If $x>sqrt{xy}>y$, then $x>y>0$.












5














I am trying to prove the following:




If $x>sqrt{xy}>y$, then show that $x>y>0$.




My argument is as follows:



We only need to show $y>0$. Suppose $y<0$. Then, for $sqrt{xy}$ to be defined, we need $x<0$. Thus, $x<sqrt{xy}$, which is a contradiction. Hence, $y>0$.



Somehow, my proof doesn't sound "rigorous" enough to me. Is there any other method to prove the result?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    I am fine with that
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Nov 10 '18 at 11:19






  • 1




    There's a very minor oversight: You should address that $y=0$ is also problematic.
    – Blue
    Nov 10 '18 at 11:22








  • 3




    Your argument is good, but makes unnecessary use of contradiction. You can turn this into a direct approach like this: Square roots are non-negative, so $x>sqrt{xy} geq 0$, which implies $x > 0$. For $sqrt{xy}$ to be defined (and real), $xygeq 0$. Therefore, $y geq 0$. Since we cannot have $y=0$ (why?), we have $y>0$. $square$
    – Blue
    Nov 10 '18 at 11:33












  • A final tip: To get the square root symbol to extend over an expression, enclose the expression with {}. For example, $sqrt{xy}$.
    – Blue
    Nov 10 '18 at 11:36






  • 1




    @Blue Thanks for the LaTeX suggestion: I was mistakenly trying with round brackets and it wasn't working. Also thanks for the alternate argument: it makes sense.
    – PGupta
    Nov 14 '18 at 4:55
















5














I am trying to prove the following:




If $x>sqrt{xy}>y$, then show that $x>y>0$.




My argument is as follows:



We only need to show $y>0$. Suppose $y<0$. Then, for $sqrt{xy}$ to be defined, we need $x<0$. Thus, $x<sqrt{xy}$, which is a contradiction. Hence, $y>0$.



Somehow, my proof doesn't sound "rigorous" enough to me. Is there any other method to prove the result?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    I am fine with that
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Nov 10 '18 at 11:19






  • 1




    There's a very minor oversight: You should address that $y=0$ is also problematic.
    – Blue
    Nov 10 '18 at 11:22








  • 3




    Your argument is good, but makes unnecessary use of contradiction. You can turn this into a direct approach like this: Square roots are non-negative, so $x>sqrt{xy} geq 0$, which implies $x > 0$. For $sqrt{xy}$ to be defined (and real), $xygeq 0$. Therefore, $y geq 0$. Since we cannot have $y=0$ (why?), we have $y>0$. $square$
    – Blue
    Nov 10 '18 at 11:33












  • A final tip: To get the square root symbol to extend over an expression, enclose the expression with {}. For example, $sqrt{xy}$.
    – Blue
    Nov 10 '18 at 11:36






  • 1




    @Blue Thanks for the LaTeX suggestion: I was mistakenly trying with round brackets and it wasn't working. Also thanks for the alternate argument: it makes sense.
    – PGupta
    Nov 14 '18 at 4:55














5












5








5


2





I am trying to prove the following:




If $x>sqrt{xy}>y$, then show that $x>y>0$.




My argument is as follows:



We only need to show $y>0$. Suppose $y<0$. Then, for $sqrt{xy}$ to be defined, we need $x<0$. Thus, $x<sqrt{xy}$, which is a contradiction. Hence, $y>0$.



Somehow, my proof doesn't sound "rigorous" enough to me. Is there any other method to prove the result?










share|cite|improve this question















I am trying to prove the following:




If $x>sqrt{xy}>y$, then show that $x>y>0$.




My argument is as follows:



We only need to show $y>0$. Suppose $y<0$. Then, for $sqrt{xy}$ to be defined, we need $x<0$. Thus, $x<sqrt{xy}$, which is a contradiction. Hence, $y>0$.



Somehow, my proof doesn't sound "rigorous" enough to me. Is there any other method to prove the result?







algebra-precalculus inequality radicals






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 10 '18 at 11:53









NoChance

3,63121221




3,63121221










asked Nov 10 '18 at 11:14









PGuptaPGupta

1373




1373








  • 1




    I am fine with that
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Nov 10 '18 at 11:19






  • 1




    There's a very minor oversight: You should address that $y=0$ is also problematic.
    – Blue
    Nov 10 '18 at 11:22








  • 3




    Your argument is good, but makes unnecessary use of contradiction. You can turn this into a direct approach like this: Square roots are non-negative, so $x>sqrt{xy} geq 0$, which implies $x > 0$. For $sqrt{xy}$ to be defined (and real), $xygeq 0$. Therefore, $y geq 0$. Since we cannot have $y=0$ (why?), we have $y>0$. $square$
    – Blue
    Nov 10 '18 at 11:33












  • A final tip: To get the square root symbol to extend over an expression, enclose the expression with {}. For example, $sqrt{xy}$.
    – Blue
    Nov 10 '18 at 11:36






  • 1




    @Blue Thanks for the LaTeX suggestion: I was mistakenly trying with round brackets and it wasn't working. Also thanks for the alternate argument: it makes sense.
    – PGupta
    Nov 14 '18 at 4:55














  • 1




    I am fine with that
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Nov 10 '18 at 11:19






  • 1




    There's a very minor oversight: You should address that $y=0$ is also problematic.
    – Blue
    Nov 10 '18 at 11:22








  • 3




    Your argument is good, but makes unnecessary use of contradiction. You can turn this into a direct approach like this: Square roots are non-negative, so $x>sqrt{xy} geq 0$, which implies $x > 0$. For $sqrt{xy}$ to be defined (and real), $xygeq 0$. Therefore, $y geq 0$. Since we cannot have $y=0$ (why?), we have $y>0$. $square$
    – Blue
    Nov 10 '18 at 11:33












  • A final tip: To get the square root symbol to extend over an expression, enclose the expression with {}. For example, $sqrt{xy}$.
    – Blue
    Nov 10 '18 at 11:36






  • 1




    @Blue Thanks for the LaTeX suggestion: I was mistakenly trying with round brackets and it wasn't working. Also thanks for the alternate argument: it makes sense.
    – PGupta
    Nov 14 '18 at 4:55








1




1




I am fine with that
– Hagen von Eitzen
Nov 10 '18 at 11:19




I am fine with that
– Hagen von Eitzen
Nov 10 '18 at 11:19




1




1




There's a very minor oversight: You should address that $y=0$ is also problematic.
– Blue
Nov 10 '18 at 11:22






There's a very minor oversight: You should address that $y=0$ is also problematic.
– Blue
Nov 10 '18 at 11:22






3




3




Your argument is good, but makes unnecessary use of contradiction. You can turn this into a direct approach like this: Square roots are non-negative, so $x>sqrt{xy} geq 0$, which implies $x > 0$. For $sqrt{xy}$ to be defined (and real), $xygeq 0$. Therefore, $y geq 0$. Since we cannot have $y=0$ (why?), we have $y>0$. $square$
– Blue
Nov 10 '18 at 11:33






Your argument is good, but makes unnecessary use of contradiction. You can turn this into a direct approach like this: Square roots are non-negative, so $x>sqrt{xy} geq 0$, which implies $x > 0$. For $sqrt{xy}$ to be defined (and real), $xygeq 0$. Therefore, $y geq 0$. Since we cannot have $y=0$ (why?), we have $y>0$. $square$
– Blue
Nov 10 '18 at 11:33














A final tip: To get the square root symbol to extend over an expression, enclose the expression with {}. For example, $sqrt{xy}$.
– Blue
Nov 10 '18 at 11:36




A final tip: To get the square root symbol to extend over an expression, enclose the expression with {}. For example, $sqrt{xy}$.
– Blue
Nov 10 '18 at 11:36




1




1




@Blue Thanks for the LaTeX suggestion: I was mistakenly trying with round brackets and it wasn't working. Also thanks for the alternate argument: it makes sense.
– PGupta
Nov 14 '18 at 4:55




@Blue Thanks for the LaTeX suggestion: I was mistakenly trying with round brackets and it wasn't working. Also thanks for the alternate argument: it makes sense.
– PGupta
Nov 14 '18 at 4:55










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














$x$ is positive since $x>sqrt {text{something}}$ which means that $y$ is also positive since $xy$ is positive and $yne sqrt {xy}$. Therefore $$x^2>xy>y^2$$which in two ways means that $$x>y>0$$






share|cite|improve this answer





























    0














    Yes that's a correct proof by contradiction, as an alternative by a constructive proof we can observe that $xy=0$ is not a solution then we need



    $$xy> 0 implies x>sqrt{xy}>0 quad land quad y> 0$$






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • You are told that $x>y.$ You want to show that $y>0.$
      – Will R
      Nov 10 '18 at 11:45












    • @WillR Yes I've added some useless step! Thanks I revise that.
      – gimusi
      Nov 10 '18 at 11:49










    • It's still a bit weird. Why do you start squaring things?
      – Will R
      Nov 10 '18 at 11:50










    • @WillR Yes indeed I was referring to that part! The chain is $$xy>0 implies x>0 implies y>0$$
      – gimusi
      Nov 10 '18 at 11:52










    • Yes, that is the chain.
      – Will R
      Nov 10 '18 at 11:53











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2992504%2fif-x-sqrtxyy-then-xy0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    $x$ is positive since $x>sqrt {text{something}}$ which means that $y$ is also positive since $xy$ is positive and $yne sqrt {xy}$. Therefore $$x^2>xy>y^2$$which in two ways means that $$x>y>0$$






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      1














      $x$ is positive since $x>sqrt {text{something}}$ which means that $y$ is also positive since $xy$ is positive and $yne sqrt {xy}$. Therefore $$x^2>xy>y^2$$which in two ways means that $$x>y>0$$






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        1












        1








        1






        $x$ is positive since $x>sqrt {text{something}}$ which means that $y$ is also positive since $xy$ is positive and $yne sqrt {xy}$. Therefore $$x^2>xy>y^2$$which in two ways means that $$x>y>0$$






        share|cite|improve this answer












        $x$ is positive since $x>sqrt {text{something}}$ which means that $y$ is also positive since $xy$ is positive and $yne sqrt {xy}$. Therefore $$x^2>xy>y^2$$which in two ways means that $$x>y>0$$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 21 '18 at 21:24









        Mostafa AyazMostafa Ayaz

        14.1k3937




        14.1k3937























            0














            Yes that's a correct proof by contradiction, as an alternative by a constructive proof we can observe that $xy=0$ is not a solution then we need



            $$xy> 0 implies x>sqrt{xy}>0 quad land quad y> 0$$






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • You are told that $x>y.$ You want to show that $y>0.$
              – Will R
              Nov 10 '18 at 11:45












            • @WillR Yes I've added some useless step! Thanks I revise that.
              – gimusi
              Nov 10 '18 at 11:49










            • It's still a bit weird. Why do you start squaring things?
              – Will R
              Nov 10 '18 at 11:50










            • @WillR Yes indeed I was referring to that part! The chain is $$xy>0 implies x>0 implies y>0$$
              – gimusi
              Nov 10 '18 at 11:52










            • Yes, that is the chain.
              – Will R
              Nov 10 '18 at 11:53
















            0














            Yes that's a correct proof by contradiction, as an alternative by a constructive proof we can observe that $xy=0$ is not a solution then we need



            $$xy> 0 implies x>sqrt{xy}>0 quad land quad y> 0$$






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • You are told that $x>y.$ You want to show that $y>0.$
              – Will R
              Nov 10 '18 at 11:45












            • @WillR Yes I've added some useless step! Thanks I revise that.
              – gimusi
              Nov 10 '18 at 11:49










            • It's still a bit weird. Why do you start squaring things?
              – Will R
              Nov 10 '18 at 11:50










            • @WillR Yes indeed I was referring to that part! The chain is $$xy>0 implies x>0 implies y>0$$
              – gimusi
              Nov 10 '18 at 11:52










            • Yes, that is the chain.
              – Will R
              Nov 10 '18 at 11:53














            0












            0








            0






            Yes that's a correct proof by contradiction, as an alternative by a constructive proof we can observe that $xy=0$ is not a solution then we need



            $$xy> 0 implies x>sqrt{xy}>0 quad land quad y> 0$$






            share|cite|improve this answer














            Yes that's a correct proof by contradiction, as an alternative by a constructive proof we can observe that $xy=0$ is not a solution then we need



            $$xy> 0 implies x>sqrt{xy}>0 quad land quad y> 0$$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Nov 10 '18 at 11:55

























            answered Nov 10 '18 at 11:43









            gimusigimusi

            1




            1












            • You are told that $x>y.$ You want to show that $y>0.$
              – Will R
              Nov 10 '18 at 11:45












            • @WillR Yes I've added some useless step! Thanks I revise that.
              – gimusi
              Nov 10 '18 at 11:49










            • It's still a bit weird. Why do you start squaring things?
              – Will R
              Nov 10 '18 at 11:50










            • @WillR Yes indeed I was referring to that part! The chain is $$xy>0 implies x>0 implies y>0$$
              – gimusi
              Nov 10 '18 at 11:52










            • Yes, that is the chain.
              – Will R
              Nov 10 '18 at 11:53


















            • You are told that $x>y.$ You want to show that $y>0.$
              – Will R
              Nov 10 '18 at 11:45












            • @WillR Yes I've added some useless step! Thanks I revise that.
              – gimusi
              Nov 10 '18 at 11:49










            • It's still a bit weird. Why do you start squaring things?
              – Will R
              Nov 10 '18 at 11:50










            • @WillR Yes indeed I was referring to that part! The chain is $$xy>0 implies x>0 implies y>0$$
              – gimusi
              Nov 10 '18 at 11:52










            • Yes, that is the chain.
              – Will R
              Nov 10 '18 at 11:53
















            You are told that $x>y.$ You want to show that $y>0.$
            – Will R
            Nov 10 '18 at 11:45






            You are told that $x>y.$ You want to show that $y>0.$
            – Will R
            Nov 10 '18 at 11:45














            @WillR Yes I've added some useless step! Thanks I revise that.
            – gimusi
            Nov 10 '18 at 11:49




            @WillR Yes I've added some useless step! Thanks I revise that.
            – gimusi
            Nov 10 '18 at 11:49












            It's still a bit weird. Why do you start squaring things?
            – Will R
            Nov 10 '18 at 11:50




            It's still a bit weird. Why do you start squaring things?
            – Will R
            Nov 10 '18 at 11:50












            @WillR Yes indeed I was referring to that part! The chain is $$xy>0 implies x>0 implies y>0$$
            – gimusi
            Nov 10 '18 at 11:52




            @WillR Yes indeed I was referring to that part! The chain is $$xy>0 implies x>0 implies y>0$$
            – gimusi
            Nov 10 '18 at 11:52












            Yes, that is the chain.
            – Will R
            Nov 10 '18 at 11:53




            Yes, that is the chain.
            – Will R
            Nov 10 '18 at 11:53


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2992504%2fif-x-sqrtxyy-then-xy0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

            Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory