Cauchy product for the reciprocal of the polynomial $x - 2x^2 + 3x^3 - 4x^4$
$begingroup$
I have come across some Laurent series in which the denominator of a fraction contains a power series. Looking around I came across this Calculate Laurent series for $1/ sin(z)$ which suggests that it is possible to calculate the reciprocal of a series up to a certain number of term. I have looked at the formula and because of the abstract notation, it is not clear to me how this formula is applied. So for example if I wanted to find the reciprocal of the following polynomial:
$$x - 2x^2 + 3x^3 - 4x^4$$
How would I compute this?
polynomials power-series cauchy-product
$endgroup$
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
I have come across some Laurent series in which the denominator of a fraction contains a power series. Looking around I came across this Calculate Laurent series for $1/ sin(z)$ which suggests that it is possible to calculate the reciprocal of a series up to a certain number of term. I have looked at the formula and because of the abstract notation, it is not clear to me how this formula is applied. So for example if I wanted to find the reciprocal of the following polynomial:
$$x - 2x^2 + 3x^3 - 4x^4$$
How would I compute this?
polynomials power-series cauchy-product
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Have you tried long division?
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 14 at 20:36
1
$begingroup$
Is the Cauchy product formula simply long division?
$endgroup$
– daljit97
Jan 14 at 20:40
$begingroup$
I would say yes, essentially. If we write$$1=(x-2x^2+3x^2-4x^4)({1over x}+a_0+a_1x+dots)$$ then the calculations to get the $a_k$ are the same ones we'd make doing a long division, or so it seems to me.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 14 at 20:48
$begingroup$
So from there I just equate the coefficients right? Like equating powers of $x^1$ I would get $a_0 - 2 = 0 ==> a_0 = 2$?
$endgroup$
– daljit97
Jan 14 at 21:11
1
$begingroup$
To do long division in this context is simplicity itself. You have to write divisor and dividend in increasing degree, as you have already done with your polynomial $f(x)$. Write the algorithm down and you see immediately that the first monomial in the series for $1/f$ is certainly $x^{-1}$.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
Jan 14 at 23:48
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
I have come across some Laurent series in which the denominator of a fraction contains a power series. Looking around I came across this Calculate Laurent series for $1/ sin(z)$ which suggests that it is possible to calculate the reciprocal of a series up to a certain number of term. I have looked at the formula and because of the abstract notation, it is not clear to me how this formula is applied. So for example if I wanted to find the reciprocal of the following polynomial:
$$x - 2x^2 + 3x^3 - 4x^4$$
How would I compute this?
polynomials power-series cauchy-product
$endgroup$
I have come across some Laurent series in which the denominator of a fraction contains a power series. Looking around I came across this Calculate Laurent series for $1/ sin(z)$ which suggests that it is possible to calculate the reciprocal of a series up to a certain number of term. I have looked at the formula and because of the abstract notation, it is not clear to me how this formula is applied. So for example if I wanted to find the reciprocal of the following polynomial:
$$x - 2x^2 + 3x^3 - 4x^4$$
How would I compute this?
polynomials power-series cauchy-product
polynomials power-series cauchy-product
asked Jan 14 at 20:31
daljit97daljit97
178111
178111
$begingroup$
Have you tried long division?
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 14 at 20:36
1
$begingroup$
Is the Cauchy product formula simply long division?
$endgroup$
– daljit97
Jan 14 at 20:40
$begingroup$
I would say yes, essentially. If we write$$1=(x-2x^2+3x^2-4x^4)({1over x}+a_0+a_1x+dots)$$ then the calculations to get the $a_k$ are the same ones we'd make doing a long division, or so it seems to me.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 14 at 20:48
$begingroup$
So from there I just equate the coefficients right? Like equating powers of $x^1$ I would get $a_0 - 2 = 0 ==> a_0 = 2$?
$endgroup$
– daljit97
Jan 14 at 21:11
1
$begingroup$
To do long division in this context is simplicity itself. You have to write divisor and dividend in increasing degree, as you have already done with your polynomial $f(x)$. Write the algorithm down and you see immediately that the first monomial in the series for $1/f$ is certainly $x^{-1}$.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
Jan 14 at 23:48
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Have you tried long division?
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 14 at 20:36
1
$begingroup$
Is the Cauchy product formula simply long division?
$endgroup$
– daljit97
Jan 14 at 20:40
$begingroup$
I would say yes, essentially. If we write$$1=(x-2x^2+3x^2-4x^4)({1over x}+a_0+a_1x+dots)$$ then the calculations to get the $a_k$ are the same ones we'd make doing a long division, or so it seems to me.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 14 at 20:48
$begingroup$
So from there I just equate the coefficients right? Like equating powers of $x^1$ I would get $a_0 - 2 = 0 ==> a_0 = 2$?
$endgroup$
– daljit97
Jan 14 at 21:11
1
$begingroup$
To do long division in this context is simplicity itself. You have to write divisor and dividend in increasing degree, as you have already done with your polynomial $f(x)$. Write the algorithm down and you see immediately that the first monomial in the series for $1/f$ is certainly $x^{-1}$.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
Jan 14 at 23:48
$begingroup$
Have you tried long division?
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 14 at 20:36
$begingroup$
Have you tried long division?
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 14 at 20:36
1
1
$begingroup$
Is the Cauchy product formula simply long division?
$endgroup$
– daljit97
Jan 14 at 20:40
$begingroup$
Is the Cauchy product formula simply long division?
$endgroup$
– daljit97
Jan 14 at 20:40
$begingroup$
I would say yes, essentially. If we write$$1=(x-2x^2+3x^2-4x^4)({1over x}+a_0+a_1x+dots)$$ then the calculations to get the $a_k$ are the same ones we'd make doing a long division, or so it seems to me.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 14 at 20:48
$begingroup$
I would say yes, essentially. If we write$$1=(x-2x^2+3x^2-4x^4)({1over x}+a_0+a_1x+dots)$$ then the calculations to get the $a_k$ are the same ones we'd make doing a long division, or so it seems to me.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 14 at 20:48
$begingroup$
So from there I just equate the coefficients right? Like equating powers of $x^1$ I would get $a_0 - 2 = 0 ==> a_0 = 2$?
$endgroup$
– daljit97
Jan 14 at 21:11
$begingroup$
So from there I just equate the coefficients right? Like equating powers of $x^1$ I would get $a_0 - 2 = 0 ==> a_0 = 2$?
$endgroup$
– daljit97
Jan 14 at 21:11
1
1
$begingroup$
To do long division in this context is simplicity itself. You have to write divisor and dividend in increasing degree, as you have already done with your polynomial $f(x)$. Write the algorithm down and you see immediately that the first monomial in the series for $1/f$ is certainly $x^{-1}$.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
Jan 14 at 23:48
$begingroup$
To do long division in this context is simplicity itself. You have to write divisor and dividend in increasing degree, as you have already done with your polynomial $f(x)$. Write the algorithm down and you see immediately that the first monomial in the series for $1/f$ is certainly $x^{-1}$.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
Jan 14 at 23:48
|
show 4 more comments
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073709%2fcauchy-product-for-the-reciprocal-of-the-polynomial-x-2x2-3x3-4x4%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073709%2fcauchy-product-for-the-reciprocal-of-the-polynomial-x-2x2-3x3-4x4%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Have you tried long division?
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 14 at 20:36
1
$begingroup$
Is the Cauchy product formula simply long division?
$endgroup$
– daljit97
Jan 14 at 20:40
$begingroup$
I would say yes, essentially. If we write$$1=(x-2x^2+3x^2-4x^4)({1over x}+a_0+a_1x+dots)$$ then the calculations to get the $a_k$ are the same ones we'd make doing a long division, or so it seems to me.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 14 at 20:48
$begingroup$
So from there I just equate the coefficients right? Like equating powers of $x^1$ I would get $a_0 - 2 = 0 ==> a_0 = 2$?
$endgroup$
– daljit97
Jan 14 at 21:11
1
$begingroup$
To do long division in this context is simplicity itself. You have to write divisor and dividend in increasing degree, as you have already done with your polynomial $f(x)$. Write the algorithm down and you see immediately that the first monomial in the series for $1/f$ is certainly $x^{-1}$.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
Jan 14 at 23:48