Lefschetz fixed point formula for Frobenius and automorphisms of finite order
$begingroup$
In Proposition 3.3 of the paper "Reductive groups over finite fields" by Deligne and Lusztig, the authors mention the fact that if $X$ is a quasi-projective scheme over $overline{F_p}$, $sigma$ is an automorphism of finite order acting on it, both $X$ and $sigma$ can be defined over $F_q$, Let $F$ be the corresponding geometric Frobenius, then for $ngeq 1$, the composite $F^{n}circsigma$ is the Forbenius map relative to some new way of lowering the field of definition of $X$ from $overline{F_p}$ to $F_{q^n}$ and the Lefschetz fixed point formula for Frobenius shows that $Tr((F^{n}sigma)^{*},H_{c}^{*}(X,Q_l))$ is the number of fixed points of $F^{n}sigma$.
I think this means that there exists some twists of $X$ over $F_{q^n}$ such that when we restrict $F^{n}sigma$ onto it we get $F^n$. I would like to know whether my understanding is correct and why such twists exist. Any comments or references will be appreciated.
algebraic-geometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In Proposition 3.3 of the paper "Reductive groups over finite fields" by Deligne and Lusztig, the authors mention the fact that if $X$ is a quasi-projective scheme over $overline{F_p}$, $sigma$ is an automorphism of finite order acting on it, both $X$ and $sigma$ can be defined over $F_q$, Let $F$ be the corresponding geometric Frobenius, then for $ngeq 1$, the composite $F^{n}circsigma$ is the Forbenius map relative to some new way of lowering the field of definition of $X$ from $overline{F_p}$ to $F_{q^n}$ and the Lefschetz fixed point formula for Frobenius shows that $Tr((F^{n}sigma)^{*},H_{c}^{*}(X,Q_l))$ is the number of fixed points of $F^{n}sigma$.
I think this means that there exists some twists of $X$ over $F_{q^n}$ such that when we restrict $F^{n}sigma$ onto it we get $F^n$. I would like to know whether my understanding is correct and why such twists exist. Any comments or references will be appreciated.
algebraic-geometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In Proposition 3.3 of the paper "Reductive groups over finite fields" by Deligne and Lusztig, the authors mention the fact that if $X$ is a quasi-projective scheme over $overline{F_p}$, $sigma$ is an automorphism of finite order acting on it, both $X$ and $sigma$ can be defined over $F_q$, Let $F$ be the corresponding geometric Frobenius, then for $ngeq 1$, the composite $F^{n}circsigma$ is the Forbenius map relative to some new way of lowering the field of definition of $X$ from $overline{F_p}$ to $F_{q^n}$ and the Lefschetz fixed point formula for Frobenius shows that $Tr((F^{n}sigma)^{*},H_{c}^{*}(X,Q_l))$ is the number of fixed points of $F^{n}sigma$.
I think this means that there exists some twists of $X$ over $F_{q^n}$ such that when we restrict $F^{n}sigma$ onto it we get $F^n$. I would like to know whether my understanding is correct and why such twists exist. Any comments or references will be appreciated.
algebraic-geometry
$endgroup$
In Proposition 3.3 of the paper "Reductive groups over finite fields" by Deligne and Lusztig, the authors mention the fact that if $X$ is a quasi-projective scheme over $overline{F_p}$, $sigma$ is an automorphism of finite order acting on it, both $X$ and $sigma$ can be defined over $F_q$, Let $F$ be the corresponding geometric Frobenius, then for $ngeq 1$, the composite $F^{n}circsigma$ is the Forbenius map relative to some new way of lowering the field of definition of $X$ from $overline{F_p}$ to $F_{q^n}$ and the Lefschetz fixed point formula for Frobenius shows that $Tr((F^{n}sigma)^{*},H_{c}^{*}(X,Q_l))$ is the number of fixed points of $F^{n}sigma$.
I think this means that there exists some twists of $X$ over $F_{q^n}$ such that when we restrict $F^{n}sigma$ onto it we get $F^n$. I would like to know whether my understanding is correct and why such twists exist. Any comments or references will be appreciated.
algebraic-geometry
algebraic-geometry
asked Jan 1 at 22:16
Sailun ZhanSailun Zhan
62
62
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058926%2flefschetz-fixed-point-formula-for-frobenius-and-automorphisms-of-finite-order%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058926%2flefschetz-fixed-point-formula-for-frobenius-and-automorphisms-of-finite-order%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
