Closed cones and exposed faces












3












$begingroup$


I was wondering if a closed cone $C$ in a Banach space $X$ of dimension at least two always has an exposed face, that is, a face $F$ such that $F=Ccapkerphi$ for some positive $phiin X^*setminus{0}$.



Thanks a lot for your help!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What is a positive functional? $phi$ is linear....
    $endgroup$
    – daw
    Nov 6 '17 at 7:23










  • $begingroup$
    $phi$ is linear, continuous, and $phi(C)subseteq [0,infty)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Roelands
    Nov 6 '17 at 7:24
















3












$begingroup$


I was wondering if a closed cone $C$ in a Banach space $X$ of dimension at least two always has an exposed face, that is, a face $F$ such that $F=Ccapkerphi$ for some positive $phiin X^*setminus{0}$.



Thanks a lot for your help!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What is a positive functional? $phi$ is linear....
    $endgroup$
    – daw
    Nov 6 '17 at 7:23










  • $begingroup$
    $phi$ is linear, continuous, and $phi(C)subseteq [0,infty)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Roelands
    Nov 6 '17 at 7:24














3












3








3


1



$begingroup$


I was wondering if a closed cone $C$ in a Banach space $X$ of dimension at least two always has an exposed face, that is, a face $F$ such that $F=Ccapkerphi$ for some positive $phiin X^*setminus{0}$.



Thanks a lot for your help!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I was wondering if a closed cone $C$ in a Banach space $X$ of dimension at least two always has an exposed face, that is, a face $F$ such that $F=Ccapkerphi$ for some positive $phiin X^*setminus{0}$.



Thanks a lot for your help!







functional-analysis convex-cone dual-cone






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 6 '17 at 7:21









Mark RoelandsMark Roelands

554




554












  • $begingroup$
    What is a positive functional? $phi$ is linear....
    $endgroup$
    – daw
    Nov 6 '17 at 7:23










  • $begingroup$
    $phi$ is linear, continuous, and $phi(C)subseteq [0,infty)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Roelands
    Nov 6 '17 at 7:24


















  • $begingroup$
    What is a positive functional? $phi$ is linear....
    $endgroup$
    – daw
    Nov 6 '17 at 7:23










  • $begingroup$
    $phi$ is linear, continuous, and $phi(C)subseteq [0,infty)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Roelands
    Nov 6 '17 at 7:24
















$begingroup$
What is a positive functional? $phi$ is linear....
$endgroup$
– daw
Nov 6 '17 at 7:23




$begingroup$
What is a positive functional? $phi$ is linear....
$endgroup$
– daw
Nov 6 '17 at 7:23












$begingroup$
$phi$ is linear, continuous, and $phi(C)subseteq [0,infty)$.
$endgroup$
– Mark Roelands
Nov 6 '17 at 7:24




$begingroup$
$phi$ is linear, continuous, and $phi(C)subseteq [0,infty)$.
$endgroup$
– Mark Roelands
Nov 6 '17 at 7:24










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

I was trying to find some information on exposed faces and found this problem, so in the category better late then never: The answer is yes, in fact, every element in the boundary lies in an exposed face.



Let $xinpartial C$. By the Hahn-Banach separation theorem there is a continuous linear functional $varphi$ and a $tinmathbb{R}$ such that
$$varphi(x)leq t<varphi(y)qquad yin C^{circ}.$$
Now let $yin C^{circ}$. Note that $lim_{nrightarrowinfty}varphi(frac{1}{n}y)=0$ so $tleq0$. Furthermore suppose that $varphi(y)<0$, then for $n$ large enough $varphi(ny)<tleq0$, which is a contradiction, so $varphi$ is a positive linear functional.



From this it follows that $emptysetneq F=text{ker}(varphi)cap Csubsetpartial C$. Finally let $x,yin C$ such that $lambda x+(1-lambda)yin F$, then $varphi(lambda x+(1-lambda)y)=0$ and as $varphi(x),varphi(y)geq0$ we find that $varphi(x)=varphi(y)=0$, so $F$ is a face.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    @ Floris Claassens. Thank you for your response! Yes, I understand why this would be true in case the cone in question has an interior. However, in general it is unclear to me why such an exposed face would exist.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Roelands
    Jan 30 at 16:24












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2507141%2fclosed-cones-and-exposed-faces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

I was trying to find some information on exposed faces and found this problem, so in the category better late then never: The answer is yes, in fact, every element in the boundary lies in an exposed face.



Let $xinpartial C$. By the Hahn-Banach separation theorem there is a continuous linear functional $varphi$ and a $tinmathbb{R}$ such that
$$varphi(x)leq t<varphi(y)qquad yin C^{circ}.$$
Now let $yin C^{circ}$. Note that $lim_{nrightarrowinfty}varphi(frac{1}{n}y)=0$ so $tleq0$. Furthermore suppose that $varphi(y)<0$, then for $n$ large enough $varphi(ny)<tleq0$, which is a contradiction, so $varphi$ is a positive linear functional.



From this it follows that $emptysetneq F=text{ker}(varphi)cap Csubsetpartial C$. Finally let $x,yin C$ such that $lambda x+(1-lambda)yin F$, then $varphi(lambda x+(1-lambda)y)=0$ and as $varphi(x),varphi(y)geq0$ we find that $varphi(x)=varphi(y)=0$, so $F$ is a face.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    @ Floris Claassens. Thank you for your response! Yes, I understand why this would be true in case the cone in question has an interior. However, in general it is unclear to me why such an exposed face would exist.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Roelands
    Jan 30 at 16:24
















1












$begingroup$

I was trying to find some information on exposed faces and found this problem, so in the category better late then never: The answer is yes, in fact, every element in the boundary lies in an exposed face.



Let $xinpartial C$. By the Hahn-Banach separation theorem there is a continuous linear functional $varphi$ and a $tinmathbb{R}$ such that
$$varphi(x)leq t<varphi(y)qquad yin C^{circ}.$$
Now let $yin C^{circ}$. Note that $lim_{nrightarrowinfty}varphi(frac{1}{n}y)=0$ so $tleq0$. Furthermore suppose that $varphi(y)<0$, then for $n$ large enough $varphi(ny)<tleq0$, which is a contradiction, so $varphi$ is a positive linear functional.



From this it follows that $emptysetneq F=text{ker}(varphi)cap Csubsetpartial C$. Finally let $x,yin C$ such that $lambda x+(1-lambda)yin F$, then $varphi(lambda x+(1-lambda)y)=0$ and as $varphi(x),varphi(y)geq0$ we find that $varphi(x)=varphi(y)=0$, so $F$ is a face.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    @ Floris Claassens. Thank you for your response! Yes, I understand why this would be true in case the cone in question has an interior. However, in general it is unclear to me why such an exposed face would exist.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Roelands
    Jan 30 at 16:24














1












1








1





$begingroup$

I was trying to find some information on exposed faces and found this problem, so in the category better late then never: The answer is yes, in fact, every element in the boundary lies in an exposed face.



Let $xinpartial C$. By the Hahn-Banach separation theorem there is a continuous linear functional $varphi$ and a $tinmathbb{R}$ such that
$$varphi(x)leq t<varphi(y)qquad yin C^{circ}.$$
Now let $yin C^{circ}$. Note that $lim_{nrightarrowinfty}varphi(frac{1}{n}y)=0$ so $tleq0$. Furthermore suppose that $varphi(y)<0$, then for $n$ large enough $varphi(ny)<tleq0$, which is a contradiction, so $varphi$ is a positive linear functional.



From this it follows that $emptysetneq F=text{ker}(varphi)cap Csubsetpartial C$. Finally let $x,yin C$ such that $lambda x+(1-lambda)yin F$, then $varphi(lambda x+(1-lambda)y)=0$ and as $varphi(x),varphi(y)geq0$ we find that $varphi(x)=varphi(y)=0$, so $F$ is a face.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



I was trying to find some information on exposed faces and found this problem, so in the category better late then never: The answer is yes, in fact, every element in the boundary lies in an exposed face.



Let $xinpartial C$. By the Hahn-Banach separation theorem there is a continuous linear functional $varphi$ and a $tinmathbb{R}$ such that
$$varphi(x)leq t<varphi(y)qquad yin C^{circ}.$$
Now let $yin C^{circ}$. Note that $lim_{nrightarrowinfty}varphi(frac{1}{n}y)=0$ so $tleq0$. Furthermore suppose that $varphi(y)<0$, then for $n$ large enough $varphi(ny)<tleq0$, which is a contradiction, so $varphi$ is a positive linear functional.



From this it follows that $emptysetneq F=text{ker}(varphi)cap Csubsetpartial C$. Finally let $x,yin C$ such that $lambda x+(1-lambda)yin F$, then $varphi(lambda x+(1-lambda)y)=0$ and as $varphi(x),varphi(y)geq0$ we find that $varphi(x)=varphi(y)=0$, so $F$ is a face.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 29 at 11:04









Floris ClaassensFloris Claassens

1,21527




1,21527












  • $begingroup$
    @ Floris Claassens. Thank you for your response! Yes, I understand why this would be true in case the cone in question has an interior. However, in general it is unclear to me why such an exposed face would exist.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Roelands
    Jan 30 at 16:24


















  • $begingroup$
    @ Floris Claassens. Thank you for your response! Yes, I understand why this would be true in case the cone in question has an interior. However, in general it is unclear to me why such an exposed face would exist.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Roelands
    Jan 30 at 16:24
















$begingroup$
@ Floris Claassens. Thank you for your response! Yes, I understand why this would be true in case the cone in question has an interior. However, in general it is unclear to me why such an exposed face would exist.
$endgroup$
– Mark Roelands
Jan 30 at 16:24




$begingroup$
@ Floris Claassens. Thank you for your response! Yes, I understand why this would be true in case the cone in question has an interior. However, in general it is unclear to me why such an exposed face would exist.
$endgroup$
– Mark Roelands
Jan 30 at 16:24


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2507141%2fclosed-cones-and-exposed-faces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith