$C^1$-diffeomorphism $implies parallel (Dvarphi)^{-1} parallel$ is bounded












1












$begingroup$


Let $U,V$ be open subsets of $mathbb{R}^n$ and $varphi:U rightarrow V$ a $C^1$-diffeomorphism. We know that $varphi, D varphi$ and $(Dvarphi)^{-1}$ are defined on compact set $K$ with $U subset K$. This implies that $varphi$ is uniformly continuous on $K$ and also on $U$.



I would like to know how one can see that $parallel (Dvarphi)^{-1} parallel$ and $mid det(D varphi)mid$ are bounded by a constant $M$.



However what I know is that for $n=1$ a continuously differentiable function is Lipschitz continuous if its first derivative is bounded. This is easy to see from the mean value theorem.



I dont know if this is getting me somewhere.



For the $mid det(Dvarphi) mid$ part I guess its just a property of diffeomorphism but I dont know how to show this.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Let $U,V$ be open subsets of $mathbb{R}^n$ and $varphi:U rightarrow V$ a $C^1$-diffeomorphism. We know that $varphi, D varphi$ and $(Dvarphi)^{-1}$ are defined on compact set $K$ with $U subset K$. This implies that $varphi$ is uniformly continuous on $K$ and also on $U$.



    I would like to know how one can see that $parallel (Dvarphi)^{-1} parallel$ and $mid det(D varphi)mid$ are bounded by a constant $M$.



    However what I know is that for $n=1$ a continuously differentiable function is Lipschitz continuous if its first derivative is bounded. This is easy to see from the mean value theorem.



    I dont know if this is getting me somewhere.



    For the $mid det(Dvarphi) mid$ part I guess its just a property of diffeomorphism but I dont know how to show this.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Let $U,V$ be open subsets of $mathbb{R}^n$ and $varphi:U rightarrow V$ a $C^1$-diffeomorphism. We know that $varphi, D varphi$ and $(Dvarphi)^{-1}$ are defined on compact set $K$ with $U subset K$. This implies that $varphi$ is uniformly continuous on $K$ and also on $U$.



      I would like to know how one can see that $parallel (Dvarphi)^{-1} parallel$ and $mid det(D varphi)mid$ are bounded by a constant $M$.



      However what I know is that for $n=1$ a continuously differentiable function is Lipschitz continuous if its first derivative is bounded. This is easy to see from the mean value theorem.



      I dont know if this is getting me somewhere.



      For the $mid det(Dvarphi) mid$ part I guess its just a property of diffeomorphism but I dont know how to show this.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let $U,V$ be open subsets of $mathbb{R}^n$ and $varphi:U rightarrow V$ a $C^1$-diffeomorphism. We know that $varphi, D varphi$ and $(Dvarphi)^{-1}$ are defined on compact set $K$ with $U subset K$. This implies that $varphi$ is uniformly continuous on $K$ and also on $U$.



      I would like to know how one can see that $parallel (Dvarphi)^{-1} parallel$ and $mid det(D varphi)mid$ are bounded by a constant $M$.



      However what I know is that for $n=1$ a continuously differentiable function is Lipschitz continuous if its first derivative is bounded. This is easy to see from the mean value theorem.



      I dont know if this is getting me somewhere.



      For the $mid det(Dvarphi) mid$ part I guess its just a property of diffeomorphism but I dont know how to show this.







      calculus diffeomorphism






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 7 at 15:40









      ArjihadArjihad

      390111




      390111






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          We say $varphi : U rightarrow V$ between $U,V$ open is a diffeomorphism if $varphi$ is $C^1$ and has a $C^1$ inverse $varphi^{-1}.$ If we are only given this, then we may not be guaranteed boundedness of the first derivative globally.



          Indeed consider the map,
          $$ varphi : (-pi/2,pi/2) rightarrow mathbb R, $$
          which is the restriction of $tan$ to $(-pi/2,pi/2).$ This map is a diffeomorphism, but $varphi'(x) = sec^2(x)$ blows up as $x$ tends to $pmpi/2.$



          Additionally your assertion about the existence of a compact subset $K supset U$ is not true in general. Indeed we see $varphi$ above does not even admit a continuous extension $[-pi/2,pi/2] rightarrow mathbb R.$





          What we have is that $lVert Dvarphi rVert,$ $lVert Dvarphi^{-1}rVert,$ $|det Dvarphi|$ and $|det Dvarphi^{-1}|$ are locally bounded. This follows because all these quantities are continuous on their respective domains, and hence their restrictions to compact subsets are bounded.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065139%2fc1-diffeomorphism-implies-parallel-d-varphi-1-parallel-is-bounded%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            We say $varphi : U rightarrow V$ between $U,V$ open is a diffeomorphism if $varphi$ is $C^1$ and has a $C^1$ inverse $varphi^{-1}.$ If we are only given this, then we may not be guaranteed boundedness of the first derivative globally.



            Indeed consider the map,
            $$ varphi : (-pi/2,pi/2) rightarrow mathbb R, $$
            which is the restriction of $tan$ to $(-pi/2,pi/2).$ This map is a diffeomorphism, but $varphi'(x) = sec^2(x)$ blows up as $x$ tends to $pmpi/2.$



            Additionally your assertion about the existence of a compact subset $K supset U$ is not true in general. Indeed we see $varphi$ above does not even admit a continuous extension $[-pi/2,pi/2] rightarrow mathbb R.$





            What we have is that $lVert Dvarphi rVert,$ $lVert Dvarphi^{-1}rVert,$ $|det Dvarphi|$ and $|det Dvarphi^{-1}|$ are locally bounded. This follows because all these quantities are continuous on their respective domains, and hence their restrictions to compact subsets are bounded.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              We say $varphi : U rightarrow V$ between $U,V$ open is a diffeomorphism if $varphi$ is $C^1$ and has a $C^1$ inverse $varphi^{-1}.$ If we are only given this, then we may not be guaranteed boundedness of the first derivative globally.



              Indeed consider the map,
              $$ varphi : (-pi/2,pi/2) rightarrow mathbb R, $$
              which is the restriction of $tan$ to $(-pi/2,pi/2).$ This map is a diffeomorphism, but $varphi'(x) = sec^2(x)$ blows up as $x$ tends to $pmpi/2.$



              Additionally your assertion about the existence of a compact subset $K supset U$ is not true in general. Indeed we see $varphi$ above does not even admit a continuous extension $[-pi/2,pi/2] rightarrow mathbb R.$





              What we have is that $lVert Dvarphi rVert,$ $lVert Dvarphi^{-1}rVert,$ $|det Dvarphi|$ and $|det Dvarphi^{-1}|$ are locally bounded. This follows because all these quantities are continuous on their respective domains, and hence their restrictions to compact subsets are bounded.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                We say $varphi : U rightarrow V$ between $U,V$ open is a diffeomorphism if $varphi$ is $C^1$ and has a $C^1$ inverse $varphi^{-1}.$ If we are only given this, then we may not be guaranteed boundedness of the first derivative globally.



                Indeed consider the map,
                $$ varphi : (-pi/2,pi/2) rightarrow mathbb R, $$
                which is the restriction of $tan$ to $(-pi/2,pi/2).$ This map is a diffeomorphism, but $varphi'(x) = sec^2(x)$ blows up as $x$ tends to $pmpi/2.$



                Additionally your assertion about the existence of a compact subset $K supset U$ is not true in general. Indeed we see $varphi$ above does not even admit a continuous extension $[-pi/2,pi/2] rightarrow mathbb R.$





                What we have is that $lVert Dvarphi rVert,$ $lVert Dvarphi^{-1}rVert,$ $|det Dvarphi|$ and $|det Dvarphi^{-1}|$ are locally bounded. This follows because all these quantities are continuous on their respective domains, and hence their restrictions to compact subsets are bounded.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                We say $varphi : U rightarrow V$ between $U,V$ open is a diffeomorphism if $varphi$ is $C^1$ and has a $C^1$ inverse $varphi^{-1}.$ If we are only given this, then we may not be guaranteed boundedness of the first derivative globally.



                Indeed consider the map,
                $$ varphi : (-pi/2,pi/2) rightarrow mathbb R, $$
                which is the restriction of $tan$ to $(-pi/2,pi/2).$ This map is a diffeomorphism, but $varphi'(x) = sec^2(x)$ blows up as $x$ tends to $pmpi/2.$



                Additionally your assertion about the existence of a compact subset $K supset U$ is not true in general. Indeed we see $varphi$ above does not even admit a continuous extension $[-pi/2,pi/2] rightarrow mathbb R.$





                What we have is that $lVert Dvarphi rVert,$ $lVert Dvarphi^{-1}rVert,$ $|det Dvarphi|$ and $|det Dvarphi^{-1}|$ are locally bounded. This follows because all these quantities are continuous on their respective domains, and hence their restrictions to compact subsets are bounded.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 7 at 16:44









                ktoiktoi

                2,3961616




                2,3961616






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065139%2fc1-diffeomorphism-implies-parallel-d-varphi-1-parallel-is-bounded%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                    in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

                    Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory