determine if the statement with limit is true












1












$begingroup$


I want to determine if the statement
$$lim_{xto a} f(x) = infty Rightarrow lim_{xto a}frac{1}{f(x)} = 0$$



is true or not (by proving it or proving a contradiction).



I know that I have a definition of limits that could be of help.
That is, if the function has a limit $A$ when $x rightarrow a$ then there is a number $ε > 0$ and $w$ such that



$$|x-a|< w Rightarrow |f(x)-A| < ε . $$



And I have all the other rules for limits. But I don't know how to go about this problem.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I want to determine if the statement
    $$lim_{xto a} f(x) = infty Rightarrow lim_{xto a}frac{1}{f(x)} = 0$$



    is true or not (by proving it or proving a contradiction).



    I know that I have a definition of limits that could be of help.
    That is, if the function has a limit $A$ when $x rightarrow a$ then there is a number $ε > 0$ and $w$ such that



    $$|x-a|< w Rightarrow |f(x)-A| < ε . $$



    And I have all the other rules for limits. But I don't know how to go about this problem.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I want to determine if the statement
      $$lim_{xto a} f(x) = infty Rightarrow lim_{xto a}frac{1}{f(x)} = 0$$



      is true or not (by proving it or proving a contradiction).



      I know that I have a definition of limits that could be of help.
      That is, if the function has a limit $A$ when $x rightarrow a$ then there is a number $ε > 0$ and $w$ such that



      $$|x-a|< w Rightarrow |f(x)-A| < ε . $$



      And I have all the other rules for limits. But I don't know how to go about this problem.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I want to determine if the statement
      $$lim_{xto a} f(x) = infty Rightarrow lim_{xto a}frac{1}{f(x)} = 0$$



      is true or not (by proving it or proving a contradiction).



      I know that I have a definition of limits that could be of help.
      That is, if the function has a limit $A$ when $x rightarrow a$ then there is a number $ε > 0$ and $w$ such that



      $$|x-a|< w Rightarrow |f(x)-A| < ε . $$



      And I have all the other rules for limits. But I don't know how to go about this problem.







      limits analysis proof-writing






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 23 at 22:02









      J. W. Tanner

      3,2401320




      3,2401320










      asked Jan 23 at 19:02









      F WiF Wi

      384




      384






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Alternatively we may use Heine's definition of the limit of a sequence.

          Let $x_n$ be a sequence so that $x_n rightarrow a => lim_{nto infty} f(x_n)=infty$.
          We have: $lim_{xto a} frac{1}{f(x)}=lim_{nto infty} frac{1}{f(x_n)}=frac{1}{lim_{ntoinfty} f(x_n)}=frac{1}{infty}=0$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            HINT



            We have to show that for each $epsilon > 0 exists delta > 0$ such that whenever $|x-a| < delta$ you have
            $$
            epsilon
            > left|frac{1}{f(x)} - 0 right|
            = left|frac1{f(x)}right|
            iff |f(x)| > 1/epsilon.
            $$



            Assume that as $x to a$, we have $f(x) to infty$, in other words, that $forall N > 0 exists delta>0$ such that $f(x) > N$ whenever $|x - a| < delta$.



            Can you see how to pick $epsilon = epsilon(N)$ to make what you want happen?






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              I know that when proving that a specific limit exists for a function you want to find δ that depends on ϵ so δ = δ(ϵ) but I cant seem to figure out why in this case you would want to find ϵ=ϵ(N)
              $endgroup$
              – F Wi
              Jan 23 at 22:01










            • $begingroup$
              @FWi knowing the $N$ (existence of which is assumed but value unknown) allows to construct the $epsilon$ with the needed property. It is perfectly fine that $epsilon$ is a function of $N$, which is in tern and function of $delta$...
              $endgroup$
              – gt6989b
              Jan 24 at 4:38



















            0












            $begingroup$

            We say that $lim_{xto a} f(x) = infty$, if $forall M>0, exists δ>0$ s.t. whenever $vert x-a vert < δ$, then $f(x) > M $.



            We say that $lim_{xto a}frac{1}{f(x)} = 0$, if $forall ε>0, exists δ>0$ s.t. whenever $vert x-a vert < δ$, then $left|frac{1}{f(x)} - 0 right| <epsilon$.



            It suffices to choose $epsilon = frac{1}{M}$, in which case $left|frac{1}{f(x)} - 0 right| <epsilon$ holds.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084914%2fdetermine-if-the-statement-with-limit-is-true%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1












              $begingroup$

              Alternatively we may use Heine's definition of the limit of a sequence.

              Let $x_n$ be a sequence so that $x_n rightarrow a => lim_{nto infty} f(x_n)=infty$.
              We have: $lim_{xto a} frac{1}{f(x)}=lim_{nto infty} frac{1}{f(x_n)}=frac{1}{lim_{ntoinfty} f(x_n)}=frac{1}{infty}=0$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                Alternatively we may use Heine's definition of the limit of a sequence.

                Let $x_n$ be a sequence so that $x_n rightarrow a => lim_{nto infty} f(x_n)=infty$.
                We have: $lim_{xto a} frac{1}{f(x)}=lim_{nto infty} frac{1}{f(x_n)}=frac{1}{lim_{ntoinfty} f(x_n)}=frac{1}{infty}=0$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  Alternatively we may use Heine's definition of the limit of a sequence.

                  Let $x_n$ be a sequence so that $x_n rightarrow a => lim_{nto infty} f(x_n)=infty$.
                  We have: $lim_{xto a} frac{1}{f(x)}=lim_{nto infty} frac{1}{f(x_n)}=frac{1}{lim_{ntoinfty} f(x_n)}=frac{1}{infty}=0$






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Alternatively we may use Heine's definition of the limit of a sequence.

                  Let $x_n$ be a sequence so that $x_n rightarrow a => lim_{nto infty} f(x_n)=infty$.
                  We have: $lim_{xto a} frac{1}{f(x)}=lim_{nto infty} frac{1}{f(x_n)}=frac{1}{lim_{ntoinfty} f(x_n)}=frac{1}{infty}=0$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 24 at 12:30









                  AlexdanutAlexdanut

                  1438




                  1438























                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      HINT



                      We have to show that for each $epsilon > 0 exists delta > 0$ such that whenever $|x-a| < delta$ you have
                      $$
                      epsilon
                      > left|frac{1}{f(x)} - 0 right|
                      = left|frac1{f(x)}right|
                      iff |f(x)| > 1/epsilon.
                      $$



                      Assume that as $x to a$, we have $f(x) to infty$, in other words, that $forall N > 0 exists delta>0$ such that $f(x) > N$ whenever $|x - a| < delta$.



                      Can you see how to pick $epsilon = epsilon(N)$ to make what you want happen?






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$













                      • $begingroup$
                        I know that when proving that a specific limit exists for a function you want to find δ that depends on ϵ so δ = δ(ϵ) but I cant seem to figure out why in this case you would want to find ϵ=ϵ(N)
                        $endgroup$
                        – F Wi
                        Jan 23 at 22:01










                      • $begingroup$
                        @FWi knowing the $N$ (existence of which is assumed but value unknown) allows to construct the $epsilon$ with the needed property. It is perfectly fine that $epsilon$ is a function of $N$, which is in tern and function of $delta$...
                        $endgroup$
                        – gt6989b
                        Jan 24 at 4:38
















                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      HINT



                      We have to show that for each $epsilon > 0 exists delta > 0$ such that whenever $|x-a| < delta$ you have
                      $$
                      epsilon
                      > left|frac{1}{f(x)} - 0 right|
                      = left|frac1{f(x)}right|
                      iff |f(x)| > 1/epsilon.
                      $$



                      Assume that as $x to a$, we have $f(x) to infty$, in other words, that $forall N > 0 exists delta>0$ such that $f(x) > N$ whenever $|x - a| < delta$.



                      Can you see how to pick $epsilon = epsilon(N)$ to make what you want happen?






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$













                      • $begingroup$
                        I know that when proving that a specific limit exists for a function you want to find δ that depends on ϵ so δ = δ(ϵ) but I cant seem to figure out why in this case you would want to find ϵ=ϵ(N)
                        $endgroup$
                        – F Wi
                        Jan 23 at 22:01










                      • $begingroup$
                        @FWi knowing the $N$ (existence of which is assumed but value unknown) allows to construct the $epsilon$ with the needed property. It is perfectly fine that $epsilon$ is a function of $N$, which is in tern and function of $delta$...
                        $endgroup$
                        – gt6989b
                        Jan 24 at 4:38














                      0












                      0








                      0





                      $begingroup$

                      HINT



                      We have to show that for each $epsilon > 0 exists delta > 0$ such that whenever $|x-a| < delta$ you have
                      $$
                      epsilon
                      > left|frac{1}{f(x)} - 0 right|
                      = left|frac1{f(x)}right|
                      iff |f(x)| > 1/epsilon.
                      $$



                      Assume that as $x to a$, we have $f(x) to infty$, in other words, that $forall N > 0 exists delta>0$ such that $f(x) > N$ whenever $|x - a| < delta$.



                      Can you see how to pick $epsilon = epsilon(N)$ to make what you want happen?






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      HINT



                      We have to show that for each $epsilon > 0 exists delta > 0$ such that whenever $|x-a| < delta$ you have
                      $$
                      epsilon
                      > left|frac{1}{f(x)} - 0 right|
                      = left|frac1{f(x)}right|
                      iff |f(x)| > 1/epsilon.
                      $$



                      Assume that as $x to a$, we have $f(x) to infty$, in other words, that $forall N > 0 exists delta>0$ such that $f(x) > N$ whenever $|x - a| < delta$.



                      Can you see how to pick $epsilon = epsilon(N)$ to make what you want happen?







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered Jan 23 at 19:10









                      gt6989bgt6989b

                      34.9k22557




                      34.9k22557












                      • $begingroup$
                        I know that when proving that a specific limit exists for a function you want to find δ that depends on ϵ so δ = δ(ϵ) but I cant seem to figure out why in this case you would want to find ϵ=ϵ(N)
                        $endgroup$
                        – F Wi
                        Jan 23 at 22:01










                      • $begingroup$
                        @FWi knowing the $N$ (existence of which is assumed but value unknown) allows to construct the $epsilon$ with the needed property. It is perfectly fine that $epsilon$ is a function of $N$, which is in tern and function of $delta$...
                        $endgroup$
                        – gt6989b
                        Jan 24 at 4:38


















                      • $begingroup$
                        I know that when proving that a specific limit exists for a function you want to find δ that depends on ϵ so δ = δ(ϵ) but I cant seem to figure out why in this case you would want to find ϵ=ϵ(N)
                        $endgroup$
                        – F Wi
                        Jan 23 at 22:01










                      • $begingroup$
                        @FWi knowing the $N$ (existence of which is assumed but value unknown) allows to construct the $epsilon$ with the needed property. It is perfectly fine that $epsilon$ is a function of $N$, which is in tern and function of $delta$...
                        $endgroup$
                        – gt6989b
                        Jan 24 at 4:38
















                      $begingroup$
                      I know that when proving that a specific limit exists for a function you want to find δ that depends on ϵ so δ = δ(ϵ) but I cant seem to figure out why in this case you would want to find ϵ=ϵ(N)
                      $endgroup$
                      – F Wi
                      Jan 23 at 22:01




                      $begingroup$
                      I know that when proving that a specific limit exists for a function you want to find δ that depends on ϵ so δ = δ(ϵ) but I cant seem to figure out why in this case you would want to find ϵ=ϵ(N)
                      $endgroup$
                      – F Wi
                      Jan 23 at 22:01












                      $begingroup$
                      @FWi knowing the $N$ (existence of which is assumed but value unknown) allows to construct the $epsilon$ with the needed property. It is perfectly fine that $epsilon$ is a function of $N$, which is in tern and function of $delta$...
                      $endgroup$
                      – gt6989b
                      Jan 24 at 4:38




                      $begingroup$
                      @FWi knowing the $N$ (existence of which is assumed but value unknown) allows to construct the $epsilon$ with the needed property. It is perfectly fine that $epsilon$ is a function of $N$, which is in tern and function of $delta$...
                      $endgroup$
                      – gt6989b
                      Jan 24 at 4:38











                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      We say that $lim_{xto a} f(x) = infty$, if $forall M>0, exists δ>0$ s.t. whenever $vert x-a vert < δ$, then $f(x) > M $.



                      We say that $lim_{xto a}frac{1}{f(x)} = 0$, if $forall ε>0, exists δ>0$ s.t. whenever $vert x-a vert < δ$, then $left|frac{1}{f(x)} - 0 right| <epsilon$.



                      It suffices to choose $epsilon = frac{1}{M}$, in which case $left|frac{1}{f(x)} - 0 right| <epsilon$ holds.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        We say that $lim_{xto a} f(x) = infty$, if $forall M>0, exists δ>0$ s.t. whenever $vert x-a vert < δ$, then $f(x) > M $.



                        We say that $lim_{xto a}frac{1}{f(x)} = 0$, if $forall ε>0, exists δ>0$ s.t. whenever $vert x-a vert < δ$, then $left|frac{1}{f(x)} - 0 right| <epsilon$.



                        It suffices to choose $epsilon = frac{1}{M}$, in which case $left|frac{1}{f(x)} - 0 right| <epsilon$ holds.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          We say that $lim_{xto a} f(x) = infty$, if $forall M>0, exists δ>0$ s.t. whenever $vert x-a vert < δ$, then $f(x) > M $.



                          We say that $lim_{xto a}frac{1}{f(x)} = 0$, if $forall ε>0, exists δ>0$ s.t. whenever $vert x-a vert < δ$, then $left|frac{1}{f(x)} - 0 right| <epsilon$.



                          It suffices to choose $epsilon = frac{1}{M}$, in which case $left|frac{1}{f(x)} - 0 right| <epsilon$ holds.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          We say that $lim_{xto a} f(x) = infty$, if $forall M>0, exists δ>0$ s.t. whenever $vert x-a vert < δ$, then $f(x) > M $.



                          We say that $lim_{xto a}frac{1}{f(x)} = 0$, if $forall ε>0, exists δ>0$ s.t. whenever $vert x-a vert < δ$, then $left|frac{1}{f(x)} - 0 right| <epsilon$.



                          It suffices to choose $epsilon = frac{1}{M}$, in which case $left|frac{1}{f(x)} - 0 right| <epsilon$ holds.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Jan 23 at 19:43









                          AlexandrosAlexandros

                          9401412




                          9401412






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084914%2fdetermine-if-the-statement-with-limit-is-true%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

                              android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

                              WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]