Is there some way to prove $nbinom nr=(r+1)binom n{r+1}+rbinom nr$ using generating functions?












2












$begingroup$


I have to prove that $$n{nchoose{r}}=(r+1){nchoose{r+1}}+r{nchoose{r}}$$
I can prove this combinatorially as follows, we have $n$ people, we want to choose $r$ people and a leader who could be within the $r$-group or outside the $r$-group but among the $n$ people. The number of such possible groups is obviously $n{nchoose{r}}$. Or we could simply choose $r+1$ people for the case when the leader is not within the group and then among them I can choose one of those $(r+1)$ to be the leader (which accounts for the $(r+1){nchoose{r+1}}$) and for the cases when the leader is withing the group, I choose $r$ people and then among those $r$ people I choose one of them as the leader (which accounts for the $r{nchoose{r}}$).
But I am curious if there is a proof using generating functions. I am new to using generating functions and even a hint would help (if the solution is possible) because I am just not getting how to begin.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    I have to prove that $$n{nchoose{r}}=(r+1){nchoose{r+1}}+r{nchoose{r}}$$
    I can prove this combinatorially as follows, we have $n$ people, we want to choose $r$ people and a leader who could be within the $r$-group or outside the $r$-group but among the $n$ people. The number of such possible groups is obviously $n{nchoose{r}}$. Or we could simply choose $r+1$ people for the case when the leader is not within the group and then among them I can choose one of those $(r+1)$ to be the leader (which accounts for the $(r+1){nchoose{r+1}}$) and for the cases when the leader is withing the group, I choose $r$ people and then among those $r$ people I choose one of them as the leader (which accounts for the $r{nchoose{r}}$).
    But I am curious if there is a proof using generating functions. I am new to using generating functions and even a hint would help (if the solution is possible) because I am just not getting how to begin.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2


      0



      $begingroup$


      I have to prove that $$n{nchoose{r}}=(r+1){nchoose{r+1}}+r{nchoose{r}}$$
      I can prove this combinatorially as follows, we have $n$ people, we want to choose $r$ people and a leader who could be within the $r$-group or outside the $r$-group but among the $n$ people. The number of such possible groups is obviously $n{nchoose{r}}$. Or we could simply choose $r+1$ people for the case when the leader is not within the group and then among them I can choose one of those $(r+1)$ to be the leader (which accounts for the $(r+1){nchoose{r+1}}$) and for the cases when the leader is withing the group, I choose $r$ people and then among those $r$ people I choose one of them as the leader (which accounts for the $r{nchoose{r}}$).
      But I am curious if there is a proof using generating functions. I am new to using generating functions and even a hint would help (if the solution is possible) because I am just not getting how to begin.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I have to prove that $$n{nchoose{r}}=(r+1){nchoose{r+1}}+r{nchoose{r}}$$
      I can prove this combinatorially as follows, we have $n$ people, we want to choose $r$ people and a leader who could be within the $r$-group or outside the $r$-group but among the $n$ people. The number of such possible groups is obviously $n{nchoose{r}}$. Or we could simply choose $r+1$ people for the case when the leader is not within the group and then among them I can choose one of those $(r+1)$ to be the leader (which accounts for the $(r+1){nchoose{r+1}}$) and for the cases when the leader is withing the group, I choose $r$ people and then among those $r$ people I choose one of them as the leader (which accounts for the $r{nchoose{r}}$).
      But I am curious if there is a proof using generating functions. I am new to using generating functions and even a hint would help (if the solution is possible) because I am just not getting how to begin.







      combinatorics binomial-coefficients generating-functions






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 14 at 16:11









      Martin Sleziak

      44.8k10118272




      44.8k10118272










      asked Jan 14 at 3:16









      Shubhraneel PalShubhraneel Pal

      46439




      46439






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Another variation with generating functions is based upon the coefficient of operator $[x^r]$ which denotes the coefficient of $x^r$ of a series. This way we can write for instance
          begin{align*}
          binom{n}{r}=[x^r](1+x)^ntag{1}
          end{align*}

          Given a generating function $A(x)$ we have
          begin{align*}
          A(x)&=sum_{j=0}^infty a_j x^jqquadqquad A^{prime}(x)=sum_{j=0}^infty ja_jx^{j-1}
          end{align*}

          from which we derive by comparing coefficients
          begin{align*}
          r a_r&=color{blue}{r[x^r]A(x)=[x^{r-1}]A^{prime}(x)}tag{2}
          end{align*}




          Equipped with (1) and (2) we obtain starting with the right-hand side of OPs identity
          begin{align*}
          color{blue}{(r+1)}&color{blue}{binom{n}{r+1}+rbinom{n}{r}}\
          &=(r+1)[x^{r+1}](1+x)^n+r[x^r](1+x)^ntag{3}\
          &=[x^r]n(1+x)^{n-1}+[x^{r-1}]n(1+x)^{n-1}tag{4}\
          &=[x^r]n(1+x)^{n-1}+[x^r]xn(1+x)^{n-1}tag{5}\
          &=n[x^r](1+x)^{n-1}(1+x)tag{6}\
          &=n[x^r](1+x)^n\
          &,,color{blue}{=nbinom{n}{r}}tag{7}
          end{align*}

          and the claim follows.




          Comment:




          • In (3) we apply (1) twice.


          • In (4) we apply (2) twice.


          • In (5) we use the rule $[x^p]x^qA(x)=[x^{p-q}]A(x)$.


          • In (6) we use the linearity of the coefficient of operator.


          • In (7) we select the coefficient of $x^r$.




          Note: When looking for an algebraic proof besides the combinatorial one which you already gave, we can also go the easy way by recalling the binomial
          identity
          begin{align*}
          color{blue}{(r+1)binom{n}{r+1}}&=(r+1)frac{n(n-1)cdots(n-r+1)(n-r)}{(r+1)rcdots 2cdot 1}\
          &=frac{n(n-1)cdots(n-r+1)}{r(r-1)cdots2cdot 1}(n-r)\
          &,,color{blue}{=binom{n}{r}(n-r)}
          end{align*}

          to derive
          begin{align*}
          (r+1)binom{n}{r+1}+rbinom{n}{r}=(n-r)binom{n}{r}+rbinom{n}{r}=nbinom{n}{r}
          end{align*}







          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$





















            2












            $begingroup$

            There are several generating function approaches.



            We could take the generating function of both sides with respect to $r$, and try to prove that
            $$
            sum_{r ge 0} left(n binom nrright) x^r = sum_{r ge 0} left((r+1) binom{n}{r+1} + r binom nrright)x^r.
            $$

            To prove this, we want closed forms for both sides, which start with the generating function
            $$
            (1+x)^n = sum_{r ge 0} binom nr x^r.
            $$

            On the left, this generating function is only multiplied by a constant (independent of $r$); on the right, the $r^{text{th}}$ term of the sum is multiplied by $r$, which requires taking some derivatives.



            We could theoretically also take the generating function of both sides with respect to $n$, but that generating function doesn't have a nice closed form.



            Finally, we could take the bivariate generating function of both sides with respect to $r$ and $n$. This requires starting with
            $$
            sum_{n ge 0} sum_{rge 0} binom nr x^r y^n = sum_{n ge 0}(1+x)^n y^n = frac{1}{1-(1+x)y}.
            $$

            Then we need to take some derivatives with respect to $x$ or with respect to $y$ to transform this into the generating function for $n binom nr$, or $r binom nr$, or $(r+1)binom n{r+1}$. Once we've done that, we can prove the identity you want by proving that it holds for the corresponding generating functions.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072810%2fis-there-some-way-to-prove-n-binom-nr-r1-binom-nr1r-binom-nr-using-gene%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              2












              $begingroup$

              Another variation with generating functions is based upon the coefficient of operator $[x^r]$ which denotes the coefficient of $x^r$ of a series. This way we can write for instance
              begin{align*}
              binom{n}{r}=[x^r](1+x)^ntag{1}
              end{align*}

              Given a generating function $A(x)$ we have
              begin{align*}
              A(x)&=sum_{j=0}^infty a_j x^jqquadqquad A^{prime}(x)=sum_{j=0}^infty ja_jx^{j-1}
              end{align*}

              from which we derive by comparing coefficients
              begin{align*}
              r a_r&=color{blue}{r[x^r]A(x)=[x^{r-1}]A^{prime}(x)}tag{2}
              end{align*}




              Equipped with (1) and (2) we obtain starting with the right-hand side of OPs identity
              begin{align*}
              color{blue}{(r+1)}&color{blue}{binom{n}{r+1}+rbinom{n}{r}}\
              &=(r+1)[x^{r+1}](1+x)^n+r[x^r](1+x)^ntag{3}\
              &=[x^r]n(1+x)^{n-1}+[x^{r-1}]n(1+x)^{n-1}tag{4}\
              &=[x^r]n(1+x)^{n-1}+[x^r]xn(1+x)^{n-1}tag{5}\
              &=n[x^r](1+x)^{n-1}(1+x)tag{6}\
              &=n[x^r](1+x)^n\
              &,,color{blue}{=nbinom{n}{r}}tag{7}
              end{align*}

              and the claim follows.




              Comment:




              • In (3) we apply (1) twice.


              • In (4) we apply (2) twice.


              • In (5) we use the rule $[x^p]x^qA(x)=[x^{p-q}]A(x)$.


              • In (6) we use the linearity of the coefficient of operator.


              • In (7) we select the coefficient of $x^r$.




              Note: When looking for an algebraic proof besides the combinatorial one which you already gave, we can also go the easy way by recalling the binomial
              identity
              begin{align*}
              color{blue}{(r+1)binom{n}{r+1}}&=(r+1)frac{n(n-1)cdots(n-r+1)(n-r)}{(r+1)rcdots 2cdot 1}\
              &=frac{n(n-1)cdots(n-r+1)}{r(r-1)cdots2cdot 1}(n-r)\
              &,,color{blue}{=binom{n}{r}(n-r)}
              end{align*}

              to derive
              begin{align*}
              (r+1)binom{n}{r+1}+rbinom{n}{r}=(n-r)binom{n}{r}+rbinom{n}{r}=nbinom{n}{r}
              end{align*}







              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$

                Another variation with generating functions is based upon the coefficient of operator $[x^r]$ which denotes the coefficient of $x^r$ of a series. This way we can write for instance
                begin{align*}
                binom{n}{r}=[x^r](1+x)^ntag{1}
                end{align*}

                Given a generating function $A(x)$ we have
                begin{align*}
                A(x)&=sum_{j=0}^infty a_j x^jqquadqquad A^{prime}(x)=sum_{j=0}^infty ja_jx^{j-1}
                end{align*}

                from which we derive by comparing coefficients
                begin{align*}
                r a_r&=color{blue}{r[x^r]A(x)=[x^{r-1}]A^{prime}(x)}tag{2}
                end{align*}




                Equipped with (1) and (2) we obtain starting with the right-hand side of OPs identity
                begin{align*}
                color{blue}{(r+1)}&color{blue}{binom{n}{r+1}+rbinom{n}{r}}\
                &=(r+1)[x^{r+1}](1+x)^n+r[x^r](1+x)^ntag{3}\
                &=[x^r]n(1+x)^{n-1}+[x^{r-1}]n(1+x)^{n-1}tag{4}\
                &=[x^r]n(1+x)^{n-1}+[x^r]xn(1+x)^{n-1}tag{5}\
                &=n[x^r](1+x)^{n-1}(1+x)tag{6}\
                &=n[x^r](1+x)^n\
                &,,color{blue}{=nbinom{n}{r}}tag{7}
                end{align*}

                and the claim follows.




                Comment:




                • In (3) we apply (1) twice.


                • In (4) we apply (2) twice.


                • In (5) we use the rule $[x^p]x^qA(x)=[x^{p-q}]A(x)$.


                • In (6) we use the linearity of the coefficient of operator.


                • In (7) we select the coefficient of $x^r$.




                Note: When looking for an algebraic proof besides the combinatorial one which you already gave, we can also go the easy way by recalling the binomial
                identity
                begin{align*}
                color{blue}{(r+1)binom{n}{r+1}}&=(r+1)frac{n(n-1)cdots(n-r+1)(n-r)}{(r+1)rcdots 2cdot 1}\
                &=frac{n(n-1)cdots(n-r+1)}{r(r-1)cdots2cdot 1}(n-r)\
                &,,color{blue}{=binom{n}{r}(n-r)}
                end{align*}

                to derive
                begin{align*}
                (r+1)binom{n}{r+1}+rbinom{n}{r}=(n-r)binom{n}{r}+rbinom{n}{r}=nbinom{n}{r}
                end{align*}







                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  Another variation with generating functions is based upon the coefficient of operator $[x^r]$ which denotes the coefficient of $x^r$ of a series. This way we can write for instance
                  begin{align*}
                  binom{n}{r}=[x^r](1+x)^ntag{1}
                  end{align*}

                  Given a generating function $A(x)$ we have
                  begin{align*}
                  A(x)&=sum_{j=0}^infty a_j x^jqquadqquad A^{prime}(x)=sum_{j=0}^infty ja_jx^{j-1}
                  end{align*}

                  from which we derive by comparing coefficients
                  begin{align*}
                  r a_r&=color{blue}{r[x^r]A(x)=[x^{r-1}]A^{prime}(x)}tag{2}
                  end{align*}




                  Equipped with (1) and (2) we obtain starting with the right-hand side of OPs identity
                  begin{align*}
                  color{blue}{(r+1)}&color{blue}{binom{n}{r+1}+rbinom{n}{r}}\
                  &=(r+1)[x^{r+1}](1+x)^n+r[x^r](1+x)^ntag{3}\
                  &=[x^r]n(1+x)^{n-1}+[x^{r-1}]n(1+x)^{n-1}tag{4}\
                  &=[x^r]n(1+x)^{n-1}+[x^r]xn(1+x)^{n-1}tag{5}\
                  &=n[x^r](1+x)^{n-1}(1+x)tag{6}\
                  &=n[x^r](1+x)^n\
                  &,,color{blue}{=nbinom{n}{r}}tag{7}
                  end{align*}

                  and the claim follows.




                  Comment:




                  • In (3) we apply (1) twice.


                  • In (4) we apply (2) twice.


                  • In (5) we use the rule $[x^p]x^qA(x)=[x^{p-q}]A(x)$.


                  • In (6) we use the linearity of the coefficient of operator.


                  • In (7) we select the coefficient of $x^r$.




                  Note: When looking for an algebraic proof besides the combinatorial one which you already gave, we can also go the easy way by recalling the binomial
                  identity
                  begin{align*}
                  color{blue}{(r+1)binom{n}{r+1}}&=(r+1)frac{n(n-1)cdots(n-r+1)(n-r)}{(r+1)rcdots 2cdot 1}\
                  &=frac{n(n-1)cdots(n-r+1)}{r(r-1)cdots2cdot 1}(n-r)\
                  &,,color{blue}{=binom{n}{r}(n-r)}
                  end{align*}

                  to derive
                  begin{align*}
                  (r+1)binom{n}{r+1}+rbinom{n}{r}=(n-r)binom{n}{r}+rbinom{n}{r}=nbinom{n}{r}
                  end{align*}







                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Another variation with generating functions is based upon the coefficient of operator $[x^r]$ which denotes the coefficient of $x^r$ of a series. This way we can write for instance
                  begin{align*}
                  binom{n}{r}=[x^r](1+x)^ntag{1}
                  end{align*}

                  Given a generating function $A(x)$ we have
                  begin{align*}
                  A(x)&=sum_{j=0}^infty a_j x^jqquadqquad A^{prime}(x)=sum_{j=0}^infty ja_jx^{j-1}
                  end{align*}

                  from which we derive by comparing coefficients
                  begin{align*}
                  r a_r&=color{blue}{r[x^r]A(x)=[x^{r-1}]A^{prime}(x)}tag{2}
                  end{align*}




                  Equipped with (1) and (2) we obtain starting with the right-hand side of OPs identity
                  begin{align*}
                  color{blue}{(r+1)}&color{blue}{binom{n}{r+1}+rbinom{n}{r}}\
                  &=(r+1)[x^{r+1}](1+x)^n+r[x^r](1+x)^ntag{3}\
                  &=[x^r]n(1+x)^{n-1}+[x^{r-1}]n(1+x)^{n-1}tag{4}\
                  &=[x^r]n(1+x)^{n-1}+[x^r]xn(1+x)^{n-1}tag{5}\
                  &=n[x^r](1+x)^{n-1}(1+x)tag{6}\
                  &=n[x^r](1+x)^n\
                  &,,color{blue}{=nbinom{n}{r}}tag{7}
                  end{align*}

                  and the claim follows.




                  Comment:




                  • In (3) we apply (1) twice.


                  • In (4) we apply (2) twice.


                  • In (5) we use the rule $[x^p]x^qA(x)=[x^{p-q}]A(x)$.


                  • In (6) we use the linearity of the coefficient of operator.


                  • In (7) we select the coefficient of $x^r$.




                  Note: When looking for an algebraic proof besides the combinatorial one which you already gave, we can also go the easy way by recalling the binomial
                  identity
                  begin{align*}
                  color{blue}{(r+1)binom{n}{r+1}}&=(r+1)frac{n(n-1)cdots(n-r+1)(n-r)}{(r+1)rcdots 2cdot 1}\
                  &=frac{n(n-1)cdots(n-r+1)}{r(r-1)cdots2cdot 1}(n-r)\
                  &,,color{blue}{=binom{n}{r}(n-r)}
                  end{align*}

                  to derive
                  begin{align*}
                  (r+1)binom{n}{r+1}+rbinom{n}{r}=(n-r)binom{n}{r}+rbinom{n}{r}=nbinom{n}{r}
                  end{align*}








                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Jan 14 at 21:57

























                  answered Jan 14 at 15:26









                  Markus ScheuerMarkus Scheuer

                  61.6k457146




                  61.6k457146























                      2












                      $begingroup$

                      There are several generating function approaches.



                      We could take the generating function of both sides with respect to $r$, and try to prove that
                      $$
                      sum_{r ge 0} left(n binom nrright) x^r = sum_{r ge 0} left((r+1) binom{n}{r+1} + r binom nrright)x^r.
                      $$

                      To prove this, we want closed forms for both sides, which start with the generating function
                      $$
                      (1+x)^n = sum_{r ge 0} binom nr x^r.
                      $$

                      On the left, this generating function is only multiplied by a constant (independent of $r$); on the right, the $r^{text{th}}$ term of the sum is multiplied by $r$, which requires taking some derivatives.



                      We could theoretically also take the generating function of both sides with respect to $n$, but that generating function doesn't have a nice closed form.



                      Finally, we could take the bivariate generating function of both sides with respect to $r$ and $n$. This requires starting with
                      $$
                      sum_{n ge 0} sum_{rge 0} binom nr x^r y^n = sum_{n ge 0}(1+x)^n y^n = frac{1}{1-(1+x)y}.
                      $$

                      Then we need to take some derivatives with respect to $x$ or with respect to $y$ to transform this into the generating function for $n binom nr$, or $r binom nr$, or $(r+1)binom n{r+1}$. Once we've done that, we can prove the identity you want by proving that it holds for the corresponding generating functions.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        There are several generating function approaches.



                        We could take the generating function of both sides with respect to $r$, and try to prove that
                        $$
                        sum_{r ge 0} left(n binom nrright) x^r = sum_{r ge 0} left((r+1) binom{n}{r+1} + r binom nrright)x^r.
                        $$

                        To prove this, we want closed forms for both sides, which start with the generating function
                        $$
                        (1+x)^n = sum_{r ge 0} binom nr x^r.
                        $$

                        On the left, this generating function is only multiplied by a constant (independent of $r$); on the right, the $r^{text{th}}$ term of the sum is multiplied by $r$, which requires taking some derivatives.



                        We could theoretically also take the generating function of both sides with respect to $n$, but that generating function doesn't have a nice closed form.



                        Finally, we could take the bivariate generating function of both sides with respect to $r$ and $n$. This requires starting with
                        $$
                        sum_{n ge 0} sum_{rge 0} binom nr x^r y^n = sum_{n ge 0}(1+x)^n y^n = frac{1}{1-(1+x)y}.
                        $$

                        Then we need to take some derivatives with respect to $x$ or with respect to $y$ to transform this into the generating function for $n binom nr$, or $r binom nr$, or $(r+1)binom n{r+1}$. Once we've done that, we can prove the identity you want by proving that it holds for the corresponding generating functions.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          2












                          2








                          2





                          $begingroup$

                          There are several generating function approaches.



                          We could take the generating function of both sides with respect to $r$, and try to prove that
                          $$
                          sum_{r ge 0} left(n binom nrright) x^r = sum_{r ge 0} left((r+1) binom{n}{r+1} + r binom nrright)x^r.
                          $$

                          To prove this, we want closed forms for both sides, which start with the generating function
                          $$
                          (1+x)^n = sum_{r ge 0} binom nr x^r.
                          $$

                          On the left, this generating function is only multiplied by a constant (independent of $r$); on the right, the $r^{text{th}}$ term of the sum is multiplied by $r$, which requires taking some derivatives.



                          We could theoretically also take the generating function of both sides with respect to $n$, but that generating function doesn't have a nice closed form.



                          Finally, we could take the bivariate generating function of both sides with respect to $r$ and $n$. This requires starting with
                          $$
                          sum_{n ge 0} sum_{rge 0} binom nr x^r y^n = sum_{n ge 0}(1+x)^n y^n = frac{1}{1-(1+x)y}.
                          $$

                          Then we need to take some derivatives with respect to $x$ or with respect to $y$ to transform this into the generating function for $n binom nr$, or $r binom nr$, or $(r+1)binom n{r+1}$. Once we've done that, we can prove the identity you want by proving that it holds for the corresponding generating functions.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          There are several generating function approaches.



                          We could take the generating function of both sides with respect to $r$, and try to prove that
                          $$
                          sum_{r ge 0} left(n binom nrright) x^r = sum_{r ge 0} left((r+1) binom{n}{r+1} + r binom nrright)x^r.
                          $$

                          To prove this, we want closed forms for both sides, which start with the generating function
                          $$
                          (1+x)^n = sum_{r ge 0} binom nr x^r.
                          $$

                          On the left, this generating function is only multiplied by a constant (independent of $r$); on the right, the $r^{text{th}}$ term of the sum is multiplied by $r$, which requires taking some derivatives.



                          We could theoretically also take the generating function of both sides with respect to $n$, but that generating function doesn't have a nice closed form.



                          Finally, we could take the bivariate generating function of both sides with respect to $r$ and $n$. This requires starting with
                          $$
                          sum_{n ge 0} sum_{rge 0} binom nr x^r y^n = sum_{n ge 0}(1+x)^n y^n = frac{1}{1-(1+x)y}.
                          $$

                          Then we need to take some derivatives with respect to $x$ or with respect to $y$ to transform this into the generating function for $n binom nr$, or $r binom nr$, or $(r+1)binom n{r+1}$. Once we've done that, we can prove the identity you want by proving that it holds for the corresponding generating functions.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Jan 14 at 3:33









                          Misha LavrovMisha Lavrov

                          46.3k656107




                          46.3k656107






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072810%2fis-there-some-way-to-prove-n-binom-nr-r1-binom-nr1r-binom-nr-using-gene%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

                              ts Property 'filter' does not exist on type '{}'

                              mat-slide-toggle shouldn't change it's state when I click cancel in confirmation window