Solution to a two-equations system.
$begingroup$
Consider the following system of two equations:
begin{cases}
delta = phi x^{phi-1}y^{1-phi} \ tag{1}
z = (1-phi)x^{phi}y^{-phi}
end{cases}
With $phi$ $in$ $(0,1)$.
To find the values $(x,y)$ that solve the system, I solve for $y$ in the first equation and obtain:
begin{equation}
y = Big(frac{delta}{phi}Big)^{frac{1}{1-phi}}xtag{2}
end{equation}
I then plug it in the second equation and obtain:
begin{equation}
z = (1-phi) Big(frac{delta}{phi}Big)^{frac{phi}{phi-1}} tag{3}
end{equation}
Where the unknowns cancel out. I have two related questions:
a) When equation (3) is satisfied, any combination of $(x,y)$ is a solution to the system. Correct?
b) When equation (3) is not satisfied, a solution does not exist. Correct?
algebra-precalculus proof-verification systems-of-equations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the following system of two equations:
begin{cases}
delta = phi x^{phi-1}y^{1-phi} \ tag{1}
z = (1-phi)x^{phi}y^{-phi}
end{cases}
With $phi$ $in$ $(0,1)$.
To find the values $(x,y)$ that solve the system, I solve for $y$ in the first equation and obtain:
begin{equation}
y = Big(frac{delta}{phi}Big)^{frac{1}{1-phi}}xtag{2}
end{equation}
I then plug it in the second equation and obtain:
begin{equation}
z = (1-phi) Big(frac{delta}{phi}Big)^{frac{phi}{phi-1}} tag{3}
end{equation}
Where the unknowns cancel out. I have two related questions:
a) When equation (3) is satisfied, any combination of $(x,y)$ is a solution to the system. Correct?
b) When equation (3) is not satisfied, a solution does not exist. Correct?
algebra-precalculus proof-verification systems-of-equations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the following system of two equations:
begin{cases}
delta = phi x^{phi-1}y^{1-phi} \ tag{1}
z = (1-phi)x^{phi}y^{-phi}
end{cases}
With $phi$ $in$ $(0,1)$.
To find the values $(x,y)$ that solve the system, I solve for $y$ in the first equation and obtain:
begin{equation}
y = Big(frac{delta}{phi}Big)^{frac{1}{1-phi}}xtag{2}
end{equation}
I then plug it in the second equation and obtain:
begin{equation}
z = (1-phi) Big(frac{delta}{phi}Big)^{frac{phi}{phi-1}} tag{3}
end{equation}
Where the unknowns cancel out. I have two related questions:
a) When equation (3) is satisfied, any combination of $(x,y)$ is a solution to the system. Correct?
b) When equation (3) is not satisfied, a solution does not exist. Correct?
algebra-precalculus proof-verification systems-of-equations
$endgroup$
Consider the following system of two equations:
begin{cases}
delta = phi x^{phi-1}y^{1-phi} \ tag{1}
z = (1-phi)x^{phi}y^{-phi}
end{cases}
With $phi$ $in$ $(0,1)$.
To find the values $(x,y)$ that solve the system, I solve for $y$ in the first equation and obtain:
begin{equation}
y = Big(frac{delta}{phi}Big)^{frac{1}{1-phi}}xtag{2}
end{equation}
I then plug it in the second equation and obtain:
begin{equation}
z = (1-phi) Big(frac{delta}{phi}Big)^{frac{phi}{phi-1}} tag{3}
end{equation}
Where the unknowns cancel out. I have two related questions:
a) When equation (3) is satisfied, any combination of $(x,y)$ is a solution to the system. Correct?
b) When equation (3) is not satisfied, a solution does not exist. Correct?
algebra-precalculus proof-verification systems-of-equations
algebra-precalculus proof-verification systems-of-equations
edited Jan 28 at 14:32
Tecon
asked Jan 28 at 13:32
TeconTecon
174
174
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
a) no.
b) yes.
The system is "degenerate" in the sense that the equations are both in terms of $dfrac xy$. If we set $t:=dfrac xy$,
$$begin{cases}delta=phi t^{phi-1},\z=(1-phi)t^phi.end{cases}$$
This is a system of two equations in a single unknown. An immediate solution is obtained by taking the ratio,
$$t=frac{zphi}{delta(1-phi)}.$$ But for this solution to be correct, if needs to satisfy both equations, and a compatibility condition must be fulfilled. For instance, by eliminating $t$,
$$left(fracdeltaphiright)^phi=left(frac z{1-phi}right)^{phi-1},$$ which is analogous to your equation 3).
But, when the system is compatible, the solutions in $x,y$ are $y=tx$, where $x$ is arbitrary.
[Not discussing the singular cases.]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@Tecon: what do you think ?
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 28 at 14:59
$begingroup$
@Tecon $phi$ in $(0,1)$ has nothing special.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 28 at 18:40
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Be careful, because the solution needs the restriction $phinotin{0,1}$.
But you are right, that or $phinotin{0,1}$ the second equation doesn't depend on $x$ or $y$. But that doesn't mean that any $(x,y)$ solves the whole system. You just don't get further restrictions on the solution of $(x,y)$. So, all $(x,y)$ such that $(2)$ holds are your solution for the case $phinotin{0,1}$.
But if $(3)$ leads to some contradition, then there are no solutions $(x,y)$ such that $(2)$ holds. Hence, there are no solutions if $phinotin{0,1}$.
Finally, you still have to check the cases $phi=0$ and $phi=1$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
After your comment I edited the question. $phi$ is actually bounded between 0 and 1. With the extremes excluded.
$endgroup$
– Tecon
Jan 28 at 13:56
$begingroup$
I don't see why the solution needs that restriction on $phi$. Can you, please, explain?
$endgroup$
– Tecon
Jan 28 at 14:38
1
$begingroup$
Plug in $phi=0$ and $phi=1$ and you see what happens: The equations doesn't depend on $x$ and $y$ anymore.
$endgroup$
– Mundron Schmidt
Jan 28 at 14:49
$begingroup$
Ah ok. My bad I misread your comment. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Tecon
Jan 28 at 14:52
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3090859%2fsolution-to-a-two-equations-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
a) no.
b) yes.
The system is "degenerate" in the sense that the equations are both in terms of $dfrac xy$. If we set $t:=dfrac xy$,
$$begin{cases}delta=phi t^{phi-1},\z=(1-phi)t^phi.end{cases}$$
This is a system of two equations in a single unknown. An immediate solution is obtained by taking the ratio,
$$t=frac{zphi}{delta(1-phi)}.$$ But for this solution to be correct, if needs to satisfy both equations, and a compatibility condition must be fulfilled. For instance, by eliminating $t$,
$$left(fracdeltaphiright)^phi=left(frac z{1-phi}right)^{phi-1},$$ which is analogous to your equation 3).
But, when the system is compatible, the solutions in $x,y$ are $y=tx$, where $x$ is arbitrary.
[Not discussing the singular cases.]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@Tecon: what do you think ?
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 28 at 14:59
$begingroup$
@Tecon $phi$ in $(0,1)$ has nothing special.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 28 at 18:40
add a comment |
$begingroup$
a) no.
b) yes.
The system is "degenerate" in the sense that the equations are both in terms of $dfrac xy$. If we set $t:=dfrac xy$,
$$begin{cases}delta=phi t^{phi-1},\z=(1-phi)t^phi.end{cases}$$
This is a system of two equations in a single unknown. An immediate solution is obtained by taking the ratio,
$$t=frac{zphi}{delta(1-phi)}.$$ But for this solution to be correct, if needs to satisfy both equations, and a compatibility condition must be fulfilled. For instance, by eliminating $t$,
$$left(fracdeltaphiright)^phi=left(frac z{1-phi}right)^{phi-1},$$ which is analogous to your equation 3).
But, when the system is compatible, the solutions in $x,y$ are $y=tx$, where $x$ is arbitrary.
[Not discussing the singular cases.]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@Tecon: what do you think ?
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 28 at 14:59
$begingroup$
@Tecon $phi$ in $(0,1)$ has nothing special.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 28 at 18:40
add a comment |
$begingroup$
a) no.
b) yes.
The system is "degenerate" in the sense that the equations are both in terms of $dfrac xy$. If we set $t:=dfrac xy$,
$$begin{cases}delta=phi t^{phi-1},\z=(1-phi)t^phi.end{cases}$$
This is a system of two equations in a single unknown. An immediate solution is obtained by taking the ratio,
$$t=frac{zphi}{delta(1-phi)}.$$ But for this solution to be correct, if needs to satisfy both equations, and a compatibility condition must be fulfilled. For instance, by eliminating $t$,
$$left(fracdeltaphiright)^phi=left(frac z{1-phi}right)^{phi-1},$$ which is analogous to your equation 3).
But, when the system is compatible, the solutions in $x,y$ are $y=tx$, where $x$ is arbitrary.
[Not discussing the singular cases.]
$endgroup$
a) no.
b) yes.
The system is "degenerate" in the sense that the equations are both in terms of $dfrac xy$. If we set $t:=dfrac xy$,
$$begin{cases}delta=phi t^{phi-1},\z=(1-phi)t^phi.end{cases}$$
This is a system of two equations in a single unknown. An immediate solution is obtained by taking the ratio,
$$t=frac{zphi}{delta(1-phi)}.$$ But for this solution to be correct, if needs to satisfy both equations, and a compatibility condition must be fulfilled. For instance, by eliminating $t$,
$$left(fracdeltaphiright)^phi=left(frac z{1-phi}right)^{phi-1},$$ which is analogous to your equation 3).
But, when the system is compatible, the solutions in $x,y$ are $y=tx$, where $x$ is arbitrary.
[Not discussing the singular cases.]
answered Jan 28 at 13:47
Yves DaoustYves Daoust
131k676229
131k676229
$begingroup$
@Tecon: what do you think ?
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 28 at 14:59
$begingroup$
@Tecon $phi$ in $(0,1)$ has nothing special.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 28 at 18:40
add a comment |
$begingroup$
@Tecon: what do you think ?
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 28 at 14:59
$begingroup$
@Tecon $phi$ in $(0,1)$ has nothing special.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 28 at 18:40
$begingroup$
@Tecon: what do you think ?
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 28 at 14:59
$begingroup$
@Tecon: what do you think ?
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 28 at 14:59
$begingroup$
@Tecon $phi$ in $(0,1)$ has nothing special.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 28 at 18:40
$begingroup$
@Tecon $phi$ in $(0,1)$ has nothing special.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Jan 28 at 18:40
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Be careful, because the solution needs the restriction $phinotin{0,1}$.
But you are right, that or $phinotin{0,1}$ the second equation doesn't depend on $x$ or $y$. But that doesn't mean that any $(x,y)$ solves the whole system. You just don't get further restrictions on the solution of $(x,y)$. So, all $(x,y)$ such that $(2)$ holds are your solution for the case $phinotin{0,1}$.
But if $(3)$ leads to some contradition, then there are no solutions $(x,y)$ such that $(2)$ holds. Hence, there are no solutions if $phinotin{0,1}$.
Finally, you still have to check the cases $phi=0$ and $phi=1$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
After your comment I edited the question. $phi$ is actually bounded between 0 and 1. With the extremes excluded.
$endgroup$
– Tecon
Jan 28 at 13:56
$begingroup$
I don't see why the solution needs that restriction on $phi$. Can you, please, explain?
$endgroup$
– Tecon
Jan 28 at 14:38
1
$begingroup$
Plug in $phi=0$ and $phi=1$ and you see what happens: The equations doesn't depend on $x$ and $y$ anymore.
$endgroup$
– Mundron Schmidt
Jan 28 at 14:49
$begingroup$
Ah ok. My bad I misread your comment. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Tecon
Jan 28 at 14:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Be careful, because the solution needs the restriction $phinotin{0,1}$.
But you are right, that or $phinotin{0,1}$ the second equation doesn't depend on $x$ or $y$. But that doesn't mean that any $(x,y)$ solves the whole system. You just don't get further restrictions on the solution of $(x,y)$. So, all $(x,y)$ such that $(2)$ holds are your solution for the case $phinotin{0,1}$.
But if $(3)$ leads to some contradition, then there are no solutions $(x,y)$ such that $(2)$ holds. Hence, there are no solutions if $phinotin{0,1}$.
Finally, you still have to check the cases $phi=0$ and $phi=1$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
After your comment I edited the question. $phi$ is actually bounded between 0 and 1. With the extremes excluded.
$endgroup$
– Tecon
Jan 28 at 13:56
$begingroup$
I don't see why the solution needs that restriction on $phi$. Can you, please, explain?
$endgroup$
– Tecon
Jan 28 at 14:38
1
$begingroup$
Plug in $phi=0$ and $phi=1$ and you see what happens: The equations doesn't depend on $x$ and $y$ anymore.
$endgroup$
– Mundron Schmidt
Jan 28 at 14:49
$begingroup$
Ah ok. My bad I misread your comment. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Tecon
Jan 28 at 14:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Be careful, because the solution needs the restriction $phinotin{0,1}$.
But you are right, that or $phinotin{0,1}$ the second equation doesn't depend on $x$ or $y$. But that doesn't mean that any $(x,y)$ solves the whole system. You just don't get further restrictions on the solution of $(x,y)$. So, all $(x,y)$ such that $(2)$ holds are your solution for the case $phinotin{0,1}$.
But if $(3)$ leads to some contradition, then there are no solutions $(x,y)$ such that $(2)$ holds. Hence, there are no solutions if $phinotin{0,1}$.
Finally, you still have to check the cases $phi=0$ and $phi=1$.
$endgroup$
Be careful, because the solution needs the restriction $phinotin{0,1}$.
But you are right, that or $phinotin{0,1}$ the second equation doesn't depend on $x$ or $y$. But that doesn't mean that any $(x,y)$ solves the whole system. You just don't get further restrictions on the solution of $(x,y)$. So, all $(x,y)$ such that $(2)$ holds are your solution for the case $phinotin{0,1}$.
But if $(3)$ leads to some contradition, then there are no solutions $(x,y)$ such that $(2)$ holds. Hence, there are no solutions if $phinotin{0,1}$.
Finally, you still have to check the cases $phi=0$ and $phi=1$.
answered Jan 28 at 13:45
Mundron SchmidtMundron Schmidt
7,5042729
7,5042729
$begingroup$
After your comment I edited the question. $phi$ is actually bounded between 0 and 1. With the extremes excluded.
$endgroup$
– Tecon
Jan 28 at 13:56
$begingroup$
I don't see why the solution needs that restriction on $phi$. Can you, please, explain?
$endgroup$
– Tecon
Jan 28 at 14:38
1
$begingroup$
Plug in $phi=0$ and $phi=1$ and you see what happens: The equations doesn't depend on $x$ and $y$ anymore.
$endgroup$
– Mundron Schmidt
Jan 28 at 14:49
$begingroup$
Ah ok. My bad I misread your comment. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Tecon
Jan 28 at 14:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
After your comment I edited the question. $phi$ is actually bounded between 0 and 1. With the extremes excluded.
$endgroup$
– Tecon
Jan 28 at 13:56
$begingroup$
I don't see why the solution needs that restriction on $phi$. Can you, please, explain?
$endgroup$
– Tecon
Jan 28 at 14:38
1
$begingroup$
Plug in $phi=0$ and $phi=1$ and you see what happens: The equations doesn't depend on $x$ and $y$ anymore.
$endgroup$
– Mundron Schmidt
Jan 28 at 14:49
$begingroup$
Ah ok. My bad I misread your comment. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Tecon
Jan 28 at 14:52
$begingroup$
After your comment I edited the question. $phi$ is actually bounded between 0 and 1. With the extremes excluded.
$endgroup$
– Tecon
Jan 28 at 13:56
$begingroup$
After your comment I edited the question. $phi$ is actually bounded between 0 and 1. With the extremes excluded.
$endgroup$
– Tecon
Jan 28 at 13:56
$begingroup$
I don't see why the solution needs that restriction on $phi$. Can you, please, explain?
$endgroup$
– Tecon
Jan 28 at 14:38
$begingroup$
I don't see why the solution needs that restriction on $phi$. Can you, please, explain?
$endgroup$
– Tecon
Jan 28 at 14:38
1
1
$begingroup$
Plug in $phi=0$ and $phi=1$ and you see what happens: The equations doesn't depend on $x$ and $y$ anymore.
$endgroup$
– Mundron Schmidt
Jan 28 at 14:49
$begingroup$
Plug in $phi=0$ and $phi=1$ and you see what happens: The equations doesn't depend on $x$ and $y$ anymore.
$endgroup$
– Mundron Schmidt
Jan 28 at 14:49
$begingroup$
Ah ok. My bad I misread your comment. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Tecon
Jan 28 at 14:52
$begingroup$
Ah ok. My bad I misread your comment. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Tecon
Jan 28 at 14:52
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3090859%2fsolution-to-a-two-equations-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown