Conjugate symmetry of an inner product












1












$begingroup$


I want to prove the following:



$langle A,B rangle = overline{langle B,A rangle}$



where



$langle A,B rangle := tr(AB^{*}),, and ,, A,B in mathbb{C}^{n times n} $



Note:



The bar denotes the complex conjugate of all entries of a matrix and the "*" the adjoint matrix.



Edit:



$langle A,B rangle = tr(AB^{*}) = tr(overline{(BA^{*})^T}) = tr(overline{BA^{*}}) = overline{tr(BA^*)} = overline{langle B,A rangle}$



The third equality holds since A and B are square matrices.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Write down an explicit formula for $langle A,Brangle $ in terms of $A_{ij}, B_{ij}$, the entries of $A$ and $B$.
    $endgroup$
    – Christopher A. Wong
    Jan 15 at 19:14












  • $begingroup$
    I did it like this: $langle A,B rangle = tr(AB^*) = sum_{j=1}^{n} (AB^*)_{jj}$
    $endgroup$
    – Fo Young Areal Lo
    Jan 15 at 19:37












  • $begingroup$
    There is not need to use the elements of the matrices. Did you see my answer?
    $endgroup$
    – GReyes
    Jan 15 at 19:52










  • $begingroup$
    Yes I did but for me personally it didn't really help me. I did prove it now, I will add an edit to my original answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Fo Young Areal Lo
    Jan 15 at 20:26
















1












$begingroup$


I want to prove the following:



$langle A,B rangle = overline{langle B,A rangle}$



where



$langle A,B rangle := tr(AB^{*}),, and ,, A,B in mathbb{C}^{n times n} $



Note:



The bar denotes the complex conjugate of all entries of a matrix and the "*" the adjoint matrix.



Edit:



$langle A,B rangle = tr(AB^{*}) = tr(overline{(BA^{*})^T}) = tr(overline{BA^{*}}) = overline{tr(BA^*)} = overline{langle B,A rangle}$



The third equality holds since A and B are square matrices.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Write down an explicit formula for $langle A,Brangle $ in terms of $A_{ij}, B_{ij}$, the entries of $A$ and $B$.
    $endgroup$
    – Christopher A. Wong
    Jan 15 at 19:14












  • $begingroup$
    I did it like this: $langle A,B rangle = tr(AB^*) = sum_{j=1}^{n} (AB^*)_{jj}$
    $endgroup$
    – Fo Young Areal Lo
    Jan 15 at 19:37












  • $begingroup$
    There is not need to use the elements of the matrices. Did you see my answer?
    $endgroup$
    – GReyes
    Jan 15 at 19:52










  • $begingroup$
    Yes I did but for me personally it didn't really help me. I did prove it now, I will add an edit to my original answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Fo Young Areal Lo
    Jan 15 at 20:26














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I want to prove the following:



$langle A,B rangle = overline{langle B,A rangle}$



where



$langle A,B rangle := tr(AB^{*}),, and ,, A,B in mathbb{C}^{n times n} $



Note:



The bar denotes the complex conjugate of all entries of a matrix and the "*" the adjoint matrix.



Edit:



$langle A,B rangle = tr(AB^{*}) = tr(overline{(BA^{*})^T}) = tr(overline{BA^{*}}) = overline{tr(BA^*)} = overline{langle B,A rangle}$



The third equality holds since A and B are square matrices.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I want to prove the following:



$langle A,B rangle = overline{langle B,A rangle}$



where



$langle A,B rangle := tr(AB^{*}),, and ,, A,B in mathbb{C}^{n times n} $



Note:



The bar denotes the complex conjugate of all entries of a matrix and the "*" the adjoint matrix.



Edit:



$langle A,B rangle = tr(AB^{*}) = tr(overline{(BA^{*})^T}) = tr(overline{BA^{*}}) = overline{tr(BA^*)} = overline{langle B,A rangle}$



The third equality holds since A and B are square matrices.







linear-algebra complex-numbers proof-writing inner-product-space






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 15 at 20:33







Fo Young Areal Lo

















asked Jan 15 at 19:10









Fo Young Areal LoFo Young Areal Lo

345




345








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Write down an explicit formula for $langle A,Brangle $ in terms of $A_{ij}, B_{ij}$, the entries of $A$ and $B$.
    $endgroup$
    – Christopher A. Wong
    Jan 15 at 19:14












  • $begingroup$
    I did it like this: $langle A,B rangle = tr(AB^*) = sum_{j=1}^{n} (AB^*)_{jj}$
    $endgroup$
    – Fo Young Areal Lo
    Jan 15 at 19:37












  • $begingroup$
    There is not need to use the elements of the matrices. Did you see my answer?
    $endgroup$
    – GReyes
    Jan 15 at 19:52










  • $begingroup$
    Yes I did but for me personally it didn't really help me. I did prove it now, I will add an edit to my original answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Fo Young Areal Lo
    Jan 15 at 20:26














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Write down an explicit formula for $langle A,Brangle $ in terms of $A_{ij}, B_{ij}$, the entries of $A$ and $B$.
    $endgroup$
    – Christopher A. Wong
    Jan 15 at 19:14












  • $begingroup$
    I did it like this: $langle A,B rangle = tr(AB^*) = sum_{j=1}^{n} (AB^*)_{jj}$
    $endgroup$
    – Fo Young Areal Lo
    Jan 15 at 19:37












  • $begingroup$
    There is not need to use the elements of the matrices. Did you see my answer?
    $endgroup$
    – GReyes
    Jan 15 at 19:52










  • $begingroup$
    Yes I did but for me personally it didn't really help me. I did prove it now, I will add an edit to my original answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Fo Young Areal Lo
    Jan 15 at 20:26








1




1




$begingroup$
Write down an explicit formula for $langle A,Brangle $ in terms of $A_{ij}, B_{ij}$, the entries of $A$ and $B$.
$endgroup$
– Christopher A. Wong
Jan 15 at 19:14






$begingroup$
Write down an explicit formula for $langle A,Brangle $ in terms of $A_{ij}, B_{ij}$, the entries of $A$ and $B$.
$endgroup$
– Christopher A. Wong
Jan 15 at 19:14














$begingroup$
I did it like this: $langle A,B rangle = tr(AB^*) = sum_{j=1}^{n} (AB^*)_{jj}$
$endgroup$
– Fo Young Areal Lo
Jan 15 at 19:37






$begingroup$
I did it like this: $langle A,B rangle = tr(AB^*) = sum_{j=1}^{n} (AB^*)_{jj}$
$endgroup$
– Fo Young Areal Lo
Jan 15 at 19:37














$begingroup$
There is not need to use the elements of the matrices. Did you see my answer?
$endgroup$
– GReyes
Jan 15 at 19:52




$begingroup$
There is not need to use the elements of the matrices. Did you see my answer?
$endgroup$
– GReyes
Jan 15 at 19:52












$begingroup$
Yes I did but for me personally it didn't really help me. I did prove it now, I will add an edit to my original answer.
$endgroup$
– Fo Young Areal Lo
Jan 15 at 20:26




$begingroup$
Yes I did but for me personally it didn't really help me. I did prove it now, I will add an edit to my original answer.
$endgroup$
– Fo Young Areal Lo
Jan 15 at 20:26










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Just observe that $(AB^*)^*=B^{**}A^*=BA^*$ and therefore the matrices $AB^*$ and $BA^*$ are complex conjugate of each other. Their diagonal elements are thus conjugate and their sums are as well, that is, $tr(AB^*)=overline{tr(BA^*)}$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3074812%2fconjugate-symmetry-of-an-inner-product%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Just observe that $(AB^*)^*=B^{**}A^*=BA^*$ and therefore the matrices $AB^*$ and $BA^*$ are complex conjugate of each other. Their diagonal elements are thus conjugate and their sums are as well, that is, $tr(AB^*)=overline{tr(BA^*)}$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Just observe that $(AB^*)^*=B^{**}A^*=BA^*$ and therefore the matrices $AB^*$ and $BA^*$ are complex conjugate of each other. Their diagonal elements are thus conjugate and their sums are as well, that is, $tr(AB^*)=overline{tr(BA^*)}$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Just observe that $(AB^*)^*=B^{**}A^*=BA^*$ and therefore the matrices $AB^*$ and $BA^*$ are complex conjugate of each other. Their diagonal elements are thus conjugate and their sums are as well, that is, $tr(AB^*)=overline{tr(BA^*)}$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Just observe that $(AB^*)^*=B^{**}A^*=BA^*$ and therefore the matrices $AB^*$ and $BA^*$ are complex conjugate of each other. Their diagonal elements are thus conjugate and their sums are as well, that is, $tr(AB^*)=overline{tr(BA^*)}$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 15 at 19:24









        GReyesGReyes

        1,43515




        1,43515






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3074812%2fconjugate-symmetry-of-an-inner-product%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

            How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter