Line integral method calculate work done by a particle












0












$begingroup$


I'm having trouble knowing how to go about solving this question:



Q: The force on a particle at a point with position vector $r = xi + yj + zk$ exerted by a charge at the origin is $F(r)=left(frac{P(r)}{|r|^2}right)$
in which P is constant. Calculate the work done as the particle moves in a straight line from (1, 0, 0) to (1, 2, 3).



What I think I need to do:

$r_1=i$, $quad$ $r_2=i+2j+3k$ $quad$ so let $r(t)=i+2tj+3tk$,$quad$ $0lt t lt 1$

Then $frac{dr}{dt}=2+3=5$ and $|r|^2=1+13t^2$

Therefore, $$F(r)=frac{P(i+2tj+3tk)}{1+13t^2}$$
As such, $int_C F(r) cdot dr=int_0^1 frac{P(i+2tj+3tk)}{1+13t^2} cdot5 dt=int_0^1 frac{5P(1+5t)}{1+13t^2}dt=5Pint_0^1 frac{1+5t}{1+13t^2}dt$


Is this the right way to go about answering this question, or am I doing something completely wrong? Any advice would be greatly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Note that $r(t)=(1,2t,3t)$ and $r'(t)$ is also a vector.
    $endgroup$
    – PierreCarre
    Feb 1 at 13:26
















0












$begingroup$


I'm having trouble knowing how to go about solving this question:



Q: The force on a particle at a point with position vector $r = xi + yj + zk$ exerted by a charge at the origin is $F(r)=left(frac{P(r)}{|r|^2}right)$
in which P is constant. Calculate the work done as the particle moves in a straight line from (1, 0, 0) to (1, 2, 3).



What I think I need to do:

$r_1=i$, $quad$ $r_2=i+2j+3k$ $quad$ so let $r(t)=i+2tj+3tk$,$quad$ $0lt t lt 1$

Then $frac{dr}{dt}=2+3=5$ and $|r|^2=1+13t^2$

Therefore, $$F(r)=frac{P(i+2tj+3tk)}{1+13t^2}$$
As such, $int_C F(r) cdot dr=int_0^1 frac{P(i+2tj+3tk)}{1+13t^2} cdot5 dt=int_0^1 frac{5P(1+5t)}{1+13t^2}dt=5Pint_0^1 frac{1+5t}{1+13t^2}dt$


Is this the right way to go about answering this question, or am I doing something completely wrong? Any advice would be greatly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Note that $r(t)=(1,2t,3t)$ and $r'(t)$ is also a vector.
    $endgroup$
    – PierreCarre
    Feb 1 at 13:26














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I'm having trouble knowing how to go about solving this question:



Q: The force on a particle at a point with position vector $r = xi + yj + zk$ exerted by a charge at the origin is $F(r)=left(frac{P(r)}{|r|^2}right)$
in which P is constant. Calculate the work done as the particle moves in a straight line from (1, 0, 0) to (1, 2, 3).



What I think I need to do:

$r_1=i$, $quad$ $r_2=i+2j+3k$ $quad$ so let $r(t)=i+2tj+3tk$,$quad$ $0lt t lt 1$

Then $frac{dr}{dt}=2+3=5$ and $|r|^2=1+13t^2$

Therefore, $$F(r)=frac{P(i+2tj+3tk)}{1+13t^2}$$
As such, $int_C F(r) cdot dr=int_0^1 frac{P(i+2tj+3tk)}{1+13t^2} cdot5 dt=int_0^1 frac{5P(1+5t)}{1+13t^2}dt=5Pint_0^1 frac{1+5t}{1+13t^2}dt$


Is this the right way to go about answering this question, or am I doing something completely wrong? Any advice would be greatly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I'm having trouble knowing how to go about solving this question:



Q: The force on a particle at a point with position vector $r = xi + yj + zk$ exerted by a charge at the origin is $F(r)=left(frac{P(r)}{|r|^2}right)$
in which P is constant. Calculate the work done as the particle moves in a straight line from (1, 0, 0) to (1, 2, 3).



What I think I need to do:

$r_1=i$, $quad$ $r_2=i+2j+3k$ $quad$ so let $r(t)=i+2tj+3tk$,$quad$ $0lt t lt 1$

Then $frac{dr}{dt}=2+3=5$ and $|r|^2=1+13t^2$

Therefore, $$F(r)=frac{P(i+2tj+3tk)}{1+13t^2}$$
As such, $int_C F(r) cdot dr=int_0^1 frac{P(i+2tj+3tk)}{1+13t^2} cdot5 dt=int_0^1 frac{5P(1+5t)}{1+13t^2}dt=5Pint_0^1 frac{1+5t}{1+13t^2}dt$


Is this the right way to go about answering this question, or am I doing something completely wrong? Any advice would be greatly appreciated.







vectors line-integrals






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Feb 1 at 13:01









AnonAnon

172




172












  • $begingroup$
    Note that $r(t)=(1,2t,3t)$ and $r'(t)$ is also a vector.
    $endgroup$
    – PierreCarre
    Feb 1 at 13:26


















  • $begingroup$
    Note that $r(t)=(1,2t,3t)$ and $r'(t)$ is also a vector.
    $endgroup$
    – PierreCarre
    Feb 1 at 13:26
















$begingroup$
Note that $r(t)=(1,2t,3t)$ and $r'(t)$ is also a vector.
$endgroup$
– PierreCarre
Feb 1 at 13:26




$begingroup$
Note that $r(t)=(1,2t,3t)$ and $r'(t)$ is also a vector.
$endgroup$
– PierreCarre
Feb 1 at 13:26










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

The work is computed as the line integral:



$$
int_C F(r)cdot dr = int_0^1 F(r(t))cdot r'(t) dt = int_0^1 frac{P}{1+4t^2+9t^2} (1,2t,3t)cdot(0,2,3) dt = int_0^1 frac{13 P ,t}{1+13t^2}dt
$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Ah ok, that makes more sense thanks. One thing I don't get though is why there is no P in the last integral, shouldn't it be 13Pt as the numerator of the integral?
    $endgroup$
    – Anon
    Feb 1 at 13:58










  • $begingroup$
    Gone with the wind... I'll edit the post!
    $endgroup$
    – PierreCarre
    Feb 1 at 16:06












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3096203%2fline-integral-method-calculate-work-done-by-a-particle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

The work is computed as the line integral:



$$
int_C F(r)cdot dr = int_0^1 F(r(t))cdot r'(t) dt = int_0^1 frac{P}{1+4t^2+9t^2} (1,2t,3t)cdot(0,2,3) dt = int_0^1 frac{13 P ,t}{1+13t^2}dt
$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Ah ok, that makes more sense thanks. One thing I don't get though is why there is no P in the last integral, shouldn't it be 13Pt as the numerator of the integral?
    $endgroup$
    – Anon
    Feb 1 at 13:58










  • $begingroup$
    Gone with the wind... I'll edit the post!
    $endgroup$
    – PierreCarre
    Feb 1 at 16:06
















0












$begingroup$

The work is computed as the line integral:



$$
int_C F(r)cdot dr = int_0^1 F(r(t))cdot r'(t) dt = int_0^1 frac{P}{1+4t^2+9t^2} (1,2t,3t)cdot(0,2,3) dt = int_0^1 frac{13 P ,t}{1+13t^2}dt
$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Ah ok, that makes more sense thanks. One thing I don't get though is why there is no P in the last integral, shouldn't it be 13Pt as the numerator of the integral?
    $endgroup$
    – Anon
    Feb 1 at 13:58










  • $begingroup$
    Gone with the wind... I'll edit the post!
    $endgroup$
    – PierreCarre
    Feb 1 at 16:06














0












0








0





$begingroup$

The work is computed as the line integral:



$$
int_C F(r)cdot dr = int_0^1 F(r(t))cdot r'(t) dt = int_0^1 frac{P}{1+4t^2+9t^2} (1,2t,3t)cdot(0,2,3) dt = int_0^1 frac{13 P ,t}{1+13t^2}dt
$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



The work is computed as the line integral:



$$
int_C F(r)cdot dr = int_0^1 F(r(t))cdot r'(t) dt = int_0^1 frac{P}{1+4t^2+9t^2} (1,2t,3t)cdot(0,2,3) dt = int_0^1 frac{13 P ,t}{1+13t^2}dt
$$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Feb 1 at 16:07

























answered Feb 1 at 13:24









PierreCarrePierreCarre

2,103214




2,103214












  • $begingroup$
    Ah ok, that makes more sense thanks. One thing I don't get though is why there is no P in the last integral, shouldn't it be 13Pt as the numerator of the integral?
    $endgroup$
    – Anon
    Feb 1 at 13:58










  • $begingroup$
    Gone with the wind... I'll edit the post!
    $endgroup$
    – PierreCarre
    Feb 1 at 16:06


















  • $begingroup$
    Ah ok, that makes more sense thanks. One thing I don't get though is why there is no P in the last integral, shouldn't it be 13Pt as the numerator of the integral?
    $endgroup$
    – Anon
    Feb 1 at 13:58










  • $begingroup$
    Gone with the wind... I'll edit the post!
    $endgroup$
    – PierreCarre
    Feb 1 at 16:06
















$begingroup$
Ah ok, that makes more sense thanks. One thing I don't get though is why there is no P in the last integral, shouldn't it be 13Pt as the numerator of the integral?
$endgroup$
– Anon
Feb 1 at 13:58




$begingroup$
Ah ok, that makes more sense thanks. One thing I don't get though is why there is no P in the last integral, shouldn't it be 13Pt as the numerator of the integral?
$endgroup$
– Anon
Feb 1 at 13:58












$begingroup$
Gone with the wind... I'll edit the post!
$endgroup$
– PierreCarre
Feb 1 at 16:06




$begingroup$
Gone with the wind... I'll edit the post!
$endgroup$
– PierreCarre
Feb 1 at 16:06


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3096203%2fline-integral-method-calculate-work-done-by-a-particle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

SQL update select statement

'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules