Norms and Parallelogram Identity
$begingroup$
I have recently started learning about Norms and Inner Products. I have came across the idea that for an inner product to introduce a norm the parallelogram Identity must be true.
The proof my books gives is just that it is apparently easy to see that the parallelogram identity fails when the norm, p is not = 2. Also that you can easily find a counterexample in R^2
I am quite confused here any help would be great.
Thanks
linear-algebra normed-spaces inner-product-space
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have recently started learning about Norms and Inner Products. I have came across the idea that for an inner product to introduce a norm the parallelogram Identity must be true.
The proof my books gives is just that it is apparently easy to see that the parallelogram identity fails when the norm, p is not = 2. Also that you can easily find a counterexample in R^2
I am quite confused here any help would be great.
Thanks
linear-algebra normed-spaces inner-product-space
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have recently started learning about Norms and Inner Products. I have came across the idea that for an inner product to introduce a norm the parallelogram Identity must be true.
The proof my books gives is just that it is apparently easy to see that the parallelogram identity fails when the norm, p is not = 2. Also that you can easily find a counterexample in R^2
I am quite confused here any help would be great.
Thanks
linear-algebra normed-spaces inner-product-space
$endgroup$
I have recently started learning about Norms and Inner Products. I have came across the idea that for an inner product to introduce a norm the parallelogram Identity must be true.
The proof my books gives is just that it is apparently easy to see that the parallelogram identity fails when the norm, p is not = 2. Also that you can easily find a counterexample in R^2
I am quite confused here any help would be great.
Thanks
linear-algebra normed-spaces inner-product-space
linear-algebra normed-spaces inner-product-space
edited Jan 8 at 21:46
jake walsh
asked Jan 8 at 21:30
jake walshjake walsh
808
808
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In $mathbb R$, the parallelogram identity will always hold for any $p$-norm, as I am about to show:
Let $p geq 1$, and $VertcdotVert_p$ denote the $p$-norm. Let $x,y in mathbb R$. Then
$$2Vert xVert_p^2 + 2Vert yVert_p^2 = 2x^2 + 2y^2 = (x+y)^2 + (x-y)^2 = Vert x+yVert_p^2 + Vert x-yVert_p^2.$$
However, in general, the parallelogram identity will fail for $p neq 2$. Let $n > 1$. Then $mathbb R^2$ sits in $mathbb R^n$. Therefore, by finding a counter-example in $mathbb R^2$, we prove that the identity fails for $mathbb R^n$.
Let $x = (1,0), y = (0,1)$. Let $p > 1, p neq 2$. Then
$$2Vert xVert_p^2 + 2Vert yVert_p^2 = 2(0^p+1^p)^{2/p} + 2(1^p + 0^p)^{2/p} = 4.$$
However,
$$Vert x+ yVert_p^2 + Vert x - yVert_p^2 = (1^p+1^p)^{2/p} + (1^p + 1^p)^{2/p} = 2times4^{1/p}.$$
Clearly $2times4^{1/p} = 4$ only if $1/p = 1/2$. But this is not the case, so we have found a counterexample to the parallelogram identity for $p neq 2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066742%2fnorms-and-parallelogram-identity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In $mathbb R$, the parallelogram identity will always hold for any $p$-norm, as I am about to show:
Let $p geq 1$, and $VertcdotVert_p$ denote the $p$-norm. Let $x,y in mathbb R$. Then
$$2Vert xVert_p^2 + 2Vert yVert_p^2 = 2x^2 + 2y^2 = (x+y)^2 + (x-y)^2 = Vert x+yVert_p^2 + Vert x-yVert_p^2.$$
However, in general, the parallelogram identity will fail for $p neq 2$. Let $n > 1$. Then $mathbb R^2$ sits in $mathbb R^n$. Therefore, by finding a counter-example in $mathbb R^2$, we prove that the identity fails for $mathbb R^n$.
Let $x = (1,0), y = (0,1)$. Let $p > 1, p neq 2$. Then
$$2Vert xVert_p^2 + 2Vert yVert_p^2 = 2(0^p+1^p)^{2/p} + 2(1^p + 0^p)^{2/p} = 4.$$
However,
$$Vert x+ yVert_p^2 + Vert x - yVert_p^2 = (1^p+1^p)^{2/p} + (1^p + 1^p)^{2/p} = 2times4^{1/p}.$$
Clearly $2times4^{1/p} = 4$ only if $1/p = 1/2$. But this is not the case, so we have found a counterexample to the parallelogram identity for $p neq 2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In $mathbb R$, the parallelogram identity will always hold for any $p$-norm, as I am about to show:
Let $p geq 1$, and $VertcdotVert_p$ denote the $p$-norm. Let $x,y in mathbb R$. Then
$$2Vert xVert_p^2 + 2Vert yVert_p^2 = 2x^2 + 2y^2 = (x+y)^2 + (x-y)^2 = Vert x+yVert_p^2 + Vert x-yVert_p^2.$$
However, in general, the parallelogram identity will fail for $p neq 2$. Let $n > 1$. Then $mathbb R^2$ sits in $mathbb R^n$. Therefore, by finding a counter-example in $mathbb R^2$, we prove that the identity fails for $mathbb R^n$.
Let $x = (1,0), y = (0,1)$. Let $p > 1, p neq 2$. Then
$$2Vert xVert_p^2 + 2Vert yVert_p^2 = 2(0^p+1^p)^{2/p} + 2(1^p + 0^p)^{2/p} = 4.$$
However,
$$Vert x+ yVert_p^2 + Vert x - yVert_p^2 = (1^p+1^p)^{2/p} + (1^p + 1^p)^{2/p} = 2times4^{1/p}.$$
Clearly $2times4^{1/p} = 4$ only if $1/p = 1/2$. But this is not the case, so we have found a counterexample to the parallelogram identity for $p neq 2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In $mathbb R$, the parallelogram identity will always hold for any $p$-norm, as I am about to show:
Let $p geq 1$, and $VertcdotVert_p$ denote the $p$-norm. Let $x,y in mathbb R$. Then
$$2Vert xVert_p^2 + 2Vert yVert_p^2 = 2x^2 + 2y^2 = (x+y)^2 + (x-y)^2 = Vert x+yVert_p^2 + Vert x-yVert_p^2.$$
However, in general, the parallelogram identity will fail for $p neq 2$. Let $n > 1$. Then $mathbb R^2$ sits in $mathbb R^n$. Therefore, by finding a counter-example in $mathbb R^2$, we prove that the identity fails for $mathbb R^n$.
Let $x = (1,0), y = (0,1)$. Let $p > 1, p neq 2$. Then
$$2Vert xVert_p^2 + 2Vert yVert_p^2 = 2(0^p+1^p)^{2/p} + 2(1^p + 0^p)^{2/p} = 4.$$
However,
$$Vert x+ yVert_p^2 + Vert x - yVert_p^2 = (1^p+1^p)^{2/p} + (1^p + 1^p)^{2/p} = 2times4^{1/p}.$$
Clearly $2times4^{1/p} = 4$ only if $1/p = 1/2$. But this is not the case, so we have found a counterexample to the parallelogram identity for $p neq 2$.
$endgroup$
In $mathbb R$, the parallelogram identity will always hold for any $p$-norm, as I am about to show:
Let $p geq 1$, and $VertcdotVert_p$ denote the $p$-norm. Let $x,y in mathbb R$. Then
$$2Vert xVert_p^2 + 2Vert yVert_p^2 = 2x^2 + 2y^2 = (x+y)^2 + (x-y)^2 = Vert x+yVert_p^2 + Vert x-yVert_p^2.$$
However, in general, the parallelogram identity will fail for $p neq 2$. Let $n > 1$. Then $mathbb R^2$ sits in $mathbb R^n$. Therefore, by finding a counter-example in $mathbb R^2$, we prove that the identity fails for $mathbb R^n$.
Let $x = (1,0), y = (0,1)$. Let $p > 1, p neq 2$. Then
$$2Vert xVert_p^2 + 2Vert yVert_p^2 = 2(0^p+1^p)^{2/p} + 2(1^p + 0^p)^{2/p} = 4.$$
However,
$$Vert x+ yVert_p^2 + Vert x - yVert_p^2 = (1^p+1^p)^{2/p} + (1^p + 1^p)^{2/p} = 2times4^{1/p}.$$
Clearly $2times4^{1/p} = 4$ only if $1/p = 1/2$. But this is not the case, so we have found a counterexample to the parallelogram identity for $p neq 2$.
answered Jan 8 at 23:50
HarambeHarambe
6,06321843
6,06321843
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066742%2fnorms-and-parallelogram-identity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown