The work of elimination is cut in half when $A$ is symmetric












2












$begingroup$


I am going through the book "Gilbert Strang - Introduction to Linear Algebra, Third Edition (2003)" and as I was working through the chapter of transpose matrices and solving systems of linear equations, I got stuck at this one particular sentence.
ss
What does the author mean by 'smaller matrices', and how do they stay the same as elimination proceeds.

I tried doing the process by hand, chose a 3x3 symmetric matrix, and I didn't see the symmetry until the very end: $A = LDU = LDL^T$

Also, as you may notice, in the end he even says the work of elimination is cut in half. I really don't see this.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    After one step of Gaussian elimination on an $n times n$ matrix $M_{n}$, you get a matrix of the form $$pmatrix{ a_{1} & a_{2} & ldots & a_{n} \ 0 & & & \ vdots & & M_{n-1}& \ 0 & & & \ }$$ where $M_{n-1}$ is an $(n-1) times (n-1)$ (smaller) matrix. I think these are the `smaller matrices' which are all symmetric.
    $endgroup$
    – preferred_anon
    Feb 3 at 9:38








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, I see it now. Thanks a ton
    $endgroup$
    – zafirzarya
    Feb 3 at 9:51
















2












$begingroup$


I am going through the book "Gilbert Strang - Introduction to Linear Algebra, Third Edition (2003)" and as I was working through the chapter of transpose matrices and solving systems of linear equations, I got stuck at this one particular sentence.
ss
What does the author mean by 'smaller matrices', and how do they stay the same as elimination proceeds.

I tried doing the process by hand, chose a 3x3 symmetric matrix, and I didn't see the symmetry until the very end: $A = LDU = LDL^T$

Also, as you may notice, in the end he even says the work of elimination is cut in half. I really don't see this.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    After one step of Gaussian elimination on an $n times n$ matrix $M_{n}$, you get a matrix of the form $$pmatrix{ a_{1} & a_{2} & ldots & a_{n} \ 0 & & & \ vdots & & M_{n-1}& \ 0 & & & \ }$$ where $M_{n-1}$ is an $(n-1) times (n-1)$ (smaller) matrix. I think these are the `smaller matrices' which are all symmetric.
    $endgroup$
    – preferred_anon
    Feb 3 at 9:38








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, I see it now. Thanks a ton
    $endgroup$
    – zafirzarya
    Feb 3 at 9:51














2












2








2





$begingroup$


I am going through the book "Gilbert Strang - Introduction to Linear Algebra, Third Edition (2003)" and as I was working through the chapter of transpose matrices and solving systems of linear equations, I got stuck at this one particular sentence.
ss
What does the author mean by 'smaller matrices', and how do they stay the same as elimination proceeds.

I tried doing the process by hand, chose a 3x3 symmetric matrix, and I didn't see the symmetry until the very end: $A = LDU = LDL^T$

Also, as you may notice, in the end he even says the work of elimination is cut in half. I really don't see this.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I am going through the book "Gilbert Strang - Introduction to Linear Algebra, Third Edition (2003)" and as I was working through the chapter of transpose matrices and solving systems of linear equations, I got stuck at this one particular sentence.
ss
What does the author mean by 'smaller matrices', and how do they stay the same as elimination proceeds.

I tried doing the process by hand, chose a 3x3 symmetric matrix, and I didn't see the symmetry until the very end: $A = LDU = LDL^T$

Also, as you may notice, in the end he even says the work of elimination is cut in half. I really don't see this.







linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Feb 3 at 9:00









zafirzaryazafirzarya

424




424








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    After one step of Gaussian elimination on an $n times n$ matrix $M_{n}$, you get a matrix of the form $$pmatrix{ a_{1} & a_{2} & ldots & a_{n} \ 0 & & & \ vdots & & M_{n-1}& \ 0 & & & \ }$$ where $M_{n-1}$ is an $(n-1) times (n-1)$ (smaller) matrix. I think these are the `smaller matrices' which are all symmetric.
    $endgroup$
    – preferred_anon
    Feb 3 at 9:38








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, I see it now. Thanks a ton
    $endgroup$
    – zafirzarya
    Feb 3 at 9:51














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    After one step of Gaussian elimination on an $n times n$ matrix $M_{n}$, you get a matrix of the form $$pmatrix{ a_{1} & a_{2} & ldots & a_{n} \ 0 & & & \ vdots & & M_{n-1}& \ 0 & & & \ }$$ where $M_{n-1}$ is an $(n-1) times (n-1)$ (smaller) matrix. I think these are the `smaller matrices' which are all symmetric.
    $endgroup$
    – preferred_anon
    Feb 3 at 9:38








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, I see it now. Thanks a ton
    $endgroup$
    – zafirzarya
    Feb 3 at 9:51








2




2




$begingroup$
After one step of Gaussian elimination on an $n times n$ matrix $M_{n}$, you get a matrix of the form $$pmatrix{ a_{1} & a_{2} & ldots & a_{n} \ 0 & & & \ vdots & & M_{n-1}& \ 0 & & & \ }$$ where $M_{n-1}$ is an $(n-1) times (n-1)$ (smaller) matrix. I think these are the `smaller matrices' which are all symmetric.
$endgroup$
– preferred_anon
Feb 3 at 9:38






$begingroup$
After one step of Gaussian elimination on an $n times n$ matrix $M_{n}$, you get a matrix of the form $$pmatrix{ a_{1} & a_{2} & ldots & a_{n} \ 0 & & & \ vdots & & M_{n-1}& \ 0 & & & \ }$$ where $M_{n-1}$ is an $(n-1) times (n-1)$ (smaller) matrix. I think these are the `smaller matrices' which are all symmetric.
$endgroup$
– preferred_anon
Feb 3 at 9:38






1




1




$begingroup$
Yes, I see it now. Thanks a ton
$endgroup$
– zafirzarya
Feb 3 at 9:51




$begingroup$
Yes, I see it now. Thanks a ton
$endgroup$
– zafirzarya
Feb 3 at 9:51










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3098336%2fthe-work-of-elimination-is-cut-in-half-when-a-is-symmetric%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3098336%2fthe-work-of-elimination-is-cut-in-half-when-a-is-symmetric%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$