Prove that the planar curve obtained by projecting $alpha$ into its osculating plane at $P$ has the same...
$begingroup$
Let $alpha(s)$ be a regular curve with $kappaneq0$ at P, where $kappa$ is the curvature. Prove that the planar curve obtained by projecting $alpha(s)$ into its osculating plane at $P$ has the same curvature at $P$ as $alpha(s)$.
(This is problem 1.2.14 in Ted Shifrin's differential geometry notes, (http://alpha.math.uga.edu/~shifrin/ShifrinDiffGeo.pdf).)
The local projection onto the osculating plane is given by $(s,frac{s^2kappa}{2})$. However, i'm not sure if this equation holds only for when curves are parametrized by arc length.
Anyway, lets say that this projection is the correct projection for $alpha(s)$ even though it's not stated to be parameterized by arc length.
The curvature is given by $frac{|alpha'(s) times alpha''(s)|}{alpha'(s)}$.
Let $gamma=(s,frac{s^2kappa}{2})$.
$rightarrow$ $gamma'=(1,skappa+frac{s^2kappa'}{2})$
$rightarrow$ $gamma''=(0,kappa+skappa'+skappa'+frac{s^2kappa''}{2})$
$rightarrow$ $|gamma'|=(1^2+(sk)^2+(frac{s^2kappa'}{2})^2+s^3kappakappa')^{1/2}$
So, if I apply the equation for curvature to $gamma$, in theory I should get $kappa$. Is this reasoning correct? Thanks!
differential-geometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $alpha(s)$ be a regular curve with $kappaneq0$ at P, where $kappa$ is the curvature. Prove that the planar curve obtained by projecting $alpha(s)$ into its osculating plane at $P$ has the same curvature at $P$ as $alpha(s)$.
(This is problem 1.2.14 in Ted Shifrin's differential geometry notes, (http://alpha.math.uga.edu/~shifrin/ShifrinDiffGeo.pdf).)
The local projection onto the osculating plane is given by $(s,frac{s^2kappa}{2})$. However, i'm not sure if this equation holds only for when curves are parametrized by arc length.
Anyway, lets say that this projection is the correct projection for $alpha(s)$ even though it's not stated to be parameterized by arc length.
The curvature is given by $frac{|alpha'(s) times alpha''(s)|}{alpha'(s)}$.
Let $gamma=(s,frac{s^2kappa}{2})$.
$rightarrow$ $gamma'=(1,skappa+frac{s^2kappa'}{2})$
$rightarrow$ $gamma''=(0,kappa+skappa'+skappa'+frac{s^2kappa''}{2})$
$rightarrow$ $|gamma'|=(1^2+(sk)^2+(frac{s^2kappa'}{2})^2+s^3kappakappa')^{1/2}$
So, if I apply the equation for curvature to $gamma$, in theory I should get $kappa$. Is this reasoning correct? Thanks!
differential-geometry
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Where you say that the local projection into the osculating plane is given by $left(s, frac{kappa}{2}s^2 right)$, you should actually have the parameterization $(s + O(s^3), frac{kappa_0}{2}s^2 + O(s^3)$, where $kappa_0$ is the curvature of $s$ at $P$. In particular, $kappa_0$ is a constant and should not be differentiated. This will make the rest of the computations a lot simpler.
$endgroup$
– Sarah T.
Jan 22 at 1:36
$begingroup$
Incidentally, this is recognizably a problem from Ted Shifrin's differential geometry notes. I've edited to add a reference.
$endgroup$
– Sarah T.
Jan 22 at 1:41
$begingroup$
Okay cool. But since the parameterization is local, shouldn't we be able to ignore the higher order terms?
$endgroup$
– user624065
Jan 22 at 1:41
$begingroup$
Yes, higher order terms can be ignored.
$endgroup$
– Sarah T.
Jan 22 at 1:44
$begingroup$
Okay, if $gamma(s)=(s,frac{ks^2}{2})$ then I got that $gamma'(s) times gamma''(s)=kappa$. However, the denominator $|gamma'(s)|$^3 is not behaving well... Is there a reason that $gamma$ is arc length parameterized because $alpha(s)$ is? Otherwise, the donominator will be $1+3ks+3(ks)^2+(ks)^3$
$endgroup$
– user624065
Jan 22 at 21:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $alpha(s)$ be a regular curve with $kappaneq0$ at P, where $kappa$ is the curvature. Prove that the planar curve obtained by projecting $alpha(s)$ into its osculating plane at $P$ has the same curvature at $P$ as $alpha(s)$.
(This is problem 1.2.14 in Ted Shifrin's differential geometry notes, (http://alpha.math.uga.edu/~shifrin/ShifrinDiffGeo.pdf).)
The local projection onto the osculating plane is given by $(s,frac{s^2kappa}{2})$. However, i'm not sure if this equation holds only for when curves are parametrized by arc length.
Anyway, lets say that this projection is the correct projection for $alpha(s)$ even though it's not stated to be parameterized by arc length.
The curvature is given by $frac{|alpha'(s) times alpha''(s)|}{alpha'(s)}$.
Let $gamma=(s,frac{s^2kappa}{2})$.
$rightarrow$ $gamma'=(1,skappa+frac{s^2kappa'}{2})$
$rightarrow$ $gamma''=(0,kappa+skappa'+skappa'+frac{s^2kappa''}{2})$
$rightarrow$ $|gamma'|=(1^2+(sk)^2+(frac{s^2kappa'}{2})^2+s^3kappakappa')^{1/2}$
So, if I apply the equation for curvature to $gamma$, in theory I should get $kappa$. Is this reasoning correct? Thanks!
differential-geometry
$endgroup$
Let $alpha(s)$ be a regular curve with $kappaneq0$ at P, where $kappa$ is the curvature. Prove that the planar curve obtained by projecting $alpha(s)$ into its osculating plane at $P$ has the same curvature at $P$ as $alpha(s)$.
(This is problem 1.2.14 in Ted Shifrin's differential geometry notes, (http://alpha.math.uga.edu/~shifrin/ShifrinDiffGeo.pdf).)
The local projection onto the osculating plane is given by $(s,frac{s^2kappa}{2})$. However, i'm not sure if this equation holds only for when curves are parametrized by arc length.
Anyway, lets say that this projection is the correct projection for $alpha(s)$ even though it's not stated to be parameterized by arc length.
The curvature is given by $frac{|alpha'(s) times alpha''(s)|}{alpha'(s)}$.
Let $gamma=(s,frac{s^2kappa}{2})$.
$rightarrow$ $gamma'=(1,skappa+frac{s^2kappa'}{2})$
$rightarrow$ $gamma''=(0,kappa+skappa'+skappa'+frac{s^2kappa''}{2})$
$rightarrow$ $|gamma'|=(1^2+(sk)^2+(frac{s^2kappa'}{2})^2+s^3kappakappa')^{1/2}$
So, if I apply the equation for curvature to $gamma$, in theory I should get $kappa$. Is this reasoning correct? Thanks!
differential-geometry
differential-geometry
edited Jan 22 at 3:42
Sarah T.
1933
1933
asked Jan 22 at 1:22
user624065
$begingroup$
Where you say that the local projection into the osculating plane is given by $left(s, frac{kappa}{2}s^2 right)$, you should actually have the parameterization $(s + O(s^3), frac{kappa_0}{2}s^2 + O(s^3)$, where $kappa_0$ is the curvature of $s$ at $P$. In particular, $kappa_0$ is a constant and should not be differentiated. This will make the rest of the computations a lot simpler.
$endgroup$
– Sarah T.
Jan 22 at 1:36
$begingroup$
Incidentally, this is recognizably a problem from Ted Shifrin's differential geometry notes. I've edited to add a reference.
$endgroup$
– Sarah T.
Jan 22 at 1:41
$begingroup$
Okay cool. But since the parameterization is local, shouldn't we be able to ignore the higher order terms?
$endgroup$
– user624065
Jan 22 at 1:41
$begingroup$
Yes, higher order terms can be ignored.
$endgroup$
– Sarah T.
Jan 22 at 1:44
$begingroup$
Okay, if $gamma(s)=(s,frac{ks^2}{2})$ then I got that $gamma'(s) times gamma''(s)=kappa$. However, the denominator $|gamma'(s)|$^3 is not behaving well... Is there a reason that $gamma$ is arc length parameterized because $alpha(s)$ is? Otherwise, the donominator will be $1+3ks+3(ks)^2+(ks)^3$
$endgroup$
– user624065
Jan 22 at 21:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Where you say that the local projection into the osculating plane is given by $left(s, frac{kappa}{2}s^2 right)$, you should actually have the parameterization $(s + O(s^3), frac{kappa_0}{2}s^2 + O(s^3)$, where $kappa_0$ is the curvature of $s$ at $P$. In particular, $kappa_0$ is a constant and should not be differentiated. This will make the rest of the computations a lot simpler.
$endgroup$
– Sarah T.
Jan 22 at 1:36
$begingroup$
Incidentally, this is recognizably a problem from Ted Shifrin's differential geometry notes. I've edited to add a reference.
$endgroup$
– Sarah T.
Jan 22 at 1:41
$begingroup$
Okay cool. But since the parameterization is local, shouldn't we be able to ignore the higher order terms?
$endgroup$
– user624065
Jan 22 at 1:41
$begingroup$
Yes, higher order terms can be ignored.
$endgroup$
– Sarah T.
Jan 22 at 1:44
$begingroup$
Okay, if $gamma(s)=(s,frac{ks^2}{2})$ then I got that $gamma'(s) times gamma''(s)=kappa$. However, the denominator $|gamma'(s)|$^3 is not behaving well... Is there a reason that $gamma$ is arc length parameterized because $alpha(s)$ is? Otherwise, the donominator will be $1+3ks+3(ks)^2+(ks)^3$
$endgroup$
– user624065
Jan 22 at 21:28
$begingroup$
Where you say that the local projection into the osculating plane is given by $left(s, frac{kappa}{2}s^2 right)$, you should actually have the parameterization $(s + O(s^3), frac{kappa_0}{2}s^2 + O(s^3)$, where $kappa_0$ is the curvature of $s$ at $P$. In particular, $kappa_0$ is a constant and should not be differentiated. This will make the rest of the computations a lot simpler.
$endgroup$
– Sarah T.
Jan 22 at 1:36
$begingroup$
Where you say that the local projection into the osculating plane is given by $left(s, frac{kappa}{2}s^2 right)$, you should actually have the parameterization $(s + O(s^3), frac{kappa_0}{2}s^2 + O(s^3)$, where $kappa_0$ is the curvature of $s$ at $P$. In particular, $kappa_0$ is a constant and should not be differentiated. This will make the rest of the computations a lot simpler.
$endgroup$
– Sarah T.
Jan 22 at 1:36
$begingroup$
Incidentally, this is recognizably a problem from Ted Shifrin's differential geometry notes. I've edited to add a reference.
$endgroup$
– Sarah T.
Jan 22 at 1:41
$begingroup$
Incidentally, this is recognizably a problem from Ted Shifrin's differential geometry notes. I've edited to add a reference.
$endgroup$
– Sarah T.
Jan 22 at 1:41
$begingroup$
Okay cool. But since the parameterization is local, shouldn't we be able to ignore the higher order terms?
$endgroup$
– user624065
Jan 22 at 1:41
$begingroup$
Okay cool. But since the parameterization is local, shouldn't we be able to ignore the higher order terms?
$endgroup$
– user624065
Jan 22 at 1:41
$begingroup$
Yes, higher order terms can be ignored.
$endgroup$
– Sarah T.
Jan 22 at 1:44
$begingroup$
Yes, higher order terms can be ignored.
$endgroup$
– Sarah T.
Jan 22 at 1:44
$begingroup$
Okay, if $gamma(s)=(s,frac{ks^2}{2})$ then I got that $gamma'(s) times gamma''(s)=kappa$. However, the denominator $|gamma'(s)|$^3 is not behaving well... Is there a reason that $gamma$ is arc length parameterized because $alpha(s)$ is? Otherwise, the donominator will be $1+3ks+3(ks)^2+(ks)^3$
$endgroup$
– user624065
Jan 22 at 21:28
$begingroup$
Okay, if $gamma(s)=(s,frac{ks^2}{2})$ then I got that $gamma'(s) times gamma''(s)=kappa$. However, the denominator $|gamma'(s)|$^3 is not behaving well... Is there a reason that $gamma$ is arc length parameterized because $alpha(s)$ is? Otherwise, the donominator will be $1+3ks+3(ks)^2+(ks)^3$
$endgroup$
– user624065
Jan 22 at 21:28
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3082641%2fprove-that-the-planar-curve-obtained-by-projecting-alpha-into-its-osculating%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3082641%2fprove-that-the-planar-curve-obtained-by-projecting-alpha-into-its-osculating%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Where you say that the local projection into the osculating plane is given by $left(s, frac{kappa}{2}s^2 right)$, you should actually have the parameterization $(s + O(s^3), frac{kappa_0}{2}s^2 + O(s^3)$, where $kappa_0$ is the curvature of $s$ at $P$. In particular, $kappa_0$ is a constant and should not be differentiated. This will make the rest of the computations a lot simpler.
$endgroup$
– Sarah T.
Jan 22 at 1:36
$begingroup$
Incidentally, this is recognizably a problem from Ted Shifrin's differential geometry notes. I've edited to add a reference.
$endgroup$
– Sarah T.
Jan 22 at 1:41
$begingroup$
Okay cool. But since the parameterization is local, shouldn't we be able to ignore the higher order terms?
$endgroup$
– user624065
Jan 22 at 1:41
$begingroup$
Yes, higher order terms can be ignored.
$endgroup$
– Sarah T.
Jan 22 at 1:44
$begingroup$
Okay, if $gamma(s)=(s,frac{ks^2}{2})$ then I got that $gamma'(s) times gamma''(s)=kappa$. However, the denominator $|gamma'(s)|$^3 is not behaving well... Is there a reason that $gamma$ is arc length parameterized because $alpha(s)$ is? Otherwise, the donominator will be $1+3ks+3(ks)^2+(ks)^3$
$endgroup$
– user624065
Jan 22 at 21:28