Inverting variable size block matrix












1












$begingroup$


Given a block matrix $M$



$$bf M=left(begin{array}{cccc}
a mathbb{I}_{2} & boldsymbol{boldsymbol{A}}_{12} & boldsymbol{A}_{13} & boldsymbol{0_{(2,3)}}\
\
boldsymbol{A_{21}} & a mathbb{I}_{2} & boldsymbol{A_{23}} & boldsymbol{0_{(2,3)}}\
\
boldsymbol{A_{31}} & boldsymbol{A_{32}} & a mathbb{I}_{2} & boldsymbol{0_
{(2,3)}}\
boldsymbol{0_{(3,2)}} & boldsymbol{0_{(3,2)}} & boldsymbol{0_{(3,2)}} & b mathbb{I}_{3}
end{array}right)$$



where $bf 0_{(m,n)}$ is an $ mtimes n$ matrix with all entries equal to zero.



We need to find $bf M^{-1}$ and I wondered if there were any theorems that allow me to invert this matrix block by block?



Also, how does the problem change for $A_{kl}=A_{lk}, k,l=1,2,3$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Given a block matrix $M$



    $$bf M=left(begin{array}{cccc}
    a mathbb{I}_{2} & boldsymbol{boldsymbol{A}}_{12} & boldsymbol{A}_{13} & boldsymbol{0_{(2,3)}}\
    \
    boldsymbol{A_{21}} & a mathbb{I}_{2} & boldsymbol{A_{23}} & boldsymbol{0_{(2,3)}}\
    \
    boldsymbol{A_{31}} & boldsymbol{A_{32}} & a mathbb{I}_{2} & boldsymbol{0_
    {(2,3)}}\
    boldsymbol{0_{(3,2)}} & boldsymbol{0_{(3,2)}} & boldsymbol{0_{(3,2)}} & b mathbb{I}_{3}
    end{array}right)$$



    where $bf 0_{(m,n)}$ is an $ mtimes n$ matrix with all entries equal to zero.



    We need to find $bf M^{-1}$ and I wondered if there were any theorems that allow me to invert this matrix block by block?



    Also, how does the problem change for $A_{kl}=A_{lk}, k,l=1,2,3$?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Given a block matrix $M$



      $$bf M=left(begin{array}{cccc}
      a mathbb{I}_{2} & boldsymbol{boldsymbol{A}}_{12} & boldsymbol{A}_{13} & boldsymbol{0_{(2,3)}}\
      \
      boldsymbol{A_{21}} & a mathbb{I}_{2} & boldsymbol{A_{23}} & boldsymbol{0_{(2,3)}}\
      \
      boldsymbol{A_{31}} & boldsymbol{A_{32}} & a mathbb{I}_{2} & boldsymbol{0_
      {(2,3)}}\
      boldsymbol{0_{(3,2)}} & boldsymbol{0_{(3,2)}} & boldsymbol{0_{(3,2)}} & b mathbb{I}_{3}
      end{array}right)$$



      where $bf 0_{(m,n)}$ is an $ mtimes n$ matrix with all entries equal to zero.



      We need to find $bf M^{-1}$ and I wondered if there were any theorems that allow me to invert this matrix block by block?



      Also, how does the problem change for $A_{kl}=A_{lk}, k,l=1,2,3$?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Given a block matrix $M$



      $$bf M=left(begin{array}{cccc}
      a mathbb{I}_{2} & boldsymbol{boldsymbol{A}}_{12} & boldsymbol{A}_{13} & boldsymbol{0_{(2,3)}}\
      \
      boldsymbol{A_{21}} & a mathbb{I}_{2} & boldsymbol{A_{23}} & boldsymbol{0_{(2,3)}}\
      \
      boldsymbol{A_{31}} & boldsymbol{A_{32}} & a mathbb{I}_{2} & boldsymbol{0_
      {(2,3)}}\
      boldsymbol{0_{(3,2)}} & boldsymbol{0_{(3,2)}} & boldsymbol{0_{(3,2)}} & b mathbb{I}_{3}
      end{array}right)$$



      where $bf 0_{(m,n)}$ is an $ mtimes n$ matrix with all entries equal to zero.



      We need to find $bf M^{-1}$ and I wondered if there were any theorems that allow me to invert this matrix block by block?



      Also, how does the problem change for $A_{kl}=A_{lk}, k,l=1,2,3$?







      linear-algebra matrices symmetry






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 18 at 15:22







      usumdelphini

















      asked Jan 16 at 16:18









      usumdelphiniusumdelphini

      323111




      323111






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          I do not think that there is any practical useful formula for this general case.



          For block $2times 2$ matrices one generally use the Schure complements (which is nothing more than the block version of Gaussian elimination). Theoretically you can recursively use this for a $ntimes n$ ($n>2$) block matrix. However this is not a good idea because you will get overly complex formula without any practical value (with nested inverses etc...).



          Beside this comment, observe that:
          $$
          M^{-1}=left(
          begin{array}{cc}
          A^{-1}& 0 \
          0 & b^{-1}I
          end{array}
          right)
          $$

          with
          $$
          A=left(
          begin{array}{ccc}
          aI & A_{12} & A_{13} \
          A_{21} & aI & A_{23} \
          A_{31} & A_{32} & aI
          end{array}
          right)
          $$

          which is certainly the first simplification to considere.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3075929%2finverting-variable-size-block-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            I do not think that there is any practical useful formula for this general case.



            For block $2times 2$ matrices one generally use the Schure complements (which is nothing more than the block version of Gaussian elimination). Theoretically you can recursively use this for a $ntimes n$ ($n>2$) block matrix. However this is not a good idea because you will get overly complex formula without any practical value (with nested inverses etc...).



            Beside this comment, observe that:
            $$
            M^{-1}=left(
            begin{array}{cc}
            A^{-1}& 0 \
            0 & b^{-1}I
            end{array}
            right)
            $$

            with
            $$
            A=left(
            begin{array}{ccc}
            aI & A_{12} & A_{13} \
            A_{21} & aI & A_{23} \
            A_{31} & A_{32} & aI
            end{array}
            right)
            $$

            which is certainly the first simplification to considere.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              2












              $begingroup$

              I do not think that there is any practical useful formula for this general case.



              For block $2times 2$ matrices one generally use the Schure complements (which is nothing more than the block version of Gaussian elimination). Theoretically you can recursively use this for a $ntimes n$ ($n>2$) block matrix. However this is not a good idea because you will get overly complex formula without any practical value (with nested inverses etc...).



              Beside this comment, observe that:
              $$
              M^{-1}=left(
              begin{array}{cc}
              A^{-1}& 0 \
              0 & b^{-1}I
              end{array}
              right)
              $$

              with
              $$
              A=left(
              begin{array}{ccc}
              aI & A_{12} & A_{13} \
              A_{21} & aI & A_{23} \
              A_{31} & A_{32} & aI
              end{array}
              right)
              $$

              which is certainly the first simplification to considere.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                I do not think that there is any practical useful formula for this general case.



                For block $2times 2$ matrices one generally use the Schure complements (which is nothing more than the block version of Gaussian elimination). Theoretically you can recursively use this for a $ntimes n$ ($n>2$) block matrix. However this is not a good idea because you will get overly complex formula without any practical value (with nested inverses etc...).



                Beside this comment, observe that:
                $$
                M^{-1}=left(
                begin{array}{cc}
                A^{-1}& 0 \
                0 & b^{-1}I
                end{array}
                right)
                $$

                with
                $$
                A=left(
                begin{array}{ccc}
                aI & A_{12} & A_{13} \
                A_{21} & aI & A_{23} \
                A_{31} & A_{32} & aI
                end{array}
                right)
                $$

                which is certainly the first simplification to considere.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                I do not think that there is any practical useful formula for this general case.



                For block $2times 2$ matrices one generally use the Schure complements (which is nothing more than the block version of Gaussian elimination). Theoretically you can recursively use this for a $ntimes n$ ($n>2$) block matrix. However this is not a good idea because you will get overly complex formula without any practical value (with nested inverses etc...).



                Beside this comment, observe that:
                $$
                M^{-1}=left(
                begin{array}{cc}
                A^{-1}& 0 \
                0 & b^{-1}I
                end{array}
                right)
                $$

                with
                $$
                A=left(
                begin{array}{ccc}
                aI & A_{12} & A_{13} \
                A_{21} & aI & A_{23} \
                A_{31} & A_{32} & aI
                end{array}
                right)
                $$

                which is certainly the first simplification to considere.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 17 at 10:14









                Picaud VincentPicaud Vincent

                1,529310




                1,529310






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3075929%2finverting-variable-size-block-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                    How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                    in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith