Solution to a two-equations system.












0












$begingroup$


Consider the following system of two equations:



begin{cases}
delta = phi x^{phi-1}y^{1-phi} \ tag{1}
z = (1-phi)x^{phi}y^{-phi}
end{cases}



With $phi$ $in$ $(0,1)$.



To find the values $(x,y)$ that solve the system, I solve for $y$ in the first equation and obtain:



begin{equation}
y = Big(frac{delta}{phi}Big)^{frac{1}{1-phi}}xtag{2}
end{equation}



I then plug it in the second equation and obtain:



begin{equation}
z = (1-phi) Big(frac{delta}{phi}Big)^{frac{phi}{phi-1}} tag{3}
end{equation}



Where the unknowns cancel out. I have two related questions:



a) When equation (3) is satisfied, any combination of $(x,y)$ is a solution to the system. Correct?



b) When equation (3) is not satisfied, a solution does not exist. Correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Consider the following system of two equations:



    begin{cases}
    delta = phi x^{phi-1}y^{1-phi} \ tag{1}
    z = (1-phi)x^{phi}y^{-phi}
    end{cases}



    With $phi$ $in$ $(0,1)$.



    To find the values $(x,y)$ that solve the system, I solve for $y$ in the first equation and obtain:



    begin{equation}
    y = Big(frac{delta}{phi}Big)^{frac{1}{1-phi}}xtag{2}
    end{equation}



    I then plug it in the second equation and obtain:



    begin{equation}
    z = (1-phi) Big(frac{delta}{phi}Big)^{frac{phi}{phi-1}} tag{3}
    end{equation}



    Where the unknowns cancel out. I have two related questions:



    a) When equation (3) is satisfied, any combination of $(x,y)$ is a solution to the system. Correct?



    b) When equation (3) is not satisfied, a solution does not exist. Correct?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Consider the following system of two equations:



      begin{cases}
      delta = phi x^{phi-1}y^{1-phi} \ tag{1}
      z = (1-phi)x^{phi}y^{-phi}
      end{cases}



      With $phi$ $in$ $(0,1)$.



      To find the values $(x,y)$ that solve the system, I solve for $y$ in the first equation and obtain:



      begin{equation}
      y = Big(frac{delta}{phi}Big)^{frac{1}{1-phi}}xtag{2}
      end{equation}



      I then plug it in the second equation and obtain:



      begin{equation}
      z = (1-phi) Big(frac{delta}{phi}Big)^{frac{phi}{phi-1}} tag{3}
      end{equation}



      Where the unknowns cancel out. I have two related questions:



      a) When equation (3) is satisfied, any combination of $(x,y)$ is a solution to the system. Correct?



      b) When equation (3) is not satisfied, a solution does not exist. Correct?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Consider the following system of two equations:



      begin{cases}
      delta = phi x^{phi-1}y^{1-phi} \ tag{1}
      z = (1-phi)x^{phi}y^{-phi}
      end{cases}



      With $phi$ $in$ $(0,1)$.



      To find the values $(x,y)$ that solve the system, I solve for $y$ in the first equation and obtain:



      begin{equation}
      y = Big(frac{delta}{phi}Big)^{frac{1}{1-phi}}xtag{2}
      end{equation}



      I then plug it in the second equation and obtain:



      begin{equation}
      z = (1-phi) Big(frac{delta}{phi}Big)^{frac{phi}{phi-1}} tag{3}
      end{equation}



      Where the unknowns cancel out. I have two related questions:



      a) When equation (3) is satisfied, any combination of $(x,y)$ is a solution to the system. Correct?



      b) When equation (3) is not satisfied, a solution does not exist. Correct?







      algebra-precalculus proof-verification systems-of-equations






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 28 at 14:32







      Tecon

















      asked Jan 28 at 13:32









      TeconTecon

      174




      174






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          a) no.



          b) yes.



          The system is "degenerate" in the sense that the equations are both in terms of $dfrac xy$. If we set $t:=dfrac xy$,



          $$begin{cases}delta=phi t^{phi-1},\z=(1-phi)t^phi.end{cases}$$



          This is a system of two equations in a single unknown. An immediate solution is obtained by taking the ratio,



          $$t=frac{zphi}{delta(1-phi)}.$$ But for this solution to be correct, if needs to satisfy both equations, and a compatibility condition must be fulfilled. For instance, by eliminating $t$,



          $$left(fracdeltaphiright)^phi=left(frac z{1-phi}right)^{phi-1},$$ which is analogous to your equation 3).



          But, when the system is compatible, the solutions in $x,y$ are $y=tx$, where $x$ is arbitrary.



          [Not discussing the singular cases.]






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            @Tecon: what do you think ?
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            Jan 28 at 14:59










          • $begingroup$
            @Tecon $phi$ in $(0,1)$ has nothing special.
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            Jan 28 at 18:40





















          1












          $begingroup$

          Be careful, because the solution needs the restriction $phinotin{0,1}$.
          But you are right, that or $phinotin{0,1}$ the second equation doesn't depend on $x$ or $y$. But that doesn't mean that any $(x,y)$ solves the whole system. You just don't get further restrictions on the solution of $(x,y)$. So, all $(x,y)$ such that $(2)$ holds are your solution for the case $phinotin{0,1}$.
          But if $(3)$ leads to some contradition, then there are no solutions $(x,y)$ such that $(2)$ holds. Hence, there are no solutions if $phinotin{0,1}$.



          Finally, you still have to check the cases $phi=0$ and $phi=1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            After your comment I edited the question. $phi$ is actually bounded between 0 and 1. With the extremes excluded.
            $endgroup$
            – Tecon
            Jan 28 at 13:56










          • $begingroup$
            I don't see why the solution needs that restriction on $phi$. Can you, please, explain?
            $endgroup$
            – Tecon
            Jan 28 at 14:38






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Plug in $phi=0$ and $phi=1$ and you see what happens: The equations doesn't depend on $x$ and $y$ anymore.
            $endgroup$
            – Mundron Schmidt
            Jan 28 at 14:49










          • $begingroup$
            Ah ok. My bad I misread your comment. Thanks.
            $endgroup$
            – Tecon
            Jan 28 at 14:52












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3090859%2fsolution-to-a-two-equations-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          a) no.



          b) yes.



          The system is "degenerate" in the sense that the equations are both in terms of $dfrac xy$. If we set $t:=dfrac xy$,



          $$begin{cases}delta=phi t^{phi-1},\z=(1-phi)t^phi.end{cases}$$



          This is a system of two equations in a single unknown. An immediate solution is obtained by taking the ratio,



          $$t=frac{zphi}{delta(1-phi)}.$$ But for this solution to be correct, if needs to satisfy both equations, and a compatibility condition must be fulfilled. For instance, by eliminating $t$,



          $$left(fracdeltaphiright)^phi=left(frac z{1-phi}right)^{phi-1},$$ which is analogous to your equation 3).



          But, when the system is compatible, the solutions in $x,y$ are $y=tx$, where $x$ is arbitrary.



          [Not discussing the singular cases.]






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            @Tecon: what do you think ?
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            Jan 28 at 14:59










          • $begingroup$
            @Tecon $phi$ in $(0,1)$ has nothing special.
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            Jan 28 at 18:40


















          1












          $begingroup$

          a) no.



          b) yes.



          The system is "degenerate" in the sense that the equations are both in terms of $dfrac xy$. If we set $t:=dfrac xy$,



          $$begin{cases}delta=phi t^{phi-1},\z=(1-phi)t^phi.end{cases}$$



          This is a system of two equations in a single unknown. An immediate solution is obtained by taking the ratio,



          $$t=frac{zphi}{delta(1-phi)}.$$ But for this solution to be correct, if needs to satisfy both equations, and a compatibility condition must be fulfilled. For instance, by eliminating $t$,



          $$left(fracdeltaphiright)^phi=left(frac z{1-phi}right)^{phi-1},$$ which is analogous to your equation 3).



          But, when the system is compatible, the solutions in $x,y$ are $y=tx$, where $x$ is arbitrary.



          [Not discussing the singular cases.]






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            @Tecon: what do you think ?
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            Jan 28 at 14:59










          • $begingroup$
            @Tecon $phi$ in $(0,1)$ has nothing special.
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            Jan 28 at 18:40
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          a) no.



          b) yes.



          The system is "degenerate" in the sense that the equations are both in terms of $dfrac xy$. If we set $t:=dfrac xy$,



          $$begin{cases}delta=phi t^{phi-1},\z=(1-phi)t^phi.end{cases}$$



          This is a system of two equations in a single unknown. An immediate solution is obtained by taking the ratio,



          $$t=frac{zphi}{delta(1-phi)}.$$ But for this solution to be correct, if needs to satisfy both equations, and a compatibility condition must be fulfilled. For instance, by eliminating $t$,



          $$left(fracdeltaphiright)^phi=left(frac z{1-phi}right)^{phi-1},$$ which is analogous to your equation 3).



          But, when the system is compatible, the solutions in $x,y$ are $y=tx$, where $x$ is arbitrary.



          [Not discussing the singular cases.]






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          a) no.



          b) yes.



          The system is "degenerate" in the sense that the equations are both in terms of $dfrac xy$. If we set $t:=dfrac xy$,



          $$begin{cases}delta=phi t^{phi-1},\z=(1-phi)t^phi.end{cases}$$



          This is a system of two equations in a single unknown. An immediate solution is obtained by taking the ratio,



          $$t=frac{zphi}{delta(1-phi)}.$$ But for this solution to be correct, if needs to satisfy both equations, and a compatibility condition must be fulfilled. For instance, by eliminating $t$,



          $$left(fracdeltaphiright)^phi=left(frac z{1-phi}right)^{phi-1},$$ which is analogous to your equation 3).



          But, when the system is compatible, the solutions in $x,y$ are $y=tx$, where $x$ is arbitrary.



          [Not discussing the singular cases.]







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 28 at 13:47









          Yves DaoustYves Daoust

          131k676229




          131k676229












          • $begingroup$
            @Tecon: what do you think ?
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            Jan 28 at 14:59










          • $begingroup$
            @Tecon $phi$ in $(0,1)$ has nothing special.
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            Jan 28 at 18:40




















          • $begingroup$
            @Tecon: what do you think ?
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            Jan 28 at 14:59










          • $begingroup$
            @Tecon $phi$ in $(0,1)$ has nothing special.
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            Jan 28 at 18:40


















          $begingroup$
          @Tecon: what do you think ?
          $endgroup$
          – Yves Daoust
          Jan 28 at 14:59




          $begingroup$
          @Tecon: what do you think ?
          $endgroup$
          – Yves Daoust
          Jan 28 at 14:59












          $begingroup$
          @Tecon $phi$ in $(0,1)$ has nothing special.
          $endgroup$
          – Yves Daoust
          Jan 28 at 18:40






          $begingroup$
          @Tecon $phi$ in $(0,1)$ has nothing special.
          $endgroup$
          – Yves Daoust
          Jan 28 at 18:40













          1












          $begingroup$

          Be careful, because the solution needs the restriction $phinotin{0,1}$.
          But you are right, that or $phinotin{0,1}$ the second equation doesn't depend on $x$ or $y$. But that doesn't mean that any $(x,y)$ solves the whole system. You just don't get further restrictions on the solution of $(x,y)$. So, all $(x,y)$ such that $(2)$ holds are your solution for the case $phinotin{0,1}$.
          But if $(3)$ leads to some contradition, then there are no solutions $(x,y)$ such that $(2)$ holds. Hence, there are no solutions if $phinotin{0,1}$.



          Finally, you still have to check the cases $phi=0$ and $phi=1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            After your comment I edited the question. $phi$ is actually bounded between 0 and 1. With the extremes excluded.
            $endgroup$
            – Tecon
            Jan 28 at 13:56










          • $begingroup$
            I don't see why the solution needs that restriction on $phi$. Can you, please, explain?
            $endgroup$
            – Tecon
            Jan 28 at 14:38






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Plug in $phi=0$ and $phi=1$ and you see what happens: The equations doesn't depend on $x$ and $y$ anymore.
            $endgroup$
            – Mundron Schmidt
            Jan 28 at 14:49










          • $begingroup$
            Ah ok. My bad I misread your comment. Thanks.
            $endgroup$
            – Tecon
            Jan 28 at 14:52
















          1












          $begingroup$

          Be careful, because the solution needs the restriction $phinotin{0,1}$.
          But you are right, that or $phinotin{0,1}$ the second equation doesn't depend on $x$ or $y$. But that doesn't mean that any $(x,y)$ solves the whole system. You just don't get further restrictions on the solution of $(x,y)$. So, all $(x,y)$ such that $(2)$ holds are your solution for the case $phinotin{0,1}$.
          But if $(3)$ leads to some contradition, then there are no solutions $(x,y)$ such that $(2)$ holds. Hence, there are no solutions if $phinotin{0,1}$.



          Finally, you still have to check the cases $phi=0$ and $phi=1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            After your comment I edited the question. $phi$ is actually bounded between 0 and 1. With the extremes excluded.
            $endgroup$
            – Tecon
            Jan 28 at 13:56










          • $begingroup$
            I don't see why the solution needs that restriction on $phi$. Can you, please, explain?
            $endgroup$
            – Tecon
            Jan 28 at 14:38






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Plug in $phi=0$ and $phi=1$ and you see what happens: The equations doesn't depend on $x$ and $y$ anymore.
            $endgroup$
            – Mundron Schmidt
            Jan 28 at 14:49










          • $begingroup$
            Ah ok. My bad I misread your comment. Thanks.
            $endgroup$
            – Tecon
            Jan 28 at 14:52














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Be careful, because the solution needs the restriction $phinotin{0,1}$.
          But you are right, that or $phinotin{0,1}$ the second equation doesn't depend on $x$ or $y$. But that doesn't mean that any $(x,y)$ solves the whole system. You just don't get further restrictions on the solution of $(x,y)$. So, all $(x,y)$ such that $(2)$ holds are your solution for the case $phinotin{0,1}$.
          But if $(3)$ leads to some contradition, then there are no solutions $(x,y)$ such that $(2)$ holds. Hence, there are no solutions if $phinotin{0,1}$.



          Finally, you still have to check the cases $phi=0$ and $phi=1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Be careful, because the solution needs the restriction $phinotin{0,1}$.
          But you are right, that or $phinotin{0,1}$ the second equation doesn't depend on $x$ or $y$. But that doesn't mean that any $(x,y)$ solves the whole system. You just don't get further restrictions on the solution of $(x,y)$. So, all $(x,y)$ such that $(2)$ holds are your solution for the case $phinotin{0,1}$.
          But if $(3)$ leads to some contradition, then there are no solutions $(x,y)$ such that $(2)$ holds. Hence, there are no solutions if $phinotin{0,1}$.



          Finally, you still have to check the cases $phi=0$ and $phi=1$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 28 at 13:45









          Mundron SchmidtMundron Schmidt

          7,5042729




          7,5042729












          • $begingroup$
            After your comment I edited the question. $phi$ is actually bounded between 0 and 1. With the extremes excluded.
            $endgroup$
            – Tecon
            Jan 28 at 13:56










          • $begingroup$
            I don't see why the solution needs that restriction on $phi$. Can you, please, explain?
            $endgroup$
            – Tecon
            Jan 28 at 14:38






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Plug in $phi=0$ and $phi=1$ and you see what happens: The equations doesn't depend on $x$ and $y$ anymore.
            $endgroup$
            – Mundron Schmidt
            Jan 28 at 14:49










          • $begingroup$
            Ah ok. My bad I misread your comment. Thanks.
            $endgroup$
            – Tecon
            Jan 28 at 14:52


















          • $begingroup$
            After your comment I edited the question. $phi$ is actually bounded between 0 and 1. With the extremes excluded.
            $endgroup$
            – Tecon
            Jan 28 at 13:56










          • $begingroup$
            I don't see why the solution needs that restriction on $phi$. Can you, please, explain?
            $endgroup$
            – Tecon
            Jan 28 at 14:38






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Plug in $phi=0$ and $phi=1$ and you see what happens: The equations doesn't depend on $x$ and $y$ anymore.
            $endgroup$
            – Mundron Schmidt
            Jan 28 at 14:49










          • $begingroup$
            Ah ok. My bad I misread your comment. Thanks.
            $endgroup$
            – Tecon
            Jan 28 at 14:52
















          $begingroup$
          After your comment I edited the question. $phi$ is actually bounded between 0 and 1. With the extremes excluded.
          $endgroup$
          – Tecon
          Jan 28 at 13:56




          $begingroup$
          After your comment I edited the question. $phi$ is actually bounded between 0 and 1. With the extremes excluded.
          $endgroup$
          – Tecon
          Jan 28 at 13:56












          $begingroup$
          I don't see why the solution needs that restriction on $phi$. Can you, please, explain?
          $endgroup$
          – Tecon
          Jan 28 at 14:38




          $begingroup$
          I don't see why the solution needs that restriction on $phi$. Can you, please, explain?
          $endgroup$
          – Tecon
          Jan 28 at 14:38




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Plug in $phi=0$ and $phi=1$ and you see what happens: The equations doesn't depend on $x$ and $y$ anymore.
          $endgroup$
          – Mundron Schmidt
          Jan 28 at 14:49




          $begingroup$
          Plug in $phi=0$ and $phi=1$ and you see what happens: The equations doesn't depend on $x$ and $y$ anymore.
          $endgroup$
          – Mundron Schmidt
          Jan 28 at 14:49












          $begingroup$
          Ah ok. My bad I misread your comment. Thanks.
          $endgroup$
          – Tecon
          Jan 28 at 14:52




          $begingroup$
          Ah ok. My bad I misread your comment. Thanks.
          $endgroup$
          – Tecon
          Jan 28 at 14:52


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3090859%2fsolution-to-a-two-equations-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

          Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory

          in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith