How to derive a bound of distortion / error between two different tensor decompositions.












0












$begingroup$


Consider a tensor $mathcal{X}inmathbb{R}^{Itimes Jtimes K} $. It can be approximately decomposed/factored in multiple ways. Namely by using the TUCKER3 decomposition:



$mathcal{X}approx sum_{p=1}^Psum_{q=1}^Qsum_{r=1}^Rmathcal{G}_{pqr}mathbf{a}_pcircmathbf{b}_qcircmathbf{c}_r $,



where $mathcal{G}in mathbb{R}^{Ptimes Qtimes R}$ is a core mixing tensor, and $mathbf{a}_p,mathbf{b}_q,mathbf{c}_r$ are vectors from $mathbf{A}inmathbb{R}^{Itimes P},mathbf{B}inmathbb{R}^{Jtimes Q},mathbf{C}inmathbb{R}^{Ktimes R}$, and $circ$ denotes the outer product.



Now if the data tensor, $mathcal{X}$ can be assumed tri-linear in some $mathbf{A,B,C}$ components, a simpler decomposition is given by the CP-deomposition:



$mathcal{X}approx sum_{r=1}^R lambda_r cdot mathbf{a}_rcircmathbf{b}_rcircmathbf{c}_r $.



Now the question:



I know my data tensor $mathcal{X}$ is not trilinear in nature, but I wish to decompose it with the CP method anyway. After this decomp. I will use the $mathbf{C}$ matrix for a clustering problem. Is there anyway to derive some maths (e.g. bounds) for how much error/distortion I can expect if use elements of the $mathbf{C}$ from the CP decomposition, instead of the TUCKER3 which is theoretically "more suitable" for my tensor.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Consider a tensor $mathcal{X}inmathbb{R}^{Itimes Jtimes K} $. It can be approximately decomposed/factored in multiple ways. Namely by using the TUCKER3 decomposition:



    $mathcal{X}approx sum_{p=1}^Psum_{q=1}^Qsum_{r=1}^Rmathcal{G}_{pqr}mathbf{a}_pcircmathbf{b}_qcircmathbf{c}_r $,



    where $mathcal{G}in mathbb{R}^{Ptimes Qtimes R}$ is a core mixing tensor, and $mathbf{a}_p,mathbf{b}_q,mathbf{c}_r$ are vectors from $mathbf{A}inmathbb{R}^{Itimes P},mathbf{B}inmathbb{R}^{Jtimes Q},mathbf{C}inmathbb{R}^{Ktimes R}$, and $circ$ denotes the outer product.



    Now if the data tensor, $mathcal{X}$ can be assumed tri-linear in some $mathbf{A,B,C}$ components, a simpler decomposition is given by the CP-deomposition:



    $mathcal{X}approx sum_{r=1}^R lambda_r cdot mathbf{a}_rcircmathbf{b}_rcircmathbf{c}_r $.



    Now the question:



    I know my data tensor $mathcal{X}$ is not trilinear in nature, but I wish to decompose it with the CP method anyway. After this decomp. I will use the $mathbf{C}$ matrix for a clustering problem. Is there anyway to derive some maths (e.g. bounds) for how much error/distortion I can expect if use elements of the $mathbf{C}$ from the CP decomposition, instead of the TUCKER3 which is theoretically "more suitable" for my tensor.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Consider a tensor $mathcal{X}inmathbb{R}^{Itimes Jtimes K} $. It can be approximately decomposed/factored in multiple ways. Namely by using the TUCKER3 decomposition:



      $mathcal{X}approx sum_{p=1}^Psum_{q=1}^Qsum_{r=1}^Rmathcal{G}_{pqr}mathbf{a}_pcircmathbf{b}_qcircmathbf{c}_r $,



      where $mathcal{G}in mathbb{R}^{Ptimes Qtimes R}$ is a core mixing tensor, and $mathbf{a}_p,mathbf{b}_q,mathbf{c}_r$ are vectors from $mathbf{A}inmathbb{R}^{Itimes P},mathbf{B}inmathbb{R}^{Jtimes Q},mathbf{C}inmathbb{R}^{Ktimes R}$, and $circ$ denotes the outer product.



      Now if the data tensor, $mathcal{X}$ can be assumed tri-linear in some $mathbf{A,B,C}$ components, a simpler decomposition is given by the CP-deomposition:



      $mathcal{X}approx sum_{r=1}^R lambda_r cdot mathbf{a}_rcircmathbf{b}_rcircmathbf{c}_r $.



      Now the question:



      I know my data tensor $mathcal{X}$ is not trilinear in nature, but I wish to decompose it with the CP method anyway. After this decomp. I will use the $mathbf{C}$ matrix for a clustering problem. Is there anyway to derive some maths (e.g. bounds) for how much error/distortion I can expect if use elements of the $mathbf{C}$ from the CP decomposition, instead of the TUCKER3 which is theoretically "more suitable" for my tensor.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Consider a tensor $mathcal{X}inmathbb{R}^{Itimes Jtimes K} $. It can be approximately decomposed/factored in multiple ways. Namely by using the TUCKER3 decomposition:



      $mathcal{X}approx sum_{p=1}^Psum_{q=1}^Qsum_{r=1}^Rmathcal{G}_{pqr}mathbf{a}_pcircmathbf{b}_qcircmathbf{c}_r $,



      where $mathcal{G}in mathbb{R}^{Ptimes Qtimes R}$ is a core mixing tensor, and $mathbf{a}_p,mathbf{b}_q,mathbf{c}_r$ are vectors from $mathbf{A}inmathbb{R}^{Itimes P},mathbf{B}inmathbb{R}^{Jtimes Q},mathbf{C}inmathbb{R}^{Ktimes R}$, and $circ$ denotes the outer product.



      Now if the data tensor, $mathcal{X}$ can be assumed tri-linear in some $mathbf{A,B,C}$ components, a simpler decomposition is given by the CP-deomposition:



      $mathcal{X}approx sum_{r=1}^R lambda_r cdot mathbf{a}_rcircmathbf{b}_rcircmathbf{c}_r $.



      Now the question:



      I know my data tensor $mathcal{X}$ is not trilinear in nature, but I wish to decompose it with the CP method anyway. After this decomp. I will use the $mathbf{C}$ matrix for a clustering problem. Is there anyway to derive some maths (e.g. bounds) for how much error/distortion I can expect if use elements of the $mathbf{C}$ from the CP decomposition, instead of the TUCKER3 which is theoretically "more suitable" for my tensor.







      vector-spaces norm tensors tensor-rank






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 2 at 9:24









      pche8701pche8701

      85




      85






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059275%2fhow-to-derive-a-bound-of-distortion-error-between-two-different-tensor-decompo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059275%2fhow-to-derive-a-bound-of-distortion-error-between-two-different-tensor-decompo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

          android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

          WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]