Conditional Expectation of One Member of a Multinomial Distribution, Conditioned on a Second Member












1














I have a homework problem, which asks:



Let X = $(X_1, X_2, X_3, X_4, X_5) sim text{Mult}_5(n, p)$ with p = $(p_1, p_2, p_3, p_4, p_5)$.



(a) Find $E(X_1 | X_2) text{ and } Var(X_1 | X_2)$.



(b) Find $E(X_1 | X_2 + X_3)$.



So here is my approach to part (a):



To find $E(X_1|X_2 = x_2)$, I think of $X_2$ being set at a fixed value and remove it from the distribution. So first I have to normalize p, so say that:



$$ p_1^{'} = frac{p_1}{1-p_2}, p_3^{'} = frac{p_3}{1-p_2}, p_4^{'} = frac{p_4}{1-p_2}, p_5^{'} = frac{p_5}{1-p_2} $$
then let $p^{'} = (p_1^{'}, p_3^{'}, p_4^{'}, p_5^{'})$



So with $X_2$ fixed, I have a new distribution: $text{Mult}_4(n-X_2, p^{'})$. And to find the probability of $(X_1|X_2)$, I can treat it like any other marginal of a multinomial distribution, and say that: $(X_1|X_2 = x_2) sim text{Bin}(n-X_2, p_1^{'})$



I know that the expected value for a binomial distribution is $n cdot p$ and the variance is $n cdot p(1-p)$, so I can say that:



$$ E(X_1|X_2) = p_1^{'}(n-X_2)$$
$$ Var(X_1|X_2) = p_1^{'}(n-X_2)(1-p_1^{'}) $$



So I have two questions.




  1. Is this approach OK?


  2. If so, can I simply take the same steps for (b) but adding $X_2$ and $X_3$ together?











share|cite|improve this question






















  • It looks good to me. You may adopt a similar approach in part b).
    – BGM
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:05
















1














I have a homework problem, which asks:



Let X = $(X_1, X_2, X_3, X_4, X_5) sim text{Mult}_5(n, p)$ with p = $(p_1, p_2, p_3, p_4, p_5)$.



(a) Find $E(X_1 | X_2) text{ and } Var(X_1 | X_2)$.



(b) Find $E(X_1 | X_2 + X_3)$.



So here is my approach to part (a):



To find $E(X_1|X_2 = x_2)$, I think of $X_2$ being set at a fixed value and remove it from the distribution. So first I have to normalize p, so say that:



$$ p_1^{'} = frac{p_1}{1-p_2}, p_3^{'} = frac{p_3}{1-p_2}, p_4^{'} = frac{p_4}{1-p_2}, p_5^{'} = frac{p_5}{1-p_2} $$
then let $p^{'} = (p_1^{'}, p_3^{'}, p_4^{'}, p_5^{'})$



So with $X_2$ fixed, I have a new distribution: $text{Mult}_4(n-X_2, p^{'})$. And to find the probability of $(X_1|X_2)$, I can treat it like any other marginal of a multinomial distribution, and say that: $(X_1|X_2 = x_2) sim text{Bin}(n-X_2, p_1^{'})$



I know that the expected value for a binomial distribution is $n cdot p$ and the variance is $n cdot p(1-p)$, so I can say that:



$$ E(X_1|X_2) = p_1^{'}(n-X_2)$$
$$ Var(X_1|X_2) = p_1^{'}(n-X_2)(1-p_1^{'}) $$



So I have two questions.




  1. Is this approach OK?


  2. If so, can I simply take the same steps for (b) but adding $X_2$ and $X_3$ together?











share|cite|improve this question






















  • It looks good to me. You may adopt a similar approach in part b).
    – BGM
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:05














1












1








1







I have a homework problem, which asks:



Let X = $(X_1, X_2, X_3, X_4, X_5) sim text{Mult}_5(n, p)$ with p = $(p_1, p_2, p_3, p_4, p_5)$.



(a) Find $E(X_1 | X_2) text{ and } Var(X_1 | X_2)$.



(b) Find $E(X_1 | X_2 + X_3)$.



So here is my approach to part (a):



To find $E(X_1|X_2 = x_2)$, I think of $X_2$ being set at a fixed value and remove it from the distribution. So first I have to normalize p, so say that:



$$ p_1^{'} = frac{p_1}{1-p_2}, p_3^{'} = frac{p_3}{1-p_2}, p_4^{'} = frac{p_4}{1-p_2}, p_5^{'} = frac{p_5}{1-p_2} $$
then let $p^{'} = (p_1^{'}, p_3^{'}, p_4^{'}, p_5^{'})$



So with $X_2$ fixed, I have a new distribution: $text{Mult}_4(n-X_2, p^{'})$. And to find the probability of $(X_1|X_2)$, I can treat it like any other marginal of a multinomial distribution, and say that: $(X_1|X_2 = x_2) sim text{Bin}(n-X_2, p_1^{'})$



I know that the expected value for a binomial distribution is $n cdot p$ and the variance is $n cdot p(1-p)$, so I can say that:



$$ E(X_1|X_2) = p_1^{'}(n-X_2)$$
$$ Var(X_1|X_2) = p_1^{'}(n-X_2)(1-p_1^{'}) $$



So I have two questions.




  1. Is this approach OK?


  2. If so, can I simply take the same steps for (b) but adding $X_2$ and $X_3$ together?











share|cite|improve this question













I have a homework problem, which asks:



Let X = $(X_1, X_2, X_3, X_4, X_5) sim text{Mult}_5(n, p)$ with p = $(p_1, p_2, p_3, p_4, p_5)$.



(a) Find $E(X_1 | X_2) text{ and } Var(X_1 | X_2)$.



(b) Find $E(X_1 | X_2 + X_3)$.



So here is my approach to part (a):



To find $E(X_1|X_2 = x_2)$, I think of $X_2$ being set at a fixed value and remove it from the distribution. So first I have to normalize p, so say that:



$$ p_1^{'} = frac{p_1}{1-p_2}, p_3^{'} = frac{p_3}{1-p_2}, p_4^{'} = frac{p_4}{1-p_2}, p_5^{'} = frac{p_5}{1-p_2} $$
then let $p^{'} = (p_1^{'}, p_3^{'}, p_4^{'}, p_5^{'})$



So with $X_2$ fixed, I have a new distribution: $text{Mult}_4(n-X_2, p^{'})$. And to find the probability of $(X_1|X_2)$, I can treat it like any other marginal of a multinomial distribution, and say that: $(X_1|X_2 = x_2) sim text{Bin}(n-X_2, p_1^{'})$



I know that the expected value for a binomial distribution is $n cdot p$ and the variance is $n cdot p(1-p)$, so I can say that:



$$ E(X_1|X_2) = p_1^{'}(n-X_2)$$
$$ Var(X_1|X_2) = p_1^{'}(n-X_2)(1-p_1^{'}) $$



So I have two questions.




  1. Is this approach OK?


  2. If so, can I simply take the same steps for (b) but adding $X_2$ and $X_3$ together?








probability statistics conditional-expectation expected-value






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 20 '18 at 4:24









JStorm

255




255












  • It looks good to me. You may adopt a similar approach in part b).
    – BGM
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:05


















  • It looks good to me. You may adopt a similar approach in part b).
    – BGM
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:05
















It looks good to me. You may adopt a similar approach in part b).
– BGM
Nov 20 '18 at 9:05




It looks good to me. You may adopt a similar approach in part b).
– BGM
Nov 20 '18 at 9:05















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005935%2fconditional-expectation-of-one-member-of-a-multinomial-distribution-conditioned%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005935%2fconditional-expectation-of-one-member-of-a-multinomial-distribution-conditioned%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$