Calculating the work done of a force field












0












$begingroup$


A force field in 3-space is given by the formula $$bar{F} (x, y, z) = (x − yz)bar{i} + (y − xz)bar{j} +(x(1−y) +z^2)bar{k}$$ Calculate the work done by $bar{F}$ in moving a particle once around the triangle with vertices $(0, 0, 0), (1, 1, 1), (1, 1, 0)$ in that order.



I'm really not sure how to go about doing this one. Any help would be much appreciated. Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    A force field in 3-space is given by the formula $$bar{F} (x, y, z) = (x − yz)bar{i} + (y − xz)bar{j} +(x(1−y) +z^2)bar{k}$$ Calculate the work done by $bar{F}$ in moving a particle once around the triangle with vertices $(0, 0, 0), (1, 1, 1), (1, 1, 0)$ in that order.



    I'm really not sure how to go about doing this one. Any help would be much appreciated. Thank you.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      A force field in 3-space is given by the formula $$bar{F} (x, y, z) = (x − yz)bar{i} + (y − xz)bar{j} +(x(1−y) +z^2)bar{k}$$ Calculate the work done by $bar{F}$ in moving a particle once around the triangle with vertices $(0, 0, 0), (1, 1, 1), (1, 1, 0)$ in that order.



      I'm really not sure how to go about doing this one. Any help would be much appreciated. Thank you.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      A force field in 3-space is given by the formula $$bar{F} (x, y, z) = (x − yz)bar{i} + (y − xz)bar{j} +(x(1−y) +z^2)bar{k}$$ Calculate the work done by $bar{F}$ in moving a particle once around the triangle with vertices $(0, 0, 0), (1, 1, 1), (1, 1, 0)$ in that order.



      I'm really not sure how to go about doing this one. Any help would be much appreciated. Thank you.







      integration multivariable-calculus line-integrals






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 28 '17 at 15:50









      TheMaster47xTheMaster47x

      696




      696






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          You can split your triangle into three line segments, calculate the work of $F$ along each segment and add the results. I'll demonstrate the calculation for the first segment.



          The line going from $(0,0,0)$ to $(1,1,1)$ can be parametrized as
          $$gamma(t) = t(1,1,1) = t vec{i} + t vec{j} + tvec{k}$$
          for $0 leq t leq 1$. Hence



          $$ int_{gamma} vec{F} ,dvec{r} = int_0^1 vec{F}(gamma(t)) cdot dot{vec{gamma}}(t) , dt = int_0^1 ((t - t^2) vec{i} + (t - t^2) vec{j} + (t(1-t) + t^2) vec{k}) cdot (vec{i} + vec{j} + vec{k}) , dt
          \
          = int_0^1 (t - t^2) + (t - t^2) + t(1-t) + t^2 , dt = int_0^1 (3t - 2t^2) , dt = left[ frac{3}{2}t^2 - frac{2}{3}t^3right]^{t=1}_{t =0} = frac{5}{6}.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Going from $(1,1,1)$ to $(1,1,0)$ would $γ(t)=-tvec{k}$ and would the limits still remain the same?
            $endgroup$
            – TheMaster47x
            Jan 28 '17 at 16:10










          • $begingroup$
            No. You want $gamma(0) = (1,1,1)$ and $gamma(1) = (1,1,0)$ so the correct parametrization is $gamma(t) = (1 - t)(1,1,1) + t(1,1,0) = (1,1,1-t) = (1,1,1) - t(0,0,1) = vec{i} + vec{j} + (1 - t)vec{k}$.
            $endgroup$
            – levap
            Jan 28 '17 at 16:12










          • $begingroup$
            I'm going to try to get my head around that, the limits are all $0≤t≤1$?
            $endgroup$
            – TheMaster47x
            Jan 28 '17 at 16:26










          • $begingroup$
            Yep. In general, a parametrization of a line which starts at $vec{p}$ at time $t = 0$ and ends at $vec{q}$ at time $t = 1$ is $gamma(t) = (1 - t) vec{p} + t vec{q}$.
            $endgroup$
            – levap
            Jan 28 '17 at 16:31










          • $begingroup$
            Just to verify does $-frac{1}{3}$ sound right for the second line and $-1$ for the third with a final answer of $-frac{1}{2}$?
            $endgroup$
            – TheMaster47x
            Jan 28 '17 at 17:04













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2117946%2fcalculating-the-work-done-of-a-force-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          You can split your triangle into three line segments, calculate the work of $F$ along each segment and add the results. I'll demonstrate the calculation for the first segment.



          The line going from $(0,0,0)$ to $(1,1,1)$ can be parametrized as
          $$gamma(t) = t(1,1,1) = t vec{i} + t vec{j} + tvec{k}$$
          for $0 leq t leq 1$. Hence



          $$ int_{gamma} vec{F} ,dvec{r} = int_0^1 vec{F}(gamma(t)) cdot dot{vec{gamma}}(t) , dt = int_0^1 ((t - t^2) vec{i} + (t - t^2) vec{j} + (t(1-t) + t^2) vec{k}) cdot (vec{i} + vec{j} + vec{k}) , dt
          \
          = int_0^1 (t - t^2) + (t - t^2) + t(1-t) + t^2 , dt = int_0^1 (3t - 2t^2) , dt = left[ frac{3}{2}t^2 - frac{2}{3}t^3right]^{t=1}_{t =0} = frac{5}{6}.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Going from $(1,1,1)$ to $(1,1,0)$ would $γ(t)=-tvec{k}$ and would the limits still remain the same?
            $endgroup$
            – TheMaster47x
            Jan 28 '17 at 16:10










          • $begingroup$
            No. You want $gamma(0) = (1,1,1)$ and $gamma(1) = (1,1,0)$ so the correct parametrization is $gamma(t) = (1 - t)(1,1,1) + t(1,1,0) = (1,1,1-t) = (1,1,1) - t(0,0,1) = vec{i} + vec{j} + (1 - t)vec{k}$.
            $endgroup$
            – levap
            Jan 28 '17 at 16:12










          • $begingroup$
            I'm going to try to get my head around that, the limits are all $0≤t≤1$?
            $endgroup$
            – TheMaster47x
            Jan 28 '17 at 16:26










          • $begingroup$
            Yep. In general, a parametrization of a line which starts at $vec{p}$ at time $t = 0$ and ends at $vec{q}$ at time $t = 1$ is $gamma(t) = (1 - t) vec{p} + t vec{q}$.
            $endgroup$
            – levap
            Jan 28 '17 at 16:31










          • $begingroup$
            Just to verify does $-frac{1}{3}$ sound right for the second line and $-1$ for the third with a final answer of $-frac{1}{2}$?
            $endgroup$
            – TheMaster47x
            Jan 28 '17 at 17:04


















          0












          $begingroup$

          You can split your triangle into three line segments, calculate the work of $F$ along each segment and add the results. I'll demonstrate the calculation for the first segment.



          The line going from $(0,0,0)$ to $(1,1,1)$ can be parametrized as
          $$gamma(t) = t(1,1,1) = t vec{i} + t vec{j} + tvec{k}$$
          for $0 leq t leq 1$. Hence



          $$ int_{gamma} vec{F} ,dvec{r} = int_0^1 vec{F}(gamma(t)) cdot dot{vec{gamma}}(t) , dt = int_0^1 ((t - t^2) vec{i} + (t - t^2) vec{j} + (t(1-t) + t^2) vec{k}) cdot (vec{i} + vec{j} + vec{k}) , dt
          \
          = int_0^1 (t - t^2) + (t - t^2) + t(1-t) + t^2 , dt = int_0^1 (3t - 2t^2) , dt = left[ frac{3}{2}t^2 - frac{2}{3}t^3right]^{t=1}_{t =0} = frac{5}{6}.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Going from $(1,1,1)$ to $(1,1,0)$ would $γ(t)=-tvec{k}$ and would the limits still remain the same?
            $endgroup$
            – TheMaster47x
            Jan 28 '17 at 16:10










          • $begingroup$
            No. You want $gamma(0) = (1,1,1)$ and $gamma(1) = (1,1,0)$ so the correct parametrization is $gamma(t) = (1 - t)(1,1,1) + t(1,1,0) = (1,1,1-t) = (1,1,1) - t(0,0,1) = vec{i} + vec{j} + (1 - t)vec{k}$.
            $endgroup$
            – levap
            Jan 28 '17 at 16:12










          • $begingroup$
            I'm going to try to get my head around that, the limits are all $0≤t≤1$?
            $endgroup$
            – TheMaster47x
            Jan 28 '17 at 16:26










          • $begingroup$
            Yep. In general, a parametrization of a line which starts at $vec{p}$ at time $t = 0$ and ends at $vec{q}$ at time $t = 1$ is $gamma(t) = (1 - t) vec{p} + t vec{q}$.
            $endgroup$
            – levap
            Jan 28 '17 at 16:31










          • $begingroup$
            Just to verify does $-frac{1}{3}$ sound right for the second line and $-1$ for the third with a final answer of $-frac{1}{2}$?
            $endgroup$
            – TheMaster47x
            Jan 28 '17 at 17:04
















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          You can split your triangle into three line segments, calculate the work of $F$ along each segment and add the results. I'll demonstrate the calculation for the first segment.



          The line going from $(0,0,0)$ to $(1,1,1)$ can be parametrized as
          $$gamma(t) = t(1,1,1) = t vec{i} + t vec{j} + tvec{k}$$
          for $0 leq t leq 1$. Hence



          $$ int_{gamma} vec{F} ,dvec{r} = int_0^1 vec{F}(gamma(t)) cdot dot{vec{gamma}}(t) , dt = int_0^1 ((t - t^2) vec{i} + (t - t^2) vec{j} + (t(1-t) + t^2) vec{k}) cdot (vec{i} + vec{j} + vec{k}) , dt
          \
          = int_0^1 (t - t^2) + (t - t^2) + t(1-t) + t^2 , dt = int_0^1 (3t - 2t^2) , dt = left[ frac{3}{2}t^2 - frac{2}{3}t^3right]^{t=1}_{t =0} = frac{5}{6}.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          You can split your triangle into three line segments, calculate the work of $F$ along each segment and add the results. I'll demonstrate the calculation for the first segment.



          The line going from $(0,0,0)$ to $(1,1,1)$ can be parametrized as
          $$gamma(t) = t(1,1,1) = t vec{i} + t vec{j} + tvec{k}$$
          for $0 leq t leq 1$. Hence



          $$ int_{gamma} vec{F} ,dvec{r} = int_0^1 vec{F}(gamma(t)) cdot dot{vec{gamma}}(t) , dt = int_0^1 ((t - t^2) vec{i} + (t - t^2) vec{j} + (t(1-t) + t^2) vec{k}) cdot (vec{i} + vec{j} + vec{k}) , dt
          \
          = int_0^1 (t - t^2) + (t - t^2) + t(1-t) + t^2 , dt = int_0^1 (3t - 2t^2) , dt = left[ frac{3}{2}t^2 - frac{2}{3}t^3right]^{t=1}_{t =0} = frac{5}{6}.$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 28 '17 at 16:05









          levaplevap

          47.4k33274




          47.4k33274












          • $begingroup$
            Going from $(1,1,1)$ to $(1,1,0)$ would $γ(t)=-tvec{k}$ and would the limits still remain the same?
            $endgroup$
            – TheMaster47x
            Jan 28 '17 at 16:10










          • $begingroup$
            No. You want $gamma(0) = (1,1,1)$ and $gamma(1) = (1,1,0)$ so the correct parametrization is $gamma(t) = (1 - t)(1,1,1) + t(1,1,0) = (1,1,1-t) = (1,1,1) - t(0,0,1) = vec{i} + vec{j} + (1 - t)vec{k}$.
            $endgroup$
            – levap
            Jan 28 '17 at 16:12










          • $begingroup$
            I'm going to try to get my head around that, the limits are all $0≤t≤1$?
            $endgroup$
            – TheMaster47x
            Jan 28 '17 at 16:26










          • $begingroup$
            Yep. In general, a parametrization of a line which starts at $vec{p}$ at time $t = 0$ and ends at $vec{q}$ at time $t = 1$ is $gamma(t) = (1 - t) vec{p} + t vec{q}$.
            $endgroup$
            – levap
            Jan 28 '17 at 16:31










          • $begingroup$
            Just to verify does $-frac{1}{3}$ sound right for the second line and $-1$ for the third with a final answer of $-frac{1}{2}$?
            $endgroup$
            – TheMaster47x
            Jan 28 '17 at 17:04




















          • $begingroup$
            Going from $(1,1,1)$ to $(1,1,0)$ would $γ(t)=-tvec{k}$ and would the limits still remain the same?
            $endgroup$
            – TheMaster47x
            Jan 28 '17 at 16:10










          • $begingroup$
            No. You want $gamma(0) = (1,1,1)$ and $gamma(1) = (1,1,0)$ so the correct parametrization is $gamma(t) = (1 - t)(1,1,1) + t(1,1,0) = (1,1,1-t) = (1,1,1) - t(0,0,1) = vec{i} + vec{j} + (1 - t)vec{k}$.
            $endgroup$
            – levap
            Jan 28 '17 at 16:12










          • $begingroup$
            I'm going to try to get my head around that, the limits are all $0≤t≤1$?
            $endgroup$
            – TheMaster47x
            Jan 28 '17 at 16:26










          • $begingroup$
            Yep. In general, a parametrization of a line which starts at $vec{p}$ at time $t = 0$ and ends at $vec{q}$ at time $t = 1$ is $gamma(t) = (1 - t) vec{p} + t vec{q}$.
            $endgroup$
            – levap
            Jan 28 '17 at 16:31










          • $begingroup$
            Just to verify does $-frac{1}{3}$ sound right for the second line and $-1$ for the third with a final answer of $-frac{1}{2}$?
            $endgroup$
            – TheMaster47x
            Jan 28 '17 at 17:04


















          $begingroup$
          Going from $(1,1,1)$ to $(1,1,0)$ would $γ(t)=-tvec{k}$ and would the limits still remain the same?
          $endgroup$
          – TheMaster47x
          Jan 28 '17 at 16:10




          $begingroup$
          Going from $(1,1,1)$ to $(1,1,0)$ would $γ(t)=-tvec{k}$ and would the limits still remain the same?
          $endgroup$
          – TheMaster47x
          Jan 28 '17 at 16:10












          $begingroup$
          No. You want $gamma(0) = (1,1,1)$ and $gamma(1) = (1,1,0)$ so the correct parametrization is $gamma(t) = (1 - t)(1,1,1) + t(1,1,0) = (1,1,1-t) = (1,1,1) - t(0,0,1) = vec{i} + vec{j} + (1 - t)vec{k}$.
          $endgroup$
          – levap
          Jan 28 '17 at 16:12




          $begingroup$
          No. You want $gamma(0) = (1,1,1)$ and $gamma(1) = (1,1,0)$ so the correct parametrization is $gamma(t) = (1 - t)(1,1,1) + t(1,1,0) = (1,1,1-t) = (1,1,1) - t(0,0,1) = vec{i} + vec{j} + (1 - t)vec{k}$.
          $endgroup$
          – levap
          Jan 28 '17 at 16:12












          $begingroup$
          I'm going to try to get my head around that, the limits are all $0≤t≤1$?
          $endgroup$
          – TheMaster47x
          Jan 28 '17 at 16:26




          $begingroup$
          I'm going to try to get my head around that, the limits are all $0≤t≤1$?
          $endgroup$
          – TheMaster47x
          Jan 28 '17 at 16:26












          $begingroup$
          Yep. In general, a parametrization of a line which starts at $vec{p}$ at time $t = 0$ and ends at $vec{q}$ at time $t = 1$ is $gamma(t) = (1 - t) vec{p} + t vec{q}$.
          $endgroup$
          – levap
          Jan 28 '17 at 16:31




          $begingroup$
          Yep. In general, a parametrization of a line which starts at $vec{p}$ at time $t = 0$ and ends at $vec{q}$ at time $t = 1$ is $gamma(t) = (1 - t) vec{p} + t vec{q}$.
          $endgroup$
          – levap
          Jan 28 '17 at 16:31












          $begingroup$
          Just to verify does $-frac{1}{3}$ sound right for the second line and $-1$ for the third with a final answer of $-frac{1}{2}$?
          $endgroup$
          – TheMaster47x
          Jan 28 '17 at 17:04






          $begingroup$
          Just to verify does $-frac{1}{3}$ sound right for the second line and $-1$ for the third with a final answer of $-frac{1}{2}$?
          $endgroup$
          – TheMaster47x
          Jan 28 '17 at 17:04




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2117946%2fcalculating-the-work-done-of-a-force-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

          How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

          Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory