Is it Possible to Call One Step Function from another Step function?
I am new to this Step Functions and AWS. Is it Possible to call one Step Function from another Step Function in AWS (EMR)? I am developing one Step function and i have to include Step Function in EMR before Stopping EMR.
Here I am having Two scenarios.
1) I have to call SFN3 from SFN2 and Stop the EMR in SFN2.
2) I have to Stop EMR after Execution of All Step funcitons.
I have included Attachment for your reference.
Kindly help me.
Many thanks.
amazon-web-services aws-lambda aws-step-functions
add a comment |
I am new to this Step Functions and AWS. Is it Possible to call one Step Function from another Step Function in AWS (EMR)? I am developing one Step function and i have to include Step Function in EMR before Stopping EMR.
Here I am having Two scenarios.
1) I have to call SFN3 from SFN2 and Stop the EMR in SFN2.
2) I have to Stop EMR after Execution of All Step funcitons.
I have included Attachment for your reference.
Kindly help me.
Many thanks.
amazon-web-services aws-lambda aws-step-functions
add a comment |
I am new to this Step Functions and AWS. Is it Possible to call one Step Function from another Step Function in AWS (EMR)? I am developing one Step function and i have to include Step Function in EMR before Stopping EMR.
Here I am having Two scenarios.
1) I have to call SFN3 from SFN2 and Stop the EMR in SFN2.
2) I have to Stop EMR after Execution of All Step funcitons.
I have included Attachment for your reference.
Kindly help me.
Many thanks.
amazon-web-services aws-lambda aws-step-functions
I am new to this Step Functions and AWS. Is it Possible to call one Step Function from another Step Function in AWS (EMR)? I am developing one Step function and i have to include Step Function in EMR before Stopping EMR.
Here I am having Two scenarios.
1) I have to call SFN3 from SFN2 and Stop the EMR in SFN2.
2) I have to Stop EMR after Execution of All Step funcitons.
I have included Attachment for your reference.
Kindly help me.
Many thanks.
amazon-web-services aws-lambda aws-step-functions
amazon-web-services aws-lambda aws-step-functions
asked Oct 25 '18 at 8:13
lakshmiprathyushalakshmiprathyusha
357
357
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You can call StartExecution
from Task State (Lambda or Activity) and then wait for it to complete (or not, if you do not require it).
If you do not need to wait for it to complete (I may have misunderstood the question, but I believe this is not the case), you may just fire&forget with StartExecution
.
In the opposite case, when you want to wait for nested State Machine to finish, you may be interested in Job Status Poller pattern (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/step-functions/latest/dg/job-status-poller-sample.html) or implement waiting as an Activity running on a EC2 / ECS / etc. (losing serverless approach).
There is also another approach to the problem of waiting for nested State Machine without active loop (status poller) or servers. It is described here: https://medium.com/semantive/part-1-asynchronous-actions-within-aws-step-functions-without-servers-f58e030a0e8b
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f52984432%2fis-it-possible-to-call-one-step-function-from-another-step-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can call StartExecution
from Task State (Lambda or Activity) and then wait for it to complete (or not, if you do not require it).
If you do not need to wait for it to complete (I may have misunderstood the question, but I believe this is not the case), you may just fire&forget with StartExecution
.
In the opposite case, when you want to wait for nested State Machine to finish, you may be interested in Job Status Poller pattern (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/step-functions/latest/dg/job-status-poller-sample.html) or implement waiting as an Activity running on a EC2 / ECS / etc. (losing serverless approach).
There is also another approach to the problem of waiting for nested State Machine without active loop (status poller) or servers. It is described here: https://medium.com/semantive/part-1-asynchronous-actions-within-aws-step-functions-without-servers-f58e030a0e8b
add a comment |
You can call StartExecution
from Task State (Lambda or Activity) and then wait for it to complete (or not, if you do not require it).
If you do not need to wait for it to complete (I may have misunderstood the question, but I believe this is not the case), you may just fire&forget with StartExecution
.
In the opposite case, when you want to wait for nested State Machine to finish, you may be interested in Job Status Poller pattern (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/step-functions/latest/dg/job-status-poller-sample.html) or implement waiting as an Activity running on a EC2 / ECS / etc. (losing serverless approach).
There is also another approach to the problem of waiting for nested State Machine without active loop (status poller) or servers. It is described here: https://medium.com/semantive/part-1-asynchronous-actions-within-aws-step-functions-without-servers-f58e030a0e8b
add a comment |
You can call StartExecution
from Task State (Lambda or Activity) and then wait for it to complete (or not, if you do not require it).
If you do not need to wait for it to complete (I may have misunderstood the question, but I believe this is not the case), you may just fire&forget with StartExecution
.
In the opposite case, when you want to wait for nested State Machine to finish, you may be interested in Job Status Poller pattern (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/step-functions/latest/dg/job-status-poller-sample.html) or implement waiting as an Activity running on a EC2 / ECS / etc. (losing serverless approach).
There is also another approach to the problem of waiting for nested State Machine without active loop (status poller) or servers. It is described here: https://medium.com/semantive/part-1-asynchronous-actions-within-aws-step-functions-without-servers-f58e030a0e8b
You can call StartExecution
from Task State (Lambda or Activity) and then wait for it to complete (or not, if you do not require it).
If you do not need to wait for it to complete (I may have misunderstood the question, but I believe this is not the case), you may just fire&forget with StartExecution
.
In the opposite case, when you want to wait for nested State Machine to finish, you may be interested in Job Status Poller pattern (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/step-functions/latest/dg/job-status-poller-sample.html) or implement waiting as an Activity running on a EC2 / ECS / etc. (losing serverless approach).
There is also another approach to the problem of waiting for nested State Machine without active loop (status poller) or servers. It is described here: https://medium.com/semantive/part-1-asynchronous-actions-within-aws-step-functions-without-servers-f58e030a0e8b
answered Nov 19 '18 at 23:35
Marcin SucharskiMarcin Sucharski
72646
72646
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f52984432%2fis-it-possible-to-call-one-step-function-from-another-step-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown