If $A = A^*$ then $ lambda_{min} leqfrac{langle Av,v rangle}{langle v,v rangle}leqlambda_{max} $
$begingroup$
I'm leaning linear algebra and new to it. I have trouble with this problem and actually, I don't know what to do! any help or hint would be appreciated.
for the linear operator $Ain ell(V)$ wich $V$ is an Inner product space with finite dimentions. if $A = A^*$ then show that for every $v in V$ we have:
$$ lambda_{min} leqfrac{langle Av,vrangle}{langle v,vrangle}leqlambda_{max}, v neq 0$$ where the lambdas are eigenvalues.
linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors operator-theory inner-product-space
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm leaning linear algebra and new to it. I have trouble with this problem and actually, I don't know what to do! any help or hint would be appreciated.
for the linear operator $Ain ell(V)$ wich $V$ is an Inner product space with finite dimentions. if $A = A^*$ then show that for every $v in V$ we have:
$$ lambda_{min} leqfrac{langle Av,vrangle}{langle v,vrangle}leqlambda_{max}, v neq 0$$ where the lambdas are eigenvalues.
linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors operator-theory inner-product-space
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm leaning linear algebra and new to it. I have trouble with this problem and actually, I don't know what to do! any help or hint would be appreciated.
for the linear operator $Ain ell(V)$ wich $V$ is an Inner product space with finite dimentions. if $A = A^*$ then show that for every $v in V$ we have:
$$ lambda_{min} leqfrac{langle Av,vrangle}{langle v,vrangle}leqlambda_{max}, v neq 0$$ where the lambdas are eigenvalues.
linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors operator-theory inner-product-space
$endgroup$
I'm leaning linear algebra and new to it. I have trouble with this problem and actually, I don't know what to do! any help or hint would be appreciated.
for the linear operator $Ain ell(V)$ wich $V$ is an Inner product space with finite dimentions. if $A = A^*$ then show that for every $v in V$ we have:
$$ lambda_{min} leqfrac{langle Av,vrangle}{langle v,vrangle}leqlambda_{max}, v neq 0$$ where the lambdas are eigenvalues.
linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors operator-theory inner-product-space
linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors operator-theory inner-product-space
edited Jan 13 at 23:30
Peyman mohseni kiasari
asked Jan 13 at 22:56


Peyman mohseni kiasariPeyman mohseni kiasari
1089
1089
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since $A=A^*$ and $A$ is a linear transformation in a finite dimensional inner product space we can represent the transformation by a Hermitian matrix $M$ with basis $mathcal{B}$. Since $M$ is Hermitian it has a basis of eigenvectors $v_1,...,v_n$ with eigenvalues $lambda_1,...,lambda_n$.
Let $[v]_mathcal{B}=hat{v}$. Then $hat{v}=sum a_i v_i$ for constants $a_i$, so $$left<Av,vright>=left<sum a_ilambda_i v_i,hat{v}right>leq lambda_{text{max}}left<sum a_iv_i,hat{v}right>=lambda_{text{max}}left<v,vright>.$$
We derive the result for $lambda_{text{min}}$ similarly.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I will use matrix notation, since we are in a finite-dimensional vector space.
$A=A^*$ implies $A$ can be diagonalized by a unitary basis, i.e. $A=UDU^*$ where $U$ is unitary and $D$ is diagonal with diagonal entries $lambda_1, ldots, lambda_n$. Then
$$langle Av, v rangle = v^* U D U^* v = sum_{i=1}^n lambda_i (U^* v)_i^2.$$
Use $lambda_{min} le lambda_i le lambda_{max}$ for all $i$ as well as the fact that $sum_{i=1}^n (U^* v)_i^2 = langle U^*v, U^* v rangle = langle v, vrangle$ to conclude.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Isn't $A$ assumed a general linear operator and not a matrix?
$endgroup$
– Melody
Jan 13 at 23:17
$begingroup$
@Melody Linear operators on finite-dimensional spaces can be represented by matrices and vice versa
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Jan 13 at 23:19
$begingroup$
thanks, but why $langle Av, v rangle = v^* U D U^* v$?
$endgroup$
– Peyman mohseni kiasari
Jan 13 at 23:20
$begingroup$
@angryavian I know that, but technically they aren't the same thing though. One is basis free. Maybe I'm just being too nitpickty
$endgroup$
– Melody
Jan 13 at 23:21
$begingroup$
@Melody It's ok, you are right. I should have prefaced my answer by choosing an arbitrary basis before mentioning matrices.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Jan 13 at 23:22
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072632%2fif-a-a-then-lambda-min-leq-frac-langle-av-v-rangle-langle-v-v-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since $A=A^*$ and $A$ is a linear transformation in a finite dimensional inner product space we can represent the transformation by a Hermitian matrix $M$ with basis $mathcal{B}$. Since $M$ is Hermitian it has a basis of eigenvectors $v_1,...,v_n$ with eigenvalues $lambda_1,...,lambda_n$.
Let $[v]_mathcal{B}=hat{v}$. Then $hat{v}=sum a_i v_i$ for constants $a_i$, so $$left<Av,vright>=left<sum a_ilambda_i v_i,hat{v}right>leq lambda_{text{max}}left<sum a_iv_i,hat{v}right>=lambda_{text{max}}left<v,vright>.$$
We derive the result for $lambda_{text{min}}$ similarly.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $A=A^*$ and $A$ is a linear transformation in a finite dimensional inner product space we can represent the transformation by a Hermitian matrix $M$ with basis $mathcal{B}$. Since $M$ is Hermitian it has a basis of eigenvectors $v_1,...,v_n$ with eigenvalues $lambda_1,...,lambda_n$.
Let $[v]_mathcal{B}=hat{v}$. Then $hat{v}=sum a_i v_i$ for constants $a_i$, so $$left<Av,vright>=left<sum a_ilambda_i v_i,hat{v}right>leq lambda_{text{max}}left<sum a_iv_i,hat{v}right>=lambda_{text{max}}left<v,vright>.$$
We derive the result for $lambda_{text{min}}$ similarly.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $A=A^*$ and $A$ is a linear transformation in a finite dimensional inner product space we can represent the transformation by a Hermitian matrix $M$ with basis $mathcal{B}$. Since $M$ is Hermitian it has a basis of eigenvectors $v_1,...,v_n$ with eigenvalues $lambda_1,...,lambda_n$.
Let $[v]_mathcal{B}=hat{v}$. Then $hat{v}=sum a_i v_i$ for constants $a_i$, so $$left<Av,vright>=left<sum a_ilambda_i v_i,hat{v}right>leq lambda_{text{max}}left<sum a_iv_i,hat{v}right>=lambda_{text{max}}left<v,vright>.$$
We derive the result for $lambda_{text{min}}$ similarly.
$endgroup$
Since $A=A^*$ and $A$ is a linear transformation in a finite dimensional inner product space we can represent the transformation by a Hermitian matrix $M$ with basis $mathcal{B}$. Since $M$ is Hermitian it has a basis of eigenvectors $v_1,...,v_n$ with eigenvalues $lambda_1,...,lambda_n$.
Let $[v]_mathcal{B}=hat{v}$. Then $hat{v}=sum a_i v_i$ for constants $a_i$, so $$left<Av,vright>=left<sum a_ilambda_i v_i,hat{v}right>leq lambda_{text{max}}left<sum a_iv_i,hat{v}right>=lambda_{text{max}}left<v,vright>.$$
We derive the result for $lambda_{text{min}}$ similarly.
edited Jan 13 at 23:29
answered Jan 13 at 23:16


MelodyMelody
80012
80012
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I will use matrix notation, since we are in a finite-dimensional vector space.
$A=A^*$ implies $A$ can be diagonalized by a unitary basis, i.e. $A=UDU^*$ where $U$ is unitary and $D$ is diagonal with diagonal entries $lambda_1, ldots, lambda_n$. Then
$$langle Av, v rangle = v^* U D U^* v = sum_{i=1}^n lambda_i (U^* v)_i^2.$$
Use $lambda_{min} le lambda_i le lambda_{max}$ for all $i$ as well as the fact that $sum_{i=1}^n (U^* v)_i^2 = langle U^*v, U^* v rangle = langle v, vrangle$ to conclude.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Isn't $A$ assumed a general linear operator and not a matrix?
$endgroup$
– Melody
Jan 13 at 23:17
$begingroup$
@Melody Linear operators on finite-dimensional spaces can be represented by matrices and vice versa
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Jan 13 at 23:19
$begingroup$
thanks, but why $langle Av, v rangle = v^* U D U^* v$?
$endgroup$
– Peyman mohseni kiasari
Jan 13 at 23:20
$begingroup$
@angryavian I know that, but technically they aren't the same thing though. One is basis free. Maybe I'm just being too nitpickty
$endgroup$
– Melody
Jan 13 at 23:21
$begingroup$
@Melody It's ok, you are right. I should have prefaced my answer by choosing an arbitrary basis before mentioning matrices.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Jan 13 at 23:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I will use matrix notation, since we are in a finite-dimensional vector space.
$A=A^*$ implies $A$ can be diagonalized by a unitary basis, i.e. $A=UDU^*$ where $U$ is unitary and $D$ is diagonal with diagonal entries $lambda_1, ldots, lambda_n$. Then
$$langle Av, v rangle = v^* U D U^* v = sum_{i=1}^n lambda_i (U^* v)_i^2.$$
Use $lambda_{min} le lambda_i le lambda_{max}$ for all $i$ as well as the fact that $sum_{i=1}^n (U^* v)_i^2 = langle U^*v, U^* v rangle = langle v, vrangle$ to conclude.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Isn't $A$ assumed a general linear operator and not a matrix?
$endgroup$
– Melody
Jan 13 at 23:17
$begingroup$
@Melody Linear operators on finite-dimensional spaces can be represented by matrices and vice versa
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Jan 13 at 23:19
$begingroup$
thanks, but why $langle Av, v rangle = v^* U D U^* v$?
$endgroup$
– Peyman mohseni kiasari
Jan 13 at 23:20
$begingroup$
@angryavian I know that, but technically they aren't the same thing though. One is basis free. Maybe I'm just being too nitpickty
$endgroup$
– Melody
Jan 13 at 23:21
$begingroup$
@Melody It's ok, you are right. I should have prefaced my answer by choosing an arbitrary basis before mentioning matrices.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Jan 13 at 23:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I will use matrix notation, since we are in a finite-dimensional vector space.
$A=A^*$ implies $A$ can be diagonalized by a unitary basis, i.e. $A=UDU^*$ where $U$ is unitary and $D$ is diagonal with diagonal entries $lambda_1, ldots, lambda_n$. Then
$$langle Av, v rangle = v^* U D U^* v = sum_{i=1}^n lambda_i (U^* v)_i^2.$$
Use $lambda_{min} le lambda_i le lambda_{max}$ for all $i$ as well as the fact that $sum_{i=1}^n (U^* v)_i^2 = langle U^*v, U^* v rangle = langle v, vrangle$ to conclude.
$endgroup$
I will use matrix notation, since we are in a finite-dimensional vector space.
$A=A^*$ implies $A$ can be diagonalized by a unitary basis, i.e. $A=UDU^*$ where $U$ is unitary and $D$ is diagonal with diagonal entries $lambda_1, ldots, lambda_n$. Then
$$langle Av, v rangle = v^* U D U^* v = sum_{i=1}^n lambda_i (U^* v)_i^2.$$
Use $lambda_{min} le lambda_i le lambda_{max}$ for all $i$ as well as the fact that $sum_{i=1}^n (U^* v)_i^2 = langle U^*v, U^* v rangle = langle v, vrangle$ to conclude.
answered Jan 13 at 23:08
angryavianangryavian
41.1k23380
41.1k23380
$begingroup$
Isn't $A$ assumed a general linear operator and not a matrix?
$endgroup$
– Melody
Jan 13 at 23:17
$begingroup$
@Melody Linear operators on finite-dimensional spaces can be represented by matrices and vice versa
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Jan 13 at 23:19
$begingroup$
thanks, but why $langle Av, v rangle = v^* U D U^* v$?
$endgroup$
– Peyman mohseni kiasari
Jan 13 at 23:20
$begingroup$
@angryavian I know that, but technically they aren't the same thing though. One is basis free. Maybe I'm just being too nitpickty
$endgroup$
– Melody
Jan 13 at 23:21
$begingroup$
@Melody It's ok, you are right. I should have prefaced my answer by choosing an arbitrary basis before mentioning matrices.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Jan 13 at 23:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Isn't $A$ assumed a general linear operator and not a matrix?
$endgroup$
– Melody
Jan 13 at 23:17
$begingroup$
@Melody Linear operators on finite-dimensional spaces can be represented by matrices and vice versa
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Jan 13 at 23:19
$begingroup$
thanks, but why $langle Av, v rangle = v^* U D U^* v$?
$endgroup$
– Peyman mohseni kiasari
Jan 13 at 23:20
$begingroup$
@angryavian I know that, but technically they aren't the same thing though. One is basis free. Maybe I'm just being too nitpickty
$endgroup$
– Melody
Jan 13 at 23:21
$begingroup$
@Melody It's ok, you are right. I should have prefaced my answer by choosing an arbitrary basis before mentioning matrices.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Jan 13 at 23:22
$begingroup$
Isn't $A$ assumed a general linear operator and not a matrix?
$endgroup$
– Melody
Jan 13 at 23:17
$begingroup$
Isn't $A$ assumed a general linear operator and not a matrix?
$endgroup$
– Melody
Jan 13 at 23:17
$begingroup$
@Melody Linear operators on finite-dimensional spaces can be represented by matrices and vice versa
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Jan 13 at 23:19
$begingroup$
@Melody Linear operators on finite-dimensional spaces can be represented by matrices and vice versa
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Jan 13 at 23:19
$begingroup$
thanks, but why $langle Av, v rangle = v^* U D U^* v$?
$endgroup$
– Peyman mohseni kiasari
Jan 13 at 23:20
$begingroup$
thanks, but why $langle Av, v rangle = v^* U D U^* v$?
$endgroup$
– Peyman mohseni kiasari
Jan 13 at 23:20
$begingroup$
@angryavian I know that, but technically they aren't the same thing though. One is basis free. Maybe I'm just being too nitpickty
$endgroup$
– Melody
Jan 13 at 23:21
$begingroup$
@angryavian I know that, but technically they aren't the same thing though. One is basis free. Maybe I'm just being too nitpickty
$endgroup$
– Melody
Jan 13 at 23:21
$begingroup$
@Melody It's ok, you are right. I should have prefaced my answer by choosing an arbitrary basis before mentioning matrices.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Jan 13 at 23:22
$begingroup$
@Melody It's ok, you are right. I should have prefaced my answer by choosing an arbitrary basis before mentioning matrices.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Jan 13 at 23:22
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072632%2fif-a-a-then-lambda-min-leq-frac-langle-av-v-rangle-langle-v-v-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown