Galois Group of $(x^2-p_1)cdots(x^2-p_n)$












1












$begingroup$



For distinct prime numbers $p_1,...,p_n$, what is the Galois group of $(x^2-p_1)cdots(x^2-p_n)$ over $mathbb{Q}$?




This problem appears to be quite common, however my understanding of Galois theory is quite poor, and I have no idea how to do this problem.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Can you deal with the case where $n=1$? What about $n=2$. Once you've tried the first few cases, you may see a pattern emerging.
    $endgroup$
    – Mathmo123
    Dec 10 '15 at 10:45






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    See this thread for IMO a good explanation as to why the dimension (and hence also the order of the Galois group) is $2^n$. With that out of the way it is easy to prove that the Galois group is an $n$-fold cartesian power of $C_2$. See also this and this.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 10 '15 at 11:14












  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Generating Elements of Galois Group
    $endgroup$
    – Watson
    Aug 17 '16 at 22:06
















1












$begingroup$



For distinct prime numbers $p_1,...,p_n$, what is the Galois group of $(x^2-p_1)cdots(x^2-p_n)$ over $mathbb{Q}$?




This problem appears to be quite common, however my understanding of Galois theory is quite poor, and I have no idea how to do this problem.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Can you deal with the case where $n=1$? What about $n=2$. Once you've tried the first few cases, you may see a pattern emerging.
    $endgroup$
    – Mathmo123
    Dec 10 '15 at 10:45






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    See this thread for IMO a good explanation as to why the dimension (and hence also the order of the Galois group) is $2^n$. With that out of the way it is easy to prove that the Galois group is an $n$-fold cartesian power of $C_2$. See also this and this.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 10 '15 at 11:14












  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Generating Elements of Galois Group
    $endgroup$
    – Watson
    Aug 17 '16 at 22:06














1












1








1


2



$begingroup$



For distinct prime numbers $p_1,...,p_n$, what is the Galois group of $(x^2-p_1)cdots(x^2-p_n)$ over $mathbb{Q}$?




This problem appears to be quite common, however my understanding of Galois theory is quite poor, and I have no idea how to do this problem.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





For distinct prime numbers $p_1,...,p_n$, what is the Galois group of $(x^2-p_1)cdots(x^2-p_n)$ over $mathbb{Q}$?




This problem appears to be quite common, however my understanding of Galois theory is quite poor, and I have no idea how to do this problem.







abstract-algebra field-theory galois-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 20 '15 at 15:59









user26857

39.3k124083




39.3k124083










asked Dec 10 '15 at 9:44









BobBob

8719




8719












  • $begingroup$
    Can you deal with the case where $n=1$? What about $n=2$. Once you've tried the first few cases, you may see a pattern emerging.
    $endgroup$
    – Mathmo123
    Dec 10 '15 at 10:45






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    See this thread for IMO a good explanation as to why the dimension (and hence also the order of the Galois group) is $2^n$. With that out of the way it is easy to prove that the Galois group is an $n$-fold cartesian power of $C_2$. See also this and this.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 10 '15 at 11:14












  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Generating Elements of Galois Group
    $endgroup$
    – Watson
    Aug 17 '16 at 22:06


















  • $begingroup$
    Can you deal with the case where $n=1$? What about $n=2$. Once you've tried the first few cases, you may see a pattern emerging.
    $endgroup$
    – Mathmo123
    Dec 10 '15 at 10:45






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    See this thread for IMO a good explanation as to why the dimension (and hence also the order of the Galois group) is $2^n$. With that out of the way it is easy to prove that the Galois group is an $n$-fold cartesian power of $C_2$. See also this and this.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 10 '15 at 11:14












  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Generating Elements of Galois Group
    $endgroup$
    – Watson
    Aug 17 '16 at 22:06
















$begingroup$
Can you deal with the case where $n=1$? What about $n=2$. Once you've tried the first few cases, you may see a pattern emerging.
$endgroup$
– Mathmo123
Dec 10 '15 at 10:45




$begingroup$
Can you deal with the case where $n=1$? What about $n=2$. Once you've tried the first few cases, you may see a pattern emerging.
$endgroup$
– Mathmo123
Dec 10 '15 at 10:45




1




1




$begingroup$
See this thread for IMO a good explanation as to why the dimension (and hence also the order of the Galois group) is $2^n$. With that out of the way it is easy to prove that the Galois group is an $n$-fold cartesian power of $C_2$. See also this and this.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 10 '15 at 11:14






$begingroup$
See this thread for IMO a good explanation as to why the dimension (and hence also the order of the Galois group) is $2^n$. With that out of the way it is easy to prove that the Galois group is an $n$-fold cartesian power of $C_2$. See also this and this.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 10 '15 at 11:14














$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Generating Elements of Galois Group
$endgroup$
– Watson
Aug 17 '16 at 22:06




$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Generating Elements of Galois Group
$endgroup$
– Watson
Aug 17 '16 at 22:06










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

This question has been asked many times, and been given many answers (see the links, especially those given by Jykri). I propose here a very simple proof based on Kummer theory. I recall the setting of this theory (which can be found in any course on Galois theory): let $m$ be a fixed integer, $K$ a field of characteristic not dividing $m$, containing the group $W_m$ of all $m$th roots of $1$; let $A$ be a subgroup of $K^ast$ containing $K^{ast m}$ , and let $L = K(A^{1/m})$, the field obtained by adding to $K$ all the $m$th roots of all the elements of $A$. Then $L/K$ is Galois, with abelian group $G$ of exponent $m$, isomorphic to $operatorname{Hom}(A/K^{ast m}, W_m)$.



Here we take $K = Bbb Q$, $m = 2$, $A_n$ = the (multiplicative) subgroup generated by $p_1$ , ..., $p_n$ and $Bbb Q^{ast 2}$. We want to show that $Bbb Q((A_n)^{1/2})/Bbb Q$ has Galois group isomorphic to $underbrace{Bbb Z/2Bbb Z times cdots Bbb Z/2Bbb Z}_{text{$n$ times}}$. By Kummer theory, this amounts to show that $A_n mod{Bbb Q^{ast 2}}$ has the same description. Here we shift perspectives and use elementary linear algebra: all the previous multiplicative groups are of exponent 2, hence can be viewed as vector spaces over the field $Bbb Z/2Bbb Z$. Let us show that $p_1 mod {Bbb Q^{ast 2}}$, ..., $p_n mod {Bbb Q^{ast 2}}$ form a basis of $A_n mod {Bbb Q^{ast 2}}$. Any relation of linear dependence between them, written multiplicatively, would be of the form:




A product of distinct $p_i$'s is equal to an element of $Bbb Q^{ast 2}$.




This is impossible by the unicity of decomposition into primes in $Bbb Z$. Thus we have shown that $A_n mod{Bbb Q^{ast 2}}$, as a vector space over $Bbb Z/2Bbb Z$ (written multiplicatively), has dimension $n$. QED






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    What is MathJax ?
    $endgroup$
    – nguyen quang do
    Jan 12 '16 at 20:31










  • $begingroup$
    Where can I find it ? I'm kind of "illiterate" concerning Tex
    $endgroup$
    – nguyen quang do
    Jan 13 '16 at 7:07










  • $begingroup$
    math.stackexchange.com/help/notation
    $endgroup$
    – Morgan Rodgers
    Jan 13 '16 at 7:43











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1569043%2fgalois-group-of-x2-p-1-cdotsx2-p-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

This question has been asked many times, and been given many answers (see the links, especially those given by Jykri). I propose here a very simple proof based on Kummer theory. I recall the setting of this theory (which can be found in any course on Galois theory): let $m$ be a fixed integer, $K$ a field of characteristic not dividing $m$, containing the group $W_m$ of all $m$th roots of $1$; let $A$ be a subgroup of $K^ast$ containing $K^{ast m}$ , and let $L = K(A^{1/m})$, the field obtained by adding to $K$ all the $m$th roots of all the elements of $A$. Then $L/K$ is Galois, with abelian group $G$ of exponent $m$, isomorphic to $operatorname{Hom}(A/K^{ast m}, W_m)$.



Here we take $K = Bbb Q$, $m = 2$, $A_n$ = the (multiplicative) subgroup generated by $p_1$ , ..., $p_n$ and $Bbb Q^{ast 2}$. We want to show that $Bbb Q((A_n)^{1/2})/Bbb Q$ has Galois group isomorphic to $underbrace{Bbb Z/2Bbb Z times cdots Bbb Z/2Bbb Z}_{text{$n$ times}}$. By Kummer theory, this amounts to show that $A_n mod{Bbb Q^{ast 2}}$ has the same description. Here we shift perspectives and use elementary linear algebra: all the previous multiplicative groups are of exponent 2, hence can be viewed as vector spaces over the field $Bbb Z/2Bbb Z$. Let us show that $p_1 mod {Bbb Q^{ast 2}}$, ..., $p_n mod {Bbb Q^{ast 2}}$ form a basis of $A_n mod {Bbb Q^{ast 2}}$. Any relation of linear dependence between them, written multiplicatively, would be of the form:




A product of distinct $p_i$'s is equal to an element of $Bbb Q^{ast 2}$.




This is impossible by the unicity of decomposition into primes in $Bbb Z$. Thus we have shown that $A_n mod{Bbb Q^{ast 2}}$, as a vector space over $Bbb Z/2Bbb Z$ (written multiplicatively), has dimension $n$. QED






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    What is MathJax ?
    $endgroup$
    – nguyen quang do
    Jan 12 '16 at 20:31










  • $begingroup$
    Where can I find it ? I'm kind of "illiterate" concerning Tex
    $endgroup$
    – nguyen quang do
    Jan 13 '16 at 7:07










  • $begingroup$
    math.stackexchange.com/help/notation
    $endgroup$
    – Morgan Rodgers
    Jan 13 '16 at 7:43
















1












$begingroup$

This question has been asked many times, and been given many answers (see the links, especially those given by Jykri). I propose here a very simple proof based on Kummer theory. I recall the setting of this theory (which can be found in any course on Galois theory): let $m$ be a fixed integer, $K$ a field of characteristic not dividing $m$, containing the group $W_m$ of all $m$th roots of $1$; let $A$ be a subgroup of $K^ast$ containing $K^{ast m}$ , and let $L = K(A^{1/m})$, the field obtained by adding to $K$ all the $m$th roots of all the elements of $A$. Then $L/K$ is Galois, with abelian group $G$ of exponent $m$, isomorphic to $operatorname{Hom}(A/K^{ast m}, W_m)$.



Here we take $K = Bbb Q$, $m = 2$, $A_n$ = the (multiplicative) subgroup generated by $p_1$ , ..., $p_n$ and $Bbb Q^{ast 2}$. We want to show that $Bbb Q((A_n)^{1/2})/Bbb Q$ has Galois group isomorphic to $underbrace{Bbb Z/2Bbb Z times cdots Bbb Z/2Bbb Z}_{text{$n$ times}}$. By Kummer theory, this amounts to show that $A_n mod{Bbb Q^{ast 2}}$ has the same description. Here we shift perspectives and use elementary linear algebra: all the previous multiplicative groups are of exponent 2, hence can be viewed as vector spaces over the field $Bbb Z/2Bbb Z$. Let us show that $p_1 mod {Bbb Q^{ast 2}}$, ..., $p_n mod {Bbb Q^{ast 2}}$ form a basis of $A_n mod {Bbb Q^{ast 2}}$. Any relation of linear dependence between them, written multiplicatively, would be of the form:




A product of distinct $p_i$'s is equal to an element of $Bbb Q^{ast 2}$.




This is impossible by the unicity of decomposition into primes in $Bbb Z$. Thus we have shown that $A_n mod{Bbb Q^{ast 2}}$, as a vector space over $Bbb Z/2Bbb Z$ (written multiplicatively), has dimension $n$. QED






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    What is MathJax ?
    $endgroup$
    – nguyen quang do
    Jan 12 '16 at 20:31










  • $begingroup$
    Where can I find it ? I'm kind of "illiterate" concerning Tex
    $endgroup$
    – nguyen quang do
    Jan 13 '16 at 7:07










  • $begingroup$
    math.stackexchange.com/help/notation
    $endgroup$
    – Morgan Rodgers
    Jan 13 '16 at 7:43














1












1








1





$begingroup$

This question has been asked many times, and been given many answers (see the links, especially those given by Jykri). I propose here a very simple proof based on Kummer theory. I recall the setting of this theory (which can be found in any course on Galois theory): let $m$ be a fixed integer, $K$ a field of characteristic not dividing $m$, containing the group $W_m$ of all $m$th roots of $1$; let $A$ be a subgroup of $K^ast$ containing $K^{ast m}$ , and let $L = K(A^{1/m})$, the field obtained by adding to $K$ all the $m$th roots of all the elements of $A$. Then $L/K$ is Galois, with abelian group $G$ of exponent $m$, isomorphic to $operatorname{Hom}(A/K^{ast m}, W_m)$.



Here we take $K = Bbb Q$, $m = 2$, $A_n$ = the (multiplicative) subgroup generated by $p_1$ , ..., $p_n$ and $Bbb Q^{ast 2}$. We want to show that $Bbb Q((A_n)^{1/2})/Bbb Q$ has Galois group isomorphic to $underbrace{Bbb Z/2Bbb Z times cdots Bbb Z/2Bbb Z}_{text{$n$ times}}$. By Kummer theory, this amounts to show that $A_n mod{Bbb Q^{ast 2}}$ has the same description. Here we shift perspectives and use elementary linear algebra: all the previous multiplicative groups are of exponent 2, hence can be viewed as vector spaces over the field $Bbb Z/2Bbb Z$. Let us show that $p_1 mod {Bbb Q^{ast 2}}$, ..., $p_n mod {Bbb Q^{ast 2}}$ form a basis of $A_n mod {Bbb Q^{ast 2}}$. Any relation of linear dependence between them, written multiplicatively, would be of the form:




A product of distinct $p_i$'s is equal to an element of $Bbb Q^{ast 2}$.




This is impossible by the unicity of decomposition into primes in $Bbb Z$. Thus we have shown that $A_n mod{Bbb Q^{ast 2}}$, as a vector space over $Bbb Z/2Bbb Z$ (written multiplicatively), has dimension $n$. QED






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



This question has been asked many times, and been given many answers (see the links, especially those given by Jykri). I propose here a very simple proof based on Kummer theory. I recall the setting of this theory (which can be found in any course on Galois theory): let $m$ be a fixed integer, $K$ a field of characteristic not dividing $m$, containing the group $W_m$ of all $m$th roots of $1$; let $A$ be a subgroup of $K^ast$ containing $K^{ast m}$ , and let $L = K(A^{1/m})$, the field obtained by adding to $K$ all the $m$th roots of all the elements of $A$. Then $L/K$ is Galois, with abelian group $G$ of exponent $m$, isomorphic to $operatorname{Hom}(A/K^{ast m}, W_m)$.



Here we take $K = Bbb Q$, $m = 2$, $A_n$ = the (multiplicative) subgroup generated by $p_1$ , ..., $p_n$ and $Bbb Q^{ast 2}$. We want to show that $Bbb Q((A_n)^{1/2})/Bbb Q$ has Galois group isomorphic to $underbrace{Bbb Z/2Bbb Z times cdots Bbb Z/2Bbb Z}_{text{$n$ times}}$. By Kummer theory, this amounts to show that $A_n mod{Bbb Q^{ast 2}}$ has the same description. Here we shift perspectives and use elementary linear algebra: all the previous multiplicative groups are of exponent 2, hence can be viewed as vector spaces over the field $Bbb Z/2Bbb Z$. Let us show that $p_1 mod {Bbb Q^{ast 2}}$, ..., $p_n mod {Bbb Q^{ast 2}}$ form a basis of $A_n mod {Bbb Q^{ast 2}}$. Any relation of linear dependence between them, written multiplicatively, would be of the form:




A product of distinct $p_i$'s is equal to an element of $Bbb Q^{ast 2}$.




This is impossible by the unicity of decomposition into primes in $Bbb Z$. Thus we have shown that $A_n mod{Bbb Q^{ast 2}}$, as a vector space over $Bbb Z/2Bbb Z$ (written multiplicatively), has dimension $n$. QED







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jan 2 at 1:03









Kenny Lau

19.9k2159




19.9k2159










answered Jan 12 '16 at 7:47









nguyen quang donguyen quang do

8,4611723




8,4611723












  • $begingroup$
    What is MathJax ?
    $endgroup$
    – nguyen quang do
    Jan 12 '16 at 20:31










  • $begingroup$
    Where can I find it ? I'm kind of "illiterate" concerning Tex
    $endgroup$
    – nguyen quang do
    Jan 13 '16 at 7:07










  • $begingroup$
    math.stackexchange.com/help/notation
    $endgroup$
    – Morgan Rodgers
    Jan 13 '16 at 7:43


















  • $begingroup$
    What is MathJax ?
    $endgroup$
    – nguyen quang do
    Jan 12 '16 at 20:31










  • $begingroup$
    Where can I find it ? I'm kind of "illiterate" concerning Tex
    $endgroup$
    – nguyen quang do
    Jan 13 '16 at 7:07










  • $begingroup$
    math.stackexchange.com/help/notation
    $endgroup$
    – Morgan Rodgers
    Jan 13 '16 at 7:43
















$begingroup$
What is MathJax ?
$endgroup$
– nguyen quang do
Jan 12 '16 at 20:31




$begingroup$
What is MathJax ?
$endgroup$
– nguyen quang do
Jan 12 '16 at 20:31












$begingroup$
Where can I find it ? I'm kind of "illiterate" concerning Tex
$endgroup$
– nguyen quang do
Jan 13 '16 at 7:07




$begingroup$
Where can I find it ? I'm kind of "illiterate" concerning Tex
$endgroup$
– nguyen quang do
Jan 13 '16 at 7:07












$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/help/notation
$endgroup$
– Morgan Rodgers
Jan 13 '16 at 7:43




$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/help/notation
$endgroup$
– Morgan Rodgers
Jan 13 '16 at 7:43


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1569043%2fgalois-group-of-x2-p-1-cdotsx2-p-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter