Calculating the work done of a force field
$begingroup$
A force field in 3-space is given by the formula $$bar{F} (x, y, z) = (x − yz)bar{i} + (y − xz)bar{j} +(x(1−y) +z^2)bar{k}$$ Calculate the work done by $bar{F}$ in moving a particle once around the triangle with vertices $(0, 0, 0), (1, 1, 1), (1, 1, 0)$ in that order.
I'm really not sure how to go about doing this one. Any help would be much appreciated. Thank you.
integration multivariable-calculus line-integrals
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A force field in 3-space is given by the formula $$bar{F} (x, y, z) = (x − yz)bar{i} + (y − xz)bar{j} +(x(1−y) +z^2)bar{k}$$ Calculate the work done by $bar{F}$ in moving a particle once around the triangle with vertices $(0, 0, 0), (1, 1, 1), (1, 1, 0)$ in that order.
I'm really not sure how to go about doing this one. Any help would be much appreciated. Thank you.
integration multivariable-calculus line-integrals
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A force field in 3-space is given by the formula $$bar{F} (x, y, z) = (x − yz)bar{i} + (y − xz)bar{j} +(x(1−y) +z^2)bar{k}$$ Calculate the work done by $bar{F}$ in moving a particle once around the triangle with vertices $(0, 0, 0), (1, 1, 1), (1, 1, 0)$ in that order.
I'm really not sure how to go about doing this one. Any help would be much appreciated. Thank you.
integration multivariable-calculus line-integrals
$endgroup$
A force field in 3-space is given by the formula $$bar{F} (x, y, z) = (x − yz)bar{i} + (y − xz)bar{j} +(x(1−y) +z^2)bar{k}$$ Calculate the work done by $bar{F}$ in moving a particle once around the triangle with vertices $(0, 0, 0), (1, 1, 1), (1, 1, 0)$ in that order.
I'm really not sure how to go about doing this one. Any help would be much appreciated. Thank you.
integration multivariable-calculus line-integrals
integration multivariable-calculus line-integrals
asked Jan 28 '17 at 15:50


TheMaster47xTheMaster47x
696
696
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You can split your triangle into three line segments, calculate the work of $F$ along each segment and add the results. I'll demonstrate the calculation for the first segment.
The line going from $(0,0,0)$ to $(1,1,1)$ can be parametrized as
$$gamma(t) = t(1,1,1) = t vec{i} + t vec{j} + tvec{k}$$
for $0 leq t leq 1$. Hence
$$ int_{gamma} vec{F} ,dvec{r} = int_0^1 vec{F}(gamma(t)) cdot dot{vec{gamma}}(t) , dt = int_0^1 ((t - t^2) vec{i} + (t - t^2) vec{j} + (t(1-t) + t^2) vec{k}) cdot (vec{i} + vec{j} + vec{k}) , dt
\
= int_0^1 (t - t^2) + (t - t^2) + t(1-t) + t^2 , dt = int_0^1 (3t - 2t^2) , dt = left[ frac{3}{2}t^2 - frac{2}{3}t^3right]^{t=1}_{t =0} = frac{5}{6}.$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Going from $(1,1,1)$ to $(1,1,0)$ would $γ(t)=-tvec{k}$ and would the limits still remain the same?
$endgroup$
– TheMaster47x
Jan 28 '17 at 16:10
$begingroup$
No. You want $gamma(0) = (1,1,1)$ and $gamma(1) = (1,1,0)$ so the correct parametrization is $gamma(t) = (1 - t)(1,1,1) + t(1,1,0) = (1,1,1-t) = (1,1,1) - t(0,0,1) = vec{i} + vec{j} + (1 - t)vec{k}$.
$endgroup$
– levap
Jan 28 '17 at 16:12
$begingroup$
I'm going to try to get my head around that, the limits are all $0≤t≤1$?
$endgroup$
– TheMaster47x
Jan 28 '17 at 16:26
$begingroup$
Yep. In general, a parametrization of a line which starts at $vec{p}$ at time $t = 0$ and ends at $vec{q}$ at time $t = 1$ is $gamma(t) = (1 - t) vec{p} + t vec{q}$.
$endgroup$
– levap
Jan 28 '17 at 16:31
$begingroup$
Just to verify does $-frac{1}{3}$ sound right for the second line and $-1$ for the third with a final answer of $-frac{1}{2}$?
$endgroup$
– TheMaster47x
Jan 28 '17 at 17:04
|
show 3 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2117946%2fcalculating-the-work-done-of-a-force-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You can split your triangle into three line segments, calculate the work of $F$ along each segment and add the results. I'll demonstrate the calculation for the first segment.
The line going from $(0,0,0)$ to $(1,1,1)$ can be parametrized as
$$gamma(t) = t(1,1,1) = t vec{i} + t vec{j} + tvec{k}$$
for $0 leq t leq 1$. Hence
$$ int_{gamma} vec{F} ,dvec{r} = int_0^1 vec{F}(gamma(t)) cdot dot{vec{gamma}}(t) , dt = int_0^1 ((t - t^2) vec{i} + (t - t^2) vec{j} + (t(1-t) + t^2) vec{k}) cdot (vec{i} + vec{j} + vec{k}) , dt
\
= int_0^1 (t - t^2) + (t - t^2) + t(1-t) + t^2 , dt = int_0^1 (3t - 2t^2) , dt = left[ frac{3}{2}t^2 - frac{2}{3}t^3right]^{t=1}_{t =0} = frac{5}{6}.$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Going from $(1,1,1)$ to $(1,1,0)$ would $γ(t)=-tvec{k}$ and would the limits still remain the same?
$endgroup$
– TheMaster47x
Jan 28 '17 at 16:10
$begingroup$
No. You want $gamma(0) = (1,1,1)$ and $gamma(1) = (1,1,0)$ so the correct parametrization is $gamma(t) = (1 - t)(1,1,1) + t(1,1,0) = (1,1,1-t) = (1,1,1) - t(0,0,1) = vec{i} + vec{j} + (1 - t)vec{k}$.
$endgroup$
– levap
Jan 28 '17 at 16:12
$begingroup$
I'm going to try to get my head around that, the limits are all $0≤t≤1$?
$endgroup$
– TheMaster47x
Jan 28 '17 at 16:26
$begingroup$
Yep. In general, a parametrization of a line which starts at $vec{p}$ at time $t = 0$ and ends at $vec{q}$ at time $t = 1$ is $gamma(t) = (1 - t) vec{p} + t vec{q}$.
$endgroup$
– levap
Jan 28 '17 at 16:31
$begingroup$
Just to verify does $-frac{1}{3}$ sound right for the second line and $-1$ for the third with a final answer of $-frac{1}{2}$?
$endgroup$
– TheMaster47x
Jan 28 '17 at 17:04
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
You can split your triangle into three line segments, calculate the work of $F$ along each segment and add the results. I'll demonstrate the calculation for the first segment.
The line going from $(0,0,0)$ to $(1,1,1)$ can be parametrized as
$$gamma(t) = t(1,1,1) = t vec{i} + t vec{j} + tvec{k}$$
for $0 leq t leq 1$. Hence
$$ int_{gamma} vec{F} ,dvec{r} = int_0^1 vec{F}(gamma(t)) cdot dot{vec{gamma}}(t) , dt = int_0^1 ((t - t^2) vec{i} + (t - t^2) vec{j} + (t(1-t) + t^2) vec{k}) cdot (vec{i} + vec{j} + vec{k}) , dt
\
= int_0^1 (t - t^2) + (t - t^2) + t(1-t) + t^2 , dt = int_0^1 (3t - 2t^2) , dt = left[ frac{3}{2}t^2 - frac{2}{3}t^3right]^{t=1}_{t =0} = frac{5}{6}.$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Going from $(1,1,1)$ to $(1,1,0)$ would $γ(t)=-tvec{k}$ and would the limits still remain the same?
$endgroup$
– TheMaster47x
Jan 28 '17 at 16:10
$begingroup$
No. You want $gamma(0) = (1,1,1)$ and $gamma(1) = (1,1,0)$ so the correct parametrization is $gamma(t) = (1 - t)(1,1,1) + t(1,1,0) = (1,1,1-t) = (1,1,1) - t(0,0,1) = vec{i} + vec{j} + (1 - t)vec{k}$.
$endgroup$
– levap
Jan 28 '17 at 16:12
$begingroup$
I'm going to try to get my head around that, the limits are all $0≤t≤1$?
$endgroup$
– TheMaster47x
Jan 28 '17 at 16:26
$begingroup$
Yep. In general, a parametrization of a line which starts at $vec{p}$ at time $t = 0$ and ends at $vec{q}$ at time $t = 1$ is $gamma(t) = (1 - t) vec{p} + t vec{q}$.
$endgroup$
– levap
Jan 28 '17 at 16:31
$begingroup$
Just to verify does $-frac{1}{3}$ sound right for the second line and $-1$ for the third with a final answer of $-frac{1}{2}$?
$endgroup$
– TheMaster47x
Jan 28 '17 at 17:04
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
You can split your triangle into three line segments, calculate the work of $F$ along each segment and add the results. I'll demonstrate the calculation for the first segment.
The line going from $(0,0,0)$ to $(1,1,1)$ can be parametrized as
$$gamma(t) = t(1,1,1) = t vec{i} + t vec{j} + tvec{k}$$
for $0 leq t leq 1$. Hence
$$ int_{gamma} vec{F} ,dvec{r} = int_0^1 vec{F}(gamma(t)) cdot dot{vec{gamma}}(t) , dt = int_0^1 ((t - t^2) vec{i} + (t - t^2) vec{j} + (t(1-t) + t^2) vec{k}) cdot (vec{i} + vec{j} + vec{k}) , dt
\
= int_0^1 (t - t^2) + (t - t^2) + t(1-t) + t^2 , dt = int_0^1 (3t - 2t^2) , dt = left[ frac{3}{2}t^2 - frac{2}{3}t^3right]^{t=1}_{t =0} = frac{5}{6}.$$
$endgroup$
You can split your triangle into three line segments, calculate the work of $F$ along each segment and add the results. I'll demonstrate the calculation for the first segment.
The line going from $(0,0,0)$ to $(1,1,1)$ can be parametrized as
$$gamma(t) = t(1,1,1) = t vec{i} + t vec{j} + tvec{k}$$
for $0 leq t leq 1$. Hence
$$ int_{gamma} vec{F} ,dvec{r} = int_0^1 vec{F}(gamma(t)) cdot dot{vec{gamma}}(t) , dt = int_0^1 ((t - t^2) vec{i} + (t - t^2) vec{j} + (t(1-t) + t^2) vec{k}) cdot (vec{i} + vec{j} + vec{k}) , dt
\
= int_0^1 (t - t^2) + (t - t^2) + t(1-t) + t^2 , dt = int_0^1 (3t - 2t^2) , dt = left[ frac{3}{2}t^2 - frac{2}{3}t^3right]^{t=1}_{t =0} = frac{5}{6}.$$
answered Jan 28 '17 at 16:05


levaplevap
47.4k33274
47.4k33274
$begingroup$
Going from $(1,1,1)$ to $(1,1,0)$ would $γ(t)=-tvec{k}$ and would the limits still remain the same?
$endgroup$
– TheMaster47x
Jan 28 '17 at 16:10
$begingroup$
No. You want $gamma(0) = (1,1,1)$ and $gamma(1) = (1,1,0)$ so the correct parametrization is $gamma(t) = (1 - t)(1,1,1) + t(1,1,0) = (1,1,1-t) = (1,1,1) - t(0,0,1) = vec{i} + vec{j} + (1 - t)vec{k}$.
$endgroup$
– levap
Jan 28 '17 at 16:12
$begingroup$
I'm going to try to get my head around that, the limits are all $0≤t≤1$?
$endgroup$
– TheMaster47x
Jan 28 '17 at 16:26
$begingroup$
Yep. In general, a parametrization of a line which starts at $vec{p}$ at time $t = 0$ and ends at $vec{q}$ at time $t = 1$ is $gamma(t) = (1 - t) vec{p} + t vec{q}$.
$endgroup$
– levap
Jan 28 '17 at 16:31
$begingroup$
Just to verify does $-frac{1}{3}$ sound right for the second line and $-1$ for the third with a final answer of $-frac{1}{2}$?
$endgroup$
– TheMaster47x
Jan 28 '17 at 17:04
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Going from $(1,1,1)$ to $(1,1,0)$ would $γ(t)=-tvec{k}$ and would the limits still remain the same?
$endgroup$
– TheMaster47x
Jan 28 '17 at 16:10
$begingroup$
No. You want $gamma(0) = (1,1,1)$ and $gamma(1) = (1,1,0)$ so the correct parametrization is $gamma(t) = (1 - t)(1,1,1) + t(1,1,0) = (1,1,1-t) = (1,1,1) - t(0,0,1) = vec{i} + vec{j} + (1 - t)vec{k}$.
$endgroup$
– levap
Jan 28 '17 at 16:12
$begingroup$
I'm going to try to get my head around that, the limits are all $0≤t≤1$?
$endgroup$
– TheMaster47x
Jan 28 '17 at 16:26
$begingroup$
Yep. In general, a parametrization of a line which starts at $vec{p}$ at time $t = 0$ and ends at $vec{q}$ at time $t = 1$ is $gamma(t) = (1 - t) vec{p} + t vec{q}$.
$endgroup$
– levap
Jan 28 '17 at 16:31
$begingroup$
Just to verify does $-frac{1}{3}$ sound right for the second line and $-1$ for the third with a final answer of $-frac{1}{2}$?
$endgroup$
– TheMaster47x
Jan 28 '17 at 17:04
$begingroup$
Going from $(1,1,1)$ to $(1,1,0)$ would $γ(t)=-tvec{k}$ and would the limits still remain the same?
$endgroup$
– TheMaster47x
Jan 28 '17 at 16:10
$begingroup$
Going from $(1,1,1)$ to $(1,1,0)$ would $γ(t)=-tvec{k}$ and would the limits still remain the same?
$endgroup$
– TheMaster47x
Jan 28 '17 at 16:10
$begingroup$
No. You want $gamma(0) = (1,1,1)$ and $gamma(1) = (1,1,0)$ so the correct parametrization is $gamma(t) = (1 - t)(1,1,1) + t(1,1,0) = (1,1,1-t) = (1,1,1) - t(0,0,1) = vec{i} + vec{j} + (1 - t)vec{k}$.
$endgroup$
– levap
Jan 28 '17 at 16:12
$begingroup$
No. You want $gamma(0) = (1,1,1)$ and $gamma(1) = (1,1,0)$ so the correct parametrization is $gamma(t) = (1 - t)(1,1,1) + t(1,1,0) = (1,1,1-t) = (1,1,1) - t(0,0,1) = vec{i} + vec{j} + (1 - t)vec{k}$.
$endgroup$
– levap
Jan 28 '17 at 16:12
$begingroup$
I'm going to try to get my head around that, the limits are all $0≤t≤1$?
$endgroup$
– TheMaster47x
Jan 28 '17 at 16:26
$begingroup$
I'm going to try to get my head around that, the limits are all $0≤t≤1$?
$endgroup$
– TheMaster47x
Jan 28 '17 at 16:26
$begingroup$
Yep. In general, a parametrization of a line which starts at $vec{p}$ at time $t = 0$ and ends at $vec{q}$ at time $t = 1$ is $gamma(t) = (1 - t) vec{p} + t vec{q}$.
$endgroup$
– levap
Jan 28 '17 at 16:31
$begingroup$
Yep. In general, a parametrization of a line which starts at $vec{p}$ at time $t = 0$ and ends at $vec{q}$ at time $t = 1$ is $gamma(t) = (1 - t) vec{p} + t vec{q}$.
$endgroup$
– levap
Jan 28 '17 at 16:31
$begingroup$
Just to verify does $-frac{1}{3}$ sound right for the second line and $-1$ for the third with a final answer of $-frac{1}{2}$?
$endgroup$
– TheMaster47x
Jan 28 '17 at 17:04
$begingroup$
Just to verify does $-frac{1}{3}$ sound right for the second line and $-1$ for the third with a final answer of $-frac{1}{2}$?
$endgroup$
– TheMaster47x
Jan 28 '17 at 17:04
|
show 3 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2117946%2fcalculating-the-work-done-of-a-force-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown