Perfect class of morphisms closed under retracts?
$begingroup$
Suppose we are working in a presentable class of morphisms $mathcal{C}$. A class of morphisms $P$ is said to be perfect if :
1) The class $P$ contains all isomorphisms.
2) The class $P$ statisfies the two-out-of-three property.
3) It is close under filtered colimits.
4)There exists a set $P_0 subseteq P$ such that every morphism in $P$ can be obtained as a filtered colimit of morphisms in $P_0$.
The question is then: is perfect class of morphisms closed under retracts? I've stumbled upon some occurences in which it looks like they are using this fact but I can not manage to produce a proof. I was thinking that using the two first axioms it would be simple to show it but I am stuck...
category-theory model-categories
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose we are working in a presentable class of morphisms $mathcal{C}$. A class of morphisms $P$ is said to be perfect if :
1) The class $P$ contains all isomorphisms.
2) The class $P$ statisfies the two-out-of-three property.
3) It is close under filtered colimits.
4)There exists a set $P_0 subseteq P$ such that every morphism in $P$ can be obtained as a filtered colimit of morphisms in $P_0$.
The question is then: is perfect class of morphisms closed under retracts? I've stumbled upon some occurences in which it looks like they are using this fact but I can not manage to produce a proof. I was thinking that using the two first axioms it would be simple to show it but I am stuck...
category-theory model-categories
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose we are working in a presentable class of morphisms $mathcal{C}$. A class of morphisms $P$ is said to be perfect if :
1) The class $P$ contains all isomorphisms.
2) The class $P$ statisfies the two-out-of-three property.
3) It is close under filtered colimits.
4)There exists a set $P_0 subseteq P$ such that every morphism in $P$ can be obtained as a filtered colimit of morphisms in $P_0$.
The question is then: is perfect class of morphisms closed under retracts? I've stumbled upon some occurences in which it looks like they are using this fact but I can not manage to produce a proof. I was thinking that using the two first axioms it would be simple to show it but I am stuck...
category-theory model-categories
$endgroup$
Suppose we are working in a presentable class of morphisms $mathcal{C}$. A class of morphisms $P$ is said to be perfect if :
1) The class $P$ contains all isomorphisms.
2) The class $P$ statisfies the two-out-of-three property.
3) It is close under filtered colimits.
4)There exists a set $P_0 subseteq P$ such that every morphism in $P$ can be obtained as a filtered colimit of morphisms in $P_0$.
The question is then: is perfect class of morphisms closed under retracts? I've stumbled upon some occurences in which it looks like they are using this fact but I can not manage to produce a proof. I was thinking that using the two first axioms it would be simple to show it but I am stuck...
category-theory model-categories
category-theory model-categories
asked Jan 7 at 15:43
Oscar P.Oscar P.
766
766
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It doesn't follow from the first two axioms. Instead, you must use that any retract can be written as a filtered colimit. Given a split epimorphism $(h,k): fto g$ in the arrow category with splitting $(i,j)$, we may write $g$ as the colimit of the filtered diagram $fto fto fto...$, where every map is $(ih,jk)$. This isn't special to the arrow category, and uses none of properties 1,2,4: any category closed under filtered colimits is closed under retractions.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065142%2fperfect-class-of-morphisms-closed-under-retracts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It doesn't follow from the first two axioms. Instead, you must use that any retract can be written as a filtered colimit. Given a split epimorphism $(h,k): fto g$ in the arrow category with splitting $(i,j)$, we may write $g$ as the colimit of the filtered diagram $fto fto fto...$, where every map is $(ih,jk)$. This isn't special to the arrow category, and uses none of properties 1,2,4: any category closed under filtered colimits is closed under retractions.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It doesn't follow from the first two axioms. Instead, you must use that any retract can be written as a filtered colimit. Given a split epimorphism $(h,k): fto g$ in the arrow category with splitting $(i,j)$, we may write $g$ as the colimit of the filtered diagram $fto fto fto...$, where every map is $(ih,jk)$. This isn't special to the arrow category, and uses none of properties 1,2,4: any category closed under filtered colimits is closed under retractions.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It doesn't follow from the first two axioms. Instead, you must use that any retract can be written as a filtered colimit. Given a split epimorphism $(h,k): fto g$ in the arrow category with splitting $(i,j)$, we may write $g$ as the colimit of the filtered diagram $fto fto fto...$, where every map is $(ih,jk)$. This isn't special to the arrow category, and uses none of properties 1,2,4: any category closed under filtered colimits is closed under retractions.
$endgroup$
It doesn't follow from the first two axioms. Instead, you must use that any retract can be written as a filtered colimit. Given a split epimorphism $(h,k): fto g$ in the arrow category with splitting $(i,j)$, we may write $g$ as the colimit of the filtered diagram $fto fto fto...$, where every map is $(ih,jk)$. This isn't special to the arrow category, and uses none of properties 1,2,4: any category closed under filtered colimits is closed under retractions.
answered Jan 8 at 20:53
Kevin CarlsonKevin Carlson
32.8k23372
32.8k23372
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065142%2fperfect-class-of-morphisms-closed-under-retracts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown