When should I use git pull --rebase instead of git pull?












0















I have a local commit [A] and a branch which points at commit [B]. I need to pull changes before pushing the commit.



Scenario 1:




Changes of commit [A] do not affect anything changed on commit [B]




git pull should be fine, pull should not overwrite anything. Same for using git pull --rebase.



Scenario 2:




Changes of commit [A] and commit [B] affect the same file




git pull should be fine, git should automerge everything. Same for using git pull --rebase.



Scenario 3:




Changes (or deletions) of commit [A] and commit [B] affect the lines of code.




git pull results into merge conflicts which I need to remove manually. Same for using git pull --rebase.



Am I wrong? In which cases I need to use git pull --rebase ? If you pull changes you need to rebase the commit anyway, either by auto merge, no merge or solving merge conflicts.










share|improve this question























  • stackoverflow.com/questions/2472254/…

    – phd
    Jan 2 at 20:37











  • stackoverflow.com/questions/18930527/…

    – phd
    Jan 2 at 20:38











  • stackoverflow.com/…

    – phd
    Jan 2 at 20:38











  • I almost got it, could you post at least one more?

    – elp
    Jan 2 at 21:31
















0















I have a local commit [A] and a branch which points at commit [B]. I need to pull changes before pushing the commit.



Scenario 1:




Changes of commit [A] do not affect anything changed on commit [B]




git pull should be fine, pull should not overwrite anything. Same for using git pull --rebase.



Scenario 2:




Changes of commit [A] and commit [B] affect the same file




git pull should be fine, git should automerge everything. Same for using git pull --rebase.



Scenario 3:




Changes (or deletions) of commit [A] and commit [B] affect the lines of code.




git pull results into merge conflicts which I need to remove manually. Same for using git pull --rebase.



Am I wrong? In which cases I need to use git pull --rebase ? If you pull changes you need to rebase the commit anyway, either by auto merge, no merge or solving merge conflicts.










share|improve this question























  • stackoverflow.com/questions/2472254/…

    – phd
    Jan 2 at 20:37











  • stackoverflow.com/questions/18930527/…

    – phd
    Jan 2 at 20:38











  • stackoverflow.com/…

    – phd
    Jan 2 at 20:38











  • I almost got it, could you post at least one more?

    – elp
    Jan 2 at 21:31














0












0








0








I have a local commit [A] and a branch which points at commit [B]. I need to pull changes before pushing the commit.



Scenario 1:




Changes of commit [A] do not affect anything changed on commit [B]




git pull should be fine, pull should not overwrite anything. Same for using git pull --rebase.



Scenario 2:




Changes of commit [A] and commit [B] affect the same file




git pull should be fine, git should automerge everything. Same for using git pull --rebase.



Scenario 3:




Changes (or deletions) of commit [A] and commit [B] affect the lines of code.




git pull results into merge conflicts which I need to remove manually. Same for using git pull --rebase.



Am I wrong? In which cases I need to use git pull --rebase ? If you pull changes you need to rebase the commit anyway, either by auto merge, no merge or solving merge conflicts.










share|improve this question














I have a local commit [A] and a branch which points at commit [B]. I need to pull changes before pushing the commit.



Scenario 1:




Changes of commit [A] do not affect anything changed on commit [B]




git pull should be fine, pull should not overwrite anything. Same for using git pull --rebase.



Scenario 2:




Changes of commit [A] and commit [B] affect the same file




git pull should be fine, git should automerge everything. Same for using git pull --rebase.



Scenario 3:




Changes (or deletions) of commit [A] and commit [B] affect the lines of code.




git pull results into merge conflicts which I need to remove manually. Same for using git pull --rebase.



Am I wrong? In which cases I need to use git pull --rebase ? If you pull changes you need to rebase the commit anyway, either by auto merge, no merge or solving merge conflicts.







git






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jan 2 at 20:10









elpelp

364116




364116













  • stackoverflow.com/questions/2472254/…

    – phd
    Jan 2 at 20:37











  • stackoverflow.com/questions/18930527/…

    – phd
    Jan 2 at 20:38











  • stackoverflow.com/…

    – phd
    Jan 2 at 20:38











  • I almost got it, could you post at least one more?

    – elp
    Jan 2 at 21:31



















  • stackoverflow.com/questions/2472254/…

    – phd
    Jan 2 at 20:37











  • stackoverflow.com/questions/18930527/…

    – phd
    Jan 2 at 20:38











  • stackoverflow.com/…

    – phd
    Jan 2 at 20:38











  • I almost got it, could you post at least one more?

    – elp
    Jan 2 at 21:31

















stackoverflow.com/questions/2472254/…

– phd
Jan 2 at 20:37





stackoverflow.com/questions/2472254/…

– phd
Jan 2 at 20:37













stackoverflow.com/questions/18930527/…

– phd
Jan 2 at 20:38





stackoverflow.com/questions/18930527/…

– phd
Jan 2 at 20:38













stackoverflow.com/…

– phd
Jan 2 at 20:38





stackoverflow.com/…

– phd
Jan 2 at 20:38













I almost got it, could you post at least one more?

– elp
Jan 2 at 21:31





I almost got it, could you post at least one more?

– elp
Jan 2 at 21:31












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














You can use git pull --rebase in all three cases. However, in the scenarios 2 and 3, you will have a new merge commit. The message will say that you are merging Branch 'foo' into branch 'foo' and with branches that have a lot of changes can make the history really confusing. Using git pull --rebase will not have these merge commits and will show a fairly straight forward history in the git log.






share|improve this answer
























  • Good point! Thank you, that makes sense :)

    – elp
    Jan 2 at 20:17












Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54012539%2fwhen-should-i-use-git-pull-rebase-instead-of-git-pull%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














You can use git pull --rebase in all three cases. However, in the scenarios 2 and 3, you will have a new merge commit. The message will say that you are merging Branch 'foo' into branch 'foo' and with branches that have a lot of changes can make the history really confusing. Using git pull --rebase will not have these merge commits and will show a fairly straight forward history in the git log.






share|improve this answer
























  • Good point! Thank you, that makes sense :)

    – elp
    Jan 2 at 20:17
















1














You can use git pull --rebase in all three cases. However, in the scenarios 2 and 3, you will have a new merge commit. The message will say that you are merging Branch 'foo' into branch 'foo' and with branches that have a lot of changes can make the history really confusing. Using git pull --rebase will not have these merge commits and will show a fairly straight forward history in the git log.






share|improve this answer
























  • Good point! Thank you, that makes sense :)

    – elp
    Jan 2 at 20:17














1












1








1







You can use git pull --rebase in all three cases. However, in the scenarios 2 and 3, you will have a new merge commit. The message will say that you are merging Branch 'foo' into branch 'foo' and with branches that have a lot of changes can make the history really confusing. Using git pull --rebase will not have these merge commits and will show a fairly straight forward history in the git log.






share|improve this answer













You can use git pull --rebase in all three cases. However, in the scenarios 2 and 3, you will have a new merge commit. The message will say that you are merging Branch 'foo' into branch 'foo' and with branches that have a lot of changes can make the history really confusing. Using git pull --rebase will not have these merge commits and will show a fairly straight forward history in the git log.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Jan 2 at 20:15









SchleisSchleis

25.9k34974




25.9k34974













  • Good point! Thank you, that makes sense :)

    – elp
    Jan 2 at 20:17



















  • Good point! Thank you, that makes sense :)

    – elp
    Jan 2 at 20:17

















Good point! Thank you, that makes sense :)

– elp
Jan 2 at 20:17





Good point! Thank you, that makes sense :)

– elp
Jan 2 at 20:17




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54012539%2fwhen-should-i-use-git-pull-rebase-instead-of-git-pull%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith