Probability of losing a game of chance.
$begingroup$
I am trying to work out the probabilities of losing a game of chance (1 in 2 chance per game) by sticking with the same answer, say heads on a coin toss.
I know there is a 1 in 2 chance of tails on the first game, then 1 of 2 possible outcomes again on the second game, and 3rd etc, but the chance of the same outcome repetitively is multiplied by the chance of each occurrence. So 2nd time 1/2 * 1/2 = 1/4, then 1/8 etc.
What I'm not sure about is, if that's the chance for each game, is the chance of losing all games multiplied together?
So to lose the first and second games you would need to multiply the 1/2 and 1/4 together giving 1/8, and to also lose the 3rd game you would also multiply by the 1/8 chance for that game. Giving 1/64. Chances for the 3rd game are a 1/8 chance of losing by sticking with heads following 2 tails outcomes, but are the chances of losing all 3 games 1 in 64?
It's 15 years since I did statistics in school and by the 4th game this gives 1/976, which seems too high to me, 1/16 seems more realistic, if anyone has a better understanding than me their input would be appreciated.
probability statistics
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to work out the probabilities of losing a game of chance (1 in 2 chance per game) by sticking with the same answer, say heads on a coin toss.
I know there is a 1 in 2 chance of tails on the first game, then 1 of 2 possible outcomes again on the second game, and 3rd etc, but the chance of the same outcome repetitively is multiplied by the chance of each occurrence. So 2nd time 1/2 * 1/2 = 1/4, then 1/8 etc.
What I'm not sure about is, if that's the chance for each game, is the chance of losing all games multiplied together?
So to lose the first and second games you would need to multiply the 1/2 and 1/4 together giving 1/8, and to also lose the 3rd game you would also multiply by the 1/8 chance for that game. Giving 1/64. Chances for the 3rd game are a 1/8 chance of losing by sticking with heads following 2 tails outcomes, but are the chances of losing all 3 games 1 in 64?
It's 15 years since I did statistics in school and by the 4th game this gives 1/976, which seems too high to me, 1/16 seems more realistic, if anyone has a better understanding than me their input would be appreciated.
probability statistics
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This may need clarification. Is not each game a single toss? But if so, then the probability of winning a given game is $frac 12$ regardless of what has come before (or what comes after). And where does $976$ come from? That isn't a power of $2$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Sep 26 '15 at 22:36
$begingroup$
If i understand correctly you are wrong because every toss has $frac{1}{2}$ probability of being tail so the probability of losing two games (even if not sticking with the same choose) is $frac{1}{4}$ and in general the probability of losing all the first $n$ games is $frac{1}{2^n}$
$endgroup$
– karmalu
Sep 27 '15 at 12:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to work out the probabilities of losing a game of chance (1 in 2 chance per game) by sticking with the same answer, say heads on a coin toss.
I know there is a 1 in 2 chance of tails on the first game, then 1 of 2 possible outcomes again on the second game, and 3rd etc, but the chance of the same outcome repetitively is multiplied by the chance of each occurrence. So 2nd time 1/2 * 1/2 = 1/4, then 1/8 etc.
What I'm not sure about is, if that's the chance for each game, is the chance of losing all games multiplied together?
So to lose the first and second games you would need to multiply the 1/2 and 1/4 together giving 1/8, and to also lose the 3rd game you would also multiply by the 1/8 chance for that game. Giving 1/64. Chances for the 3rd game are a 1/8 chance of losing by sticking with heads following 2 tails outcomes, but are the chances of losing all 3 games 1 in 64?
It's 15 years since I did statistics in school and by the 4th game this gives 1/976, which seems too high to me, 1/16 seems more realistic, if anyone has a better understanding than me their input would be appreciated.
probability statistics
$endgroup$
I am trying to work out the probabilities of losing a game of chance (1 in 2 chance per game) by sticking with the same answer, say heads on a coin toss.
I know there is a 1 in 2 chance of tails on the first game, then 1 of 2 possible outcomes again on the second game, and 3rd etc, but the chance of the same outcome repetitively is multiplied by the chance of each occurrence. So 2nd time 1/2 * 1/2 = 1/4, then 1/8 etc.
What I'm not sure about is, if that's the chance for each game, is the chance of losing all games multiplied together?
So to lose the first and second games you would need to multiply the 1/2 and 1/4 together giving 1/8, and to also lose the 3rd game you would also multiply by the 1/8 chance for that game. Giving 1/64. Chances for the 3rd game are a 1/8 chance of losing by sticking with heads following 2 tails outcomes, but are the chances of losing all 3 games 1 in 64?
It's 15 years since I did statistics in school and by the 4th game this gives 1/976, which seems too high to me, 1/16 seems more realistic, if anyone has a better understanding than me their input would be appreciated.
probability statistics
probability statistics
asked Sep 26 '15 at 22:33
ShaunShaun
11
11
$begingroup$
This may need clarification. Is not each game a single toss? But if so, then the probability of winning a given game is $frac 12$ regardless of what has come before (or what comes after). And where does $976$ come from? That isn't a power of $2$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Sep 26 '15 at 22:36
$begingroup$
If i understand correctly you are wrong because every toss has $frac{1}{2}$ probability of being tail so the probability of losing two games (even if not sticking with the same choose) is $frac{1}{4}$ and in general the probability of losing all the first $n$ games is $frac{1}{2^n}$
$endgroup$
– karmalu
Sep 27 '15 at 12:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This may need clarification. Is not each game a single toss? But if so, then the probability of winning a given game is $frac 12$ regardless of what has come before (or what comes after). And where does $976$ come from? That isn't a power of $2$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Sep 26 '15 at 22:36
$begingroup$
If i understand correctly you are wrong because every toss has $frac{1}{2}$ probability of being tail so the probability of losing two games (even if not sticking with the same choose) is $frac{1}{4}$ and in general the probability of losing all the first $n$ games is $frac{1}{2^n}$
$endgroup$
– karmalu
Sep 27 '15 at 12:06
$begingroup$
This may need clarification. Is not each game a single toss? But if so, then the probability of winning a given game is $frac 12$ regardless of what has come before (or what comes after). And where does $976$ come from? That isn't a power of $2$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Sep 26 '15 at 22:36
$begingroup$
This may need clarification. Is not each game a single toss? But if so, then the probability of winning a given game is $frac 12$ regardless of what has come before (or what comes after). And where does $976$ come from? That isn't a power of $2$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Sep 26 '15 at 22:36
$begingroup$
If i understand correctly you are wrong because every toss has $frac{1}{2}$ probability of being tail so the probability of losing two games (even if not sticking with the same choose) is $frac{1}{4}$ and in general the probability of losing all the first $n$ games is $frac{1}{2^n}$
$endgroup$
– karmalu
Sep 27 '15 at 12:06
$begingroup$
If i understand correctly you are wrong because every toss has $frac{1}{2}$ probability of being tail so the probability of losing two games (even if not sticking with the same choose) is $frac{1}{4}$ and in general the probability of losing all the first $n$ games is $frac{1}{2^n}$
$endgroup$
– karmalu
Sep 27 '15 at 12:06
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It comes down what you consider a win. Is it to get one of the tosses or all? I think you ask about getting everything right.
Lets say you stick to heads (H) and there are two games. Then all possible outcomes on your world are HH,HT,TH,TT and only HH is good for you. The probability you will win all games is $(1/2)^n$, for n=2 or 1/4. For n=3 it is $(1/2)^3=1/8$ etc
HOWEVER if you already are at the point that you have won the first game , then we are at a world that allows only HH and HT because the first turn is already played (this is called conditional: you are basing your estimations on the condition that something has already happened). Then your chances of winning this round conditional to the fact you already won all previous is 1/2. The same if you are asking about your chances of winning round n+1 conditional to the fact you won all previous rounds.
So every round, your chances are 50-50, but this is because you can only arrive to that round if you win all previous rounds. And for every player that arrived to round n, there will be $2^{n-1}$ players on average that never made it there. (for n>=2)
This means sticking makes no difference. Now, so that is not confused with a different question: if at every round you have more than one choices AND something is revealed to you (you get some additional information by say showing to you that there is nothing behind curtain 3, then this is a different problem)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1452804%2fprobability-of-losing-a-game-of-chance%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It comes down what you consider a win. Is it to get one of the tosses or all? I think you ask about getting everything right.
Lets say you stick to heads (H) and there are two games. Then all possible outcomes on your world are HH,HT,TH,TT and only HH is good for you. The probability you will win all games is $(1/2)^n$, for n=2 or 1/4. For n=3 it is $(1/2)^3=1/8$ etc
HOWEVER if you already are at the point that you have won the first game , then we are at a world that allows only HH and HT because the first turn is already played (this is called conditional: you are basing your estimations on the condition that something has already happened). Then your chances of winning this round conditional to the fact you already won all previous is 1/2. The same if you are asking about your chances of winning round n+1 conditional to the fact you won all previous rounds.
So every round, your chances are 50-50, but this is because you can only arrive to that round if you win all previous rounds. And for every player that arrived to round n, there will be $2^{n-1}$ players on average that never made it there. (for n>=2)
This means sticking makes no difference. Now, so that is not confused with a different question: if at every round you have more than one choices AND something is revealed to you (you get some additional information by say showing to you that there is nothing behind curtain 3, then this is a different problem)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It comes down what you consider a win. Is it to get one of the tosses or all? I think you ask about getting everything right.
Lets say you stick to heads (H) and there are two games. Then all possible outcomes on your world are HH,HT,TH,TT and only HH is good for you. The probability you will win all games is $(1/2)^n$, for n=2 or 1/4. For n=3 it is $(1/2)^3=1/8$ etc
HOWEVER if you already are at the point that you have won the first game , then we are at a world that allows only HH and HT because the first turn is already played (this is called conditional: you are basing your estimations on the condition that something has already happened). Then your chances of winning this round conditional to the fact you already won all previous is 1/2. The same if you are asking about your chances of winning round n+1 conditional to the fact you won all previous rounds.
So every round, your chances are 50-50, but this is because you can only arrive to that round if you win all previous rounds. And for every player that arrived to round n, there will be $2^{n-1}$ players on average that never made it there. (for n>=2)
This means sticking makes no difference. Now, so that is not confused with a different question: if at every round you have more than one choices AND something is revealed to you (you get some additional information by say showing to you that there is nothing behind curtain 3, then this is a different problem)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It comes down what you consider a win. Is it to get one of the tosses or all? I think you ask about getting everything right.
Lets say you stick to heads (H) and there are two games. Then all possible outcomes on your world are HH,HT,TH,TT and only HH is good for you. The probability you will win all games is $(1/2)^n$, for n=2 or 1/4. For n=3 it is $(1/2)^3=1/8$ etc
HOWEVER if you already are at the point that you have won the first game , then we are at a world that allows only HH and HT because the first turn is already played (this is called conditional: you are basing your estimations on the condition that something has already happened). Then your chances of winning this round conditional to the fact you already won all previous is 1/2. The same if you are asking about your chances of winning round n+1 conditional to the fact you won all previous rounds.
So every round, your chances are 50-50, but this is because you can only arrive to that round if you win all previous rounds. And for every player that arrived to round n, there will be $2^{n-1}$ players on average that never made it there. (for n>=2)
This means sticking makes no difference. Now, so that is not confused with a different question: if at every round you have more than one choices AND something is revealed to you (you get some additional information by say showing to you that there is nothing behind curtain 3, then this is a different problem)
$endgroup$
It comes down what you consider a win. Is it to get one of the tosses or all? I think you ask about getting everything right.
Lets say you stick to heads (H) and there are two games. Then all possible outcomes on your world are HH,HT,TH,TT and only HH is good for you. The probability you will win all games is $(1/2)^n$, for n=2 or 1/4. For n=3 it is $(1/2)^3=1/8$ etc
HOWEVER if you already are at the point that you have won the first game , then we are at a world that allows only HH and HT because the first turn is already played (this is called conditional: you are basing your estimations on the condition that something has already happened). Then your chances of winning this round conditional to the fact you already won all previous is 1/2. The same if you are asking about your chances of winning round n+1 conditional to the fact you won all previous rounds.
So every round, your chances are 50-50, but this is because you can only arrive to that round if you win all previous rounds. And for every player that arrived to round n, there will be $2^{n-1}$ players on average that never made it there. (for n>=2)
This means sticking makes no difference. Now, so that is not confused with a different question: if at every round you have more than one choices AND something is revealed to you (you get some additional information by say showing to you that there is nothing behind curtain 3, then this is a different problem)
edited Aug 24 '16 at 11:51
answered Aug 23 '16 at 14:28
ntgntg
1236
1236
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1452804%2fprobability-of-losing-a-game-of-chance%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
This may need clarification. Is not each game a single toss? But if so, then the probability of winning a given game is $frac 12$ regardless of what has come before (or what comes after). And where does $976$ come from? That isn't a power of $2$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Sep 26 '15 at 22:36
$begingroup$
If i understand correctly you are wrong because every toss has $frac{1}{2}$ probability of being tail so the probability of losing two games (even if not sticking with the same choose) is $frac{1}{4}$ and in general the probability of losing all the first $n$ games is $frac{1}{2^n}$
$endgroup$
– karmalu
Sep 27 '15 at 12:06