A straight line is fit to a data set (ln x, y). This line intercepts the abscissa at ln x = 0.1 and with...
$begingroup$
A straight line is fit to a data set $(ln x, y)$. This line intercepts the abscissa at $ln x = 0.1$ and has a slope of $−0.02$. What is the value of $y$ at $x = 5$ from the fit?
I can not understand what is asking in this problem .
Can anyone please help me to understand?
numerical-methods analytic-geometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A straight line is fit to a data set $(ln x, y)$. This line intercepts the abscissa at $ln x = 0.1$ and has a slope of $−0.02$. What is the value of $y$ at $x = 5$ from the fit?
I can not understand what is asking in this problem .
Can anyone please help me to understand?
numerical-methods analytic-geometry
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
For clarity, let's set $t=ln{x}$. So we assume $y=y(t)$ and that it's a linear relationship, $y=at+b$. We also know that it crosses the abscissa at $t=0.1$, in other words $y(t=0.1) = 0$ or $atimes 0.1 + b = 0$. So we have one equation for the coefficients $a$ and $b$. How would you form the second equation?
$endgroup$
– Matti P.
Feb 1 at 7:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A straight line is fit to a data set $(ln x, y)$. This line intercepts the abscissa at $ln x = 0.1$ and has a slope of $−0.02$. What is the value of $y$ at $x = 5$ from the fit?
I can not understand what is asking in this problem .
Can anyone please help me to understand?
numerical-methods analytic-geometry
$endgroup$
A straight line is fit to a data set $(ln x, y)$. This line intercepts the abscissa at $ln x = 0.1$ and has a slope of $−0.02$. What is the value of $y$ at $x = 5$ from the fit?
I can not understand what is asking in this problem .
Can anyone please help me to understand?
numerical-methods analytic-geometry
numerical-methods analytic-geometry
asked Feb 1 at 6:58


sanisani
216211
216211
$begingroup$
For clarity, let's set $t=ln{x}$. So we assume $y=y(t)$ and that it's a linear relationship, $y=at+b$. We also know that it crosses the abscissa at $t=0.1$, in other words $y(t=0.1) = 0$ or $atimes 0.1 + b = 0$. So we have one equation for the coefficients $a$ and $b$. How would you form the second equation?
$endgroup$
– Matti P.
Feb 1 at 7:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For clarity, let's set $t=ln{x}$. So we assume $y=y(t)$ and that it's a linear relationship, $y=at+b$. We also know that it crosses the abscissa at $t=0.1$, in other words $y(t=0.1) = 0$ or $atimes 0.1 + b = 0$. So we have one equation for the coefficients $a$ and $b$. How would you form the second equation?
$endgroup$
– Matti P.
Feb 1 at 7:02
$begingroup$
For clarity, let's set $t=ln{x}$. So we assume $y=y(t)$ and that it's a linear relationship, $y=at+b$. We also know that it crosses the abscissa at $t=0.1$, in other words $y(t=0.1) = 0$ or $atimes 0.1 + b = 0$. So we have one equation for the coefficients $a$ and $b$. How would you form the second equation?
$endgroup$
– Matti P.
Feb 1 at 7:02
$begingroup$
For clarity, let's set $t=ln{x}$. So we assume $y=y(t)$ and that it's a linear relationship, $y=at+b$. We also know that it crosses the abscissa at $t=0.1$, in other words $y(t=0.1) = 0$ or $atimes 0.1 + b = 0$. So we have one equation for the coefficients $a$ and $b$. How would you form the second equation?
$endgroup$
– Matti P.
Feb 1 at 7:02
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
y and lnx have a linear relationship.
Let lnx=t then y=y(t).Therefore y=mt+c———>1
Given that the line has an x intercept at lnx=0.1(y=0).
Using 1,
$$0=m(0.1)+c$$
Implies,
$$c=-0.1m——->2$$.
Given that the slope is -0.02 which means that m=-0.02.
From 2,
$$c=-0.1(-0.02)$$
$$c=0.002$$
Therefore the line equation has to be
$$y=-0.02t+0.002$$
i.e,
$$y=-0.02lnx+0.002$$
Therefore when x=5
$$y=-0.02ln5+0.002$$
$$yapprox-0.0301$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3095909%2fa-straight-line-is-fit-to-a-data-set-ln-x-y-this-line-intercepts-the-absciss%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
y and lnx have a linear relationship.
Let lnx=t then y=y(t).Therefore y=mt+c———>1
Given that the line has an x intercept at lnx=0.1(y=0).
Using 1,
$$0=m(0.1)+c$$
Implies,
$$c=-0.1m——->2$$.
Given that the slope is -0.02 which means that m=-0.02.
From 2,
$$c=-0.1(-0.02)$$
$$c=0.002$$
Therefore the line equation has to be
$$y=-0.02t+0.002$$
i.e,
$$y=-0.02lnx+0.002$$
Therefore when x=5
$$y=-0.02ln5+0.002$$
$$yapprox-0.0301$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
y and lnx have a linear relationship.
Let lnx=t then y=y(t).Therefore y=mt+c———>1
Given that the line has an x intercept at lnx=0.1(y=0).
Using 1,
$$0=m(0.1)+c$$
Implies,
$$c=-0.1m——->2$$.
Given that the slope is -0.02 which means that m=-0.02.
From 2,
$$c=-0.1(-0.02)$$
$$c=0.002$$
Therefore the line equation has to be
$$y=-0.02t+0.002$$
i.e,
$$y=-0.02lnx+0.002$$
Therefore when x=5
$$y=-0.02ln5+0.002$$
$$yapprox-0.0301$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
y and lnx have a linear relationship.
Let lnx=t then y=y(t).Therefore y=mt+c———>1
Given that the line has an x intercept at lnx=0.1(y=0).
Using 1,
$$0=m(0.1)+c$$
Implies,
$$c=-0.1m——->2$$.
Given that the slope is -0.02 which means that m=-0.02.
From 2,
$$c=-0.1(-0.02)$$
$$c=0.002$$
Therefore the line equation has to be
$$y=-0.02t+0.002$$
i.e,
$$y=-0.02lnx+0.002$$
Therefore when x=5
$$y=-0.02ln5+0.002$$
$$yapprox-0.0301$$
$endgroup$
y and lnx have a linear relationship.
Let lnx=t then y=y(t).Therefore y=mt+c———>1
Given that the line has an x intercept at lnx=0.1(y=0).
Using 1,
$$0=m(0.1)+c$$
Implies,
$$c=-0.1m——->2$$.
Given that the slope is -0.02 which means that m=-0.02.
From 2,
$$c=-0.1(-0.02)$$
$$c=0.002$$
Therefore the line equation has to be
$$y=-0.02t+0.002$$
i.e,
$$y=-0.02lnx+0.002$$
Therefore when x=5
$$y=-0.02ln5+0.002$$
$$yapprox-0.0301$$
answered Feb 1 at 8:59
user631874user631874
84
84
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3095909%2fa-straight-line-is-fit-to-a-data-set-ln-x-y-this-line-intercepts-the-absciss%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
For clarity, let's set $t=ln{x}$. So we assume $y=y(t)$ and that it's a linear relationship, $y=at+b$. We also know that it crosses the abscissa at $t=0.1$, in other words $y(t=0.1) = 0$ or $atimes 0.1 + b = 0$. So we have one equation for the coefficients $a$ and $b$. How would you form the second equation?
$endgroup$
– Matti P.
Feb 1 at 7:02