How to raise runtime error when a namelist variable is missing in an input namelist file?












2















An example code is as follows:



program main
implicit none
integer :: ufile
real :: a, b, c
namelist /my_nlt/ a, b, c
open(newunit=ufile,file='my_nlt.txt')
read(ufile,my_nlt)
close(ufile)
write(*,my_nlt)
end program main


And the input file my_nlt.txt contains:



 &my_nlt
a=1.0
b=2.0
/


Here the variable c is missing in the input file.
Running the code compiled by gfortran gives no warnning/error. I am wondering whether there is a compiler option that can be used to raise an error/warning when encountering this situation?










share|improve this question



























    2















    An example code is as follows:



    program main
    implicit none
    integer :: ufile
    real :: a, b, c
    namelist /my_nlt/ a, b, c
    open(newunit=ufile,file='my_nlt.txt')
    read(ufile,my_nlt)
    close(ufile)
    write(*,my_nlt)
    end program main


    And the input file my_nlt.txt contains:



     &my_nlt
    a=1.0
    b=2.0
    /


    Here the variable c is missing in the input file.
    Running the code compiled by gfortran gives no warnning/error. I am wondering whether there is a compiler option that can be used to raise an error/warning when encountering this situation?










    share|improve this question

























      2












      2








      2


      1






      An example code is as follows:



      program main
      implicit none
      integer :: ufile
      real :: a, b, c
      namelist /my_nlt/ a, b, c
      open(newunit=ufile,file='my_nlt.txt')
      read(ufile,my_nlt)
      close(ufile)
      write(*,my_nlt)
      end program main


      And the input file my_nlt.txt contains:



       &my_nlt
      a=1.0
      b=2.0
      /


      Here the variable c is missing in the input file.
      Running the code compiled by gfortran gives no warnning/error. I am wondering whether there is a compiler option that can be used to raise an error/warning when encountering this situation?










      share|improve this question














      An example code is as follows:



      program main
      implicit none
      integer :: ufile
      real :: a, b, c
      namelist /my_nlt/ a, b, c
      open(newunit=ufile,file='my_nlt.txt')
      read(ufile,my_nlt)
      close(ufile)
      write(*,my_nlt)
      end program main


      And the input file my_nlt.txt contains:



       &my_nlt
      a=1.0
      b=2.0
      /


      Here the variable c is missing in the input file.
      Running the code compiled by gfortran gives no warnning/error. I am wondering whether there is a compiler option that can be used to raise an error/warning when encountering this situation?







      fortran






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 21 '18 at 19:19









      Youjun HuYoujun Hu

      538




      538
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          I am not aware of such an option for gfortran (or any other Fortran compiler). I would also strongly recommend not relying on such an option should one be found.



          Namelist formatting exists to give a certain simplicity and flexibility of input to specific objects. Desiring a warning with a namelist read not updating all variables is perhaps trying to use the tool inappropriately.



          For the program and input of the question, the expected runtime behaviour is for a and b to be defined with the values stated, and for c to be undefined. Instead, we could define the three variables with a value prior to the read and see whether they are updated by the read:



          real, parameter :: SENTINEL=HUGE(0.)
          real :: a=SENTINEL, b=SENTINEL, c=SENTINEL
          namelist /my_nlt/ a, b, c
          open(newunit=ufile,file='my_nlt.txt')
          read(ufile,my_nlt)

          if (a==SENTINEL.or.b==SENTINEL.or.c==SENTINEL) ERROR STOP


          Here SENTINEL would be a value undesired for the variables or unexpected in the input. A variable not included in a namelist record retains its value prior to the read.



          This isn't the same thing as certainly not appearing (especially where there may be no out-of-range input value) but if you want to check that then you'll have to parse the input file manually. The structure of such a namelist file is well defined.



          As a final consideration, is the variable c "present" in the following namelist input record?



          &my_nlt a=1., b=2., c=1* /





          share|improve this answer



















          • 1





            Adding to @francescalus' excellent answer, a NAMELIST read where a variable is not named leaves the variable in its previous definition status. I'll note that you can't even rely on a compiler's uninitialized variable checking to detect this.

            – Steve Lionel
            Nov 22 '18 at 0:36











          • If the input file looks like &my_nlt a=1.0,b=2.0, c=2+1 /, c still gets a value without error (tested using gfortran), but the value is not as we expected. To just test whether a variable presents, maybe the safest way is to parse the input file manually.

            – Youjun Hu
            Nov 22 '18 at 6:09








          • 1





            @YoujunHu, my comment about using the tool "inappropriately" relates to how namelist input is designed not to affect variables which don't feature in the input record (and may appear in any order, or incompletely), which is in stark contrast to the other form of formatted input. Think of it as a facility like command line arguments: the user expects to be able to give just a selection of values on the command line, perhaps leaving others as "default values" or unspecified.

            – francescalus
            Nov 22 '18 at 16:15






          • 1





            @YoujunHu, c has a well-defined value from the namelist record &my_nlt a=1.0,b=2.0, c=2+1 /. That value is 20.. [If you don't understand why, then that could make a good question.]

            – francescalus
            Nov 22 '18 at 16:21






          • 1





            @YoujunHu, it's 20 because 2+1 as input field is interpreted as 2 with exponent 1 (2×10^1).

            – francescalus
            Nov 22 '18 at 17:59











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53419146%2fhow-to-raise-runtime-error-when-a-namelist-variable-is-missing-in-an-input-namel%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4














          I am not aware of such an option for gfortran (or any other Fortran compiler). I would also strongly recommend not relying on such an option should one be found.



          Namelist formatting exists to give a certain simplicity and flexibility of input to specific objects. Desiring a warning with a namelist read not updating all variables is perhaps trying to use the tool inappropriately.



          For the program and input of the question, the expected runtime behaviour is for a and b to be defined with the values stated, and for c to be undefined. Instead, we could define the three variables with a value prior to the read and see whether they are updated by the read:



          real, parameter :: SENTINEL=HUGE(0.)
          real :: a=SENTINEL, b=SENTINEL, c=SENTINEL
          namelist /my_nlt/ a, b, c
          open(newunit=ufile,file='my_nlt.txt')
          read(ufile,my_nlt)

          if (a==SENTINEL.or.b==SENTINEL.or.c==SENTINEL) ERROR STOP


          Here SENTINEL would be a value undesired for the variables or unexpected in the input. A variable not included in a namelist record retains its value prior to the read.



          This isn't the same thing as certainly not appearing (especially where there may be no out-of-range input value) but if you want to check that then you'll have to parse the input file manually. The structure of such a namelist file is well defined.



          As a final consideration, is the variable c "present" in the following namelist input record?



          &my_nlt a=1., b=2., c=1* /





          share|improve this answer



















          • 1





            Adding to @francescalus' excellent answer, a NAMELIST read where a variable is not named leaves the variable in its previous definition status. I'll note that you can't even rely on a compiler's uninitialized variable checking to detect this.

            – Steve Lionel
            Nov 22 '18 at 0:36











          • If the input file looks like &my_nlt a=1.0,b=2.0, c=2+1 /, c still gets a value without error (tested using gfortran), but the value is not as we expected. To just test whether a variable presents, maybe the safest way is to parse the input file manually.

            – Youjun Hu
            Nov 22 '18 at 6:09








          • 1





            @YoujunHu, my comment about using the tool "inappropriately" relates to how namelist input is designed not to affect variables which don't feature in the input record (and may appear in any order, or incompletely), which is in stark contrast to the other form of formatted input. Think of it as a facility like command line arguments: the user expects to be able to give just a selection of values on the command line, perhaps leaving others as "default values" or unspecified.

            – francescalus
            Nov 22 '18 at 16:15






          • 1





            @YoujunHu, c has a well-defined value from the namelist record &my_nlt a=1.0,b=2.0, c=2+1 /. That value is 20.. [If you don't understand why, then that could make a good question.]

            – francescalus
            Nov 22 '18 at 16:21






          • 1





            @YoujunHu, it's 20 because 2+1 as input field is interpreted as 2 with exponent 1 (2×10^1).

            – francescalus
            Nov 22 '18 at 17:59
















          4














          I am not aware of such an option for gfortran (or any other Fortran compiler). I would also strongly recommend not relying on such an option should one be found.



          Namelist formatting exists to give a certain simplicity and flexibility of input to specific objects. Desiring a warning with a namelist read not updating all variables is perhaps trying to use the tool inappropriately.



          For the program and input of the question, the expected runtime behaviour is for a and b to be defined with the values stated, and for c to be undefined. Instead, we could define the three variables with a value prior to the read and see whether they are updated by the read:



          real, parameter :: SENTINEL=HUGE(0.)
          real :: a=SENTINEL, b=SENTINEL, c=SENTINEL
          namelist /my_nlt/ a, b, c
          open(newunit=ufile,file='my_nlt.txt')
          read(ufile,my_nlt)

          if (a==SENTINEL.or.b==SENTINEL.or.c==SENTINEL) ERROR STOP


          Here SENTINEL would be a value undesired for the variables or unexpected in the input. A variable not included in a namelist record retains its value prior to the read.



          This isn't the same thing as certainly not appearing (especially where there may be no out-of-range input value) but if you want to check that then you'll have to parse the input file manually. The structure of such a namelist file is well defined.



          As a final consideration, is the variable c "present" in the following namelist input record?



          &my_nlt a=1., b=2., c=1* /





          share|improve this answer



















          • 1





            Adding to @francescalus' excellent answer, a NAMELIST read where a variable is not named leaves the variable in its previous definition status. I'll note that you can't even rely on a compiler's uninitialized variable checking to detect this.

            – Steve Lionel
            Nov 22 '18 at 0:36











          • If the input file looks like &my_nlt a=1.0,b=2.0, c=2+1 /, c still gets a value without error (tested using gfortran), but the value is not as we expected. To just test whether a variable presents, maybe the safest way is to parse the input file manually.

            – Youjun Hu
            Nov 22 '18 at 6:09








          • 1





            @YoujunHu, my comment about using the tool "inappropriately" relates to how namelist input is designed not to affect variables which don't feature in the input record (and may appear in any order, or incompletely), which is in stark contrast to the other form of formatted input. Think of it as a facility like command line arguments: the user expects to be able to give just a selection of values on the command line, perhaps leaving others as "default values" or unspecified.

            – francescalus
            Nov 22 '18 at 16:15






          • 1





            @YoujunHu, c has a well-defined value from the namelist record &my_nlt a=1.0,b=2.0, c=2+1 /. That value is 20.. [If you don't understand why, then that could make a good question.]

            – francescalus
            Nov 22 '18 at 16:21






          • 1





            @YoujunHu, it's 20 because 2+1 as input field is interpreted as 2 with exponent 1 (2×10^1).

            – francescalus
            Nov 22 '18 at 17:59














          4












          4








          4







          I am not aware of such an option for gfortran (or any other Fortran compiler). I would also strongly recommend not relying on such an option should one be found.



          Namelist formatting exists to give a certain simplicity and flexibility of input to specific objects. Desiring a warning with a namelist read not updating all variables is perhaps trying to use the tool inappropriately.



          For the program and input of the question, the expected runtime behaviour is for a and b to be defined with the values stated, and for c to be undefined. Instead, we could define the three variables with a value prior to the read and see whether they are updated by the read:



          real, parameter :: SENTINEL=HUGE(0.)
          real :: a=SENTINEL, b=SENTINEL, c=SENTINEL
          namelist /my_nlt/ a, b, c
          open(newunit=ufile,file='my_nlt.txt')
          read(ufile,my_nlt)

          if (a==SENTINEL.or.b==SENTINEL.or.c==SENTINEL) ERROR STOP


          Here SENTINEL would be a value undesired for the variables or unexpected in the input. A variable not included in a namelist record retains its value prior to the read.



          This isn't the same thing as certainly not appearing (especially where there may be no out-of-range input value) but if you want to check that then you'll have to parse the input file manually. The structure of such a namelist file is well defined.



          As a final consideration, is the variable c "present" in the following namelist input record?



          &my_nlt a=1., b=2., c=1* /





          share|improve this answer













          I am not aware of such an option for gfortran (or any other Fortran compiler). I would also strongly recommend not relying on such an option should one be found.



          Namelist formatting exists to give a certain simplicity and flexibility of input to specific objects. Desiring a warning with a namelist read not updating all variables is perhaps trying to use the tool inappropriately.



          For the program and input of the question, the expected runtime behaviour is for a and b to be defined with the values stated, and for c to be undefined. Instead, we could define the three variables with a value prior to the read and see whether they are updated by the read:



          real, parameter :: SENTINEL=HUGE(0.)
          real :: a=SENTINEL, b=SENTINEL, c=SENTINEL
          namelist /my_nlt/ a, b, c
          open(newunit=ufile,file='my_nlt.txt')
          read(ufile,my_nlt)

          if (a==SENTINEL.or.b==SENTINEL.or.c==SENTINEL) ERROR STOP


          Here SENTINEL would be a value undesired for the variables or unexpected in the input. A variable not included in a namelist record retains its value prior to the read.



          This isn't the same thing as certainly not appearing (especially where there may be no out-of-range input value) but if you want to check that then you'll have to parse the input file manually. The structure of such a namelist file is well defined.



          As a final consideration, is the variable c "present" in the following namelist input record?



          &my_nlt a=1., b=2., c=1* /






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 21 '18 at 21:14









          francescalusfrancescalus

          17.5k73456




          17.5k73456








          • 1





            Adding to @francescalus' excellent answer, a NAMELIST read where a variable is not named leaves the variable in its previous definition status. I'll note that you can't even rely on a compiler's uninitialized variable checking to detect this.

            – Steve Lionel
            Nov 22 '18 at 0:36











          • If the input file looks like &my_nlt a=1.0,b=2.0, c=2+1 /, c still gets a value without error (tested using gfortran), but the value is not as we expected. To just test whether a variable presents, maybe the safest way is to parse the input file manually.

            – Youjun Hu
            Nov 22 '18 at 6:09








          • 1





            @YoujunHu, my comment about using the tool "inappropriately" relates to how namelist input is designed not to affect variables which don't feature in the input record (and may appear in any order, or incompletely), which is in stark contrast to the other form of formatted input. Think of it as a facility like command line arguments: the user expects to be able to give just a selection of values on the command line, perhaps leaving others as "default values" or unspecified.

            – francescalus
            Nov 22 '18 at 16:15






          • 1





            @YoujunHu, c has a well-defined value from the namelist record &my_nlt a=1.0,b=2.0, c=2+1 /. That value is 20.. [If you don't understand why, then that could make a good question.]

            – francescalus
            Nov 22 '18 at 16:21






          • 1





            @YoujunHu, it's 20 because 2+1 as input field is interpreted as 2 with exponent 1 (2×10^1).

            – francescalus
            Nov 22 '18 at 17:59














          • 1





            Adding to @francescalus' excellent answer, a NAMELIST read where a variable is not named leaves the variable in its previous definition status. I'll note that you can't even rely on a compiler's uninitialized variable checking to detect this.

            – Steve Lionel
            Nov 22 '18 at 0:36











          • If the input file looks like &my_nlt a=1.0,b=2.0, c=2+1 /, c still gets a value without error (tested using gfortran), but the value is not as we expected. To just test whether a variable presents, maybe the safest way is to parse the input file manually.

            – Youjun Hu
            Nov 22 '18 at 6:09








          • 1





            @YoujunHu, my comment about using the tool "inappropriately" relates to how namelist input is designed not to affect variables which don't feature in the input record (and may appear in any order, or incompletely), which is in stark contrast to the other form of formatted input. Think of it as a facility like command line arguments: the user expects to be able to give just a selection of values on the command line, perhaps leaving others as "default values" or unspecified.

            – francescalus
            Nov 22 '18 at 16:15






          • 1





            @YoujunHu, c has a well-defined value from the namelist record &my_nlt a=1.0,b=2.0, c=2+1 /. That value is 20.. [If you don't understand why, then that could make a good question.]

            – francescalus
            Nov 22 '18 at 16:21






          • 1





            @YoujunHu, it's 20 because 2+1 as input field is interpreted as 2 with exponent 1 (2×10^1).

            – francescalus
            Nov 22 '18 at 17:59








          1




          1





          Adding to @francescalus' excellent answer, a NAMELIST read where a variable is not named leaves the variable in its previous definition status. I'll note that you can't even rely on a compiler's uninitialized variable checking to detect this.

          – Steve Lionel
          Nov 22 '18 at 0:36





          Adding to @francescalus' excellent answer, a NAMELIST read where a variable is not named leaves the variable in its previous definition status. I'll note that you can't even rely on a compiler's uninitialized variable checking to detect this.

          – Steve Lionel
          Nov 22 '18 at 0:36













          If the input file looks like &my_nlt a=1.0,b=2.0, c=2+1 /, c still gets a value without error (tested using gfortran), but the value is not as we expected. To just test whether a variable presents, maybe the safest way is to parse the input file manually.

          – Youjun Hu
          Nov 22 '18 at 6:09







          If the input file looks like &my_nlt a=1.0,b=2.0, c=2+1 /, c still gets a value without error (tested using gfortran), but the value is not as we expected. To just test whether a variable presents, maybe the safest way is to parse the input file manually.

          – Youjun Hu
          Nov 22 '18 at 6:09






          1




          1





          @YoujunHu, my comment about using the tool "inappropriately" relates to how namelist input is designed not to affect variables which don't feature in the input record (and may appear in any order, or incompletely), which is in stark contrast to the other form of formatted input. Think of it as a facility like command line arguments: the user expects to be able to give just a selection of values on the command line, perhaps leaving others as "default values" or unspecified.

          – francescalus
          Nov 22 '18 at 16:15





          @YoujunHu, my comment about using the tool "inappropriately" relates to how namelist input is designed not to affect variables which don't feature in the input record (and may appear in any order, or incompletely), which is in stark contrast to the other form of formatted input. Think of it as a facility like command line arguments: the user expects to be able to give just a selection of values on the command line, perhaps leaving others as "default values" or unspecified.

          – francescalus
          Nov 22 '18 at 16:15




          1




          1





          @YoujunHu, c has a well-defined value from the namelist record &my_nlt a=1.0,b=2.0, c=2+1 /. That value is 20.. [If you don't understand why, then that could make a good question.]

          – francescalus
          Nov 22 '18 at 16:21





          @YoujunHu, c has a well-defined value from the namelist record &my_nlt a=1.0,b=2.0, c=2+1 /. That value is 20.. [If you don't understand why, then that could make a good question.]

          – francescalus
          Nov 22 '18 at 16:21




          1




          1





          @YoujunHu, it's 20 because 2+1 as input field is interpreted as 2 with exponent 1 (2×10^1).

          – francescalus
          Nov 22 '18 at 17:59





          @YoujunHu, it's 20 because 2+1 as input field is interpreted as 2 with exponent 1 (2×10^1).

          – francescalus
          Nov 22 '18 at 17:59




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53419146%2fhow-to-raise-runtime-error-when-a-namelist-variable-is-missing-in-an-input-namel%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

          android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

          WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]