Show that if $f''(0)$ exists and $f(0)=f'(0)=0$, then $sum f(frac1n)$ converges












1












$begingroup$


I need help with this problem:
Let $f$ be a continous function over an interval that contains $0$. Let $a_n = f(frac 1 n)$ (for n large enough).




  1. Show that if $f''(0)$ exists and $f(0)=f'(0)=0$, then $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ converges.


I've already shown that if $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ converges, then $f(0)=0$ and that if $f'(0)$ exists and $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ converges, then $f'(0)=0$.



How do I show this one?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I need help with this problem:
    Let $f$ be a continous function over an interval that contains $0$. Let $a_n = f(frac 1 n)$ (for n large enough).




    1. Show that if $f''(0)$ exists and $f(0)=f'(0)=0$, then $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ converges.


    I've already shown that if $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ converges, then $f(0)=0$ and that if $f'(0)$ exists and $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ converges, then $f'(0)=0$.



    How do I show this one?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I need help with this problem:
      Let $f$ be a continous function over an interval that contains $0$. Let $a_n = f(frac 1 n)$ (for n large enough).




      1. Show that if $f''(0)$ exists and $f(0)=f'(0)=0$, then $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ converges.


      I've already shown that if $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ converges, then $f(0)=0$ and that if $f'(0)$ exists and $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ converges, then $f'(0)=0$.



      How do I show this one?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I need help with this problem:
      Let $f$ be a continous function over an interval that contains $0$. Let $a_n = f(frac 1 n)$ (for n large enough).




      1. Show that if $f''(0)$ exists and $f(0)=f'(0)=0$, then $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ converges.


      I've already shown that if $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ converges, then $f(0)=0$ and that if $f'(0)$ exists and $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ converges, then $f'(0)=0$.



      How do I show this one?







      sequences-and-series convergence






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Feb 1 at 16:46







      davidllerenav

















      asked Feb 1 at 5:49









      davidllerenavdavidllerenav

      3128




      3128






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          We can use comparison test based on the following fact
          $$
          lim_{xto 0} frac{f(x)}{x^2}=lim_{xto 0}frac{f'(x)}{2x}=frac{f''(0)}{2}
          $$
          where L'Hopital's rule is used in the first equation. Thus for all sufficiently large $nge N$,
          $$
          n^2|a_n| = n^2left|fleft(frac1nright)right|le |f''(0)|
          $$
          hence
          $$
          sum_{nge 1}|a_n| le sum_{n=1}^{N-1} |a_n|+sum_{nge N} frac{|f''(0)|}{n^2}<infty.
          $$
          The series converges absolutely, which implies that the series converges.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Why did you compare it to $x^2$?
            $endgroup$
            – davidllerenav
            Feb 1 at 16:33










          • $begingroup$
            @davidllerenav It is a natural choice in view of the Taylor-Mclaurin expansion $f(x) = f(0)+f'(0)x +frac{f''(0)}2 x^2 +cdots cong frac{f''(0)}2 x^2$. Also, $2$ is the first exponent $rin Bbb N$ such that $sum_{nge 1} frac1{n^r}<infty$. (Thus we find that $sum_{nge 1}f(1/n)cong sum_{nge 1} frac{f'(0)}{n}$ does not converge if $f'(0)ne 0$.)
            $endgroup$
            – Song
            Feb 1 at 16:59












          • $begingroup$
            Ok, I think I got it. Can't I also do it by the limit comparison? Because I already proved that if $f'(0)$ exists and $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ converges then $f'(0)=0$. I did it by using the derivative definition and supposing that $f'(0)$ isn't 0, ending up with $lim_ntoinfty nf(frac 1 n)=t$. Then by the limit comparison test, I reached a contradiction, thus $f'(0)=0$. Can't I do it that way instead?
            $endgroup$
            – davidllerenav
            Feb 1 at 17:08










          • $begingroup$
            @davidllerenav Yes, you can also do it by limit comparison test. Indeed, what I wrote in my answer can be viewed as a logic behind applying limit comparison test.
            $endgroup$
            – Song
            Feb 1 at 17:10












          • $begingroup$
            So if I just write the same thing but with $f''(0)$ and show that $f''(0)=0$, then $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ must converge?
            $endgroup$
            – davidllerenav
            Feb 1 at 17:13



















          0












          $begingroup$

          By Taylor's Formula with remainder $|f(x)| leq cx^{2}$ for some constant $C$ for $x$ in a neighborhoodod $0$. Hence $sum f(frac 1 n)$ is dominated by a constant times $sum frac 1 {n^{2}}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Why is the remainder $cx^2$? Is there another way of doing it?
            $endgroup$
            – davidllerenav
            Feb 1 at 16:31










          • $begingroup$
            $frac {f'(x)|} {|x|}=frac {|f'(x)-f'(0)|} {|x|} to f''(0)$. From this it follows that $|f'(x)| <(1+|f''(0)|) |x|$ if $|x|$ is sufficiently small. Now $|f(x))=|f(x)-f(0)|=|x||f'zeta)|$ for some $zeta$ between $0$ and $x$. Is it clear now that $|f(x)| leq Mx^{2}$ for some $M$, for $|x|$ is sufficiently small?
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Feb 1 at 23:18





















          0












          $begingroup$

          As $f''(0)$ exists, $f'(0)$ is can be linearly approximated:
          $$ f'(h) = mcdot h+ r(h)$$



          With some function $r$ with $frac {r(h)} hto 0$ for $hto 0 $. Therefore we can find an interval $U:=[-a,a]$ so that $ r(h) le mcdot h$, and by that:
          $$xin Uimplies f'(x) le 2 mcdot x
          $$



          From this follows $f(x) le mx^2$ per integration for $xin U$, and thus the sum converges

          (as for some $N$ the tail of the sum, $sum_{i=N}^infty f(1/i)$, is completely in $U$ for all $i$ it assumes, and we know that $sum_{i=0}^infty frac 1 {x^2}$ converges).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3095871%2fshow-that-if-f0-exists-and-f0-f0-0-then-sum-f-frac1n-converge%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            We can use comparison test based on the following fact
            $$
            lim_{xto 0} frac{f(x)}{x^2}=lim_{xto 0}frac{f'(x)}{2x}=frac{f''(0)}{2}
            $$
            where L'Hopital's rule is used in the first equation. Thus for all sufficiently large $nge N$,
            $$
            n^2|a_n| = n^2left|fleft(frac1nright)right|le |f''(0)|
            $$
            hence
            $$
            sum_{nge 1}|a_n| le sum_{n=1}^{N-1} |a_n|+sum_{nge N} frac{|f''(0)|}{n^2}<infty.
            $$
            The series converges absolutely, which implies that the series converges.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Why did you compare it to $x^2$?
              $endgroup$
              – davidllerenav
              Feb 1 at 16:33










            • $begingroup$
              @davidllerenav It is a natural choice in view of the Taylor-Mclaurin expansion $f(x) = f(0)+f'(0)x +frac{f''(0)}2 x^2 +cdots cong frac{f''(0)}2 x^2$. Also, $2$ is the first exponent $rin Bbb N$ such that $sum_{nge 1} frac1{n^r}<infty$. (Thus we find that $sum_{nge 1}f(1/n)cong sum_{nge 1} frac{f'(0)}{n}$ does not converge if $f'(0)ne 0$.)
              $endgroup$
              – Song
              Feb 1 at 16:59












            • $begingroup$
              Ok, I think I got it. Can't I also do it by the limit comparison? Because I already proved that if $f'(0)$ exists and $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ converges then $f'(0)=0$. I did it by using the derivative definition and supposing that $f'(0)$ isn't 0, ending up with $lim_ntoinfty nf(frac 1 n)=t$. Then by the limit comparison test, I reached a contradiction, thus $f'(0)=0$. Can't I do it that way instead?
              $endgroup$
              – davidllerenav
              Feb 1 at 17:08










            • $begingroup$
              @davidllerenav Yes, you can also do it by limit comparison test. Indeed, what I wrote in my answer can be viewed as a logic behind applying limit comparison test.
              $endgroup$
              – Song
              Feb 1 at 17:10












            • $begingroup$
              So if I just write the same thing but with $f''(0)$ and show that $f''(0)=0$, then $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ must converge?
              $endgroup$
              – davidllerenav
              Feb 1 at 17:13
















            1












            $begingroup$

            We can use comparison test based on the following fact
            $$
            lim_{xto 0} frac{f(x)}{x^2}=lim_{xto 0}frac{f'(x)}{2x}=frac{f''(0)}{2}
            $$
            where L'Hopital's rule is used in the first equation. Thus for all sufficiently large $nge N$,
            $$
            n^2|a_n| = n^2left|fleft(frac1nright)right|le |f''(0)|
            $$
            hence
            $$
            sum_{nge 1}|a_n| le sum_{n=1}^{N-1} |a_n|+sum_{nge N} frac{|f''(0)|}{n^2}<infty.
            $$
            The series converges absolutely, which implies that the series converges.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Why did you compare it to $x^2$?
              $endgroup$
              – davidllerenav
              Feb 1 at 16:33










            • $begingroup$
              @davidllerenav It is a natural choice in view of the Taylor-Mclaurin expansion $f(x) = f(0)+f'(0)x +frac{f''(0)}2 x^2 +cdots cong frac{f''(0)}2 x^2$. Also, $2$ is the first exponent $rin Bbb N$ such that $sum_{nge 1} frac1{n^r}<infty$. (Thus we find that $sum_{nge 1}f(1/n)cong sum_{nge 1} frac{f'(0)}{n}$ does not converge if $f'(0)ne 0$.)
              $endgroup$
              – Song
              Feb 1 at 16:59












            • $begingroup$
              Ok, I think I got it. Can't I also do it by the limit comparison? Because I already proved that if $f'(0)$ exists and $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ converges then $f'(0)=0$. I did it by using the derivative definition and supposing that $f'(0)$ isn't 0, ending up with $lim_ntoinfty nf(frac 1 n)=t$. Then by the limit comparison test, I reached a contradiction, thus $f'(0)=0$. Can't I do it that way instead?
              $endgroup$
              – davidllerenav
              Feb 1 at 17:08










            • $begingroup$
              @davidllerenav Yes, you can also do it by limit comparison test. Indeed, what I wrote in my answer can be viewed as a logic behind applying limit comparison test.
              $endgroup$
              – Song
              Feb 1 at 17:10












            • $begingroup$
              So if I just write the same thing but with $f''(0)$ and show that $f''(0)=0$, then $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ must converge?
              $endgroup$
              – davidllerenav
              Feb 1 at 17:13














            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            We can use comparison test based on the following fact
            $$
            lim_{xto 0} frac{f(x)}{x^2}=lim_{xto 0}frac{f'(x)}{2x}=frac{f''(0)}{2}
            $$
            where L'Hopital's rule is used in the first equation. Thus for all sufficiently large $nge N$,
            $$
            n^2|a_n| = n^2left|fleft(frac1nright)right|le |f''(0)|
            $$
            hence
            $$
            sum_{nge 1}|a_n| le sum_{n=1}^{N-1} |a_n|+sum_{nge N} frac{|f''(0)|}{n^2}<infty.
            $$
            The series converges absolutely, which implies that the series converges.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            We can use comparison test based on the following fact
            $$
            lim_{xto 0} frac{f(x)}{x^2}=lim_{xto 0}frac{f'(x)}{2x}=frac{f''(0)}{2}
            $$
            where L'Hopital's rule is used in the first equation. Thus for all sufficiently large $nge N$,
            $$
            n^2|a_n| = n^2left|fleft(frac1nright)right|le |f''(0)|
            $$
            hence
            $$
            sum_{nge 1}|a_n| le sum_{n=1}^{N-1} |a_n|+sum_{nge N} frac{|f''(0)|}{n^2}<infty.
            $$
            The series converges absolutely, which implies that the series converges.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Feb 1 at 7:20









            SongSong

            18.6k21651




            18.6k21651












            • $begingroup$
              Why did you compare it to $x^2$?
              $endgroup$
              – davidllerenav
              Feb 1 at 16:33










            • $begingroup$
              @davidllerenav It is a natural choice in view of the Taylor-Mclaurin expansion $f(x) = f(0)+f'(0)x +frac{f''(0)}2 x^2 +cdots cong frac{f''(0)}2 x^2$. Also, $2$ is the first exponent $rin Bbb N$ such that $sum_{nge 1} frac1{n^r}<infty$. (Thus we find that $sum_{nge 1}f(1/n)cong sum_{nge 1} frac{f'(0)}{n}$ does not converge if $f'(0)ne 0$.)
              $endgroup$
              – Song
              Feb 1 at 16:59












            • $begingroup$
              Ok, I think I got it. Can't I also do it by the limit comparison? Because I already proved that if $f'(0)$ exists and $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ converges then $f'(0)=0$. I did it by using the derivative definition and supposing that $f'(0)$ isn't 0, ending up with $lim_ntoinfty nf(frac 1 n)=t$. Then by the limit comparison test, I reached a contradiction, thus $f'(0)=0$. Can't I do it that way instead?
              $endgroup$
              – davidllerenav
              Feb 1 at 17:08










            • $begingroup$
              @davidllerenav Yes, you can also do it by limit comparison test. Indeed, what I wrote in my answer can be viewed as a logic behind applying limit comparison test.
              $endgroup$
              – Song
              Feb 1 at 17:10












            • $begingroup$
              So if I just write the same thing but with $f''(0)$ and show that $f''(0)=0$, then $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ must converge?
              $endgroup$
              – davidllerenav
              Feb 1 at 17:13


















            • $begingroup$
              Why did you compare it to $x^2$?
              $endgroup$
              – davidllerenav
              Feb 1 at 16:33










            • $begingroup$
              @davidllerenav It is a natural choice in view of the Taylor-Mclaurin expansion $f(x) = f(0)+f'(0)x +frac{f''(0)}2 x^2 +cdots cong frac{f''(0)}2 x^2$. Also, $2$ is the first exponent $rin Bbb N$ such that $sum_{nge 1} frac1{n^r}<infty$. (Thus we find that $sum_{nge 1}f(1/n)cong sum_{nge 1} frac{f'(0)}{n}$ does not converge if $f'(0)ne 0$.)
              $endgroup$
              – Song
              Feb 1 at 16:59












            • $begingroup$
              Ok, I think I got it. Can't I also do it by the limit comparison? Because I already proved that if $f'(0)$ exists and $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ converges then $f'(0)=0$. I did it by using the derivative definition and supposing that $f'(0)$ isn't 0, ending up with $lim_ntoinfty nf(frac 1 n)=t$. Then by the limit comparison test, I reached a contradiction, thus $f'(0)=0$. Can't I do it that way instead?
              $endgroup$
              – davidllerenav
              Feb 1 at 17:08










            • $begingroup$
              @davidllerenav Yes, you can also do it by limit comparison test. Indeed, what I wrote in my answer can be viewed as a logic behind applying limit comparison test.
              $endgroup$
              – Song
              Feb 1 at 17:10












            • $begingroup$
              So if I just write the same thing but with $f''(0)$ and show that $f''(0)=0$, then $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ must converge?
              $endgroup$
              – davidllerenav
              Feb 1 at 17:13
















            $begingroup$
            Why did you compare it to $x^2$?
            $endgroup$
            – davidllerenav
            Feb 1 at 16:33




            $begingroup$
            Why did you compare it to $x^2$?
            $endgroup$
            – davidllerenav
            Feb 1 at 16:33












            $begingroup$
            @davidllerenav It is a natural choice in view of the Taylor-Mclaurin expansion $f(x) = f(0)+f'(0)x +frac{f''(0)}2 x^2 +cdots cong frac{f''(0)}2 x^2$. Also, $2$ is the first exponent $rin Bbb N$ such that $sum_{nge 1} frac1{n^r}<infty$. (Thus we find that $sum_{nge 1}f(1/n)cong sum_{nge 1} frac{f'(0)}{n}$ does not converge if $f'(0)ne 0$.)
            $endgroup$
            – Song
            Feb 1 at 16:59






            $begingroup$
            @davidllerenav It is a natural choice in view of the Taylor-Mclaurin expansion $f(x) = f(0)+f'(0)x +frac{f''(0)}2 x^2 +cdots cong frac{f''(0)}2 x^2$. Also, $2$ is the first exponent $rin Bbb N$ such that $sum_{nge 1} frac1{n^r}<infty$. (Thus we find that $sum_{nge 1}f(1/n)cong sum_{nge 1} frac{f'(0)}{n}$ does not converge if $f'(0)ne 0$.)
            $endgroup$
            – Song
            Feb 1 at 16:59














            $begingroup$
            Ok, I think I got it. Can't I also do it by the limit comparison? Because I already proved that if $f'(0)$ exists and $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ converges then $f'(0)=0$. I did it by using the derivative definition and supposing that $f'(0)$ isn't 0, ending up with $lim_ntoinfty nf(frac 1 n)=t$. Then by the limit comparison test, I reached a contradiction, thus $f'(0)=0$. Can't I do it that way instead?
            $endgroup$
            – davidllerenav
            Feb 1 at 17:08




            $begingroup$
            Ok, I think I got it. Can't I also do it by the limit comparison? Because I already proved that if $f'(0)$ exists and $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ converges then $f'(0)=0$. I did it by using the derivative definition and supposing that $f'(0)$ isn't 0, ending up with $lim_ntoinfty nf(frac 1 n)=t$. Then by the limit comparison test, I reached a contradiction, thus $f'(0)=0$. Can't I do it that way instead?
            $endgroup$
            – davidllerenav
            Feb 1 at 17:08












            $begingroup$
            @davidllerenav Yes, you can also do it by limit comparison test. Indeed, what I wrote in my answer can be viewed as a logic behind applying limit comparison test.
            $endgroup$
            – Song
            Feb 1 at 17:10






            $begingroup$
            @davidllerenav Yes, you can also do it by limit comparison test. Indeed, what I wrote in my answer can be viewed as a logic behind applying limit comparison test.
            $endgroup$
            – Song
            Feb 1 at 17:10














            $begingroup$
            So if I just write the same thing but with $f''(0)$ and show that $f''(0)=0$, then $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ must converge?
            $endgroup$
            – davidllerenav
            Feb 1 at 17:13




            $begingroup$
            So if I just write the same thing but with $f''(0)$ and show that $f''(0)=0$, then $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ must converge?
            $endgroup$
            – davidllerenav
            Feb 1 at 17:13











            0












            $begingroup$

            By Taylor's Formula with remainder $|f(x)| leq cx^{2}$ for some constant $C$ for $x$ in a neighborhoodod $0$. Hence $sum f(frac 1 n)$ is dominated by a constant times $sum frac 1 {n^{2}}$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Why is the remainder $cx^2$? Is there another way of doing it?
              $endgroup$
              – davidllerenav
              Feb 1 at 16:31










            • $begingroup$
              $frac {f'(x)|} {|x|}=frac {|f'(x)-f'(0)|} {|x|} to f''(0)$. From this it follows that $|f'(x)| <(1+|f''(0)|) |x|$ if $|x|$ is sufficiently small. Now $|f(x))=|f(x)-f(0)|=|x||f'zeta)|$ for some $zeta$ between $0$ and $x$. Is it clear now that $|f(x)| leq Mx^{2}$ for some $M$, for $|x|$ is sufficiently small?
              $endgroup$
              – Kavi Rama Murthy
              Feb 1 at 23:18


















            0












            $begingroup$

            By Taylor's Formula with remainder $|f(x)| leq cx^{2}$ for some constant $C$ for $x$ in a neighborhoodod $0$. Hence $sum f(frac 1 n)$ is dominated by a constant times $sum frac 1 {n^{2}}$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Why is the remainder $cx^2$? Is there another way of doing it?
              $endgroup$
              – davidllerenav
              Feb 1 at 16:31










            • $begingroup$
              $frac {f'(x)|} {|x|}=frac {|f'(x)-f'(0)|} {|x|} to f''(0)$. From this it follows that $|f'(x)| <(1+|f''(0)|) |x|$ if $|x|$ is sufficiently small. Now $|f(x))=|f(x)-f(0)|=|x||f'zeta)|$ for some $zeta$ between $0$ and $x$. Is it clear now that $|f(x)| leq Mx^{2}$ for some $M$, for $|x|$ is sufficiently small?
              $endgroup$
              – Kavi Rama Murthy
              Feb 1 at 23:18
















            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            By Taylor's Formula with remainder $|f(x)| leq cx^{2}$ for some constant $C$ for $x$ in a neighborhoodod $0$. Hence $sum f(frac 1 n)$ is dominated by a constant times $sum frac 1 {n^{2}}$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            By Taylor's Formula with remainder $|f(x)| leq cx^{2}$ for some constant $C$ for $x$ in a neighborhoodod $0$. Hence $sum f(frac 1 n)$ is dominated by a constant times $sum frac 1 {n^{2}}$.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Feb 1 at 6:00









            Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

            73.7k53170




            73.7k53170












            • $begingroup$
              Why is the remainder $cx^2$? Is there another way of doing it?
              $endgroup$
              – davidllerenav
              Feb 1 at 16:31










            • $begingroup$
              $frac {f'(x)|} {|x|}=frac {|f'(x)-f'(0)|} {|x|} to f''(0)$. From this it follows that $|f'(x)| <(1+|f''(0)|) |x|$ if $|x|$ is sufficiently small. Now $|f(x))=|f(x)-f(0)|=|x||f'zeta)|$ for some $zeta$ between $0$ and $x$. Is it clear now that $|f(x)| leq Mx^{2}$ for some $M$, for $|x|$ is sufficiently small?
              $endgroup$
              – Kavi Rama Murthy
              Feb 1 at 23:18




















            • $begingroup$
              Why is the remainder $cx^2$? Is there another way of doing it?
              $endgroup$
              – davidllerenav
              Feb 1 at 16:31










            • $begingroup$
              $frac {f'(x)|} {|x|}=frac {|f'(x)-f'(0)|} {|x|} to f''(0)$. From this it follows that $|f'(x)| <(1+|f''(0)|) |x|$ if $|x|$ is sufficiently small. Now $|f(x))=|f(x)-f(0)|=|x||f'zeta)|$ for some $zeta$ between $0$ and $x$. Is it clear now that $|f(x)| leq Mx^{2}$ for some $M$, for $|x|$ is sufficiently small?
              $endgroup$
              – Kavi Rama Murthy
              Feb 1 at 23:18


















            $begingroup$
            Why is the remainder $cx^2$? Is there another way of doing it?
            $endgroup$
            – davidllerenav
            Feb 1 at 16:31




            $begingroup$
            Why is the remainder $cx^2$? Is there another way of doing it?
            $endgroup$
            – davidllerenav
            Feb 1 at 16:31












            $begingroup$
            $frac {f'(x)|} {|x|}=frac {|f'(x)-f'(0)|} {|x|} to f''(0)$. From this it follows that $|f'(x)| <(1+|f''(0)|) |x|$ if $|x|$ is sufficiently small. Now $|f(x))=|f(x)-f(0)|=|x||f'zeta)|$ for some $zeta$ between $0$ and $x$. Is it clear now that $|f(x)| leq Mx^{2}$ for some $M$, for $|x|$ is sufficiently small?
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Feb 1 at 23:18






            $begingroup$
            $frac {f'(x)|} {|x|}=frac {|f'(x)-f'(0)|} {|x|} to f''(0)$. From this it follows that $|f'(x)| <(1+|f''(0)|) |x|$ if $|x|$ is sufficiently small. Now $|f(x))=|f(x)-f(0)|=|x||f'zeta)|$ for some $zeta$ between $0$ and $x$. Is it clear now that $|f(x)| leq Mx^{2}$ for some $M$, for $|x|$ is sufficiently small?
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Feb 1 at 23:18













            0












            $begingroup$

            As $f''(0)$ exists, $f'(0)$ is can be linearly approximated:
            $$ f'(h) = mcdot h+ r(h)$$



            With some function $r$ with $frac {r(h)} hto 0$ for $hto 0 $. Therefore we can find an interval $U:=[-a,a]$ so that $ r(h) le mcdot h$, and by that:
            $$xin Uimplies f'(x) le 2 mcdot x
            $$



            From this follows $f(x) le mx^2$ per integration for $xin U$, and thus the sum converges

            (as for some $N$ the tail of the sum, $sum_{i=N}^infty f(1/i)$, is completely in $U$ for all $i$ it assumes, and we know that $sum_{i=0}^infty frac 1 {x^2}$ converges).






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              As $f''(0)$ exists, $f'(0)$ is can be linearly approximated:
              $$ f'(h) = mcdot h+ r(h)$$



              With some function $r$ with $frac {r(h)} hto 0$ for $hto 0 $. Therefore we can find an interval $U:=[-a,a]$ so that $ r(h) le mcdot h$, and by that:
              $$xin Uimplies f'(x) le 2 mcdot x
              $$



              From this follows $f(x) le mx^2$ per integration for $xin U$, and thus the sum converges

              (as for some $N$ the tail of the sum, $sum_{i=N}^infty f(1/i)$, is completely in $U$ for all $i$ it assumes, and we know that $sum_{i=0}^infty frac 1 {x^2}$ converges).






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                As $f''(0)$ exists, $f'(0)$ is can be linearly approximated:
                $$ f'(h) = mcdot h+ r(h)$$



                With some function $r$ with $frac {r(h)} hto 0$ for $hto 0 $. Therefore we can find an interval $U:=[-a,a]$ so that $ r(h) le mcdot h$, and by that:
                $$xin Uimplies f'(x) le 2 mcdot x
                $$



                From this follows $f(x) le mx^2$ per integration for $xin U$, and thus the sum converges

                (as for some $N$ the tail of the sum, $sum_{i=N}^infty f(1/i)$, is completely in $U$ for all $i$ it assumes, and we know that $sum_{i=0}^infty frac 1 {x^2}$ converges).






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                As $f''(0)$ exists, $f'(0)$ is can be linearly approximated:
                $$ f'(h) = mcdot h+ r(h)$$



                With some function $r$ with $frac {r(h)} hto 0$ for $hto 0 $. Therefore we can find an interval $U:=[-a,a]$ so that $ r(h) le mcdot h$, and by that:
                $$xin Uimplies f'(x) le 2 mcdot x
                $$



                From this follows $f(x) le mx^2$ per integration for $xin U$, and thus the sum converges

                (as for some $N$ the tail of the sum, $sum_{i=N}^infty f(1/i)$, is completely in $U$ for all $i$ it assumes, and we know that $sum_{i=0}^infty frac 1 {x^2}$ converges).







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Feb 1 at 7:12









                SudixSudix

                9601316




                9601316






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3095871%2fshow-that-if-f0-exists-and-f0-f0-0-then-sum-f-frac1n-converge%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                    in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

                    Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory