Wronskian is not defined












0












$begingroup$


Suppose a general question: What does it mean that the Wronskian at a certain point is not even defined? take for example two solutions for a second order ODE: $ y_1(x)=frac{1}{x^{3}} $ and $y_2(x)=x^{2}$.



We get that $W=frac{5}{x^{2}}$ which is not defined on $x=0$.
What is the correct explanation?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure what exactly is your doubt, but I think a good explanation is that thopse solutions to the ODE are not defined in a domain containing zero...which seems pretty obvious.
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Jan 13 at 20:17










  • $begingroup$
    $y_1$ is also not defined at $x=0$, so this is not surprising. The Wronskian of linearly independent solutions of a second order linear ODE $y'' + a(x) y' + b(x)=0$ is a constant multiple of $exp(-A(x))$ where $A$ is an antiderivative of $a$. In this case $A(x) = 2 ln(x) + c$, so $a(x) = 2/x$. Again, this is not defined at $x=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 13 at 20:19
















0












$begingroup$


Suppose a general question: What does it mean that the Wronskian at a certain point is not even defined? take for example two solutions for a second order ODE: $ y_1(x)=frac{1}{x^{3}} $ and $y_2(x)=x^{2}$.



We get that $W=frac{5}{x^{2}}$ which is not defined on $x=0$.
What is the correct explanation?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure what exactly is your doubt, but I think a good explanation is that thopse solutions to the ODE are not defined in a domain containing zero...which seems pretty obvious.
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Jan 13 at 20:17










  • $begingroup$
    $y_1$ is also not defined at $x=0$, so this is not surprising. The Wronskian of linearly independent solutions of a second order linear ODE $y'' + a(x) y' + b(x)=0$ is a constant multiple of $exp(-A(x))$ where $A$ is an antiderivative of $a$. In this case $A(x) = 2 ln(x) + c$, so $a(x) = 2/x$. Again, this is not defined at $x=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 13 at 20:19














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Suppose a general question: What does it mean that the Wronskian at a certain point is not even defined? take for example two solutions for a second order ODE: $ y_1(x)=frac{1}{x^{3}} $ and $y_2(x)=x^{2}$.



We get that $W=frac{5}{x^{2}}$ which is not defined on $x=0$.
What is the correct explanation?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Suppose a general question: What does it mean that the Wronskian at a certain point is not even defined? take for example two solutions for a second order ODE: $ y_1(x)=frac{1}{x^{3}} $ and $y_2(x)=x^{2}$.



We get that $W=frac{5}{x^{2}}$ which is not defined on $x=0$.
What is the correct explanation?







real-analysis ordinary-differential-equations






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 13 at 20:10









alexander_yzalexander_yz

165




165








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure what exactly is your doubt, but I think a good explanation is that thopse solutions to the ODE are not defined in a domain containing zero...which seems pretty obvious.
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Jan 13 at 20:17










  • $begingroup$
    $y_1$ is also not defined at $x=0$, so this is not surprising. The Wronskian of linearly independent solutions of a second order linear ODE $y'' + a(x) y' + b(x)=0$ is a constant multiple of $exp(-A(x))$ where $A$ is an antiderivative of $a$. In this case $A(x) = 2 ln(x) + c$, so $a(x) = 2/x$. Again, this is not defined at $x=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 13 at 20:19














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure what exactly is your doubt, but I think a good explanation is that thopse solutions to the ODE are not defined in a domain containing zero...which seems pretty obvious.
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Jan 13 at 20:17










  • $begingroup$
    $y_1$ is also not defined at $x=0$, so this is not surprising. The Wronskian of linearly independent solutions of a second order linear ODE $y'' + a(x) y' + b(x)=0$ is a constant multiple of $exp(-A(x))$ where $A$ is an antiderivative of $a$. In this case $A(x) = 2 ln(x) + c$, so $a(x) = 2/x$. Again, this is not defined at $x=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 13 at 20:19








1




1




$begingroup$
I'm not sure what exactly is your doubt, but I think a good explanation is that thopse solutions to the ODE are not defined in a domain containing zero...which seems pretty obvious.
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Jan 13 at 20:17




$begingroup$
I'm not sure what exactly is your doubt, but I think a good explanation is that thopse solutions to the ODE are not defined in a domain containing zero...which seems pretty obvious.
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Jan 13 at 20:17












$begingroup$
$y_1$ is also not defined at $x=0$, so this is not surprising. The Wronskian of linearly independent solutions of a second order linear ODE $y'' + a(x) y' + b(x)=0$ is a constant multiple of $exp(-A(x))$ where $A$ is an antiderivative of $a$. In this case $A(x) = 2 ln(x) + c$, so $a(x) = 2/x$. Again, this is not defined at $x=0$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 13 at 20:19




$begingroup$
$y_1$ is also not defined at $x=0$, so this is not surprising. The Wronskian of linearly independent solutions of a second order linear ODE $y'' + a(x) y' + b(x)=0$ is a constant multiple of $exp(-A(x))$ where $A$ is an antiderivative of $a$. In this case $A(x) = 2 ln(x) + c$, so $a(x) = 2/x$. Again, this is not defined at $x=0$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 13 at 20:19










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

The solution to your differential equation is by definition a differentiable function defined on an interval of existence.



In your example the function $y_1(x)=frac{1}{x^3}$ is not defined at $x=0$ so at this point the wronskian is not defined.



We need to stay within the interval of existence.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072461%2fwronskian-is-not-defined%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    The solution to your differential equation is by definition a differentiable function defined on an interval of existence.



    In your example the function $y_1(x)=frac{1}{x^3}$ is not defined at $x=0$ so at this point the wronskian is not defined.



    We need to stay within the interval of existence.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      The solution to your differential equation is by definition a differentiable function defined on an interval of existence.



      In your example the function $y_1(x)=frac{1}{x^3}$ is not defined at $x=0$ so at this point the wronskian is not defined.



      We need to stay within the interval of existence.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        The solution to your differential equation is by definition a differentiable function defined on an interval of existence.



        In your example the function $y_1(x)=frac{1}{x^3}$ is not defined at $x=0$ so at this point the wronskian is not defined.



        We need to stay within the interval of existence.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The solution to your differential equation is by definition a differentiable function defined on an interval of existence.



        In your example the function $y_1(x)=frac{1}{x^3}$ is not defined at $x=0$ so at this point the wronskian is not defined.



        We need to stay within the interval of existence.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 13 at 20:23









        Mohammad Riazi-KermaniMohammad Riazi-Kermani

        41.6k42061




        41.6k42061






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072461%2fwronskian-is-not-defined%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith