Conditionally remove elements from a ConcurrentHashMap (thread-safe)












0















I have a ConcurrentHashMap<String, Instant> which is accessed concurrently. I'd say that



map.entrySet().removeIf(e -> e.getValue().isBefore(Instant.now()));


would be a thread-safe implementation as it would never remove a String which got a new Instant by another thread right after the predicate evaluation and before the actual removal. Even if multiple threads put strings with instants into this map, never an entry with an instant after Instant.now() is removed. That's because





  1. entrySet() is a view on the original map


  2. removeIf() uses the iterator from the entrySet() supporting Iterator.remove()


  3. removeIf() removes the String/Instant entry by calling remove(Object, Object)


I'm just not entirely sure about (3). Who can help me out?










share|improve this question























  • Note: Instant.now() can return a different value every time it is called. This means it doesn't remove up to the same point for all entries.

    – Peter Lawrey
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:06
















0















I have a ConcurrentHashMap<String, Instant> which is accessed concurrently. I'd say that



map.entrySet().removeIf(e -> e.getValue().isBefore(Instant.now()));


would be a thread-safe implementation as it would never remove a String which got a new Instant by another thread right after the predicate evaluation and before the actual removal. Even if multiple threads put strings with instants into this map, never an entry with an instant after Instant.now() is removed. That's because





  1. entrySet() is a view on the original map


  2. removeIf() uses the iterator from the entrySet() supporting Iterator.remove()


  3. removeIf() removes the String/Instant entry by calling remove(Object, Object)


I'm just not entirely sure about (3). Who can help me out?










share|improve this question























  • Note: Instant.now() can return a different value every time it is called. This means it doesn't remove up to the same point for all entries.

    – Peter Lawrey
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:06














0












0








0








I have a ConcurrentHashMap<String, Instant> which is accessed concurrently. I'd say that



map.entrySet().removeIf(e -> e.getValue().isBefore(Instant.now()));


would be a thread-safe implementation as it would never remove a String which got a new Instant by another thread right after the predicate evaluation and before the actual removal. Even if multiple threads put strings with instants into this map, never an entry with an instant after Instant.now() is removed. That's because





  1. entrySet() is a view on the original map


  2. removeIf() uses the iterator from the entrySet() supporting Iterator.remove()


  3. removeIf() removes the String/Instant entry by calling remove(Object, Object)


I'm just not entirely sure about (3). Who can help me out?










share|improve this question














I have a ConcurrentHashMap<String, Instant> which is accessed concurrently. I'd say that



map.entrySet().removeIf(e -> e.getValue().isBefore(Instant.now()));


would be a thread-safe implementation as it would never remove a String which got a new Instant by another thread right after the predicate evaluation and before the actual removal. Even if multiple threads put strings with instants into this map, never an entry with an instant after Instant.now() is removed. That's because





  1. entrySet() is a view on the original map


  2. removeIf() uses the iterator from the entrySet() supporting Iterator.remove()


  3. removeIf() removes the String/Instant entry by calling remove(Object, Object)


I'm just not entirely sure about (3). Who can help me out?







java multithreading






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 21 '18 at 17:17









steffensteffen

9,37022355




9,37022355













  • Note: Instant.now() can return a different value every time it is called. This means it doesn't remove up to the same point for all entries.

    – Peter Lawrey
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:06



















  • Note: Instant.now() can return a different value every time it is called. This means it doesn't remove up to the same point for all entries.

    – Peter Lawrey
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:06

















Note: Instant.now() can return a different value every time it is called. This means it doesn't remove up to the same point for all entries.

– Peter Lawrey
Nov 21 '18 at 19:06





Note: Instant.now() can return a different value every time it is called. This means it doesn't remove up to the same point for all entries.

– Peter Lawrey
Nov 21 '18 at 19:06












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53417422%2fconditionally-remove-elements-from-a-concurrenthashmap-thread-safe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53417422%2fconditionally-remove-elements-from-a-concurrenthashmap-thread-safe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$