,2,6,10,20.....
When n=2,x=2(since x>0) and we get,
$$2=sqrt{2+sqrt{2+......}}$$
Similarly for n=6,x=3,
$$3=sqrt{6+sqrt{6+......}}$$
So x is an integer whenever $$n=k^{2}-k$$ where k is a non-negative integer.Substituting $$n=k^{2}-k$$ you get x=k.
After all this I get,
$$n=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$$
sequences-and-series
$endgroup$
I just found this formula although it can be easily derived.
Let $ n $ be any integer then,
$$n=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$$
So if I plug in $ 0 $ in this equation I get,
$$0=sqrt{0-0+sqrt{0-0+....}}$$
$$0=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+sqrt{0+....}}}$$—————->1
But if I plug in $1$ in the equation I get,
$$1=sqrt{1^{2}-1+sqrt{1^{2}-1+.....}}$$
$$1=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+sqrt{0+....}}}$$,—————->2
Which gives me that 0=1.Where is the mistake?
Edit:
Equation 1 can also be derived by the following method
$$1=sqrt{0+sqrt{1}}$$
$$1=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+sqrt{1}}}$$
.
.
.
$$1=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+sqrt{0+....}}}$$
Ok so let me tell you how I derived it.
I came across this particular expression,
$$x=sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+.....}}}$$ which actually gives me the golden ratio,
So I chose n to be an integer and let x be the value of the following expression,
$$x=sqrt{n+sqrt{n+sqrt{n+...}}}$$.
After solving for x you get it’s value to be!
$$x=frac{1+sqrt{1+4n}}{2}$$
(I took a positive sign since x is greater than or equal to 0)
So x can be an integer whenever n=0,2,6,10,20.....
When n=2,x=2(since x>0) and we get,
$$2=sqrt{2+sqrt{2+......}}$$
Similarly for n=6,x=3,
$$3=sqrt{6+sqrt{6+......}}$$
So x is an integer whenever $$n=k^{2}-k$$ where k is a non-negative integer.Substituting $$n=k^{2}-k$$ you get x=k.
After all this I get,
$$n=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$$
sequences-and-series
sequences-and-series
edited Jan 29 at 15:26
user549397
1,6541418
1,6541418
asked Jan 29 at 14:06
user631874user631874
84
84
$begingroup$
"easily proved" ????
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 29 at 14:09
$begingroup$
Yeah why not?(proved/derived)
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:12
1
$begingroup$
The mistake is in your formula.
$endgroup$
– Word Shallow
Jan 29 at 14:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
"easily proved" ????
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 29 at 14:09
$begingroup$
Yeah why not?(proved/derived)
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:12
1
$begingroup$
The mistake is in your formula.
$endgroup$
– Word Shallow
Jan 29 at 14:12
$begingroup$
"easily proved" ????
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 29 at 14:09
$begingroup$
"easily proved" ????
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 29 at 14:09
$begingroup$
Yeah why not?(proved/derived)
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:12
$begingroup$
Yeah why not?(proved/derived)
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:12
1
1
$begingroup$
The mistake is in your formula.
$endgroup$
– Word Shallow
Jan 29 at 14:12
$begingroup$
The mistake is in your formula.
$endgroup$
– Word Shallow
Jan 29 at 14:12
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The problem arises because you didn't really defined the radical expression
$$sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}}}.$$
Let us rewrite it as the recurrence
$$a_{k+1}=sqrt{n^2-n+a_k}.$$
Then with $n=0$ or $1$,
$$a_{k+1}=sqrt{a_k}=sqrt[4]{a_{k-1}}=cdotssqrt[2^{k+1}]{a_0}.$$
For $a_0=0$, we have the limit $a_infty=0$, and for $a_0>0$, $a_infty=1$, so you could indeed assign the expression the value $0$ or $1$, and the equation
$$n=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}}}$$ may hold or not depending on the value of $a_0$.
In other words, the truth is that you should write
$$0=sqrt{0^{2}-0+sqrt{0^{2}-0+sqrt{0^{2}-0+cdots0}}}$$
$$1=sqrt{1^{2}-1+sqrt{1^{2}-1+sqrt{1^{2}-1+cdots1}}}$$
while you innocently assumed
$$1=sqrt{1^{2}-1+sqrt{1^{2}-1+sqrt{1^{2}-1+cdotscolor{red}0}}}.$$
For other $n$, if there is convergence, we have
$$a(a-1)=n(n-1)$$ and
$$a=frac{1pm|1-2n|}2.$$
For $n>1$, the only positive possibility is $a=n$. Otherwise, there could be two solutions, presumably depending on the initial value. But you can't spare convergence analysis.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yeah I think I messed up with the final term since any number can be expressed in that form,$$n=sqrt{0+n^{2}}$$ then,$$n=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+n^{4}}}$$ which gives me the same thing $$n=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+........}}$$
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:59
$begingroup$
@user631874: you messed-up by lack of rigor, not defining the radical expression, as warned by 5xum. And you continue to do so.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 29 at 15:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You claim the equation $$n=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$$ can be easily proved/derived. Can you provide the proof/derivation?
The proof/derivation should consist of two parts:
- A strict definition of what $sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$ means
- A strict proof that, using the definition of $sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$, it is equal to $n$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I’m sorry I meant it can be derived by using induction
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:14
$begingroup$
@user631874 OK, I would love to see the derivation. Can you provide it?
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 29 at 14:14
3
$begingroup$
It might be worth adding that the fact that $0=1$ can be derived from the formula $n = sqrt{n^2-n + sqrt{n^2-n + cdots}}$ is itself a proof that the formula, whatever it means, is false.
$endgroup$
– Clive Newstead
Jan 29 at 14:15
$begingroup$
It only has approximate value, choose $n=2$.
$endgroup$
– Word Shallow
Jan 29 at 14:17
1
$begingroup$
@user631874 Also, you just tested the equation, you plugged in $1$ and discovered that it does not hold!
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 29 at 14:24
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Assuming convergence:
$$a=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$$
$$a=sqrt{n^2-n+a}$$
$$a^2=n^2-n+a$$
$$a^2-a=n^2-n$$
$$a(a-1)=n(n-1)$$
For the case $n=1$:
$$a(a-1)=0$$
Notice that $a$ has roots $1$ and $0$. Why did you assume $a$ to be one of them, $1$? All $a$ that satisfies $a=sqrt{n^2-n+a}$ and is positive is correct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I’m not assuming but I’m asking why can’t it be 1
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:20
$begingroup$
@user631874 You are assuming that $a=1$ when you assume that $sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}}=n$.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 29 at 14:23
$begingroup$
Similarly, for n=0, can't a be either of 0 or 1?
$endgroup$
– Nihal Jain
Jan 29 at 14:26
$begingroup$
Is this another case where on squaring both sides extra solutions get produced?
$endgroup$
– Nihal Jain
Jan 29 at 14:28
$begingroup$
First quesiton: yes. Second question: no, this has two solutions. Consider $a=sqrt(3+a)$, it has one solution as we know that it's nonnegative although $a^2=3+a$ has two solutions. Because both are nonnegative in this answer, it has two roots.
$endgroup$
– MCCCS
Jan 29 at 14:33
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
As most have been doing, assuming convergence, let,
$$k=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}}$$
Squaring both sides,
$$k^2=n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}$$
$$k^2=n^2-n+k$$
$$k^2-k-(n^2-n) = 0$$
$$k=frac{1pmsqrt{4n^2-4n+1}}{2}$$
$$k=frac{1pm(2n-1)}{2}$$
$$k={n,1-n}$$
Now, we have to be careful. Squaring produced extra solutions. So, we must verify which ones are right for what domains.
Clearly, $forall n<0, 1-n$ is the candidate and $forall n>1, n$ is the answer.
For $n=0, k$ is trivially 0.
Finally, for $n=1, k=1-n$ as you have verified.
In a summary,
$$k=$$ begin{cases}
1-n & n< 0,n=1 \
n & 1< n,n=0\
end{cases}
P.S. I'm not sure if this is correct. I would be glad if someone could verify this.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3092214%2f0-1-where-is-the-mistake%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The problem arises because you didn't really defined the radical expression
$$sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}}}.$$
Let us rewrite it as the recurrence
$$a_{k+1}=sqrt{n^2-n+a_k}.$$
Then with $n=0$ or $1$,
$$a_{k+1}=sqrt{a_k}=sqrt[4]{a_{k-1}}=cdotssqrt[2^{k+1}]{a_0}.$$
For $a_0=0$, we have the limit $a_infty=0$, and for $a_0>0$, $a_infty=1$, so you could indeed assign the expression the value $0$ or $1$, and the equation
$$n=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}}}$$ may hold or not depending on the value of $a_0$.
In other words, the truth is that you should write
$$0=sqrt{0^{2}-0+sqrt{0^{2}-0+sqrt{0^{2}-0+cdots0}}}$$
$$1=sqrt{1^{2}-1+sqrt{1^{2}-1+sqrt{1^{2}-1+cdots1}}}$$
while you innocently assumed
$$1=sqrt{1^{2}-1+sqrt{1^{2}-1+sqrt{1^{2}-1+cdotscolor{red}0}}}.$$
For other $n$, if there is convergence, we have
$$a(a-1)=n(n-1)$$ and
$$a=frac{1pm|1-2n|}2.$$
For $n>1$, the only positive possibility is $a=n$. Otherwise, there could be two solutions, presumably depending on the initial value. But you can't spare convergence analysis.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yeah I think I messed up with the final term since any number can be expressed in that form,$$n=sqrt{0+n^{2}}$$ then,$$n=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+n^{4}}}$$ which gives me the same thing $$n=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+........}}$$
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:59
$begingroup$
@user631874: you messed-up by lack of rigor, not defining the radical expression, as warned by 5xum. And you continue to do so.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 29 at 15:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The problem arises because you didn't really defined the radical expression
$$sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}}}.$$
Let us rewrite it as the recurrence
$$a_{k+1}=sqrt{n^2-n+a_k}.$$
Then with $n=0$ or $1$,
$$a_{k+1}=sqrt{a_k}=sqrt[4]{a_{k-1}}=cdotssqrt[2^{k+1}]{a_0}.$$
For $a_0=0$, we have the limit $a_infty=0$, and for $a_0>0$, $a_infty=1$, so you could indeed assign the expression the value $0$ or $1$, and the equation
$$n=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}}}$$ may hold or not depending on the value of $a_0$.
In other words, the truth is that you should write
$$0=sqrt{0^{2}-0+sqrt{0^{2}-0+sqrt{0^{2}-0+cdots0}}}$$
$$1=sqrt{1^{2}-1+sqrt{1^{2}-1+sqrt{1^{2}-1+cdots1}}}$$
while you innocently assumed
$$1=sqrt{1^{2}-1+sqrt{1^{2}-1+sqrt{1^{2}-1+cdotscolor{red}0}}}.$$
For other $n$, if there is convergence, we have
$$a(a-1)=n(n-1)$$ and
$$a=frac{1pm|1-2n|}2.$$
For $n>1$, the only positive possibility is $a=n$. Otherwise, there could be two solutions, presumably depending on the initial value. But you can't spare convergence analysis.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yeah I think I messed up with the final term since any number can be expressed in that form,$$n=sqrt{0+n^{2}}$$ then,$$n=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+n^{4}}}$$ which gives me the same thing $$n=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+........}}$$
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:59
$begingroup$
@user631874: you messed-up by lack of rigor, not defining the radical expression, as warned by 5xum. And you continue to do so.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 29 at 15:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The problem arises because you didn't really defined the radical expression
$$sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}}}.$$
Let us rewrite it as the recurrence
$$a_{k+1}=sqrt{n^2-n+a_k}.$$
Then with $n=0$ or $1$,
$$a_{k+1}=sqrt{a_k}=sqrt[4]{a_{k-1}}=cdotssqrt[2^{k+1}]{a_0}.$$
For $a_0=0$, we have the limit $a_infty=0$, and for $a_0>0$, $a_infty=1$, so you could indeed assign the expression the value $0$ or $1$, and the equation
$$n=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}}}$$ may hold or not depending on the value of $a_0$.
In other words, the truth is that you should write
$$0=sqrt{0^{2}-0+sqrt{0^{2}-0+sqrt{0^{2}-0+cdots0}}}$$
$$1=sqrt{1^{2}-1+sqrt{1^{2}-1+sqrt{1^{2}-1+cdots1}}}$$
while you innocently assumed
$$1=sqrt{1^{2}-1+sqrt{1^{2}-1+sqrt{1^{2}-1+cdotscolor{red}0}}}.$$
For other $n$, if there is convergence, we have
$$a(a-1)=n(n-1)$$ and
$$a=frac{1pm|1-2n|}2.$$
For $n>1$, the only positive possibility is $a=n$. Otherwise, there could be two solutions, presumably depending on the initial value. But you can't spare convergence analysis.
$endgroup$
The problem arises because you didn't really defined the radical expression
$$sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}}}.$$
Let us rewrite it as the recurrence
$$a_{k+1}=sqrt{n^2-n+a_k}.$$
Then with $n=0$ or $1$,
$$a_{k+1}=sqrt{a_k}=sqrt[4]{a_{k-1}}=cdotssqrt[2^{k+1}]{a_0}.$$
For $a_0=0$, we have the limit $a_infty=0$, and for $a_0>0$, $a_infty=1$, so you could indeed assign the expression the value $0$ or $1$, and the equation
$$n=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}}}$$ may hold or not depending on the value of $a_0$.
In other words, the truth is that you should write
$$0=sqrt{0^{2}-0+sqrt{0^{2}-0+sqrt{0^{2}-0+cdots0}}}$$
$$1=sqrt{1^{2}-1+sqrt{1^{2}-1+sqrt{1^{2}-1+cdots1}}}$$
while you innocently assumed
$$1=sqrt{1^{2}-1+sqrt{1^{2}-1+sqrt{1^{2}-1+cdotscolor{red}0}}}.$$
For other $n$, if there is convergence, we have
$$a(a-1)=n(n-1)$$ and
$$a=frac{1pm|1-2n|}2.$$
For $n>1$, the only positive possibility is $a=n$. Otherwise, there could be two solutions, presumably depending on the initial value. But you can't spare convergence analysis.
edited Jan 29 at 15:19
answered Jan 29 at 14:30
Yves DaoustYves Daoust
131k676229
131k676229
$begingroup$
Yeah I think I messed up with the final term since any number can be expressed in that form,$$n=sqrt{0+n^{2}}$$ then,$$n=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+n^{4}}}$$ which gives me the same thing $$n=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+........}}$$
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:59
$begingroup$
@user631874: you messed-up by lack of rigor, not defining the radical expression, as warned by 5xum. And you continue to do so.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 29 at 15:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yeah I think I messed up with the final term since any number can be expressed in that form,$$n=sqrt{0+n^{2}}$$ then,$$n=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+n^{4}}}$$ which gives me the same thing $$n=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+........}}$$
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:59
$begingroup$
@user631874: you messed-up by lack of rigor, not defining the radical expression, as warned by 5xum. And you continue to do so.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 29 at 15:02
$begingroup$
Yeah I think I messed up with the final term since any number can be expressed in that form,$$n=sqrt{0+n^{2}}$$ then,$$n=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+n^{4}}}$$ which gives me the same thing $$n=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+........}}$$
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:59
$begingroup$
Yeah I think I messed up with the final term since any number can be expressed in that form,$$n=sqrt{0+n^{2}}$$ then,$$n=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+n^{4}}}$$ which gives me the same thing $$n=sqrt{0+sqrt{0+........}}$$
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:59
$begingroup$
@user631874: you messed-up by lack of rigor, not defining the radical expression, as warned by 5xum. And you continue to do so.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 29 at 15:02
$begingroup$
@user631874: you messed-up by lack of rigor, not defining the radical expression, as warned by 5xum. And you continue to do so.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 29 at 15:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You claim the equation $$n=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$$ can be easily proved/derived. Can you provide the proof/derivation?
The proof/derivation should consist of two parts:
- A strict definition of what $sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$ means
- A strict proof that, using the definition of $sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$, it is equal to $n$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I’m sorry I meant it can be derived by using induction
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:14
$begingroup$
@user631874 OK, I would love to see the derivation. Can you provide it?
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 29 at 14:14
3
$begingroup$
It might be worth adding that the fact that $0=1$ can be derived from the formula $n = sqrt{n^2-n + sqrt{n^2-n + cdots}}$ is itself a proof that the formula, whatever it means, is false.
$endgroup$
– Clive Newstead
Jan 29 at 14:15
$begingroup$
It only has approximate value, choose $n=2$.
$endgroup$
– Word Shallow
Jan 29 at 14:17
1
$begingroup$
@user631874 Also, you just tested the equation, you plugged in $1$ and discovered that it does not hold!
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 29 at 14:24
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
You claim the equation $$n=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$$ can be easily proved/derived. Can you provide the proof/derivation?
The proof/derivation should consist of two parts:
- A strict definition of what $sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$ means
- A strict proof that, using the definition of $sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$, it is equal to $n$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I’m sorry I meant it can be derived by using induction
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:14
$begingroup$
@user631874 OK, I would love to see the derivation. Can you provide it?
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 29 at 14:14
3
$begingroup$
It might be worth adding that the fact that $0=1$ can be derived from the formula $n = sqrt{n^2-n + sqrt{n^2-n + cdots}}$ is itself a proof that the formula, whatever it means, is false.
$endgroup$
– Clive Newstead
Jan 29 at 14:15
$begingroup$
It only has approximate value, choose $n=2$.
$endgroup$
– Word Shallow
Jan 29 at 14:17
1
$begingroup$
@user631874 Also, you just tested the equation, you plugged in $1$ and discovered that it does not hold!
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 29 at 14:24
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
You claim the equation $$n=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$$ can be easily proved/derived. Can you provide the proof/derivation?
The proof/derivation should consist of two parts:
- A strict definition of what $sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$ means
- A strict proof that, using the definition of $sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$, it is equal to $n$.
$endgroup$
You claim the equation $$n=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$$ can be easily proved/derived. Can you provide the proof/derivation?
The proof/derivation should consist of two parts:
- A strict definition of what $sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$ means
- A strict proof that, using the definition of $sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$, it is equal to $n$.
edited Jan 29 at 14:15
answered Jan 29 at 14:12
5xum5xum
91.8k394161
91.8k394161
$begingroup$
I’m sorry I meant it can be derived by using induction
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:14
$begingroup$
@user631874 OK, I would love to see the derivation. Can you provide it?
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 29 at 14:14
3
$begingroup$
It might be worth adding that the fact that $0=1$ can be derived from the formula $n = sqrt{n^2-n + sqrt{n^2-n + cdots}}$ is itself a proof that the formula, whatever it means, is false.
$endgroup$
– Clive Newstead
Jan 29 at 14:15
$begingroup$
It only has approximate value, choose $n=2$.
$endgroup$
– Word Shallow
Jan 29 at 14:17
1
$begingroup$
@user631874 Also, you just tested the equation, you plugged in $1$ and discovered that it does not hold!
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 29 at 14:24
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
I’m sorry I meant it can be derived by using induction
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:14
$begingroup$
@user631874 OK, I would love to see the derivation. Can you provide it?
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 29 at 14:14
3
$begingroup$
It might be worth adding that the fact that $0=1$ can be derived from the formula $n = sqrt{n^2-n + sqrt{n^2-n + cdots}}$ is itself a proof that the formula, whatever it means, is false.
$endgroup$
– Clive Newstead
Jan 29 at 14:15
$begingroup$
It only has approximate value, choose $n=2$.
$endgroup$
– Word Shallow
Jan 29 at 14:17
1
$begingroup$
@user631874 Also, you just tested the equation, you plugged in $1$ and discovered that it does not hold!
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 29 at 14:24
$begingroup$
I’m sorry I meant it can be derived by using induction
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:14
$begingroup$
I’m sorry I meant it can be derived by using induction
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:14
$begingroup$
@user631874 OK, I would love to see the derivation. Can you provide it?
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 29 at 14:14
$begingroup$
@user631874 OK, I would love to see the derivation. Can you provide it?
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 29 at 14:14
3
3
$begingroup$
It might be worth adding that the fact that $0=1$ can be derived from the formula $n = sqrt{n^2-n + sqrt{n^2-n + cdots}}$ is itself a proof that the formula, whatever it means, is false.
$endgroup$
– Clive Newstead
Jan 29 at 14:15
$begingroup$
It might be worth adding that the fact that $0=1$ can be derived from the formula $n = sqrt{n^2-n + sqrt{n^2-n + cdots}}$ is itself a proof that the formula, whatever it means, is false.
$endgroup$
– Clive Newstead
Jan 29 at 14:15
$begingroup$
It only has approximate value, choose $n=2$.
$endgroup$
– Word Shallow
Jan 29 at 14:17
$begingroup$
It only has approximate value, choose $n=2$.
$endgroup$
– Word Shallow
Jan 29 at 14:17
1
1
$begingroup$
@user631874 Also, you just tested the equation, you plugged in $1$ and discovered that it does not hold!
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 29 at 14:24
$begingroup$
@user631874 Also, you just tested the equation, you plugged in $1$ and discovered that it does not hold!
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 29 at 14:24
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Assuming convergence:
$$a=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$$
$$a=sqrt{n^2-n+a}$$
$$a^2=n^2-n+a$$
$$a^2-a=n^2-n$$
$$a(a-1)=n(n-1)$$
For the case $n=1$:
$$a(a-1)=0$$
Notice that $a$ has roots $1$ and $0$. Why did you assume $a$ to be one of them, $1$? All $a$ that satisfies $a=sqrt{n^2-n+a}$ and is positive is correct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I’m not assuming but I’m asking why can’t it be 1
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:20
$begingroup$
@user631874 You are assuming that $a=1$ when you assume that $sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}}=n$.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 29 at 14:23
$begingroup$
Similarly, for n=0, can't a be either of 0 or 1?
$endgroup$
– Nihal Jain
Jan 29 at 14:26
$begingroup$
Is this another case where on squaring both sides extra solutions get produced?
$endgroup$
– Nihal Jain
Jan 29 at 14:28
$begingroup$
First quesiton: yes. Second question: no, this has two solutions. Consider $a=sqrt(3+a)$, it has one solution as we know that it's nonnegative although $a^2=3+a$ has two solutions. Because both are nonnegative in this answer, it has two roots.
$endgroup$
– MCCCS
Jan 29 at 14:33
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Assuming convergence:
$$a=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$$
$$a=sqrt{n^2-n+a}$$
$$a^2=n^2-n+a$$
$$a^2-a=n^2-n$$
$$a(a-1)=n(n-1)$$
For the case $n=1$:
$$a(a-1)=0$$
Notice that $a$ has roots $1$ and $0$. Why did you assume $a$ to be one of them, $1$? All $a$ that satisfies $a=sqrt{n^2-n+a}$ and is positive is correct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I’m not assuming but I’m asking why can’t it be 1
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:20
$begingroup$
@user631874 You are assuming that $a=1$ when you assume that $sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}}=n$.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 29 at 14:23
$begingroup$
Similarly, for n=0, can't a be either of 0 or 1?
$endgroup$
– Nihal Jain
Jan 29 at 14:26
$begingroup$
Is this another case where on squaring both sides extra solutions get produced?
$endgroup$
– Nihal Jain
Jan 29 at 14:28
$begingroup$
First quesiton: yes. Second question: no, this has two solutions. Consider $a=sqrt(3+a)$, it has one solution as we know that it's nonnegative although $a^2=3+a$ has two solutions. Because both are nonnegative in this answer, it has two roots.
$endgroup$
– MCCCS
Jan 29 at 14:33
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Assuming convergence:
$$a=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$$
$$a=sqrt{n^2-n+a}$$
$$a^2=n^2-n+a$$
$$a^2-a=n^2-n$$
$$a(a-1)=n(n-1)$$
For the case $n=1$:
$$a(a-1)=0$$
Notice that $a$ has roots $1$ and $0$. Why did you assume $a$ to be one of them, $1$? All $a$ that satisfies $a=sqrt{n^2-n+a}$ and is positive is correct.
$endgroup$
Assuming convergence:
$$a=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+.....}}$$
$$a=sqrt{n^2-n+a}$$
$$a^2=n^2-n+a$$
$$a^2-a=n^2-n$$
$$a(a-1)=n(n-1)$$
For the case $n=1$:
$$a(a-1)=0$$
Notice that $a$ has roots $1$ and $0$. Why did you assume $a$ to be one of them, $1$? All $a$ that satisfies $a=sqrt{n^2-n+a}$ and is positive is correct.
edited Jan 29 at 14:35
answered Jan 29 at 14:16


MCCCSMCCCS
1,3091822
1,3091822
$begingroup$
I’m not assuming but I’m asking why can’t it be 1
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:20
$begingroup$
@user631874 You are assuming that $a=1$ when you assume that $sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}}=n$.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 29 at 14:23
$begingroup$
Similarly, for n=0, can't a be either of 0 or 1?
$endgroup$
– Nihal Jain
Jan 29 at 14:26
$begingroup$
Is this another case where on squaring both sides extra solutions get produced?
$endgroup$
– Nihal Jain
Jan 29 at 14:28
$begingroup$
First quesiton: yes. Second question: no, this has two solutions. Consider $a=sqrt(3+a)$, it has one solution as we know that it's nonnegative although $a^2=3+a$ has two solutions. Because both are nonnegative in this answer, it has two roots.
$endgroup$
– MCCCS
Jan 29 at 14:33
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I’m not assuming but I’m asking why can’t it be 1
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:20
$begingroup$
@user631874 You are assuming that $a=1$ when you assume that $sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}}=n$.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 29 at 14:23
$begingroup$
Similarly, for n=0, can't a be either of 0 or 1?
$endgroup$
– Nihal Jain
Jan 29 at 14:26
$begingroup$
Is this another case where on squaring both sides extra solutions get produced?
$endgroup$
– Nihal Jain
Jan 29 at 14:28
$begingroup$
First quesiton: yes. Second question: no, this has two solutions. Consider $a=sqrt(3+a)$, it has one solution as we know that it's nonnegative although $a^2=3+a$ has two solutions. Because both are nonnegative in this answer, it has two roots.
$endgroup$
– MCCCS
Jan 29 at 14:33
$begingroup$
I’m not assuming but I’m asking why can’t it be 1
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:20
$begingroup$
I’m not assuming but I’m asking why can’t it be 1
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:20
$begingroup$
@user631874 You are assuming that $a=1$ when you assume that $sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}}=n$.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 29 at 14:23
$begingroup$
@user631874 You are assuming that $a=1$ when you assume that $sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}}=n$.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 29 at 14:23
$begingroup$
Similarly, for n=0, can't a be either of 0 or 1?
$endgroup$
– Nihal Jain
Jan 29 at 14:26
$begingroup$
Similarly, for n=0, can't a be either of 0 or 1?
$endgroup$
– Nihal Jain
Jan 29 at 14:26
$begingroup$
Is this another case where on squaring both sides extra solutions get produced?
$endgroup$
– Nihal Jain
Jan 29 at 14:28
$begingroup$
Is this another case where on squaring both sides extra solutions get produced?
$endgroup$
– Nihal Jain
Jan 29 at 14:28
$begingroup$
First quesiton: yes. Second question: no, this has two solutions. Consider $a=sqrt(3+a)$, it has one solution as we know that it's nonnegative although $a^2=3+a$ has two solutions. Because both are nonnegative in this answer, it has two roots.
$endgroup$
– MCCCS
Jan 29 at 14:33
$begingroup$
First quesiton: yes. Second question: no, this has two solutions. Consider $a=sqrt(3+a)$, it has one solution as we know that it's nonnegative although $a^2=3+a$ has two solutions. Because both are nonnegative in this answer, it has two roots.
$endgroup$
– MCCCS
Jan 29 at 14:33
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
As most have been doing, assuming convergence, let,
$$k=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}}$$
Squaring both sides,
$$k^2=n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}$$
$$k^2=n^2-n+k$$
$$k^2-k-(n^2-n) = 0$$
$$k=frac{1pmsqrt{4n^2-4n+1}}{2}$$
$$k=frac{1pm(2n-1)}{2}$$
$$k={n,1-n}$$
Now, we have to be careful. Squaring produced extra solutions. So, we must verify which ones are right for what domains.
Clearly, $forall n<0, 1-n$ is the candidate and $forall n>1, n$ is the answer.
For $n=0, k$ is trivially 0.
Finally, for $n=1, k=1-n$ as you have verified.
In a summary,
$$k=$$ begin{cases}
1-n & n< 0,n=1 \
n & 1< n,n=0\
end{cases}
P.S. I'm not sure if this is correct. I would be glad if someone could verify this.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As most have been doing, assuming convergence, let,
$$k=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}}$$
Squaring both sides,
$$k^2=n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}$$
$$k^2=n^2-n+k$$
$$k^2-k-(n^2-n) = 0$$
$$k=frac{1pmsqrt{4n^2-4n+1}}{2}$$
$$k=frac{1pm(2n-1)}{2}$$
$$k={n,1-n}$$
Now, we have to be careful. Squaring produced extra solutions. So, we must verify which ones are right for what domains.
Clearly, $forall n<0, 1-n$ is the candidate and $forall n>1, n$ is the answer.
For $n=0, k$ is trivially 0.
Finally, for $n=1, k=1-n$ as you have verified.
In a summary,
$$k=$$ begin{cases}
1-n & n< 0,n=1 \
n & 1< n,n=0\
end{cases}
P.S. I'm not sure if this is correct. I would be glad if someone could verify this.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As most have been doing, assuming convergence, let,
$$k=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}}$$
Squaring both sides,
$$k^2=n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}$$
$$k^2=n^2-n+k$$
$$k^2-k-(n^2-n) = 0$$
$$k=frac{1pmsqrt{4n^2-4n+1}}{2}$$
$$k=frac{1pm(2n-1)}{2}$$
$$k={n,1-n}$$
Now, we have to be careful. Squaring produced extra solutions. So, we must verify which ones are right for what domains.
Clearly, $forall n<0, 1-n$ is the candidate and $forall n>1, n$ is the answer.
For $n=0, k$ is trivially 0.
Finally, for $n=1, k=1-n$ as you have verified.
In a summary,
$$k=$$ begin{cases}
1-n & n< 0,n=1 \
n & 1< n,n=0\
end{cases}
P.S. I'm not sure if this is correct. I would be glad if someone could verify this.
$endgroup$
As most have been doing, assuming convergence, let,
$$k=sqrt{n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}}$$
Squaring both sides,
$$k^2=n^2-n+sqrt{n^2-n+cdots}$$
$$k^2=n^2-n+k$$
$$k^2-k-(n^2-n) = 0$$
$$k=frac{1pmsqrt{4n^2-4n+1}}{2}$$
$$k=frac{1pm(2n-1)}{2}$$
$$k={n,1-n}$$
Now, we have to be careful. Squaring produced extra solutions. So, we must verify which ones are right for what domains.
Clearly, $forall n<0, 1-n$ is the candidate and $forall n>1, n$ is the answer.
For $n=0, k$ is trivially 0.
Finally, for $n=1, k=1-n$ as you have verified.
In a summary,
$$k=$$ begin{cases}
1-n & n< 0,n=1 \
n & 1< n,n=0\
end{cases}
P.S. I'm not sure if this is correct. I would be glad if someone could verify this.
answered Jan 29 at 15:07
Nihal JainNihal Jain
28528
28528
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3092214%2f0-1-where-is-the-mistake%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
"easily proved" ????
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 29 at 14:09
$begingroup$
Yeah why not?(proved/derived)
$endgroup$
– user631874
Jan 29 at 14:12
1
$begingroup$
The mistake is in your formula.
$endgroup$
– Word Shallow
Jan 29 at 14:12