郭子興




郭 子興（かく しこう、1302年 - 1355年）は、元末期の白蓮教を率いた武将。富豪の父・郭公と瞽女の母との間の子として生まれ、彼は郭公の三男一女のうちの中子（真ん中の子）である。子は、郭某（名は不詳）、郭天叙、郭天爵、郭恵妃ら。明の馬皇后（孝慈高皇后）は養女。



概要


定遠（現在の安徽省滁州市定遠県）の人。


若くして、任侠を好み、多くの人物と交際があったという。　


至正12年（1352年）、郭子興は数千人を終結し濠州地方で自立し、朱元璋の人物を見込んで重用し、その際に麾下の朱元璋を軍功ありとして十夫長に任用し、その養女の婿に迎えている。


郭子興は南下する元軍を撃退するなどの活躍をするが、その陣営内では幹部の孫徳崖、趙均用らによる内訌が絶えず、そのため勢力を大きく拡大することができなかった。


1355年に滁州で病没した。婿の朱元璋がその勢力を継承し、明の建国に大きな影響を与えた。


1370年に婿の朱元璋によって滁陽王を追贈されている。


郭子興の長男は戦死し、次男の郭天叙、三男の郭天爵は禍を恐れた朱元璋によって、謀殺されたといわれる。娘の郭恵妃は朱元璋の側室となり、蜀献王・朱椿、代簡王・朱桂、谷王・朱橞らを産んだ。



伝記資料


  • 『明史』 巻一百二十二 列伝第十巻



Popular posts from this blog

Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

Image
28 6 $begingroup$ Per the Font of Magic feature, sorcerer can use Flexible Casting to create 5th-level spell slots at level 7, even though they are not typically available until level 9. You can transform unexpended sorcery points into one spell slot as a bonus action on your turn. The Creating Spell Slots table shows the cost of creating a spell slot of [5th level is 7] If such a sorcerer levels up while still having this 5th-level spell slot, can they choose a 5th-level spell as the spell they gain upon levelling up? The Spellcasting feature states: Additionally, when you gain a level in this class, you can choose one of the sorcerer spells you know and replace it with another spell from the sorcerer spell list, which also must be of a level for which you have spell slots.
Read more

Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

Image
up vote 13 down vote favorite 1 After the 2018 errata, the disintegrate spell description now reads: A creature targeted by this spell must make a Dexterity saving throw. On a failed save, the target takes 10d6 + 40 force damage. The target is disintegrated if this damage leaves it with 0 hit points. If you were to polymorph an enemy into a rat and then disintegrate it, would the enemy be disintegrated or would it just return to its original form? I know that for Druids, it’s not an instant kill anymore, but is this the case for polymorph as well? dnd-5e spells polymorph errata share | improve this question edited 18 hours ago
Read more

A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$

Image
3 3 $begingroup$ Recently, I saw a construction of topological invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$ with $ngeq 2$ : $$ N=frac{1}{24pi^2}int_{S^3} d^3x epsilon^{ijk} Tr[(U^{-1}partial_{x_i}U)(U^{-1}partial_{x_j}U)(U^{-1}partial_{x_k}U)] , $$ where $Uin U(n)$ depends on $boldsymbol{x}=(x_1,x_2,x_3)in S^3$ , $epsilon^{ijk}$ is the Levi-Civita symbol, $i,j,k=1,2,3$ , and the duplicated indexes are summed over. It is claimed that $N$ is an integer, but why? Update 02/02/2019 I think I got an argument for $n=2$ . In this case, $U=e^{i varphi} q$ with $qin SU(2)$ . Due to the trace and the Levi-Civita symbol in $N$ , $varphi$ does not contribute to $N$ . As $Tr[q^{dagger}partial_i q]=0$ and $(q^{dagger}partial_i q)^{dagger}=-q^{dagger}partial_i q$ , $q^{dagger}partial_i q$ in geneeral has the form $q^{dagger}partia
Read more