Some problems in additive functions.












-1












$begingroup$


Let f be a function that satisfies $forall xin R: f(x)+f(y)=f(x+y)$ .
I'm thinking about equivalnce
$$f(x_0)=0 Leftrightarrow x_0=0$$
Where f(x) $neq 0$. It's true of course if $f$ is a continous function (because then $f(x)=f(1)x$), but I do not know if it is going to work if $f$ is not continous.

I managed to prove the following equivalence:
$f(x_0)=0 Longleftrightarrow x_0=0 Longleftrightarrow f$ is an injective function(for f(x) $neq 0$), but it does not help me so much. It is also hard to even draw not continous additive functions, because they are not continous in any point.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    $f(x)=0$ is continuous and it get the value zero even when $x_0not = 0$. You can easily prove that $f(0)=0$ because $f(0)+f(0)=f(0+0)=f(0)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Feb 1 at 14:09






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy%27s_functional_equation The non-continuous functions are basically a collection of many different linear functions, one for each scaled copy of $Bbb Q$ (I believe they require the axiom of choice to construct).
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Feb 1 at 14:10








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Arthur They do require more than ZF. If the functions are measurable, then they are linear, and there exist models for ZF in which all functions are measurable.
    $endgroup$
    – Theo Bendit
    Feb 1 at 14:17










  • $begingroup$
    @TheoBendit Obviously they don't require the full strength of the AoC. But among the axioms to add to ZF which guarantees that nonlinear solutions exist, AoC is definitely the most commonly used one.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Feb 1 at 14:39


















-1












$begingroup$


Let f be a function that satisfies $forall xin R: f(x)+f(y)=f(x+y)$ .
I'm thinking about equivalnce
$$f(x_0)=0 Leftrightarrow x_0=0$$
Where f(x) $neq 0$. It's true of course if $f$ is a continous function (because then $f(x)=f(1)x$), but I do not know if it is going to work if $f$ is not continous.

I managed to prove the following equivalence:
$f(x_0)=0 Longleftrightarrow x_0=0 Longleftrightarrow f$ is an injective function(for f(x) $neq 0$), but it does not help me so much. It is also hard to even draw not continous additive functions, because they are not continous in any point.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    $f(x)=0$ is continuous and it get the value zero even when $x_0not = 0$. You can easily prove that $f(0)=0$ because $f(0)+f(0)=f(0+0)=f(0)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Feb 1 at 14:09






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy%27s_functional_equation The non-continuous functions are basically a collection of many different linear functions, one for each scaled copy of $Bbb Q$ (I believe they require the axiom of choice to construct).
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Feb 1 at 14:10








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Arthur They do require more than ZF. If the functions are measurable, then they are linear, and there exist models for ZF in which all functions are measurable.
    $endgroup$
    – Theo Bendit
    Feb 1 at 14:17










  • $begingroup$
    @TheoBendit Obviously they don't require the full strength of the AoC. But among the axioms to add to ZF which guarantees that nonlinear solutions exist, AoC is definitely the most commonly used one.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Feb 1 at 14:39
















-1












-1








-1





$begingroup$


Let f be a function that satisfies $forall xin R: f(x)+f(y)=f(x+y)$ .
I'm thinking about equivalnce
$$f(x_0)=0 Leftrightarrow x_0=0$$
Where f(x) $neq 0$. It's true of course if $f$ is a continous function (because then $f(x)=f(1)x$), but I do not know if it is going to work if $f$ is not continous.

I managed to prove the following equivalence:
$f(x_0)=0 Longleftrightarrow x_0=0 Longleftrightarrow f$ is an injective function(for f(x) $neq 0$), but it does not help me so much. It is also hard to even draw not continous additive functions, because they are not continous in any point.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let f be a function that satisfies $forall xin R: f(x)+f(y)=f(x+y)$ .
I'm thinking about equivalnce
$$f(x_0)=0 Leftrightarrow x_0=0$$
Where f(x) $neq 0$. It's true of course if $f$ is a continous function (because then $f(x)=f(1)x$), but I do not know if it is going to work if $f$ is not continous.

