Volume of a solid using disk method












2












$begingroup$


I have the following homework problem which I can't seem to get right. The question stated is:




Find the volume of the solid generated by revolving the region bounded
by the parabola $y=frac{x^2}{25}$ and the line y=1 about the line
y=1.




So I came up with the following integral and solved to get $frac{8}{3}pi$ but the correct answer according to my homework is $frac{16}{3}pi$.
$$piint_0^5left(1-frac{2x^2}{25}+frac{x^4}{625}right)dx$$



So is my integral correct and I'm simply not doing the math right when solving it? Or am I just missing something in the integral?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    I have the following homework problem which I can't seem to get right. The question stated is:




    Find the volume of the solid generated by revolving the region bounded
    by the parabola $y=frac{x^2}{25}$ and the line y=1 about the line
    y=1.




    So I came up with the following integral and solved to get $frac{8}{3}pi$ but the correct answer according to my homework is $frac{16}{3}pi$.
    $$piint_0^5left(1-frac{2x^2}{25}+frac{x^4}{625}right)dx$$



    So is my integral correct and I'm simply not doing the math right when solving it? Or am I just missing something in the integral?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      I have the following homework problem which I can't seem to get right. The question stated is:




      Find the volume of the solid generated by revolving the region bounded
      by the parabola $y=frac{x^2}{25}$ and the line y=1 about the line
      y=1.




      So I came up with the following integral and solved to get $frac{8}{3}pi$ but the correct answer according to my homework is $frac{16}{3}pi$.
      $$piint_0^5left(1-frac{2x^2}{25}+frac{x^4}{625}right)dx$$



      So is my integral correct and I'm simply not doing the math right when solving it? Or am I just missing something in the integral?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I have the following homework problem which I can't seem to get right. The question stated is:




      Find the volume of the solid generated by revolving the region bounded
      by the parabola $y=frac{x^2}{25}$ and the line y=1 about the line
      y=1.




      So I came up with the following integral and solved to get $frac{8}{3}pi$ but the correct answer according to my homework is $frac{16}{3}pi$.
      $$piint_0^5left(1-frac{2x^2}{25}+frac{x^4}{625}right)dx$$



      So is my integral correct and I'm simply not doing the math right when solving it? Or am I just missing something in the integral?







      calculus integration definite-integrals volume






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 13 at 21:35









      KM101

      6,0251525




      6,0251525










      asked Jan 13 at 21:21









      blizzblizz

      1485




      1485






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          You have to integrate from -5 to 5 or multiply your integral by two. That does the trick






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            But in all the other similar problems, I integrate similarly starting from zero and I still get the correct answer. And all the other similar problems also involve a revolution around both the x- and y- axes, and my answers there were all correct.
            $endgroup$
            – blizz
            Jan 13 at 21:46










          • $begingroup$
            What other similar problems do you have in mind? No two problems are identical. In this case, the curve crosses y=1 at points (-5,1) and (5,1). Therefore you have to integrate from -5 to 5. Does it make sense to you?
            $endgroup$
            – pendermath
            Jan 13 at 21:48










          • $begingroup$
            I understand...I only drew half the graph (only the first quadrant)! Thanks for clarifying!
            $endgroup$
            – blizz
            Jan 13 at 21:54










          • $begingroup$
            Exactly! You got it
            $endgroup$
            – pendermath
            Jan 13 at 21:55



















          1












          $begingroup$

          You forgot to multiple it by $2$, because you set the lower bound $0$ instead of $-5$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072542%2fvolume-of-a-solid-using-disk-method%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            You have to integrate from -5 to 5 or multiply your integral by two. That does the trick






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              But in all the other similar problems, I integrate similarly starting from zero and I still get the correct answer. And all the other similar problems also involve a revolution around both the x- and y- axes, and my answers there were all correct.
              $endgroup$
              – blizz
              Jan 13 at 21:46










            • $begingroup$
              What other similar problems do you have in mind? No two problems are identical. In this case, the curve crosses y=1 at points (-5,1) and (5,1). Therefore you have to integrate from -5 to 5. Does it make sense to you?
              $endgroup$
              – pendermath
              Jan 13 at 21:48










            • $begingroup$
              I understand...I only drew half the graph (only the first quadrant)! Thanks for clarifying!
              $endgroup$
              – blizz
              Jan 13 at 21:54










            • $begingroup$
              Exactly! You got it
              $endgroup$
              – pendermath
              Jan 13 at 21:55
















            2












            $begingroup$

            You have to integrate from -5 to 5 or multiply your integral by two. That does the trick






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              But in all the other similar problems, I integrate similarly starting from zero and I still get the correct answer. And all the other similar problems also involve a revolution around both the x- and y- axes, and my answers there were all correct.
              $endgroup$
              – blizz
              Jan 13 at 21:46










            • $begingroup$
              What other similar problems do you have in mind? No two problems are identical. In this case, the curve crosses y=1 at points (-5,1) and (5,1). Therefore you have to integrate from -5 to 5. Does it make sense to you?
              $endgroup$
              – pendermath
              Jan 13 at 21:48










            • $begingroup$
              I understand...I only drew half the graph (only the first quadrant)! Thanks for clarifying!
              $endgroup$
              – blizz
              Jan 13 at 21:54










            • $begingroup$
              Exactly! You got it
              $endgroup$
              – pendermath
              Jan 13 at 21:55














            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            You have to integrate from -5 to 5 or multiply your integral by two. That does the trick






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            You have to integrate from -5 to 5 or multiply your integral by two. That does the trick







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Jan 13 at 21:41









            pendermathpendermath

            58612




            58612












            • $begingroup$
              But in all the other similar problems, I integrate similarly starting from zero and I still get the correct answer. And all the other similar problems also involve a revolution around both the x- and y- axes, and my answers there were all correct.
              $endgroup$
              – blizz
              Jan 13 at 21:46










            • $begingroup$
              What other similar problems do you have in mind? No two problems are identical. In this case, the curve crosses y=1 at points (-5,1) and (5,1). Therefore you have to integrate from -5 to 5. Does it make sense to you?
              $endgroup$
              – pendermath
              Jan 13 at 21:48










            • $begingroup$
              I understand...I only drew half the graph (only the first quadrant)! Thanks for clarifying!
              $endgroup$
              – blizz
              Jan 13 at 21:54










            • $begingroup$
              Exactly! You got it
              $endgroup$
              – pendermath
              Jan 13 at 21:55


















            • $begingroup$
              But in all the other similar problems, I integrate similarly starting from zero and I still get the correct answer. And all the other similar problems also involve a revolution around both the x- and y- axes, and my answers there were all correct.
              $endgroup$
              – blizz
              Jan 13 at 21:46










            • $begingroup$
              What other similar problems do you have in mind? No two problems are identical. In this case, the curve crosses y=1 at points (-5,1) and (5,1). Therefore you have to integrate from -5 to 5. Does it make sense to you?
              $endgroup$
              – pendermath
              Jan 13 at 21:48










            • $begingroup$
              I understand...I only drew half the graph (only the first quadrant)! Thanks for clarifying!
              $endgroup$
              – blizz
              Jan 13 at 21:54










            • $begingroup$
              Exactly! You got it
              $endgroup$
              – pendermath
              Jan 13 at 21:55
















            $begingroup$
            But in all the other similar problems, I integrate similarly starting from zero and I still get the correct answer. And all the other similar problems also involve a revolution around both the x- and y- axes, and my answers there were all correct.
            $endgroup$
            – blizz
            Jan 13 at 21:46




            $begingroup$
            But in all the other similar problems, I integrate similarly starting from zero and I still get the correct answer. And all the other similar problems also involve a revolution around both the x- and y- axes, and my answers there were all correct.
            $endgroup$
            – blizz
            Jan 13 at 21:46












            $begingroup$
            What other similar problems do you have in mind? No two problems are identical. In this case, the curve crosses y=1 at points (-5,1) and (5,1). Therefore you have to integrate from -5 to 5. Does it make sense to you?
            $endgroup$
            – pendermath
            Jan 13 at 21:48




            $begingroup$
            What other similar problems do you have in mind? No two problems are identical. In this case, the curve crosses y=1 at points (-5,1) and (5,1). Therefore you have to integrate from -5 to 5. Does it make sense to you?
            $endgroup$
            – pendermath
            Jan 13 at 21:48












            $begingroup$
            I understand...I only drew half the graph (only the first quadrant)! Thanks for clarifying!
            $endgroup$
            – blizz
            Jan 13 at 21:54




            $begingroup$
            I understand...I only drew half the graph (only the first quadrant)! Thanks for clarifying!
            $endgroup$
            – blizz
            Jan 13 at 21:54












            $begingroup$
            Exactly! You got it
            $endgroup$
            – pendermath
            Jan 13 at 21:55




            $begingroup$
            Exactly! You got it
            $endgroup$
            – pendermath
            Jan 13 at 21:55











            1












            $begingroup$

            You forgot to multiple it by $2$, because you set the lower bound $0$ instead of $-5$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              You forgot to multiple it by $2$, because you set the lower bound $0$ instead of $-5$.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                You forgot to multiple it by $2$, because you set the lower bound $0$ instead of $-5$.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                You forgot to multiple it by $2$, because you set the lower bound $0$ instead of $-5$.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Jan 13 at 22:11









                tinlyx

                95221118




                95221118










                answered Jan 13 at 21:41









                CristianoCristiano

                255




                255






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072542%2fvolume-of-a-solid-using-disk-method%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                    in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

                    How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter