Dual of $mathbb{Q}$[x] is not isomorphic to $mathbb{Q}$[x]












2












$begingroup$


Denote by $mathbb{Q}$ the set of the rational numbers. Denote by $mathbb{Q}[x]$ the vector space over $mathbb{Q}$ of the polynomials with rational coefficients.



Denote by $(mathbb{Q}[x] )^{star}$ the dual of $mathbb{Q}$[x] . I am trying to show that $(mathbb{Q}[x] )^{star}$ and $mathbb{Q}[x] $ are not isomorphic (that is: does not exist a linear transformation which is bijective). I really don't know how to start. Someone could help me ?



Thanks in advance










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Hint: compute the cardinality of the dual
    $endgroup$
    – Wojowu
    Jan 8 at 21:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    the dual will consist of the sequences $a_n = 1, n in I$ where $I subset mathbb{N}$ is finite and zero otherwise?
    $endgroup$
    – math student
    Jan 8 at 21:50












  • $begingroup$
    Good guess, but not right. Consider the $Bbb Q$-linear mapping from $Bbb Q[x]$ that associates to a polynomial $f$ the sum of the coefficients of $f$. There are finitely many of these, but the above lin.tf. can not be represented by such a finitary construction as appears in your guess.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Jan 8 at 22:44
















2












$begingroup$


Denote by $mathbb{Q}$ the set of the rational numbers. Denote by $mathbb{Q}[x]$ the vector space over $mathbb{Q}$ of the polynomials with rational coefficients.



Denote by $(mathbb{Q}[x] )^{star}$ the dual of $mathbb{Q}$[x] . I am trying to show that $(mathbb{Q}[x] )^{star}$ and $mathbb{Q}[x] $ are not isomorphic (that is: does not exist a linear transformation which is bijective). I really don't know how to start. Someone could help me ?



Thanks in advance










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Hint: compute the cardinality of the dual
    $endgroup$
    – Wojowu
    Jan 8 at 21:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    the dual will consist of the sequences $a_n = 1, n in I$ where $I subset mathbb{N}$ is finite and zero otherwise?
    $endgroup$
    – math student
    Jan 8 at 21:50












  • $begingroup$
    Good guess, but not right. Consider the $Bbb Q$-linear mapping from $Bbb Q[x]$ that associates to a polynomial $f$ the sum of the coefficients of $f$. There are finitely many of these, but the above lin.tf. can not be represented by such a finitary construction as appears in your guess.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Jan 8 at 22:44














2












2








2


2



$begingroup$


Denote by $mathbb{Q}$ the set of the rational numbers. Denote by $mathbb{Q}[x]$ the vector space over $mathbb{Q}$ of the polynomials with rational coefficients.



Denote by $(mathbb{Q}[x] )^{star}$ the dual of $mathbb{Q}$[x] . I am trying to show that $(mathbb{Q}[x] )^{star}$ and $mathbb{Q}[x] $ are not isomorphic (that is: does not exist a linear transformation which is bijective). I really don't know how to start. Someone could help me ?



Thanks in advance










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Denote by $mathbb{Q}$ the set of the rational numbers. Denote by $mathbb{Q}[x]$ the vector space over $mathbb{Q}$ of the polynomials with rational coefficients.



Denote by $(mathbb{Q}[x] )^{star}$ the dual of $mathbb{Q}$[x] . I am trying to show that $(mathbb{Q}[x] )^{star}$ and $mathbb{Q}[x] $ are not isomorphic (that is: does not exist a linear transformation which is bijective). I really don't know how to start. Someone could help me ?



Thanks in advance







linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 8 at 21:40









math studentmath student

2,37411017




2,37411017








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Hint: compute the cardinality of the dual
    $endgroup$
    – Wojowu
    Jan 8 at 21:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    the dual will consist of the sequences $a_n = 1, n in I$ where $I subset mathbb{N}$ is finite and zero otherwise?
    $endgroup$
    – math student
    Jan 8 at 21:50












  • $begingroup$
    Good guess, but not right. Consider the $Bbb Q$-linear mapping from $Bbb Q[x]$ that associates to a polynomial $f$ the sum of the coefficients of $f$. There are finitely many of these, but the above lin.tf. can not be represented by such a finitary construction as appears in your guess.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Jan 8 at 22:44














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Hint: compute the cardinality of the dual
    $endgroup$
    – Wojowu
    Jan 8 at 21:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    the dual will consist of the sequences $a_n = 1, n in I$ where $I subset mathbb{N}$ is finite and zero otherwise?
    $endgroup$
    – math student
    Jan 8 at 21:50












  • $begingroup$
    Good guess, but not right. Consider the $Bbb Q$-linear mapping from $Bbb Q[x]$ that associates to a polynomial $f$ the sum of the coefficients of $f$. There are finitely many of these, but the above lin.tf. can not be represented by such a finitary construction as appears in your guess.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Jan 8 at 22:44








3




3




$begingroup$
Hint: compute the cardinality of the dual
$endgroup$
– Wojowu
Jan 8 at 21:42




$begingroup$
Hint: compute the cardinality of the dual
$endgroup$
– Wojowu
Jan 8 at 21:42




1




1




$begingroup$
the dual will consist of the sequences $a_n = 1, n in I$ where $I subset mathbb{N}$ is finite and zero otherwise?
$endgroup$
– math student
Jan 8 at 21:50






$begingroup$
the dual will consist of the sequences $a_n = 1, n in I$ where $I subset mathbb{N}$ is finite and zero otherwise?
$endgroup$
– math student
Jan 8 at 21:50














$begingroup$
Good guess, but not right. Consider the $Bbb Q$-linear mapping from $Bbb Q[x]$ that associates to a polynomial $f$ the sum of the coefficients of $f$. There are finitely many of these, but the above lin.tf. can not be represented by such a finitary construction as appears in your guess.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
Jan 8 at 22:44




$begingroup$
Good guess, but not right. Consider the $Bbb Q$-linear mapping from $Bbb Q[x]$ that associates to a polynomial $f$ the sum of the coefficients of $f$. There are finitely many of these, but the above lin.tf. can not be represented by such a finitary construction as appears in your guess.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
Jan 8 at 22:44










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

The vector space $Bbb Q[x]$ may be viewed as consisting of those sequences



$(a_i)_0^infty, tag 1$



where each $a_i in Bbb Q$ and $a_i = 0$ for all but a finite number of $i$; now consider an arbitrary sequence of the form



$(lambda_i)_0^infty in Bbb Q^infty, tag{2}$



where we allow $lambda_i ne 0$ for an infinite number of index values $i$. Any such sequence $lambda = (lambda_i)_0^infty$ determines a well-defined linear functional on $Bbb Q[x]$ via the formula



$lambda(p(x)) = displaystyle sum_0^infty lambda_i p_i, tag 3$



where



$p(x) = displaystyle sum_0^{deg p} p_i x^i in Bbb Q[x]. tag 4$



Since only a finite number of the $p_i ne 0$, the sum in (3) is well-defined and determines a unique element of $(Bbb Q[x])^ast$; linearity is easily verified.



Now the cardinality $vert Bbb Q[x] vert$ of $Bbb Q[x]$ is well known to be



$vert Bbb Q[x] vert = aleph_0, tag 5$



that is, $Bbb Q[x]$ is countable; but it is also reasonably well-known that the cardinality of the set of sequences of rationals is $vert Bbb R vert$, the cardinality of $Bbb R$:



$vert { (lambda_i)_0^infty } vert = vert Bbb R vert; tag 6$



since



$vert Bbb Q[x] vert = aleph_0 ne vert Bbb R vert = vert { (lambda_i)_0^infty } vert, tag 7$



we see that



$Bbb Q[x] not cong (Bbb Q[x])^ast. tag 8$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066755%2fdual-of-mathbbqx-is-not-isomorphic-to-mathbbqx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    The vector space $Bbb Q[x]$ may be viewed as consisting of those sequences



    $(a_i)_0^infty, tag 1$



    where each $a_i in Bbb Q$ and $a_i = 0$ for all but a finite number of $i$; now consider an arbitrary sequence of the form



    $(lambda_i)_0^infty in Bbb Q^infty, tag{2}$



    where we allow $lambda_i ne 0$ for an infinite number of index values $i$. Any such sequence $lambda = (lambda_i)_0^infty$ determines a well-defined linear functional on $Bbb Q[x]$ via the formula



    $lambda(p(x)) = displaystyle sum_0^infty lambda_i p_i, tag 3$



    where



    $p(x) = displaystyle sum_0^{deg p} p_i x^i in Bbb Q[x]. tag 4$



    Since only a finite number of the $p_i ne 0$, the sum in (3) is well-defined and determines a unique element of $(Bbb Q[x])^ast$; linearity is easily verified.



    Now the cardinality $vert Bbb Q[x] vert$ of $Bbb Q[x]$ is well known to be



    $vert Bbb Q[x] vert = aleph_0, tag 5$



    that is, $Bbb Q[x]$ is countable; but it is also reasonably well-known that the cardinality of the set of sequences of rationals is $vert Bbb R vert$, the cardinality of $Bbb R$:



    $vert { (lambda_i)_0^infty } vert = vert Bbb R vert; tag 6$



    since



    $vert Bbb Q[x] vert = aleph_0 ne vert Bbb R vert = vert { (lambda_i)_0^infty } vert, tag 7$



    we see that



    $Bbb Q[x] not cong (Bbb Q[x])^ast. tag 8$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      The vector space $Bbb Q[x]$ may be viewed as consisting of those sequences



      $(a_i)_0^infty, tag 1$



      where each $a_i in Bbb Q$ and $a_i = 0$ for all but a finite number of $i$; now consider an arbitrary sequence of the form



      $(lambda_i)_0^infty in Bbb Q^infty, tag{2}$



      where we allow $lambda_i ne 0$ for an infinite number of index values $i$. Any such sequence $lambda = (lambda_i)_0^infty$ determines a well-defined linear functional on $Bbb Q[x]$ via the formula



      $lambda(p(x)) = displaystyle sum_0^infty lambda_i p_i, tag 3$



      where



      $p(x) = displaystyle sum_0^{deg p} p_i x^i in Bbb Q[x]. tag 4$



      Since only a finite number of the $p_i ne 0$, the sum in (3) is well-defined and determines a unique element of $(Bbb Q[x])^ast$; linearity is easily verified.



      Now the cardinality $vert Bbb Q[x] vert$ of $Bbb Q[x]$ is well known to be



      $vert Bbb Q[x] vert = aleph_0, tag 5$



      that is, $Bbb Q[x]$ is countable; but it is also reasonably well-known that the cardinality of the set of sequences of rationals is $vert Bbb R vert$, the cardinality of $Bbb R$:



      $vert { (lambda_i)_0^infty } vert = vert Bbb R vert; tag 6$



      since



      $vert Bbb Q[x] vert = aleph_0 ne vert Bbb R vert = vert { (lambda_i)_0^infty } vert, tag 7$



      we see that



      $Bbb Q[x] not cong (Bbb Q[x])^ast. tag 8$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        The vector space $Bbb Q[x]$ may be viewed as consisting of those sequences



        $(a_i)_0^infty, tag 1$



        where each $a_i in Bbb Q$ and $a_i = 0$ for all but a finite number of $i$; now consider an arbitrary sequence of the form



        $(lambda_i)_0^infty in Bbb Q^infty, tag{2}$



        where we allow $lambda_i ne 0$ for an infinite number of index values $i$. Any such sequence $lambda = (lambda_i)_0^infty$ determines a well-defined linear functional on $Bbb Q[x]$ via the formula



        $lambda(p(x)) = displaystyle sum_0^infty lambda_i p_i, tag 3$



        where



        $p(x) = displaystyle sum_0^{deg p} p_i x^i in Bbb Q[x]. tag 4$



        Since only a finite number of the $p_i ne 0$, the sum in (3) is well-defined and determines a unique element of $(Bbb Q[x])^ast$; linearity is easily verified.



        Now the cardinality $vert Bbb Q[x] vert$ of $Bbb Q[x]$ is well known to be



        $vert Bbb Q[x] vert = aleph_0, tag 5$



        that is, $Bbb Q[x]$ is countable; but it is also reasonably well-known that the cardinality of the set of sequences of rationals is $vert Bbb R vert$, the cardinality of $Bbb R$:



        $vert { (lambda_i)_0^infty } vert = vert Bbb R vert; tag 6$



        since



        $vert Bbb Q[x] vert = aleph_0 ne vert Bbb R vert = vert { (lambda_i)_0^infty } vert, tag 7$



        we see that



        $Bbb Q[x] not cong (Bbb Q[x])^ast. tag 8$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The vector space $Bbb Q[x]$ may be viewed as consisting of those sequences



        $(a_i)_0^infty, tag 1$



        where each $a_i in Bbb Q$ and $a_i = 0$ for all but a finite number of $i$; now consider an arbitrary sequence of the form



        $(lambda_i)_0^infty in Bbb Q^infty, tag{2}$



        where we allow $lambda_i ne 0$ for an infinite number of index values $i$. Any such sequence $lambda = (lambda_i)_0^infty$ determines a well-defined linear functional on $Bbb Q[x]$ via the formula



        $lambda(p(x)) = displaystyle sum_0^infty lambda_i p_i, tag 3$



        where



        $p(x) = displaystyle sum_0^{deg p} p_i x^i in Bbb Q[x]. tag 4$



        Since only a finite number of the $p_i ne 0$, the sum in (3) is well-defined and determines a unique element of $(Bbb Q[x])^ast$; linearity is easily verified.



        Now the cardinality $vert Bbb Q[x] vert$ of $Bbb Q[x]$ is well known to be



        $vert Bbb Q[x] vert = aleph_0, tag 5$



        that is, $Bbb Q[x]$ is countable; but it is also reasonably well-known that the cardinality of the set of sequences of rationals is $vert Bbb R vert$, the cardinality of $Bbb R$:



        $vert { (lambda_i)_0^infty } vert = vert Bbb R vert; tag 6$



        since



        $vert Bbb Q[x] vert = aleph_0 ne vert Bbb R vert = vert { (lambda_i)_0^infty } vert, tag 7$



        we see that



        $Bbb Q[x] not cong (Bbb Q[x])^ast. tag 8$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 9 at 2:30









        Robert LewisRobert Lewis

        45.6k23065




        45.6k23065






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066755%2fdual-of-mathbbqx-is-not-isomorphic-to-mathbbqx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

            Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

            A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$