I managed to prove the following equivalence:
$f(x_0)=0 Longleftrightarrow x_0=0 Longleftrightarrow f$ is an injective function(for f(x) $neq 0$), but it does not help me so much. It is also hard to even draw not continous additive functions, because they are not continous in any point.







real-analysis calculus






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 1 at 14:57







Lucian

















asked Feb 1 at 14:06









LucianLucian

396




396












  • $begingroup$
    $f(x)=0$ is continuous and it get the value zero even when $x_0not = 0$. You can easily prove that $f(0)=0$ because $f(0)+f(0)=f(0+0)=f(0)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Feb 1 at 14:09






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy%27s_functional_equation The non-continuous functions are basically a collection of many different linear functions, one for each scaled copy of $Bbb Q$ (I believe they require the axiom of choice to construct).
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Feb 1 at 14:10








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Arthur They do require more than ZF. If the functions are measurable, then they are linear, and there exist models for ZF in which all functions are measurable.
    $endgroup$
    – Theo Bendit
    Feb 1 at 14:17










  • $begingroup$
    @TheoBendit Obviously they don't require the full strength of the AoC. But among the axioms to add to ZF which guarantees that nonlinear solutions exist, AoC is definitely the most commonly used one.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Feb 1 at 14:39




















  • $begingroup$
    $f(x)=0$ is continuous and it get the value zero even when $x_0not = 0$. You can easily prove that $f(0)=0$ because $f(0)+f(0)=f(0+0)=f(0)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Feb 1 at 14:09






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy%27s_functional_equation The non-continuous functions are basically a collection of many different linear functions, one for each scaled copy of $Bbb Q$ (I believe they require the axiom of choice to construct).
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Feb 1 at 14:10








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Arthur They do require more than ZF. If the functions are measurable, then they are linear, and there exist models for ZF in which all functions are measurable.
    $endgroup$
    – Theo Bendit
    Feb 1 at 14:17










  • $begingroup$
    @TheoBendit Obviously they don't require the full strength of the AoC. But among the axioms to add to ZF which guarantees that nonlinear solutions exist, AoC is definitely the most commonly used one.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Feb 1 at 14:39


















$begingroup$
$f(x)=0$ is continuous and it get the value zero even when $x_0not = 0$. You can easily prove that $f(0)=0$ because $f(0)+f(0)=f(0+0)=f(0)$.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Feb 1 at 14:09




$begingroup$
$f(x)=0$ is continuous and it get the value zero even when $x_0not = 0$. You can easily prove that $f(0)=0$ because $f(0)+f(0)=f(0+0)=f(0)$.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Feb 1 at 14:09




1




1




$begingroup$
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy%27s_functional_equation The non-continuous functions are basically a collection of many different linear functions, one for each scaled copy of $Bbb Q$ (I believe they require the axiom of choice to construct).
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Feb 1 at 14:10






$begingroup$
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy%27s_functional_equation The non-continuous functions are basically a collection of many different linear functions, one for each scaled copy of $Bbb Q$ (I believe they require the axiom of choice to construct).
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Feb 1 at 14:10






1




1




$begingroup$
@Arthur They do require more than ZF. If the functions are measurable, then they are linear, and there exist models for ZF in which all functions are measurable.
$endgroup$
– Theo Bendit
Feb 1 at 14:17




$begingroup$
@Arthur They do require more than ZF. If the functions are measurable, then they are linear, and there exist models for ZF in which all functions are measurable.
$endgroup$
– Theo Bendit
Feb 1 at 14:17












$begingroup$
@TheoBendit Obviously they don't require the full strength of the AoC. But among the axioms to add to ZF which guarantees that nonlinear solutions exist, AoC is definitely the most commonly used one.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Feb 1 at 14:39






$begingroup$
@TheoBendit Obviously they don't require the full strength of the AoC. But among the axioms to add to ZF which guarantees that nonlinear solutions exist, AoC is definitely the most commonly used one.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Feb 1 at 14:39












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

$$f(x)=0$$ is a continuous and additive function.



But



$$f(x_0)=0iff x_0=0$$ does not hold.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3096263%2fsome-problems-in-additive-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    $$f(x)=0$$ is a continuous and additive function.



    But



    $$f(x_0)=0iff x_0=0$$ does not hold.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      $$f(x)=0$$ is a continuous and additive function.



      But



      $$f(x_0)=0iff x_0=0$$ does not hold.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        $$f(x)=0$$ is a continuous and additive function.



        But



        $$f(x_0)=0iff x_0=0$$ does not hold.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        $$f(x)=0$$ is a continuous and additive function.



        But



        $$f(x_0)=0iff x_0=0$$ does not hold.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Feb 1 at 14:46









        Yves DaoustYves Daoust

        133k676231




        133k676231






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3096263%2fsome-problems-in-additive-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

            android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

            WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]