Is every commutative ring a limit of noetherian rings?












9












$begingroup$


Let $mathsf{Noeth}$ be the category of noetherian rings, viewed as a full subcategory of the category $mathsf{CRing}$ of commutative rings with one.



Let $A$ be in $mathsf{CRing}$.




Question 1. Is there a functor from a small category to $mathsf{Noeth}$ whose limit in $mathsf{CRing}$ is $A$?




(I know that there is a functor from a small category to $mathsf{Noeth}$ whose colimit is $A$.)



Let $f:Ato B$ be a morphism in $mathsf{CRing}$ such that the map
$$
circ f:text{Hom}_{mathsf{CRing}}(B,C)totext{Hom}_{mathsf{CRing}}(A,C)
$$

sending $g$ to $gcirc f$ is bijective for all $C$ in $mathsf{Noeth}$.




Question 2. Does this imply that $f$ is an isomorphism?




Yes to Question 1 would imply yes to Question 2.




Question 3. Does the inclusion functor $iota:mathsf{Noeth}tomathsf{CRing}$ commute with colimits? That is, if $Ainmathsf{Noeth}$ is the colimit of a functor $alpha$ from a small category to $mathsf{Noeth}$, is $A$ naturally isomorphic to the colimit of $iotacircalpha$?




Yes to Question 2 would imply yes to Question 3, and yes to Question 3 would imply that many colimits, and in particular many binary coproducts, do not exist in $mathsf{Noeth}$: see this answer of Martin Brandenburg.





One may try to attack the first question as follows:



Let $A$ be in $mathsf{CRing}$ and $I$ the set of those ideals $mathfrak a$ of $A$ such that $A/mathfrak a$ is noetherian. Then $I$ is an ordered set, and thus can be viewed as a category. We can form the limit of the $A/mathfrak a$ with $mathfrak ain I$, and we have a natural morphism from $A$ to this limit. I'd be interested in knowing if this morphism is bijective.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I guess by question 1 you mean if there's a functor $F$ from a small category to ${bf Noeth}$ such that $A$ is the limit of $EF$. ($E:{bf Noeth} rightarrow {bf CRing}$ is the inclusion functor.)
    $endgroup$
    – sqtrat
    Feb 1 at 13:24












  • $begingroup$
    @sqtrat - Thanks! Yes. I've added "in $mathsf{CRing}$". I hope it's clear enough now.
    $endgroup$
    – Pierre-Yves Gaillard
    Feb 1 at 13:41










  • $begingroup$
    Doesn't question 2 follow from the fact that a ring is colimit of noetherian rings ?(plug in $C_i$, where $varinjlim C_i =A$ to get $id_A$ has an antecedent, then plug in $D_i$ where $varinjlim D_i = B$ to get that the inverse we get was a $2$-sided inverse) (I used $varinjlim$ to denote the colimit, because in fact we can choose the colimit to be a "direct limit")
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Feb 1 at 14:12








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Pierre-YvesGaillard : sorry I actually wrote it down and it didn't work
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Feb 1 at 16:53






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Crossposted on MathOverflow: mathoverflow.net/q/323136/461
    $endgroup$
    – Pierre-Yves Gaillard
    Feb 13 at 12:52
















9












$begingroup$


Let $mathsf{Noeth}$ be the category of noetherian rings, viewed as a full subcategory of the category $mathsf{CRing}$ of commutative rings with one.



Let $A$ be in $mathsf{CRing}$.




Question 1. Is there a functor from a small category to $mathsf{Noeth}$ whose limit in $mathsf{CRing}$ is $A$?




(I know that there is a functor from a small category to $mathsf{Noeth}$ whose colimit is $A$.)



Let $f:Ato B$ be a morphism in $mathsf{CRing}$ such that the map
$$
circ f:text{Hom}_{mathsf{CRing}}(B,C)totext{Hom}_{mathsf{CRing}}(A,C)
$$

sending $g$ to $gcirc f$ is bijective for all $C$ in $mathsf{Noeth}$.




Question 2. Does this imply that $f$ is an isomorphism?




Yes to Question 1 would imply yes to Question 2.




Question 3. Does the inclusion functor $iota:mathsf{Noeth}tomathsf{CRing}$ commute with colimits? That is, if $Ainmathsf{Noeth}$ is the colimit of a functor $alpha$ from a small category to $mathsf{Noeth}$, is $A$ naturally isomorphic to the colimit of $iotacircalpha$?




Yes to Question 2 would imply yes to Question 3, and yes to Question 3 would imply that many colimits, and in particular many binary coproducts, do not exist in $mathsf{Noeth}$: see this answer of Martin Brandenburg.





One may try to attack the first question as follows:



Let $A$ be in $mathsf{CRing}$ and $I$ the set of those ideals $mathfrak a$ of $A$ such that $A/mathfrak a$ is noetherian. Then $I$ is an ordered set, and thus can be viewed as a category. We can form the limit of the $A/mathfrak a$ with $mathfrak ain I$, and we have a natural morphism from $A$ to this limit. I'd be interested in knowing if this morphism is bijective.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I guess by question 1 you mean if there's a functor $F$ from a small category to ${bf Noeth}$ such that $A$ is the limit of $EF$. ($E:{bf Noeth} rightarrow {bf CRing}$ is the inclusion functor.)
    $endgroup$
    – sqtrat
    Feb 1 at 13:24












  • $begingroup$
    @sqtrat - Thanks! Yes. I've added "in $mathsf{CRing}$". I hope it's clear enough now.
    $endgroup$
    – Pierre-Yves Gaillard
    Feb 1 at 13:41










  • $begingroup$
    Doesn't question 2 follow from the fact that a ring is colimit of noetherian rings ?(plug in $C_i$, where $varinjlim C_i =A$ to get $id_A$ has an antecedent, then plug in $D_i$ where $varinjlim D_i = B$ to get that the inverse we get was a $2$-sided inverse) (I used $varinjlim$ to denote the colimit, because in fact we can choose the colimit to be a "direct limit")
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Feb 1 at 14:12








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Pierre-YvesGaillard : sorry I actually wrote it down and it didn't work
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Feb 1 at 16:53






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Crossposted on MathOverflow: mathoverflow.net/q/323136/461
    $endgroup$
    – Pierre-Yves Gaillard
    Feb 13 at 12:52














9












9








9


2



$begingroup$


Let $mathsf{Noeth}$ be the category of noetherian rings, viewed as a full subcategory of the category $mathsf{CRing}$ of commutative rings with one.



Let $A$ be in $mathsf{CRing}$.




Question 1. Is there a functor from a small category to $mathsf{Noeth}$ whose limit in $mathsf{CRing}$ is $A$?




(I know that there is a functor from a small category to $mathsf{Noeth}$ whose colimit is $A$.)



Let $f:Ato B$ be a morphism in $mathsf{CRing}$ such that the map
$$
circ f:text{Hom}_{mathsf{CRing}}(B,C)totext{Hom}_{mathsf{CRing}}(A,C)
$$

sending $g$ to $gcirc f$ is bijective for all $C$ in $mathsf{Noeth}$.




Question 2. Does this imply that $f$ is an isomorphism?




Yes to Question 1 would imply yes to Question 2.




Question 3. Does the inclusion functor $iota:mathsf{Noeth}tomathsf{CRing}$ commute with colimits? That is, if $Ainmathsf{Noeth}$ is the colimit of a functor $alpha$ from a small category to $mathsf{Noeth}$, is $A$ naturally isomorphic to the colimit of $iotacircalpha$?




Yes to Question 2 would imply yes to Question 3, and yes to Question 3 would imply that many colimits, and in particular many binary coproducts, do not exist in $mathsf{Noeth}$: see this answer of Martin Brandenburg.





One may try to attack the first question as follows:



Let $A$ be in $mathsf{CRing}$ and $I$ the set of those ideals $mathfrak a$ of $A$ such that $A/mathfrak a$ is noetherian. Then $I$ is an ordered set, and thus can be viewed as a category. We can form the limit of the $A/mathfrak a$ with $mathfrak ain I$, and we have a natural morphism from $A$ to this limit. I'd be interested in knowing if this morphism is bijective.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $mathsf{Noeth}$ be the category of noetherian rings, viewed as a full subcategory of the category $mathsf{CRing}$ of commutative rings with one.



Let $A$ be in $mathsf{CRing}$.




Question 1. Is there a functor from a small category to $mathsf{Noeth}$ whose limit in $mathsf{CRing}$ is $A$?




(I know that there is a functor from a small category to $mathsf{Noeth}$ whose colimit is $A$.)



Let $f:Ato B$ be a morphism in $mathsf{CRing}$ such that the map
$$
circ f:text{Hom}_{mathsf{CRing}}(B,C)totext{Hom}_{mathsf{CRing}}(A,C)
$$

sending $g$ to $gcirc f$ is bijective for all $C$ in $mathsf{Noeth}$.




Question 2. Does this imply that $f$ is an isomorphism?




Yes to Question 1 would imply yes to Question 2.




Question 3. Does the inclusion functor $iota:mathsf{Noeth}tomathsf{CRing}$ commute with colimits? That is, if $Ainmathsf{Noeth}$ is the colimit of a functor $alpha$ from a small category to $mathsf{Noeth}$, is $A$ naturally isomorphic to the colimit of $iotacircalpha$?




Yes to Question 2 would imply yes to Question 3, and yes to Question 3 would imply that many colimits, and in particular many binary coproducts, do not exist in $mathsf{Noeth}$: see this answer of Martin Brandenburg.





One may try to attack the first question as follows:



Let $A$ be in $mathsf{CRing}$ and $I$ the set of those ideals $mathfrak a$ of $A$ such that $A/mathfrak a$ is noetherian. Then $I$ is an ordered set, and thus can be viewed as a category. We can form the limit of the $A/mathfrak a$ with $mathfrak ain I$, and we have a natural morphism from $A$ to this limit. I'd be interested in knowing if this morphism is bijective.







commutative-algebra category-theory noetherian limits-colimits






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 1 at 13:39







Pierre-Yves Gaillard

















asked Feb 1 at 12:11









Pierre-Yves GaillardPierre-Yves Gaillard

13.5k23184




13.5k23184












  • $begingroup$
    I guess by question 1 you mean if there's a functor $F$ from a small category to ${bf Noeth}$ such that $A$ is the limit of $EF$. ($E:{bf Noeth} rightarrow {bf CRing}$ is the inclusion functor.)
    $endgroup$
    – sqtrat
    Feb 1 at 13:24












  • $begingroup$
    @sqtrat - Thanks! Yes. I've added "in $mathsf{CRing}$". I hope it's clear enough now.
    $endgroup$
    – Pierre-Yves Gaillard
    Feb 1 at 13:41










  • $begingroup$
    Doesn't question 2 follow from the fact that a ring is colimit of noetherian rings ?(plug in $C_i$, where $varinjlim C_i =A$ to get $id_A$ has an antecedent, then plug in $D_i$ where $varinjlim D_i = B$ to get that the inverse we get was a $2$-sided inverse) (I used $varinjlim$ to denote the colimit, because in fact we can choose the colimit to be a "direct limit")
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Feb 1 at 14:12








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Pierre-YvesGaillard : sorry I actually wrote it down and it didn't work
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Feb 1 at 16:53






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Crossposted on MathOverflow: mathoverflow.net/q/323136/461
    $endgroup$
    – Pierre-Yves Gaillard
    Feb 13 at 12:52


















  • $begingroup$
    I guess by question 1 you mean if there's a functor $F$ from a small category to ${bf Noeth}$ such that $A$ is the limit of $EF$. ($E:{bf Noeth} rightarrow {bf CRing}$ is the inclusion functor.)
    $endgroup$
    – sqtrat
    Feb 1 at 13:24












  • $begingroup$
    @sqtrat - Thanks! Yes. I've added "in $mathsf{CRing}$". I hope it's clear enough now.
    $endgroup$
    – Pierre-Yves Gaillard
    Feb 1 at 13:41










  • $begingroup$
    Doesn't question 2 follow from the fact that a ring is colimit of noetherian rings ?(plug in $C_i$, where $varinjlim C_i =A$ to get $id_A$ has an antecedent, then plug in $D_i$ where $varinjlim D_i = B$ to get that the inverse we get was a $2$-sided inverse) (I used $varinjlim$ to denote the colimit, because in fact we can choose the colimit to be a "direct limit")
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Feb 1 at 14:12








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Pierre-YvesGaillard : sorry I actually wrote it down and it didn't work
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Feb 1 at 16:53






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Crossposted on MathOverflow: mathoverflow.net/q/323136/461
    $endgroup$
    – Pierre-Yves Gaillard
    Feb 13 at 12:52
















$begingroup$
I guess by question 1 you mean if there's a functor $F$ from a small category to ${bf Noeth}$ such that $A$ is the limit of $EF$. ($E:{bf Noeth} rightarrow {bf CRing}$ is the inclusion functor.)
$endgroup$
– sqtrat
Feb 1 at 13:24






$begingroup$
I guess by question 1 you mean if there's a functor $F$ from a small category to ${bf Noeth}$ such that $A$ is the limit of $EF$. ($E:{bf Noeth} rightarrow {bf CRing}$ is the inclusion functor.)
$endgroup$
– sqtrat
Feb 1 at 13:24














$begingroup$
@sqtrat - Thanks! Yes. I've added "in $mathsf{CRing}$". I hope it's clear enough now.
$endgroup$
– Pierre-Yves Gaillard
Feb 1 at 13:41




$begingroup$
@sqtrat - Thanks! Yes. I've added "in $mathsf{CRing}$". I hope it's clear enough now.
$endgroup$
– Pierre-Yves Gaillard
Feb 1 at 13:41












$begingroup$
Doesn't question 2 follow from the fact that a ring is colimit of noetherian rings ?(plug in $C_i$, where $varinjlim C_i =A$ to get $id_A$ has an antecedent, then plug in $D_i$ where $varinjlim D_i = B$ to get that the inverse we get was a $2$-sided inverse) (I used $varinjlim$ to denote the colimit, because in fact we can choose the colimit to be a "direct limit")
$endgroup$
– Max
Feb 1 at 14:12






$begingroup$
Doesn't question 2 follow from the fact that a ring is colimit of noetherian rings ?(plug in $C_i$, where $varinjlim C_i =A$ to get $id_A$ has an antecedent, then plug in $D_i$ where $varinjlim D_i = B$ to get that the inverse we get was a $2$-sided inverse) (I used $varinjlim$ to denote the colimit, because in fact we can choose the colimit to be a "direct limit")
$endgroup$
– Max
Feb 1 at 14:12






1




1




$begingroup$
@Pierre-YvesGaillard : sorry I actually wrote it down and it didn't work
$endgroup$
– Max
Feb 1 at 16:53




$begingroup$
@Pierre-YvesGaillard : sorry I actually wrote it down and it didn't work
$endgroup$
– Max
Feb 1 at 16:53




1




1




$begingroup$
Crossposted on MathOverflow: mathoverflow.net/q/323136/461
$endgroup$
– Pierre-Yves Gaillard
Feb 13 at 12:52




$begingroup$
Crossposted on MathOverflow: mathoverflow.net/q/323136/461
$endgroup$
– Pierre-Yves Gaillard
Feb 13 at 12:52










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3096154%2fis-every-commutative-ring-a-limit-of-noetherian-rings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3096154%2fis-every-commutative-ring-a-limit-of-noetherian-rings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith