Wronskian is not defined
$begingroup$
Suppose a general question: What does it mean that the Wronskian at a certain point is not even defined? take for example two solutions for a second order ODE: $ y_1(x)=frac{1}{x^{3}} $ and $y_2(x)=x^{2}$.
We get that $W=frac{5}{x^{2}}$ which is not defined on $x=0$.
What is the correct explanation?
real-analysis ordinary-differential-equations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose a general question: What does it mean that the Wronskian at a certain point is not even defined? take for example two solutions for a second order ODE: $ y_1(x)=frac{1}{x^{3}} $ and $y_2(x)=x^{2}$.
We get that $W=frac{5}{x^{2}}$ which is not defined on $x=0$.
What is the correct explanation?
real-analysis ordinary-differential-equations
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I'm not sure what exactly is your doubt, but I think a good explanation is that thopse solutions to the ODE are not defined in a domain containing zero...which seems pretty obvious.
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Jan 13 at 20:17
$begingroup$
$y_1$ is also not defined at $x=0$, so this is not surprising. The Wronskian of linearly independent solutions of a second order linear ODE $y'' + a(x) y' + b(x)=0$ is a constant multiple of $exp(-A(x))$ where $A$ is an antiderivative of $a$. In this case $A(x) = 2 ln(x) + c$, so $a(x) = 2/x$. Again, this is not defined at $x=0$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 13 at 20:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose a general question: What does it mean that the Wronskian at a certain point is not even defined? take for example two solutions for a second order ODE: $ y_1(x)=frac{1}{x^{3}} $ and $y_2(x)=x^{2}$.
We get that $W=frac{5}{x^{2}}$ which is not defined on $x=0$.
What is the correct explanation?
real-analysis ordinary-differential-equations
$endgroup$
Suppose a general question: What does it mean that the Wronskian at a certain point is not even defined? take for example two solutions for a second order ODE: $ y_1(x)=frac{1}{x^{3}} $ and $y_2(x)=x^{2}$.
We get that $W=frac{5}{x^{2}}$ which is not defined on $x=0$.
What is the correct explanation?
real-analysis ordinary-differential-equations
real-analysis ordinary-differential-equations
asked Jan 13 at 20:10
alexander_yzalexander_yz
165
165
1
$begingroup$
I'm not sure what exactly is your doubt, but I think a good explanation is that thopse solutions to the ODE are not defined in a domain containing zero...which seems pretty obvious.
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Jan 13 at 20:17
$begingroup$
$y_1$ is also not defined at $x=0$, so this is not surprising. The Wronskian of linearly independent solutions of a second order linear ODE $y'' + a(x) y' + b(x)=0$ is a constant multiple of $exp(-A(x))$ where $A$ is an antiderivative of $a$. In this case $A(x) = 2 ln(x) + c$, so $a(x) = 2/x$. Again, this is not defined at $x=0$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 13 at 20:19
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
I'm not sure what exactly is your doubt, but I think a good explanation is that thopse solutions to the ODE are not defined in a domain containing zero...which seems pretty obvious.
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Jan 13 at 20:17
$begingroup$
$y_1$ is also not defined at $x=0$, so this is not surprising. The Wronskian of linearly independent solutions of a second order linear ODE $y'' + a(x) y' + b(x)=0$ is a constant multiple of $exp(-A(x))$ where $A$ is an antiderivative of $a$. In this case $A(x) = 2 ln(x) + c$, so $a(x) = 2/x$. Again, this is not defined at $x=0$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 13 at 20:19
1
1
$begingroup$
I'm not sure what exactly is your doubt, but I think a good explanation is that thopse solutions to the ODE are not defined in a domain containing zero...which seems pretty obvious.
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Jan 13 at 20:17
$begingroup$
I'm not sure what exactly is your doubt, but I think a good explanation is that thopse solutions to the ODE are not defined in a domain containing zero...which seems pretty obvious.
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Jan 13 at 20:17
$begingroup$
$y_1$ is also not defined at $x=0$, so this is not surprising. The Wronskian of linearly independent solutions of a second order linear ODE $y'' + a(x) y' + b(x)=0$ is a constant multiple of $exp(-A(x))$ where $A$ is an antiderivative of $a$. In this case $A(x) = 2 ln(x) + c$, so $a(x) = 2/x$. Again, this is not defined at $x=0$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 13 at 20:19
$begingroup$
$y_1$ is also not defined at $x=0$, so this is not surprising. The Wronskian of linearly independent solutions of a second order linear ODE $y'' + a(x) y' + b(x)=0$ is a constant multiple of $exp(-A(x))$ where $A$ is an antiderivative of $a$. In this case $A(x) = 2 ln(x) + c$, so $a(x) = 2/x$. Again, this is not defined at $x=0$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 13 at 20:19
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The solution to your differential equation is by definition a differentiable function defined on an interval of existence.
In your example the function $y_1(x)=frac{1}{x^3}$ is not defined at $x=0$ so at this point the wronskian is not defined.
We need to stay within the interval of existence.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072461%2fwronskian-is-not-defined%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The solution to your differential equation is by definition a differentiable function defined on an interval of existence.
In your example the function $y_1(x)=frac{1}{x^3}$ is not defined at $x=0$ so at this point the wronskian is not defined.
We need to stay within the interval of existence.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The solution to your differential equation is by definition a differentiable function defined on an interval of existence.
In your example the function $y_1(x)=frac{1}{x^3}$ is not defined at $x=0$ so at this point the wronskian is not defined.
We need to stay within the interval of existence.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The solution to your differential equation is by definition a differentiable function defined on an interval of existence.
In your example the function $y_1(x)=frac{1}{x^3}$ is not defined at $x=0$ so at this point the wronskian is not defined.
We need to stay within the interval of existence.
$endgroup$
The solution to your differential equation is by definition a differentiable function defined on an interval of existence.
In your example the function $y_1(x)=frac{1}{x^3}$ is not defined at $x=0$ so at this point the wronskian is not defined.
We need to stay within the interval of existence.
answered Jan 13 at 20:23


Mohammad Riazi-KermaniMohammad Riazi-Kermani
41.6k42061
41.6k42061
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072461%2fwronskian-is-not-defined%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
I'm not sure what exactly is your doubt, but I think a good explanation is that thopse solutions to the ODE are not defined in a domain containing zero...which seems pretty obvious.
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Jan 13 at 20:17
$begingroup$
$y_1$ is also not defined at $x=0$, so this is not surprising. The Wronskian of linearly independent solutions of a second order linear ODE $y'' + a(x) y' + b(x)=0$ is a constant multiple of $exp(-A(x))$ where $A$ is an antiderivative of $a$. In this case $A(x) = 2 ln(x) + c$, so $a(x) = 2/x$. Again, this is not defined at $x=0$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 13 at 20:19